When this
information collection request is submitted for reapproval, it
should explain in greater useful detail why the burden changed.
Simply stating that the number of hours per program approval
request changed from 40 to 200 is not sufficient. The text should
explain why and provide back-up data to substantiate the new
number.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
06/30/1987
06/30/1987
5
0
0
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
A STATE SEEKING APPROVAL OF ITS
PRETREATMENT APPROVAL/OVERSIGHT PROGRAM SUBMITS A PROGRAM
DESCRIPTION TO THE EPA REGIONAL ADMINISTRATO EPA REVIEWS THE
PROGRAM TO DETERMINE ITS ADEQUACY AS SPECIFIED IN THE GENERAL
PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.