THIS SUBMISSION
HAS BEEN APPROVED UNTIL NOVEMBER 30, 1981, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING
THAT IF THE FDIC SHOULD ASK FOR AN EXTENSION OF THIS APPROVAL, IT
SHOULD ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN ITS SUPPORTING STATEMENT:
1. WHY ISN'T THE DATA OBTAINED ON PAGE ONE OF FDIC FORM 6200/09
SUFFICIENT FOR FDIC TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF TRUST POWERS
ALREADY GRANTED OR PERMITTED BY STATE AUTHORITIES? 2. WHY ISN'T THE
EXAMINATION PROCESS SUFFICIENT FOR DETERMINING IF MINIMUM STANDARDS
OF COMPETENCY HAVE BEEN MET? 3. CAN THE FDIC REDUCE THE AMMOUNT OF
INFORMATION COLLECTED ON THIS FORM AND STILL BE CONFIDENT THAT THE
APPLICANT BANK'S MANAGEMENT IS PROVIDING ENOUGH INFORMATION TO
HANDLE THE ANTICIPATED TRUST ACTIVITY? 4. HOW DOES THIS FORM
COMPARE WITH SIMILAR TRUST POWER APPLICATIONS FORMS OF THE OTHER
BANKING AGENCIES?
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
09/30/1984
09/30/1984
12/31/1981
67
0
67
1,052
0
1,052
0
0
0
PART 333.2 OF THE FDIC RULES AND
REGULATIONS STATES THAT ALL BANKS THA WISH TO EXERCISE TRUST POWERS
MUST RECEIVE PERMISSION FROM THE FDIC.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.