METHADONE TREATMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability

No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
112028	METHADONE TREATMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY		Migrated

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0930-0154	ICR Reference No: 199107-0930-002
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: HHS/SAMHSA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: METHADONE TREATMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 10/31/1991
	Date Received in OIRA: 07/24/1991
Terms of Clearance: Phase I of this feasibility study is approved for use through 10/92 under the following conditions: 1) Prior to fielding the instrument, NIDA:(a) justifies the practical utility of interviewer problem severity rating questions (e.g. questio D8) and explains how inter rater reliability will be ensured for such questions; and (b) justifies the validity of responses to questions su as J6a. and J18a. which ask clients whether physical or emotional problems were due to drug use. In the absence of adequate justification from the Department, OMB may ask that such questions be deleted from the instrument prior to use. 2) No later than 12/91, NIDA provides OMB with a comprehensive explanation of its plans to evaluate potential bias in non participati programs, client non respondents, and item specific non response. In addition, NIDA should present a plan for: 1) validation of client responses in all outcome categories; and 2) controlling for facility bias in administering the survey and responding to the Program Directo questionnaire. Finally, NIDA should articulate how results from NDATU or the Drug Research Study could be used to supplant or validate treatment program responses. 3) NIDA concentrates on the development of a case mix measurement and adjustment methodology in Phase I of this effort and will present this methodology in its next package for OMB clearance. (continued)

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	10/31/1992	10/31/1992
Responses	5,430	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	3,511	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: THE PROJECT EXAMINES THE FEASIBILITY OF A PERFORMANCE REPORTING SYSTEM FOR METHADONE TREATMENT PROGRAMS. RELATIVE PERFORMANCE ON OBJECTIVE, VERIFIABLE OUTCOMES WILL BE ASSESSED CONSIDERING CLIENT CASE-MIX. INFORMATION FROM PERFORMANCE REPORTS TO PROGRAMS WILL ASSIST IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF TREATMENT THEY PROVIDE. THIS SUBMISSION IS F THE FIELD TEST ONLY TO DEVELOP INSTRUMENT AND PROCEDURES.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
METHADONE TREATMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	5,430	0	0	5,430	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	3,511	0	0	3,511	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 07/24/1991

---