Revision of Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems: Petition of City of Richardson, Texas: Order on Reconsideration II

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability

No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
31631	Revision of Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems: Petition of City of Richardson, Texas: Order on Reconsideration II		Migrated

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 3060-1031	ICR Reference No: 200301-3060-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: FCC	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Revision of Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems: Petition of City of Richardson, Texas: Order on Reconsideration II
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Emergency	Approval Requested By: 01/17/2003
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 01/16/2003
	Date Received in OIRA: 01/07/2003
Terms of Clearance: OMB waives the requirement that the expiration date for this collection be displayed.

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	08/31/2003	08/31/2003
Responses	1,358	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	13,960	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Order on Reconsideration responds to two petitions for reconsideration of a previous Order which responds to a petition from the city of Richardson, Texas. The current Order on Reconsideration contains three new PRA burdens. First, It allows wireless carriers to toll the six-month E911 implementation period if the carrier certifies that the requesting PSAP is not E911 capable. Second, PSAP may file a response to the carrier's certification. Third, the Order on Reconsideration clarifies that wireless carriers and PSAPs may mutually agree on an e911 implementation date other than that prescribed in the............

Emergency Justfication:

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Revision of Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems: Petition of City of Richardson, Texas: Order on Reconsideration II

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	1,358	0	0	1,358	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	13,960	0	0	13,960	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 01/07/2003

---