FERC-546 supporting statement

FERC-546 supporting statement.docx

FERC-546, Certificated Rate Filings: Gas Pipeline Rates

OMB: 1902-0155

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

FERC-546 (OMB Control No. 1902-0155)

Supporting Statement for

FERC-546, Certificated Rate Filings: Gas Pipeline Rates


The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) requests that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve FERC-546, Certificated Rate Filings: Gas Pipeline Rates, for a three year period. FERC-546 (OMB Control No. 1902-0155) is an existing Commission data collection, as stated by 18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 154 and 284.1


  1. CIRCUMSTANCES THAT MAKE THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION NECESSARY


The following list outlines four circumstances under which the FERC-546 information collection requirements for certificated rates must be met:


A company decides to:

  1. Construct and operate a new jurisdictional pipeline2;

  2. Expand its certificated pipeline capacity by constructing a lateral pipeline, adding compression or providing storage at incremental or cost-based rates;

  3. Build a new liquefied natural gas facility; or

  4. Provide gas storage and negotiate market based rates.


Under the circumstances 1-3, the company must file its FERC-546 cost data along with an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under the statutory requirements of NGA Section 7(c). For circumstance 4, the company must file its FERC-546 information with an application under NGA Section 4(f)5.


The FERC-546 includes the following:

  • Supporting information for proposed initial rates (e.g. cost-based, market based, incremental rates);

  • Pro forma tariffs;

  • Motions to put proposed initial rates into effect subject to Commission findings on the related certificate;

  • Unexecuted precedent agreements; and


Section 16 of the NGA grants the Commission administrative powers including the ability to define accounting, technical and trade terms, prescribe forms, statements, declarations or reports and to prescribe rules and regulations.


Section 403 authorizes the Commission, as delegated through the Department of Energy Organization Act, to establish and review priorities for curtailments under the Natural Gas Act.


  1. HOW, BY WHOM AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE IS THE INFORMATION TO BE USED AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT COLLECTING THE INFORMATION


The Commission reviews the FERC-546 materials in order to approve rates and tariff changes associated with an application for a certificate under NGA Section 7(c). Additionally, the Commission reviews FERC-546 materials in 4(f) storage applications to evaluate market power and decide whether to grant, deny, or condition market based rate authority for the applicant. The Commission also uses the FERC-546 information to monitor jurisdictional transportation, natural gas storage, and unbundled sales activities of interstate natural gas pipelines and Hinshaw3 pipelines. In addition to fulfilling the Commission’s obligations under the NGA, the FERC-546 enables the Commission to monitor activities, evaluate transactions, ensure competitiveness, and improved efficiency of the gas industry's operations. In summary, the Commission uses the FERC-546 information to:

  • Ensure adequate customer protections under section 4(f) of the NGA;

  • Review rate and tariff changes by natural gas companies for the transportation of natural gas and natural gas storage services;

  • Provide general industry oversight; and

  • Supplement documentation during its audits process.


Failure to collect this information would prevent the Commission from being able to monitor and evaluate transactions and operations of interstate pipelines and perform its regulatory functions.


  1. DESCRIBE ANY CONSIDERATION OF THE USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN AND THE TECHNICAL OR LEGAL OBSTACLES TO REDUCING BURDEN


The Commission provides ongoing effort to apply improved information technology to reduce the burden related to this information collection. Most documents may be filed electronically with the Commission via the Internet (e.g. via eFiling, eForms, eTariff). These efforts are part of FERC compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Government Paperwork Elimination Act, and the E-Government Act of 2002.


By issuing Order No. 7144 in 2008, the Commission revised its regulations to require electronic filing of all tariffs, tariff revisions and rate change applications for public utilities, natural gas pipelines, oil pipelines and power administrations starting in April 2010.


FERC-546 data can be embedded within the XML schema of the eTariff system. Providing FERC-546 filers with the eTariff system for submitting information reduced physical storage space needs and document processing time. It has also provided easier tracking of document filing activity and reduced mailing and courier fees. The eTariff system allows concurrent access to FERC-546 tariff filings by multiple parties as well as the ability to download and print tariff filings. It automatically sends filers an email indicating their filing has arrived at FERC and of its acceptance. All FERC-546 filings are also available electronically in FERC’s eLibrary system.


4. DESCRIBE EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION AND SHOW SPECIFICALLY WHY ANY SIMILAR INFORMATION ALREADY AVAILABLE CANNOT BE USED OR MODIFIED FOR USE FOR THE PURPOSE(S) DESCRIBED IN INSTRUCTION NO. 2.


The FERC-546 information concerns rates for new or changed transportation and storage services stemming from new or modified natural gas infrastructure. There is a relationship with the FERC-545 because that collection’s data includes the cost and revenue studies that NGA Section 7(c) certificate holders file to support a rate after their initial certificated rate period elapses. However, there is no duplication between the FERC 546 and any other data collection. Finally, each FERC-546 filing is unique to the filing pipeline and activity.


The Commission published a notice within the Federal Register6 to help identify any duplication of the information in FERC-546. The Commission received no comments regarding this collection. No similar information can be used or modified. There are no other Federal agencies responsible for deciding whether or not to determine an initial rates associated with an application for a certificate under NGA Section 7(c).


5. METHODS USED TO MINIMIZE BURDEN IN COLLECTION OF INFORMATION INVOLVING SMALL ENTITIES


FERC-546 is a filing requirement pertaining to pipeline service filing obligations for the transportation, storage, and sale of natural gas. The FERC-546 filing collects data from both large and small respondent companies. The data required impose the least possible burden for companies while collecting the required information for the certificated rate filings. Use of the Internet to file documents electronically is the primary method the Commission uses to minimize the burden.


The filing of all documents within the data collection occurs through the eFiling interface as a means of reducing burden for respondents including small entities.


  1. CONSEQUENCE TO FEDERAL PROGRAM IF COLLECTION WERE CONDUCTED LESS FREQUENTLY


Industry respondents only file the FERC-546 data when rates for new or changed transportation and storage services will be needed for new or modified natural gas infrastructure. It is not possible for the Commission to receive FERC-546 data less frequently and meet its statutory responsibility of ensuring that the rates of these natural gas pipelines are just and reasonable under the Natural Gas Act.


7. EXPLAIN ANY SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE INFORMATION


There are no special circumstances related to this collection.


8. DESCRIBE EFFORTS TO CONSULT OUTSIDE THE AGENCY: SUMMARIZE PUBLIC COMMENTS AND THE AGENCY’S RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS


In accordance with OMB requirements5, the Commission published a 60-day notice6 and a 30-day notice7 to the public regarding this information collection on 11/2/2018 and 2/14/2019 respectively. Within the public notice, the Commission noted that it would be requesting a three-year extension of the public reporting burden with no change to the existing requirements concerning the collection of data. No comments were received.


9. EXPLAIN ANY PAYMENT OR GIFTS TO RESPONDENTS


There are no payments or gifts to FERC-546 respondents.


10. DESCRIBE ANY ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY PROVIDED TO RESPONDENTS


The Commission does not consider the information collected in FERC-546 filings to be confidential. However, the filer may request privileged treatment of a filing that may contain information harmful to the competitive posture of the applicant if released to the general public.8


11. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL JUSTIFICATION FOR ANY QUESTIONS OF A SENSITIVE NATURE, SUCH AS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR AND ATTITUDES, RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, AND OTHER MATTERS THAT ARE COMMONLY CONSIDERED PRIVATE


The Commission does not consider any of the questions to be sensitive or private.

12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


The Commission estimates the Public Reporting Burden for this information collection as:


FERC-546 (Certificated Rate Filings: Gas Pipeline Rates)


Annual Number of Respondents
(1)

Annual Number of Responses per Respondent

(2)

Total Number of Responses

(rounded)

(1)*(2)=(3)

Average Burden & Cost Per Response9

(rounded)

(4)

Total Annual Burden Hours & Total Annual Cost

(rounded)

(3)*(4)=(5)

Cost per Respondent

($)

(rounded)

(5)÷(1)

Pipeline Certificate Filings and Storage Applications

51


1.47110

75

500 hrs.;

$40,000

37,500 hrs.;

$3,000,000

$58,82411



  1. ESTIMATE OF TOTAL ANNUAL COST OF BURDEN TO

RESPONDENTS


There are no non-labor start-up costs. All costs are related to burden hours and are addressed in Questions #12 and #15.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO FEDERAL

GOVERNMENT



Number of Employees (FTEs)

Estimated Annual Federal Cost

PRA12 Administration Cost13

-

$4,931

Data Processing and Analysis14

0.75

$123,615

FERC Total


$128,546


The Commission bases its estimate of the “Data Processing and Analysis” cost to the Federal Government on salaries and benefits for professional and clerical support. This estimated cost represents staff analysis, decision making, and review of any actual filings made in response to the information collection.


15. REASONS FOR CHANGES IN BURDEN INCLUDING THE NEED FOR ANY INCREASE


The Commission’s goal has been to increase natural gas availability for electric generation, decrease natural gas price volatility, and encourage development of natural gas storage capacity in the United States. These emphases have caused burden projections for the FERC-546 information collection to be significantly higher than previous levels.


The 2015 renewal for the FERC-546 estimated 51 pipeline respondents would (industry-wide) submit 51 applications (across both pipeline respondents and storage operators) with FERC 546 information. While the number of potentially affected entities remains static, actual numbers for the FERC-546 filings and average burden per response were both significantly higher than previously proposed estimates due to increases in the natural gas industry’s infrastructure to transport numerous newly discovered supplies of shale gas. Commission staff, therefore, increased the burden estimates in the currently proposed clearance package in accordance with the aforementioned analysis of actual filings received for the FERC-546 information collection (burden estimate is explained in detail in Question #12). Commission staff made this adjustment to the total estimated burden via increases in both filing numbers (i.e. number of responses) and to the average respondent burden hours/response for both pipeline companies and storage operators (from 46.08 hours/response to 500 hours/response). The large increase in hourly burden per response is due to a recent, more thorough analysis of FERC-546 information collection and its actual affect upon industry respondents.


Thus, the public reporting burden has increased for this information collection. However, the Commission made no program changes regarding burden imposed upon respondents and the FERC-546 requirements remain unchanged from previously approved clearance packages.


The following table shows the total burden of the new collection of information. The format, labels, and definitions of the table follow the ROCIS submission system’s “Information Collection Request Summary of Burden” for the metadata.


FERC-546

Total Request

Previously Approved

Change due to Adjustment in Estimate

Change Due to Agency Discretion

Annual Number of Responses

75

51

24

0

Annual Time Burden (Hr)

37,500

2,350

35,150

0

Annual Cost Burden ($)

0

0

0

0


The format, labels, and definitions of the table above follow the ROCIS system’s “ICR Summary of Burden” for the meta-data.


  1. TIME SCHEDULE FOR PUBLICATION OF DATA


There are no tabulating, statistical or tabulating analysis or publication plans for the collection of information. The data are used for regulatory purposes only.


17. DISPLAY OF EXPIRATION DATE


The OMB expiration dates are posted on http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/info-collections.asp .


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions.


1 More specifically requirements are contained within 18 CFR 154.4, 154.7, 154.202, 154.204-208, 154.602-603 and 284.501-505.

2 Also known as a “greenfield” pipeline.

3 Hinshaw pipelines are those that receive all out-of-state gas from entities within or at the boundary of a state if all the natural gas so received is ultimately consumed within the state in which it is received, 15 USC 717(c). Congress concluded that Hinshaw pipelines are "matters primarily of local concern," and so are more appropriately regulated by pertinent state agencies rather than by FERC. The Natural Gas Act section 1(c) exempts Hinshaw pipelines from FERC jurisdiction. A Hinshaw pipeline, however, may apply for a FERC certificate to transport gas outside of state lines.

4 73 FR 57515

5 5 CFR 1320.8(d)

6 83 FR 55155

7 84 FR 4055

8 18 CFR 388.112

9 The hourly cost (for salary plus benefits) uses the figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2017, for positions involved in the reporting and recordkeeping requirements. These figures include salary (https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm ) and benefits http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm) and are:

Electrical Engineer (Occupation Code: 17-2071; $66.90/hour)

Management Analyst (Occupation Code: 13-1111; $63.32/hour)

Accounting (Occupation Code: 13-2011; $56.59/hours)

Computer and Mathematical (Occupation Code: 15-0000; $63.25/hour)

Legal (Occupation Code: 23-0000; $143.68/hour)

The average hourly cost (salary plus benefits) is calculated weighting each of the previously mentioned wage categories as follows:

$66.90/hour (0.4) + $63.32/hour (0.2) + $56.59/hour (0.1) + $63.25/hour (0.1) + $143.68/hour (0.2) = $80.14/hour. The Commission rounds this figure to $80/hour.

10 This figure was calculated by dividing the total number of responses (75) by the total number of respondents (51). The resulting figure was then rounded to the nearest thousandth place.

11 Rounded from $58,823.53.

12 Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).

13 The PRA Administration Cost is $4,193, and includes preparing supporting statements, notices, and other activities associated with Paperwork Reduction Act compliance.

14 The cost estimate is based upon FERC’s FY2018 average annual salary plus benefits per FTE (full-time equivalent) of $164,820.

7


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleFERC-546 supporting statement
AuthorHeather Dowding
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-15

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy