Petitions for LATA Boundary Modification for the Deployment of Advanced Services

Forms and Documents

Document	Type	Status	Availability
0921_ss_091206.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2006-09-13	Available

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
31369	Petitions for LATA Boundary Modification for the Deployment of Advanced Services	Other-null	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 3060-0921	ICR Reference No: 200609-3060-013
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200308-3060-013
Agency/Subagency: FCC	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Petitions for LATA Boundary Modification for the Deployment of Advanced Services
Type of Information Collection: Extension without change of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Delegated
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 09/13/2006
	Date Received in OIRA: 09/13/2006
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	09/30/2009	36 Months From Approved	10/31/2006
Responses	1	0	20
Time Burden (Hours)	8	0	160
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) that petition for LATA boundary modifications to encourage the deployment of advanced service on a reasonable and timely basis are requested to include information in accordance with specified criteria. The Commission will use this information to review the petitions.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 47 USC 601(e)(1) Name of Law: Telecommunications Act of 1996
   US Code: 47 USC 601(a)(1) Name of Law: Telecommunications Act of 1996
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
3060-AH03	Final or interim final rulemaking	66 FR 43516	08/20/2001

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	71 FR 14526	03/22/2006
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	71 FR 14526	03/22/2006
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Petitions for LATA Boundary Modification for the Deployment of Advanced Services

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	1	20	0	0	-19	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	8	160	0	0	-152	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: The Commission is submitting this information collection as an extension (no change in requirements) in order to obtain the full three year clearance from OMB. The Commission has adjusted the hourly burden due to less respondents filing information with the Commission (from 20 respondents to 1).

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $6,720

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 09/13/2006

---