From: Armstrong, Karen (SAMHSA/CMHS)
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 5:38 PM
To: King, Summer (SAMHSA/OAS)
Subject: RE: comments re: proposed PAIMI PPR 2007

Thank you.

 

 

Karen Saltus Armstrong

Senior Public Health Advisor/

PAIMI Program

SAMHSA/CMHS/DSCSD/SPSDB

1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 2-1115

Rockville, Maryland 20857

Work (240) 276 - 1760

Fax - (240) 276 -1770


From: King, Summer (SAMHSA/OAS)
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:57 PM
To: Armstrong, Karen (SAMHSA/CMHS)
Subject: FW: comments re: proposed PAIMI PPR 2007

 

FYI

 

Summer King

Survey Statistician/

   OMB Clearance Officer

SAMHSA/OAS

Room 7-1045

1 Choke Cherry Road

Rockville, MD  20850

Phone:  240-276-1243

Fax:  240-276-1260


From: Beck, Rosemary [mailto:rbeck@adap.ua.edu]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 4:28 PM
To: King, Summer (SAMHSA/OAS)
Subject: comments re: proposed PAIMI PPR 2007

 

Hi Summer,

 

I just wanted to make a few comments about the proposed PAIMI PPR for 2007.

 

Section 5 Interventions on Behalf of Groups of PAIMI-Eligible Individuals. 

5.A. Types of Inventions – Intervention is misspelled.

It also seems that the number being captured for potential number of individuals impacted could be quite high and end up being of no consequence. Couldn’t we enter that number by each activity?  (Activity 1=10,000  Activity 2=200 Activity 3=500 - I have been presenting mine this way on the PPR because I could not see the benefit of using such a large number that didn’t give you the entire story of whether an activity met the needs of 200 people vs. 10,000.)

Under 5E providing examples – Do you mean to give an example of each outcome or an example of each category of intervention?  We have been providing information on each intervention, numbering the activities 1-? and then entering the potential number of individuals impacted by each activity number.

 

Section 6 Non-client Directed Advocacy Activities

Section 6.C.4. Dissemination Activities – This number is similar to the example above where the number could be so large that it doesn’t give a clear picture of each activity’s outreach effort.

 

I hope this makes sense to you and if I am misinterpreting these statements please let me know what I should do differently for this next reporting year.  Thank you for your time.

 

Rosemary S. Beck

Information Systems Administrator

Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program

Box 870395

Tuscaloosa, AL  35487

205-348-4928

205-348-3909 fax

www.adap.net