Licensing, Operation, and Transition of the 2500-2690 MHz Band

35178

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
#Depth in feet
above ground.
*Elevation in feet
(NGVD).
+Elevation in feet
(NAVD).

Source of flooding and location

At the confluence with Mill Creek ............................................................................................

+199

Approximately 1.3 miles upstream of Ceasar Road
Bienville Parish, Louisiana and Incorporated Areas, (FEMA Docket No. P–7903).

+250

Communities affected

Bienville Parish (Unincorporated Areas).

ADDRESSES
Town of Arcadia:
Maps are available for inspection at 1819 South Railroad Avenue, Arcadia, Louisiana.
Bienville Parish (Unincorporated Areas):
Maps are available for inspection at 100 Courthouse Drive, Arcadia, Louisiana.
Town of Ringgold:
Maps are available for inspection at 2135 Hall Street, Ringgold, Louisiana.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
83.100, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
Michael Buckley,
Deputy Director, Mitigation Division, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E6–9514 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 25 and 27
[WT Docket Nos. 03–66, 03–67, 02–68, 00–
230, MM Docket No. 97–217, IB Docket No.
02–364, ET Docket No. 00–258; FCC 06–
46]

Facilitating the Provision of Fixed and
Mobile Broadband Access,
Educational and Other Advanced
Services in the 2150–2162 and 2500–
2690 MHz Bands; Review of the
Spectrum Sharing Plan Among NonGeostationary Satellite Orbit Mobile
Satellite Service Systems in the 1.6/2.4
GHz Bands
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

AGENCY:

SUMMARY: In this document the
Commission amends the rules governing
the Broadband Radio Service (BRS) and
Educational Broadband Service (EBS) in
response to petitions for reconsideration
filed in the BRS/EBS Report and Order
and comments filed in the BRS/EBS
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
Also, the Commission responds to
petitions for reconsideration filed the
BIG LEO Spectrum Sharing Order by
affirming its decision to establish a plan
for sharing between the fixed and
mobile (except aeronautical mobile)
services and Code Division Multiple
Access (CDMA) Mobile-Satellite Service

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

(MSS) operators in the 2495–2500 MHz
band. This decision will permit BRS
Channel No. 1 licensees to relocate to
the 2496–2502 MHZ portion of the
2495–2690 MHz band. The
Commission’s actions in this proceeding
are designed to encourage the transition
of the 2495–2690 MHz band and to
provide both incumbent licensees and
potential new entrants in the 2495–2690
MHz band with greatly enhanced
flexibility to encourage the efficient and
effective use of spectrum domestically
and internationally, and the growth and
rapid deployment of innovative and
efficient communications technologies
and services.
DATES: Effective on July 19, 2006, except
for 47 CFR 27.1231(d), 27.1231(f),
27.1231(g), and 27.1235–27.1239, which
contain information collection
modifications that have not been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). The Commission
will publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the effective date
of those sections.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. A copy of any
comments on the Paperwork Reduction
Act information collection requirements
contained herein should be submitted to
Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1–
C804, 445 12th Street, SE., Washington,
DC 20554 or via the Internet at Judith
B. [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Zaczek at 202–418–7590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Order on
Reconsideration and Fifth
Memorandum Opinion and Order and
Third Memorandum Opinion and Order
and Second Report and Order, released
on April 27, 2006. The complete text of
the Order on Reconsideration and Fifth

PO 00000

Frm 00036

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

Memorandum Opinion and Order and
Third Memorandum Opinion and Order
and Second Report and Order,
including attachments and related
Commission documents is available for
public inspection and copying from 8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through
Thursday or from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
on Friday at the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete
text of the Order on Reconsideration
and Fifth Memorandum Opinion and
Order and Third Memorandum Opinion
and Order and Second Report and
Order and related Commission
documents may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., (BCPI),
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., CY–
B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone
202–488–5300, facsimile 202–488–5563,
or you may contact BCPI at its Web site:
http://www.BCPIWEB.com. When
ordering documents from BCPI please
provide the appropriate FCC document
number, for example, FCC 06–46. The
Order on Reconsideration and Fifth
Memorandum Opinion and Order and
Third Memorandum Opinion and Order
and Second Report and Order is
available on the Commission’s Web site:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/
attachmatch/FCC–06–46A1.doc.
Alternate formats are available to
persons with disabilities by e-mail at
[email protected] or by calling (202)
418–0530 or TTY (202) 418–0432.
Summary
I. Big Leo Order on Reconsideration
and AWS Fifth Memorandum Opinion
and Order
1. In the Big LEO Spectrum Sharing
Order, the Commission established a
primary fixed and mobile (except
aeronautical mobile) allocation in the

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
upper five megahertz of Big LEO MSS
S-band spectrum at 2495–2500 MHz.
The Commission stated that the
resulting services would operate in
those frequencies with CDMA MSS
downlink operations. The Commission
further stated that the CDMA MSS
providers would provide their services
in that spectrum on an unprotected
basis. The Commission determined that
this allocation was appropriate because
the Commission was reviewing
proposals to restructure the adjacent
2500–2690 MHz band, also allocated as
a primary fixed and mobile (except
aeronautical mobile) band. The result
would establish the new BRS/EBS band
plan at 2496–2690 MHz. The
Commission also stated that those bands
combined could serve as suitable
relocation spectrum for BRS licensees
currently operating in the 2150–2160/62
MHz band.
2. The Commission concluded that
CDMA MSS operators could use the
same spectrum as fixed and mobile
operators, specifically BRS, without
harmful interference because BRS
operations would be more likely to
occur in urban, suburban and less
developed areas, whereas MSS
operators would more likely serve
customers in rural and underdeveloped
areas. To address interference concerns
for CDMA MSS, the Commission stated
that the BRS would be a low power
service at 2496–2500 MHz. The
Commission also noted that MSS
operators would have access to a newlyestablished one megahertz guard band at
2495–2496 MHz, but MSS would not
receive protection in the 2495–2500
MHz band. To address interference
concerns for BRS, the Commission
stated that the ITU-established power
flux-density (PFD) values for MSS
downlinks operations in this band
should sufficiently protect the BRS from
harmful interference. The Commission
also shifted MSS ancillary terrestrial
component (ATC) operations down five
megahertz, from 2492.5–2498 MHz to
2487.5–2493 MHz, to ensure adequate
separation between MSS ATC and BRS
operations at and above 2496 MHz.
3. With respect to incumbent
terrestrial radio operators in the 2483.5–
2500 MHz band, the Commission
declined to relocate industrial, science,
and medical (ISM) devices, reasoning
that BRS could operate with ISM
operations present. The Commission
stated, however, that it would consider
a relocation plan for broadcast auxiliary
service (BAS) and private radio services
grandfathered in that band, if necessary,
after addressing the then-remaining
issues concerning the relocation
associated with the introduction of

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) in
ET Docket No. 00–258.
A. Relocation Policy and BRS Operators
4. In the Big LEO Order on
Reconsideration and AWS Fifth
Memorandum Opinion and Order, we
take the following actions with respect
to petitions for reconsideration filed in
response to the Big LEO Spectrum
Sharing Order:
• Affirm the Commission’s decision
to allocate the 2495–2500 MHz band for
fixed and mobile (except aeronautical
mobile) services on a primary basis.
• Conclude that BRS/EBS and MSS
operators have compatible
characteristics that enable them to share
the 2496–2500 MHz band through
engineering solutions, without causing
harmful interference.
• Adopt specific PFD limits for
CDMA MSS downlink operations in the
band to further ensure that harmful
interference does not occur to BRS
operations.
• Decline to modify part 18 of the
Commission’s rules to restrict the
emissions of ISM devices in that band.
• Decline to relocate grandfathered
BAS and parts 90 and 101 fixed service
licensees.
II. BRS/EBS Third Memorandum
Opinion and Order
5. On July 29, 2004, the Commission
released the BRS/EBS Report and Order
and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM).
In the BRS/EBS R&O, the Commission
adopted a band plan that restructured
the 2500–2690 MHz band into upper
and lower-band segments for low-power
operations (UBS and LBS, respectively),
and a mid-band segment (MBS) for highpower operations, in order to reduce the
likelihood of interference caused by
incompatible uses. The Commission
also designated the 2496–2500 MHz
band for use in connection with the
2500–2690 MHz band. Through the
adoption of the new band plan, the
Commission provided incentives for the
development of low-power cellularized
broadband use and, accordingly,
renamed Multipoint Distribution
Service (MDS) and the Instructional
Television Fixed Service (ITFS) as the
‘‘Broadband Radio Service’’ and
‘‘Educational Broadband Service,’’
respectively, to more accurately
describe the kinds of the services
anticipated in this band.
6. The BRS/EBS R&O also adopted
service rules that give licensees
increased flexibility, reduce
administrative burdens on both
licensees and the Commission, and
promote regulatory parity. Specifically,

PO 00000

Frm 00037

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

35179

the Commission implemented
geographic area licensing for all
licensees in the band, consolidated
licensing and service rules for EBS and
BRS in part 27, allowed spectrum
leasing for BRS and EBS under our
secondary markets spectrum leasing
policies and procedures, and provided
licensees with the flexibility to employ
the technologies of their choice in the
band. In addition, the Commission
applied the part 1 Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau rules to the
BRS/EBS spectrum, dismissed pending
mutually exclusive applications for new
ITFS stations, and took other actions to
streamline the rules and eliminate
unnecessary regulatory burdens.
7. With respect to eligibility to hold
licenses in 2496–2690 MHz band, the
Commission retained restrictions on the
use of EBS licenses in continued
furtherance of the educational objectives
that led to the establishment of ITFS.
Also, the Commission removed all nonstatutory eligibility restrictions
applicable to cable and digital
subscriber line (DSL) operators for the
BRS and thus permitted these operators
to provide non-video services like
broadband internet access.
8. In addition, the BRS/EBS R&O
resolved certain technical issues as
follows: Set the signal strength limits for
the low-power bands at the boundaries
of the geographic service areas (GSAs) to
47 dBµ(V/m; restricted the transmitter
output power of response stations to 2.0
watts; modified emission limits for
stations that would operate on the LBS
and UBS channels; and refrained from
allowing high-power unlicensed
operations in the 2500–2690 MHz band,
but allowed unlicensed operation under
our existing part 15 rules in the 2655–
2690 MHz band.
9. We received 33 petitions for
reconsideration of the BRS/EBS R&O.
A. Transition
10. The rules governing the transition
of the 2500–2690 MHz band adopted in
the BRS/EBS R&O are designed to
reconfigure the 2500–2690 MHz band to
enable the provision of new and
innovative wireless services. To
accomplish this goal, the transition
rules create a market-oriented process
for relocating EBS licensees and BRS
licensees from their current interleaved
channel locations to their new
contiguous spectrum blocks in the LBS,
MBS, or UBS. The transition rules also
provide for the relocation of EBS and
BRS licensees from 2500–2502 MHz and
2618–2624 MHz to allow for the
relocation of BRS Channels No. 1 and
No. 2/2A licensees from the 2150–2160/

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

35180

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

62 MHz band to the 2496–2690 MHz
band.
11. In the BRS/EBS Third
Memorandum Opinion and Order, we
take the following actions with respect
to the transition of the 2.5 GHz band to
the new band plan adopted in the BRS/
EBS R&O:
• Transition Size. Require the
transition to occur by Basic Trading
Areas (BTAs), rather than by Major
Economic Areas (MEAs).
• Overlapping Transition Areas.
Decline to require a proponent to
transition two or more BTAs when a
stations’ geographic service area
overlaps two or more BTAs. However, if
the center point of a geographic service
area is located in a BTA, the proponent
must transition all facilities associated
within the geographic service area but
in another BTA if the other BTA is not
bring transitioned.
• Multichannel Video Programming
Distributors. Require certain
Multichannel Video Programming
Distributors (MVPD) to obtain a waiver
before opting out of the transition
process. To assist a proponent in
transitioning a BTA, a MVPD operator
that is intending to seek a waiver must
so indicate to the proponent when it
responds to the Pre-Transition Data
Request. In any event, the MVPD
operator must then seek a waiver from
the Commission by April 30, 2007. If a
proponent files an Initiation Plan with
the Commission prior to April 30, 2007,
an MVPD operator must file its waiver
request within sixty days after the
Initiation Plan is filed with the
Commission. Furthermore, to enable the
transition of the 2.5 GHz band to
proceed quickly and efficiently and to
protect the operations of MVPD
licensees that have developed
successful systems under the old band
plan, we expect the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau to act on
unopposed requests for waiver within
180 days.
• WATCH TV’s Waiver Request.
Grants WATCH TV’s Waiver Request to
permanently opt-out of transitioning to
the new band plan. Based upon our
evaluation of WATCH TV’s request, we
conclude that requiring WATCH TV to
transition pursuant to the new band
plan would be inequitable, unduly
burdensome, and contrary to the public
interest.
• Proponents. Requires that a
proponent must be a BRS licensee or
lessee or an EBS licensee or lessee.
Adopt a ‘‘first-in-time’’ rule for
determining which entity will be a
proponent. Thus, the first entity to file
an Initiation Plan with the Commission
shall automatically be designated as the

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

proponent for a given BTA without any
action required by the Commission.
• Pre-Transition Data Requests.
Makes minor changes to our rules
relating to Pre-Transition Data Requests
in order to clarify the responsibilities of
the parties and the data the proponents
can request from licensees. Makes
changes to improve the administration
of the transition process and to require
BRS and EBS licensees to respond
within 45 days of receiving the PreTransition Data Request. Declines to
establish automatic sanctions for
licensees that fail to respond to pretransition data requests.
• Initiation Plans and Initiation
Planning Period. Extends the length of
the Initiation Planning Period until 30
months after the effective date of the
amended rules. Removes the
requirement to complete an engineering
analysis at the Initiation Planning stage.
Requires that the proponent give its best
available estimate of when the transition
will be completed.
• Transition Planning Phase. Adopts
two additional ‘‘safe harbors’’ that will
be presumed to be reasonable offers for
the transition from proponents. One safe
harbor addresses situations in which
more than one licensee shares a channel
group in a particular location. The other
safe harbor applies when an EBS
licensee uses one or more of its
channels for studio-to-transmitter links.
Declines to adopt a proposed safe harbor
involving a situation where a licensee is
entitled to two or more programming
tracks in the Middle Band Segment.
• Eligibility restrictions/channel
swapping. Clarifies that although the
Commission retained the eligibility
restrictions in the BRS/EBS R&O, those
restrictions do not prohibit licensees
from swapping channels to effectuate
the transition. Further clarifies that EBS
licensees are not restricted to four
channels nor are they restricted to one
MBS channel.
• Financial penalties in dispute
resolution process. Declines to
reconsider the Commission’s
determination not to adopt financial
penalties within the dispute resolution
context.
• Relocation of BRS Channels No. 1
and 2. Amends our rules to designate
2496–2500 MHz as available pretransition spectrum for BRS Channel
No. 1 and 2686–2690 MHz as available
pre-transition spectrum for BRS
Channel No. 2.
• Self-transitions. Allows licensees to
self-transition after 30 months after the
effective date of the amended rules in
markets where a proponent does not
come forward. Requires that licensees in
areas that will not be transitioned by a

PO 00000

Frm 00038

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

proponent must notify the Commission
within 90 days of the date Initiation
Plans must be filed with the
Commission whether they will selftransition or be subject to whatever
alternative transition process the
Commission may adopt. Also, requires
BRS and EBS licensees that seek to selftransition to notify other licensees in the
BTA where their licensee’s GSA
geographic center point is located, as
well as other licensees whose GSAs
overlap with the self-transitioning
licensee that they will self-transition.
An adjacent licensee that is not selftransitioning may not object to the
transition. If, however, the adjacent
licensee is also self-transitioning, the
licensees must work out interference
issues. Licensees that self-transition are
not required to file engineering analyses
with the Commission. Licensees may
only self-transition to the LBS, UBS, or
MBS channels assigned to them under
the new band plan, however. Licensees
must file modification applications to
complete the self-transition and must
complete the self-transition on or before
21 months after the Initiation Plans
must be filed.
• Replacement Downconverters.
Declines to require proponents to
replace downconverters in an EBS
licensee’s protected service area (PSA)
but outside its GSA as inconsistent with
our decision to adopt GSAs,
burdensome to proponents, and likely to
slow the transition process. Further
declines to adopt a recommendation to
refine the criteria for eligible receive
sites under § 27.1233(a) of the
Commission’s rules.
• Transition deadline. Retains the
transition deadline as adopted in the
BRS/EBS R&O, i.e., the transition must
be completed 18 months after the
transition planning period ends.
• Post-transition Notification. Allows
a proponent to certify on behalf of all
affected licensees that a transition has
been completed. Requires the proponent
to provide all parties to the transition
with a copy of the post-transition
notification. Directs the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau to issue a
public notice when a post-transition
notification is filed. Requires objections
to post-transition notifications to be
filed within 30 days after public notice
is issued.
• Transition Costs-Proponent-driven
transitions. Requires non-proponent
BRS licensees and other commercial
users of the 2.5 GHz band to reimburse
the proponent for their pro rata share of
the costs of transitioning a BTA and that
eligible costs be allocated among the
proponent and commercial licensees
and lessees based on a MHz/pops

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
formula. Adopts a list of costs eligible
for reimbursement. Permits coproponents to agree among themselves
on how to share cost allocation
reimbursements. Requires that the costs
of transitioning a GSA that overlaps two
or more BTAs be attributable to each
BTA in proportion to the amount of the
GSA located in the BTA. When the
proponent must transition licensees in
an adjoining BTA to resolve interference
issues, requires ‘‘Proponent B’’ (of the
adjoining BTA) to fully reimburse
‘‘Proponent A’’ (of the transitioning
BTA) and then seek reimbursement
from spectrum holders in its own BTA.
Permits the proponent to request
reimbursements after the PostTransition Notification has been filed
and the proponent has accumulated the
documentation necessary to substantiate
the full and accurate cost of the
transition. When a license is transferred
or assigned, the reimbursement
obligation must be paid immediately, or
the assignor/transferor and assignee/
transferee remain jointly and severally
liable to pay the reimbursement
obligation. With regard to licenses that
are partitioned or disaggregated, the
parties to the partition or disaggregation
must remain jointly and severally liable
for repaying the proponent.
• Cost of EBS self-transitions. Permits
EBS licensees that self-transition to
recover their costs. Requires selftransitioning EBS licensees to send a
Self-Transition Data Request to all BRS
and EBS licensees in the BTA where the
EBS licensee’s GSA geographic center
point is located, as well as other
licensees whose GSAs overlap with the
self-transitioning licensee. The SelfTransition Data Request contains the
same information that is contained in
the Pre-Transition Data Request, which
is used in the proponent-driven
transition. EBS licensees may request
reimbursement from all BRS licensees
and lessees, entities that lease EBS
spectrum for a commercial purpose, and
commercial EBS licensees that are
located in the BTA where the EBS
licensee’s GSA geographic center point
is located, as well as other licensees
whose GSAs overlap with the selftransitioning licensee. BRS licensees
and lessees, entities that lease EBS
spectrum for a commercial purpose, and
commercial EBS licensees must pay a
pro-rata share based on MHz/pops. The
EBS licensee may seek reimbursement
of the same costs that must be
reimbursed in the proponent-based
transition. The EBS licensee may
request reimbursement after the EBS
licensee has filed a modification
application with the Commission. The

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

cost-sharing obligation remains with the
license. Thus, if a license with a
reimbursement obligation is transferred
or assigned, the reimbursement
obligation must be paid immediately by
the assignor or transferor, or the
obligation remains with the license.
• Dispute Resolution. With regard to
disputes over the Transition Plan, we
have urged the parties to the dispute to
seek dispute resolution through a third
party. With regard to other disputes that
may arise, we decline to mandate the
use of a clearinghouse, although we
encourage the BRS/EBS community to
use a clearinghouse if they believe that
this would be the most expedient means
of resolving disputes. Furthermore, we
note that parties have several options to
resolve disputes that may arise
including mediation, the voluntary use
of a clearinghouse, or pursuing civil
remedies in the court system. We will
consider mandating a clearinghouse or
other appropriate mechanism for
resolving cost-sharing disputes in the
future if we find that there are an
inordinate number of such disputes.
• Bureau Reports. The Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau must
report to the Commission on the status
of the transition of the 2.5 GHz band at
18 months, three years, and five years
after the effective date of the amended
rules.
B. Technical Issues
12. In the BRS/EBS Third
Memorandum Opinion and Order, we
take the following actions with respect
to the technical rules adopted in the
BRS/EBS R&O:
• Receive sites. Requires that all
downconverters within the EBS GSA
must be replaced, regardless of the
desired or undesired signal strength.
Allows a proponent to upgrade EBS
reception equipment at a site.
• Adjacent channel. Allows a -10 dB
adjacent channel D/U signal ratio for
EBS receive sites that are transitioned.
However, in instances where EBS
stations utilize older television receivers
that are not transitioned, the adjacent
channel D/U ratio will remain 0 dB.
• Signal Strength Limits. Declines to
repeal the rule that permits licensees to
exceed the signal level at the border of
their geographic service area where
there is no affected licensee providing
service.
• Documented Interference
Complaint Requirement. Declines to
eliminate the requirement in § 27.53(l)
of the Commission’s rules that a
licensee receive a documented
interference complaint before being
subject to a stricter emission mask for
base stations. Affirms our prior

PO 00000

Frm 00039

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

35181

conclusion that only adjacent channel
licensees can file a documented
interference complaint. Gives the
interfering licensee 60 days after
receiving a documented interference
complaint to coordinate with affected
licensee and resolve the situation. If no
resolution is reached in that time
period, both licensees must employ a
more rigorous emission mask.
• User stations. Declines to amend
the requirement in § 27.53(l)(4) of the
Commission’s rules that provides that
‘‘[f]or mobile digital stations, the
attenuation factor shall not be less than
43 + 10 log (P) dB at the channel edge
and 55 + 10 log (P) at 5.5 MHz from the
channel edges.’’
• 2495–2496 MHz Guard Band.
Retains the requirement in § 27.53(a)(6)
that requires licensees to measure
emission limits from ‘‘as close to the
edges, both upper and lower, of the
licensee’s bands of operation as the
design permits.’’ Therefore, BRS
Channel No. 1 licensees would be
required to measure out-of-band
emissions from the lower edge of their
channel and meet the 67 + 10 log (P)
standard 3 MHz from that edge.
• Geographic Service Areas. Retains
the ‘‘splitting the football’’ methodology
adopted in the BRS/EBS R&O. Adopts
recommendations concerning the GSAs
of pending applications on file January
10, 2005 as follows. Where there is
pending as of January 10, 2005 an
application for a new incumbent station
with a PSA that overlaps that of a
licensed incumbent station, the GSA of
the incumbent station is created by
‘‘splitting the football’’ and, if the
pending application is ultimately
dismissed or denied, the territory
covered by the GSA of the applied-for
station reverts to the BRS BTA holder (if
a BRS application) or to EBS white
space (if an EBS application). Where
there is pending as of January 10, 2005
an application for a modification that
would impact the location/size of an
incumbent station’s GSA and the
resulting splitting of a football with
another station, the GSAs should be
calculated by ‘‘splitting the football’’
based on the current authorizations, and
if the modification is granted, the GSAs
will be immediately redrawn upon the
grant of the modification. Where there is
pending as of January 10, 2005 an
application for review or petition for
reconsideration of the dismissal or
denial of an application for a new or
modified station that has a PSA
overlapping another station’s PSA, the
facilities proposed in the dismissed or
denied application should not be
considered in establishing GSAs.
However, the GSA of the incumbent

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

35182

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

licensee will be subject to carving back
consistent with the ‘‘splitting the
football’’ rules if the dismissed/denied
application is reinstated. Where there is
pending as of January 10, 2005 an
application for review or petition for
reconsideration of the forfeiture or
cancellation of a license that has a PSA
overlapping another station’s PSA, that
license should not be considered in
establishing GSAs. However, the GSAs
of licensees with overlapping GSAs will
be subject to carving back consistent
with the ‘‘splitting the football’’ rules if
the forfeited or cancelled license is
reinstated. Where an incumbent station
license was in existence as of January
10, 2005 and caused a splitting of the
football, and that incumbent station
license is later forfeited, the reclaimed
territory reverts to the BRS BTA holder
(if BRS spectrum) or to EBS white space
(if EBS spectrum) regardless of whether
the action/inaction that caused the
forfeiture occurred prior to January 10,
2005.
• Modifications to Geographic
Licensing. Declines to revise the
provision in § 27.1206(a) of the
Commission’s rules that permits BRS
and EBS licensees to place transmitters
anywhere within their GSA without
prior authorization as long as their
operations comply with applicable
service rules. Notes that we will take
prompt and decisive action when
interference is caused to EBS operations
and a two-way operator is unable or
unwilling to resolve the problem
promptly.
• Unlicensed Operations. Continues
to permit low-power unlicensed
operations in the 2655–2690 MHz
portion of the band in accordance with
part 15 of our rules, as described in and
to the extent indicated in the BRS/EBS
R&O.
• Minimum Performance
Requirements for EBS receive sites.
Declines to adopt a rule that EBS receive
sites must meet minimum standards in
order to receive interference protection.
• Miscellaneous Corrections to
Sections 27.5 and 27.1221. Amends the
footnote to § 27.5 (i)(2) to read: ‘‘No 125
kHz channels are provided for operation
in this service. The 125 kHz channels
previously associated with these
channels have been reallocated to
channel G3 in the UBS.’’ Corrects
§ 27.1221(a) to refer to interference
protection for both BRS and EBS on a
station-by-station basis.
C. Minimum Usage Requirements
13. Declines to make any changes to
the minimum educational usage
requirements for EBS licensees. The
Commission stated that it will continue

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

to rely on the good faith efforts of EBS
licensees to meet these requirements.
Revises § 27.1214(b)(1), which states a
licensee must reserve 5% of the capacity
of its channels for ‘‘instructional
purposes’’ to state that the reservation
must be for ‘‘educational uses consistent
with § 27.1203(b) and (c) of the rules.’’
D. Cable/ILEC Cross Ownership
14. Finds that there is no basis to
reconsider our decision to allow cable
operators and ILECs to acquire or lease
BRS or EBS spectrum, subject to the
statutory prohibition on cable operators
holding licenses or leasing spectrum to
supply MVPD service.
E. Mutually Exclusive Applications
15. With one exception, we affirm the
dismissal of the applications that were
dismissed in the BRS/EBS R&O. We
affirm the dismissal of South Florida
applications that were the subject of a
May 24, 1995 settlement agreement
because that agreement did not resolve
all of the pending mutual exclusivity.
16. Petitioner Shekinah Network
presented evidence that it had filed, and
the Commission approved, a settlement
agreement before the April 2, 2003
deadline. We will therefore grant
Shekinah’s petition and reinstate its
application.
F. Leasing Issues
• License Purchase Rights. Declines
to prohibit purchase option provisions
in EBS leases.
• Filing of Excess Capacity Leases.
Rejects proposal to require licensees to
file unredacted copies of EBS leases.
• Limitation on Length of EBS Leases.
The comments we have received on this
issue demonstrate the need to clarify the
Commission’s intentions as they relate
to the length of EBS leases and the
validity of automatic renewal provisions
in such leases.
17. First, as the Catholic Television
Network (CTN) and the National ITFS
Association (NIA) correctly point out, in
paragraph 180 of the BRS/EBS R&O, the
Commission concluded that leases
entered into prior to the effective date
of the new EBS rules would be
grandfathered under the then-existing
EBS leasing framework, thus, such
leases would be subject to the existing
15-year lease limitation.
18. With the exceptions noted below,
spectrum leasing arrangements entered
into after the effective date of the new
EBS rules, however, are subject to the
Commission’s Secondary Markets rules.
With respect to the Secondary Markets
rules, we must distinguish between
restrictions on the terms in any lease
agreement between the parties, and the

PO 00000

Frm 00040

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

length of any spectrum leasing
arrangement that the licensee and
spectrum lessee have filed with
Commission under our part 1 rules.
Under our Secondary Markets rules and
policies, ‘‘no spectrum manager lease
notification or de facto transfer lease
application can propose a lease term
that extends beyond the term of the
license authorization itself.’’
19. We conclude that EBS licensees
may enter into a lease with a maximum
term of thirty years, subject to
conditions designed to ensure that EBS
licensees have a fair opportunity to reevaluate their educational needs. We are
persuaded by the analyses presented by
commenters indicating the difficulty
that commercial lessees may have in
obtaining financing if leases are limited
to a shorter duration. We agree with the
Wireless Communications Association
International, Inc. (WCA) and CTN,
however, that EBS licensees must have
a mechanism to ensure that their
educational, technological, and
spectrum needs are being met.
Therefore, we adopt a requirement for
all EBS leases with a term of fifteen
years or longer to include a right to
review the educational use requirements
of their leases every five years starting
at year fifteen of the lease agreement.
We agree with WCA and CTN that a
spectrum leasing arrangement may
include any mutually agreeable terms
designed to accommodate changes in
the EBS licensee’s educational use
requirements and the commercial
lessee’s wireless broadband operations.
20. With regard to EBS leases entered
into between the effective date of the
existing BRS/EBS rules (January 10,
2005) and the effective date of the
amended rules adopted today, however,
we clarify those leases were governed by
the Secondary Markets rules and
policies that did not restrict the parties’
ability to have lease agreements with
terms longer than the license term.
Thus, the length of EBS leases entered
into between January 10, 2005 and the
effective date of the amended rules
adopted today was not limited under
the Commission’s rules.
21. Although we will not permit
automatic renewal of an EBS lease
beyond 30 years, we will maintain the
Commission’s existing policy of
allowing EBS licensees to afford lessees
a right of first refusal, as well as
allowing agreements to grant the EBS
licensee (but not a lessee) the unilateral
right to extend a lease. That is, at the
end of any particular EBS lease term,
the EBS licensee must retain the ability
to re-evaluate the use of their licensed
spectrum to identify new educational
uses, and to renegotiate such leases as

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
they relate to the licensee’s current
needs. We continue to permit renewal
options or rights of first refusal for
lessees, while prohibiting automatic
renewal provisions that do not afford
licensees the opportunity to renegotiate
their leases at the end of the lease term.
• Other Leasing Issues. Amends
§ 27.1214(c) to reflect that EBS licensees
retain the right to purchase or lease
dedicated or common equipment
regardless of whether the relationship
terminates as a result of action by the
lessee. Agrees that two of the EBS
substantive use requirements, (iv) and
(v), which the Commission indicated in
the BRS/EBS R&O apply to EBS leases,
are not appropriate under the de facto
transfer model. Thus, in de facto
leasing, EBS licensees are not required
to retain responsibility for compliance
with rules regarding station
construction and operation or to have
all station modification applications
submitted through the EBS licensee. To
reflect that EBS stations in the two-way
data environment may not always be
used for in-classroom instruction,
amends the first sentence of
§ 27.1214(b)(1) to indicate that EBS
licensees must reserve a minimum of 5
percent of the capacity of its channels
for educational uses consistent with
§ 27.1203(b) and (c) of our rules.
III. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order
A. Performance Requirements

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

i. Use of Substantial Service
22. We conclude that BRS and EBS
licensees will be required to
demonstrate substantial service in order
to retain their licenses. ‘‘’Substantial
service’’ is defined in part 27 of our
rules as service which is sound,
favorable, and substantially above a
level of mediocre service which just
might minimally warrant renewal.’’
ii. Safe Harbors
23. We agree with WCA, Bell South,
and the other commenters that it is
appropriate to use the type of safe
harbors applied to other fixed and
mobile services to BRS and EBS. Our
new rules give licensees the flexibility
to use these services to provide a wide
variety of services. Consequently, we
believe it is vital to establish safe
harbors that encompass licensees’
potentially disparate business and
service deployment plans. We also
believe, however, that it is appropriate
to establish safe harbors that are
predicated upon an appropriate
showing by the licensee that it has made
notable progress in deploying service.
We agree with Clearwire that the
traditional safe harbors associated with

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

other part 27 services are too lenient
given the particular circumstances of
BRS and EBS. The safe harbors we
adopt today give licensees offering a
variety of services ample opportunity to
meet at least one safe harbor while
ensuring that these frequencies are used
to provide an appropriate level of
service.
24. We believe that distinctive
characteristics of this band support
setting safe harbors for these services
that are more stringent than those
proposed by WCA, BellSouth, and
others. First, as noted below, licensees
have approximately five years from the
release of this item to demonstrate
substantial service. Most of the existing
licenses in the band were issued at least
ten years ago, and proposals to reshape
the band have been under discussion
within the industry since at least 2002,
when WCA, CTN, and NIA (the
Coalition) developed their proposal (the
White Paper) to change the band plan
and technical rules of the 2500–2690
MHz band. Accordingly, we believe that
licensees and/or their predecessors have
had a more than adequate opportunity
to develop plans for rapidly instituting
service pursuant to our new rules. We,
therefore believe, that licensees should
only be permitted to rely on a safe
harbor to meet the substantial service
requirement if they can show significant
service deployment. We, therefore,
adopt safe harbors that require licensees
to make a stronger showing of service
deployment than that proposed by
WCA, BellSouth, and others.
25. In determining the precise level of
service to be required in order to meet
a safe harbor, we must also ensure that
we do not place an undue burden on
licensees. These standards will apply to
EBS licenses and small rural operators
as well as large carriers. Furthermore,
the past difficulties licensees have faced
in this band do place some limit on the
amount of service we can expect
licensees to provide. We, therefore,
agree with commenters that urge us to
establish safe harbors that encompass
both fixed and mobile service
deployments and recognize efforts to
serve specialized or niche markets. After
full consideration of all the relevant
factors, we adopt the following safe
harbors:
• Constructing six permanent links
per one million people for licensees
providing fixed point-to-point services;
• Providing coverage of at least 30
percent of the population of the licensed
area for licensees providing mobile
services or fixed point-to-multipoint
services;
• Providing specialized or
technologically sophisticated service

PO 00000

Frm 00041

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

35183

that does not require a high level of
coverage to benefit consumers; or
• Providing service to niche markets
or areas outside the areas served by
other licensees.
26. Additionally, in an effort to
provide maximum flexibility for
licensees in satisfying the safe harbors,
we agree with Sprint and BloostonLaw
that a licensee will be deemed to satisfy
a safe harbor through lease agreements
when such arrangements satisfy the
conditions set forth in the Secondary
Markets 2nd R&O, and the lessee is
actually providing the level of service
required by a licensee that would be
deemed to satisfy one of the safe harbors
that we adopt today for BRS/EBS
licensees.
27. Finally, in response to WCA’s and
Clearwire’s concern that the
Commission does not plan to make
substantial service determinations on a
case by case basis, we explain how we
expect the substantial service review
process will work. If a licensee meets a
safe harbor established by the
Commission, we will deem the licensee
to have offered substantial service with
that license. If the licensee does not
meet a safe harbor, we will review the
showing on a case-by-case basis. We
emphasize that a licensee will not be
required to meet a safe harbor if it can
otherwise demonstrate substantial
service to the public. As recognized in
the Commission’s own precedent, the
primary advantage of the substantial
service standard is that it is tied to the
individual circumstances of each
licensee. In general, there is broad
support for the adoption of a substantial
service performance standard that
provides for case-by-case showings of
substantial service coupled with safe
harbors.
iii. Additional Safe Harbors for EBS
Licensees
28. We agree with the commenters
and believe that EBS licensees should
be given additional flexibility to satisfy
the substantial service standard. With
respect to the first safe harbor proposed
by CTN and NIA, we believe that this
safe harbor properly takes into account
the special circumstances EBS licensees
and provides EBS licensees with
flexibility while ensuring that they are
providing educational services. With
respect to the second safe harbor
proposed by CTN and NIA, we have
established above that both EBS and
BRS licensees have the flexibility to
meet the substantial service standard
through leasing. In light of this, we
agree that EBS licensees can meet the
substantial service standard through
leasing but we decline to adopt CTN’s

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

35184

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

and NIA’s second safe harbor proposal
that a lease agreement can be used to
meet a safe harbor standard on a systemwide basis regardless of the number of
channels leased or in use. As discussed
in greater detail below, we apply the
safe harbors to both BRS and EBS
licensees on a license-by-license basis.

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

iv. Service to Rural Areas
29. We adopt the definition of ‘‘rural
area’’ used in the Rural Order for BRS/
EBS, i.e., those counties (or equivalent)
with a population density of 100
persons per square mile or less, based
upon the most recently available Census
data. We also adopt modified versions
of the safe harbors adopted by the
Commission in the Rural Order.
Specifically, we adopt the following safe
harbors:
• Providing service to ‘‘rural areas’’ (a
county (or equivalent) with a population
density of 100 persons per square mile
or less, based upon the most recently
available Census data) and areas with
limited access to telecommunications
services:
• For mobile service, where coverage
is provided to at least 75% of the
geographic area of at least 30% of the
rural areas within its service area; or
• For fixed service, where the BRS or
EBS licensee has constructed at least
one end of a permanent link in at least
30% of the rural areas within its
licensed area.
v. Other Decisions Regarding
Substantial Service
• Require that substantial service be
demonstrated on a per-license basis.
• Establish May 1, 2011 as the
deadline for demonstrating substantial
service.
• Agree with the majority of the
commenters that prior service, even if
discontinued, should be a factor that we
take into account when making a
determination as to whether substantial
service has been met. We, however,
decline to adopt a rule stating that a
licensee will have deemed to have
provided substantial service if it met a
safe harbor at any point during the
license term. The most significant
consideration in a substantial service
evaluation is the licensee’s current
service. If the current operations are
sufficient to support a finding of
substantial service, no further
evaluation is needed. If the current
service does not support a finding of
substantial service, we will look at the
licensee’s overall record during the
prior license term.
• Hold that in order for a BRS/EBS
licensee or lessee to provide substantial
service, it must be providing service to

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

customers or students. We therefore
conclude that the transmission of test
signals and/or color bars by a BRS/EBS
licensee or lessee that has no customers
or students does not constitute
substantial service.
B. Licensing Unassigned and
Untransitioned Spectrum in the Band
30. We make the following
conclusions regarding unassigned and
untransitioned spectrum:
• Conclude that we should not make
any decisions regarding how to assign
unassigned spectrum at this time.
• Conclude that any future auction of
unassigned spectrum will be open to all
eligible bidders.
• Conclude that it is premature to
make available unassigned spectrum
until the transition period is completed.
• Conclude that the resolution of
issues related to additional new licenses
is premature prior to the completion of
voluntary incumbent transitions.
C. Grandfathered E and F Channel EBS
Stations
31. We first conclude that where there
is no overlap between the EBS and BRS
licensees, we will free up the
grandfathered E and F channel EBS
licensees, grant these licensees a GSA,
and allow them to modify or assign their
license. Next we conclude, in the case
where the GSAs of a grandfathered EBS
and BRS licensees overlap, but that
overlap is 50% or less, we will divide
the GSAs by ‘‘splitting the football,’’ as
we do with other overlapping GSAs.
Both the BRS and EBS licensees will be
free to add, modify, and remove
facilities within their GSAs, consistent
with our new technical rules. In
addition, the grandfathered EBS facility
will be free to assign its license. In the
case of an overlap that is greater than
50% in service areas, we conclude that
different treatment is warranted. Where
there is a major overlap of service areas,
splitting the football may no longer be
the best solution for accommodating the
needs of both licensees. To encourage a
voluntary settlement of this issue
between the affected parties, we will
establish a ninety-day mandatory
negotiation period where both the BRS
and EBS licenses have an explicit duty
to work to accommodate each other’s
communications requirements. If, at the
end of ninety days the parties cannot
reach a mutual agreement, the
Commission then will split the football
on its own accord.
D. Four Channel Rule
32. In light of the record on this issue,
we agree that retaining the rule pretransition is not in the public interest.

PO 00000

Frm 00042

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

E. Wireless Cable Exception
33. Concludes to eliminate the
wireless cable exception, pre-transition.
Grandfathers existing licenses granted
pursuant to the rules, and permits such
licenses to continue to be renewed and
assigned. Permits transfers of control of
such licenses and modifications to these
licenses.
F. Regulatory Fees
34. With regard to EBS licensees, we
agree with commenters that we should
not impose regulatory fees on EBS
licensees. We note that governmental
entities are statutorily exempt from fees
under Section 8 of the Communications
Act, and both governmental entities and
nonprofit entities are statutorily exempt
from Section 9 fees. EBS licensees by
definition fit within these statutory
exemptions, with the exception of
entities licensed pursuant to the
wireless cable exception.
35. With regard to BRS licensees, we
conclude that the regulatory fee
structure for BRS should be changed as
proposed in the FNPRM to reflect the
scope of a licensee’s authorized
spectrum use and the benefits it receives
under its spectrum authorization. We
shall adopt, therefore, a MHz-based
formula with tiered fees by markets,
similar to our annual scale for broadcast
television stations, but on a somewhat
more simplified scale. Annual fees will
be charged on a per-megahertz basis
based upon the size of the BRS
licensee’s BTA. For a BRS licensee
licensed by GSA, its BTA is the BTA
where the geographic center point of its
GSA is located. We shall assess a permegahertz fee in three categories, BTA
ranked by population size those ranked
1–60 paying the highest fee, those
ranked 61–200 paying a lesser fee, and
those ranked 201–493 paying the lowest
fee.
G. Gulf of Mexico Proceeding
36. The record does not demonstrate
a demand for BRS or EBS operations in
the Gulf of Mexico at this time.
IV. Procedural Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Analysis
37. This document contains new
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13. It
will be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review under Section 3507(d) of the
PRA. OMB, the general public, and
other Federal agencies are invited to
comment on the new information
collection requirements contained in
this proceeding. In addition, we note

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

that pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public
Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4),
we previously sought specific comment
on how the Commission might ‘‘further
reduce the information collection
burden for small business concerns with
fewer than 25 employees.’’
38. In this present document, we have
assessed the effects of changes in the
pre-transition data request, selftransition notification, Initiation Plans,
Post-Transition Notifications, and
transition costs, and find that in most
instances the effect on entities with
fewer than 25 employees will be minor.
We anticipate that entities with fewer
than 25 employees will be most affected
by the changes to the pre-transition data
request and the post-transition
notification. The changes to the pretransition data request are relatively
minor, were requested by petitioners,
and are designed to ease the transition.
The changes to the post-transition
notification eases the paperwork burden
on all affected BRS and EBS licensees.
V. Final Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification of Big LEO Order on
Reconsideration
39. For the reasons described below,
we now certify that the policies and
rules adopted in the Big LEO Order on
Reconsideration will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The RFA generally defines the term
‘‘small entity’’ as having the same
meaning as the terms ‘‘small business,’’
‘‘small organization,’’ and ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction.’’ In addition,
the term ‘‘small business’’ has the same
meaning as the term ‘‘small business
concern’’ under the Small Business Act.
A ‘‘small business concern’’ is one
which: (1) Is independently owned and
operated; (2) is not dominant in its field
of operation; and (3) satisfies any
additional criteria established by the
U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA).
40. In this Big LEO Order on
Reconsideration, the Commission
adopts specific PFD limits for MSS
downlink operations in the 2496–2500
MHz band. If the MSS providers intend
to operate at power levels that exceed
those PFD limits, or if actual operations
routinely exceed those PFD limits, the
MSS operators must obtain approval
from BRS systems operating in the same
region that are affected by these PFD
limits. These rules will help to ensure
that MSS–BRS sharing in that band will
not result in harmful interference to the
BRS.
41. We find that our actions will not
affect a substantial number of small

VerDate Aug<31>2005

17:28 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

entities because only MSS operators in
the 2496–2500 MHz band will be
affected. In particular, only one Big LEO
MSS licensee currently is authorized to
provide MSS in the 2496–2500 MHz
band in United States. We find that this
licensee is not a small business. Small
businesses often do not have the
financial ability to become MSS system
operators due to high implementation
costs associated with launching and
operating satellite systems and services.
Therefore, we certify that the
requirements of the Big LEO Order on
Reconsideration will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Commission will send a copy of
this Order, including a copy of this
Final Regulatory Flexibility
Certification, in a report to Congress and
the Government Accountability Office
pursuant to the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
VI. Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis of BRS/EBS Third
Memorandum Opinion and Order and
Second Report and Order
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Final
Rules
42. On July 29, 2004, the Commission
released the BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM.
In the BRS/EBS R&O, the Commission
adopted a band plan that restructured
the 2500–2690 MHz band into upper
and lower-band segments for low-power
operations (UBS and LBS, respectively),
and a mid-band segment (MBS) for highpower operations, in order to reduce the
likelihood of interference caused by
incompatible uses. The Commission
also designated the 2495–2500 MHz
band for use in connection with the
2500–2690 MHz band. Through the
adoption of the new band plan, the
Commission provided incentives for the
development of low-power cellularized
broadband use and, accordingly,
renamed MDS and ITFS as the
‘‘Broadband Radio Service’’ and
‘‘Educational Broadband Service,’’
respectively, to more accurately
describe the kinds of the services
anticipated in this band. In order to
facilitate the transition to the new band
plan, the BRS/EBS R&O adopted a
market-oriented, transition mechanism
that enables incumbent licensees to
develop regional plans for moving to
new spectrum assignments in the
restructured band plan. The BRS/EBS
R&O also adopted service rules that give
licensees increased flexibility, reduce
administrative burdens on both
licensees and the Commission, and
promotes regulatory parity.

PO 00000

Frm 00043

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

35185

43. In this Third Memorandum
Opinion and Order and Second Report
and Order (3rd MO&O and 2nd R&O)
we adopt a number of changes
concerning the rules governing the
2500–2690 MHz band, for the
Broadband Radio Service (BRS) and the
Educational Broadband Service (EBS).
The rules we adopt today include:
requiring licensees to transition based
on Basic Trading Areas (BTAs), rather
than Major Economic Areas (MEAs) as
specified in the BRS/EBS R&O
permitting licensees to self-transition if
a proponent does not file an Initiation
Plan by a date certain or withdraws an
Initiation Plan and another proponent
does not come forward by a date certain;
requiring all commercial licensees, in a
proponent-driven transition, to
reimburse the proponent a pro rata
share of the cost of transitioning a BTA
to the new band plan; requiring
commercial licensees to pay their own
costs if they self-transition, but
permitting non-commercial EBS
licensees to seek reimbursement from
commercial licensees; establishing a
geographic service area for
grandfathered E and F channel EBS
licensees, and allowing such licensees
to modify or assign their licenses;
eliminating the overlap between a
grandfathered EBS licensee and a BRS
site-based incumbent by ‘‘splitting the
football; eliminating the rule that limits
EBS licensees to four channels in a
given geographic area; eliminating the
wireless cable exception to the EBS
eligibility rules; altering, where
possible, the regulatory fee structure for
the BRS services to establish a tiered
regulatory fee structure based on market
size MHz; adopting a substantial service
standard for BRS and EBS licensees, and
establishing safe harbors similar to those
used in other services; and requiring all
licensees to establish substantial service
by May 1, 2011.’’
44. We believe the rules we adopt
today will both encourage the
enhancement of existing services using
this band and promote the development
of new innovative services to the public,
such as providing wireless broadband
services, including high-speed Internet
access and mobile services. We also
believe that our new rules will allow
licensees to adapt quickly to changing
market conditions and the marketplace,
rather than to government regulation, in
determining how this band can best be
used.
B. Summary of Significant Issues Raised
by Public Comments in Response to the
IRFA
45. No comments were submitted
specifically in response to the IRFA.

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

35186

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

C. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Rules Will Apply
46. The RFA directs agencies to
provide a description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities that may be affected by
the proposed rules. The RFA generally
defines the term ‘‘small entity’’ as
having the same meaning as the terms,
‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small organization,’’
and ‘‘small governmental jurisdiction.’’
In addition, the term ‘‘small business’’
has the same meaning as the term
‘‘small business concern’’ under the
Small Business Act. A small business
concern is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the SBA. A small
organization is generally ‘‘any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.’’ Nationwide, as of
2002, there were approximately 1.6
million small organizations. The term
‘‘small governmental jurisdiction’’ is
defined as ‘‘governments of cities,
towns, townships, villages, school
districts, or special districts, with a
population of less than fifty thousand.’’
The term ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction’’ is defined generally as
‘‘governments of cities, towns,
townships, villages, school districts, or
special districts, with a population of
less than fifty thousand.’’ Census
Bureau data for 2002 indicate that there
were 87,525 local governmental
jurisdictions in the United States. We
estimate that, of this total, 84,377
entities were ‘‘small governmental
jurisdictions.’’ Thus, we estimate that
most governmental jurisdictions are
small. Below, we discuss the total
estimated numbers of small businesses
that might be affected by our actions.
47. Broadband Radio Service systems,
previously referred to as Multipoint
Distribution Service (MDS) and
Multichannel Multipoint Distribution
Service (MMDS) systems, and ‘‘wireless
cable,’’ transmit video programming to
subscribers and provide two way high
speed data operations using the
microwave frequencies of the
Broadband Radio Service (BRS) and
Educational Broadband Service (EBS)
(previously referred to as the
Instructional Television Fixed Service
(ITFS)). In connection with the 1996
BRS auction, the Commission
established a small business size
standard as an entity that had annual
average gross revenues of no more than
$40 million in the previous three
calendar years. The BRS auctions

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

resulted in 67 successful bidders
obtaining licensing opportunities for
493 Basic Trading Areas (BTAs). Of the
67 auction winners, 61 met the
definition of a small business. BRS also
includes licensees of stations authorized
prior to the auction. At this time, we
estimate that of the 61 small business
BRS auction winners, 48 remain small
business licensees. In addition to the 48
small businesses that hold BTA
authorizations, there are approximately
392 incumbent BRS licensees that are
considered small entities. After adding
the number of small business auction
licensees to the number of incumbent
licensees not already counted, we find
that there are currently approximately
440 BRS licensees that are defined as
small businesses under either the SBA
or the Commission’s rules. Some of
those 440 small business licensees may
be affected by the decisions in this 3rd
MO&O and 2nd R&O.
48. In addition, the SBA has
developed a small business size
standard for Cable and Other Program
Distribution, which includes all such
companies generating $13.5 million or
less in annual receipts. According to
Census Bureau data for 2002, there were
a total of 1,191 firms in this category
that operated for the entire year. Of this
total, 1,087 firms had annual receipts of
under $10 million, and 43 firms had
receipts of $10 million or more but less
than $25 million. Consequently, we
estimate that the majority of providers
in this service category are small
businesses that may be affected by the
rules and policies adopted herein. This
SBA small business size standard is
applicable to EBS. There are presently
2,032 EBS licensees. All but 100 of these
licenses are held by educational
institutions. Educational institutions are
included in this analysis as small
entities. Thus, we estimate that at least
1,932 licensees are small businesses.
49. There are presently 2,032 EBS
licensees. All but 100 of these licenses
are held by educational institutions.
Educational institutions may be
included in the definition of a small
entity. EBS is a non-profit non-broadcast
service. We do not collect, nor are we
aware of other collections of, annual
revenue data for EBS licensees. We find
that up to 1,932 of these educational
institutions are small entities that may
take advantage of our amended rules to
provide additional flexibility to EBS.
D. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
50. While these requirements are new
with respect to potential licensees in the
EBS and BRS bands, the Commission

PO 00000

Frm 00044

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

has applied these requirements to
licensees in other bands. Moreover, the
Commission is also eliminating many
burdensome filing requirements that
have previously been applied to BRS
and EBS.
51. To enable transition proponents to
arrange for the installation of required
equipment, BRS and EBS licensees will
be required to provide the following
information to potential proponents: the
transitioning licensee’s full name, postal
mailing address, contact person, e-mail
address, and phone and fax number.
Licensees will also be required to
provide the location (street address and
geographic coordinates) of the main
station or booster serving each EBS
receive site entitled to protection and
other pertinent technical information on
the antenna for that main station or
booster. These requirements are being
adopted in response to a request from
commenters that such information be
provided. This information is critical to
ensuring a smooth transition, because
the Commission’s ULS database does
not contain information concerning the
desired signal level at each EBS receive
site entitled to protection during the
transition. Furthermore, this
information should be readily available
to the licensee and is not particularly
burdensome to collect and provide.
52. Licensees that self-transition must
provide the following information to all
BRS and EBS licensees in the BTA
where the self-transitioning licensee is
located: the self-transitioning licensee’s
full name, postal mailing address,
contact person, e-mail address, and
phone and fax number. Selftransitioning licensees will also be
required to provide the location (street
address and geographic coordinates) of
the main station or booster serving each
EBS receive site entitled to protection
and other pertinent technical
information on the antenna for that
main station or booster.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
53. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): ‘‘(1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for such small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than
design standards; and (4) an exemption

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
from coverage of the rule, or any part
thereof, for small entities.’’
54. Regarding our decision to require
licensees to transition by BTA instead of
by MEA, we do not anticipate any
significant economic impact on small
entities. The overwhelming majority of
commenters preferred BTAs over the
alternative of MEAs because they
believe BTAs are both significantly
easier to transition and less expensive to
transition then MEAs. The record
reflects that licensees almost
unanimously agreed that the
Commission should alter the transition
area from MEAs to BTAs because these
areas are more likely to conform to the
size and location of geographic markets
where systems have developed, and
licensees, in many cases, have already
developed interference and other
interoperating relationships along BTA
lines. Commenters also requested that
the transition area be changed to BTAs
because transitioning such areas will be
less expensive, making it easier for
licensees to transition, especially small
and rural operators. Thus, we believe
this decision will actually result in costsavings to entities that are responsible
for transition costs.
55. Regarding our decision to grant
individual waivers of the rules rather
than adopt a blanket ‘‘opt-out’’ for
Multichannel Video Programming
Distributors (MVPD), we believe that a
large number of small entities will not
be unduly burdened. While individual
waivers require more work on the part
of licensees, we anticipate that only a
very few licensees, fewer than twenty,
will be affected by the waiver process.
Given that so few entities will be
affected, we believe that an individual
waiver is the more appropriate
regulatory response than crafting a rule
that covers so few entities.
56. Regarding our decision to allow
licensees the option to self-transition in
markets where a proponent does not
come forward by a date certain or has
withdrawn and no other proponent has
come forward by a date certain, we do
not believe this rule will impose any
significant burdens on licensees because
self-transitioning EBS licensees will be
able to seek reimbursement for the costs
of self-transitioning from commercial
licensees and lessees in the BTA. BRS
licensees that self-transition will be
required to pay for their own costs.
Licensees that do not transition will be
faced with the prospect of losing their
licenses. Thus, this rule provides an
additional transition option for
licensees who wish to comply with
transition rules but cannot afford to be
a proponent to retain their spectrum.
Pursuant to this rule, EBS licensees can

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

avoid losing their licenses for reasons
that may be beyond their control (such
as the financial inability to transition all
licensees within its transition area, or
the absence of a commercial proponent
that can do so, or the failure of a
commercial proponent to complete the
process). We considered the alternative
of requiring self-transitioning EBS
licensees to pay their costs and rejected
it as too costly for educational entities.
There was overwhelming support in the
record to permit licensees to selftransition and no opposition.
57. Regarding our decision to require
that all commercial licensees, in a
proponent-driven transition, reimburse
the proponent a pro rata share of the
cost of transitioning a BTA to the new
band plan, this decision is beneficial to
licensees in that it avoids the ‘‘free
rider’’ problem by requiring those who
provide commercial service, whether
through their own BRS or EBS channels
or through leased EBS channels, to
share the costs of transitioning the 2.5
GHz band. This relieves any particular
commercial provider from having to pay
for expenses of other commercial
providers and institutes a cost-sharing
regime that provides greater incentive
for a proponent to come forward. We
recognize that developing a list of
reimbursable costs in the BRS/EBS
context may be difficult given the varied
types of operations in the band, but
interested parties, such as Sprint, have
already developed proposed lists. We
also recognize that it may be difficult for
the FCC to determine the population of
a GSA, which is based on a 35-mile
protected service area and not on a
particular jurisdiction. Nonetheless, we
believe that this scheme provides a fair
and equitable solution, which
outweighs the calculation difficulties
that may arise.
58. Regarding our decision to adopt
substantial service standards for BRS
and EBS licensees and establish safe
harbors similar to those used in other
services, this decision does not impose
any burdens on licensees above what is
traditionally required for one to be a
license holder. It is reasonable to expect
that a licensee will deploy service on
spectrum on which they have been
licensed to operate, and the Commission
routinely obligates licensees to do so
lest the spectrum lie fallow and valuable
spectrum resources go unutilized.
Commenters expressed much support
for the part 27 standard we have
adopted which accomplishes the goal of
regulatory parity between like services
as this standard is used for other part 27
wireless services. Furthermore,
substantial service standards are
preferable to the alternative of

PO 00000

Frm 00045

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

35187

construction benchmarks that focus
solely on population served or
geography covered and do not take into
account qualitative factors important to
end-users and the market, such as
reliability of service, and the availability
of technologically sophisticated
premium services. Moreover, these
standards reduce the likelihood of
scenarios where licensees construct
solely to meet regulatory requirements
as opposed to satisfying market
conditions.
59. Regarding our decision to
establish a geographic service area for
grandfathered E & F channel EBS
licensees, allow such licensees to
modify or assign their licenses, and
employ a ‘‘splitting the football’’
mechanism where there is overlap, we
do not believe this rule will impose any
burdens upon licensees. To the
contrary, this procedure will eliminate
deadlocks in areas where licensees have
overlapping service areas and have been
unable to deploy service as a result
thereof. Furthermore, this rule will
permit grandfathered E & F EBS
licenses, which have been providing
service for 20 years, to modernize their
systems to better serve the public.
Granting this type of flexibility is
consistent with the BRS/EBS R&O’s
geographic area licensing and greater
flexibility approaches. Moreover, there
is substantial support from the
commenters regarding this decision.
60. Regarding our decision to
eliminate the rule that limits EBS
licensees to four channels in a given
geographic area, we do not believe that
this action will impose additional
obligations upon a licensee. To the
contrary, given the wider range of
services that EBS channels can now be
used for and the changes to the
Commission’s leasing rules, retention of
the four-channel rule may actually
unduly limit the ability of educational
institutions and organizations to take
full advantage of the potential of EBS.
We recognize that this rule was
designed to promote diversity of
programming and ownership, and that,
in many cases, four channels should
provide sufficient capacity for EBS
operations. However, this concern is
mitigated by the fact that the fourchannel rule could result in spectrum
laying fallow when an educator wishes
to use the spectrum. Furthermore,
choosing the alternative option of
retaining the restriction could
undermine transition planning, which
may in some instances require licensees
to swap MBS for UBS/LBS channels or
vice versa. Moreover, commenters
overwhelmingly support elimination of
the rule, which will obviate the need for

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

35188

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

the Commission to review numerous
waiver requests by EBS licensees.
61. Regarding our decision to
eliminate the wireless cable exception
to the EBS eligibility rules, we recognize
that BTA licensees who acquired their
rights at auction may contend that they
had an expectation that the exception
would apply. However, this concern is
mitigated by the fact that changes made
by the BRS/EBS R&O to the BRS–EBS
band and the continued availability of
EBS spectrum on a leased basis will
provide commercial operators with
sufficient access to spectrum even if the
exception is eliminated. Furthermore,
due to changes in technology and the
video marketplace, there is unlikely to
be a growing need for spectrum for
wireless cable systems.
62. Regarding our decision to, where
possible, change the regulatory fee
structure for the BRS services to
establish a tiered regulatory fee
structure based on market size/MHz, we
do not believe this new structure would
be burdensome to licensees. On the
contrary, the current methodology for
assessing regulatory fees can be onerous
for rural operators because, on a per
population basis, the fees can amount to
multiple times that of fees paid by urban
licensees who serve more customers. In
contrast, a sliding fee—based upon
population density—would more
equitably distribute fees. We recognize
that assessing fees based on the benefits
of spectrum requires quantification and
measurement of those benefits to the
greatest extent possible, and that to the
extent that variables used for fee
calculation can change or become
unknown, the fee could be difficult to
ascertain. However, we believe that the
public interest is better served by
assessing BRS regulatory fees based on
the scope of a licensee’s authorized
spectrum use and the benefits they
receive under their spectrum
authorization. Furthermore, this
concern is mitigated by the fact that
calculations will actually be simpler for
licensees than employing a MHz/pops
formula. Moreover, establishing a tiered
formula by market size eliminates the
difficulties involved in ascertaining
population within a GSA.
63. The regulatory burdens contained
in the 3rd MO&O and 2nd R&O are
necessary in order to ensure that the
public receives the benefits of
innovative new services, or enhanced
existing services, in a prompt and
efficient manner. As described above,
we have reduced burdens wherever
possible by eliminating a number of
unnecessary regulations.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

VII. Report to Congress
64. The Commission will send a copy
of this 3rd MO&O and 2nd R&O,
including this FRFA, in a report to be
sent to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act. In addition,
the Commission will send a copy of this
3rd MO&O and 2nd R&O, including this
FRFA, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Parts 25 and
27
Communications common carriers,
Communications equipment, Equal
employment opportunity, Radio,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Satellites, Securities,
Telecommunications.

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR parts 25
and 27 as follows:

■

PART 25—SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 25
continues to read as follows:

65. Pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 7,
10, 201, 214, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308,
309, 310, 319, 324, 332, 333 and 706 of
the Communications Act of 1934, 47
U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 157, 160, 201,
214, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310,
319, 324, 332, 333, and 706, that this
Order on Reconsideration and Fifth
Memorandum Opinion and Order,
Third Memorandum Opinion and Order
and Second Report and Order is hereby
adopted.
66. The Petitions for Reconsideration
filed in these proceedings are granted to
the extent indicated and are otherwise
denied.
67. Pursuant to section 4(i) of the
Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.
154(i), and § 1.925 of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 1.925, that the ‘‘Request
for Waiver’’ filed by W.A.T.C.H. TV
Company on April 29, 2005 is granted.
68. The proceeding entitled
Amendment of parts 21 and 74 of the
Commission’s Rules With Regard to
Licensing in the Multipoint Distribution
Service and in the Instructional
Television Fixed Service for the Gulf of
Mexico, WT Docket No. 02–68 is
terminated.
69. The Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis and the Final Regulatory
Flexibility Certification are adopted.
70. The Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Order on Reconsideration and Fifth
Memorandum Opinion and Order,
Third Memorandum Opinion and Order
and Second Report and Order, including
the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
and Final Regulatory Flexibility
Certification, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.

Frm 00046

Final Rules

■

VIII. Ordering Clauses

PO 00000

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 701–744. Interprets or
applies Sections 4, 301, 302, 303, 307, 309,
and 332 of the Communications Act, as
amended. 47 U.S.C. Sections 154, 301, 302,
303, 307, 309, and 332, unless otherwise
noted.

2. Amend § 25.208 by adding a new
paragraph (v) to read as follows:

■

§ 25.208

Power flux-density limits

*

*
*
*
*
(v) In the band 2496–2500 MHz, the
power flux-density at the Earth’s surface
produced by emissions from nongeostationary space stations for all
conditions and all methods of
modulation shall not exceed the
following values (these values are
obtained under assumed free-space
propagation conditions):
(1) -144 dB (W/m∧2) in 4 kHz for all
angles of arrival between 0 and 5
degrees above the horizontal plane; -144
dB (W/m∧2) + 0.65(d -5) in 4 kHz for all
angles of arrival between 5 and 25
degrees above the horizontal plane; and
-131 dB (W/m∧2) in 4 kHz and for all
angles of arrival between 25 and 90
degrees above the horizontal plane.
(2) -126 dB (W/m∧2) in 1 MHz for all
angles of starrival between 0 and 5
degrees above the horizontal plane; -126
dB (W/m∧2) + 0.65(d -5) in 1 MHz for
all angles of arrival between 5 and 25
degrees above the horizontal plane; and
-113 dB (W/m∧2) in 1 MHz and for all
angles of arrival between 25 and 90
degrees above the horizontal plane.
■ 3. Amend § 25.213 by adding the text
to paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 25.213 Inter-Service coordination
requirements for the 1.6/2.4 GHz mobilesatellite service.

*

*
*
*
*
(b) If a Mobile-Satellite Service space
station operator in the 2496–2500 MHz
band intends to operate at powers levels
that exceed the PFD limits in
§ 25.208(v), or if actual operations
routinely exceed these PFD limits, we
require the Mobile-Satellite Service
operator to receive approval from each
operational BRS system in the affected
geographical region.

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
PART 27—MISCELLANEOUS
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
SERVICES
4. The authority citation for part 27
continues to read as follows:

■

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154 and 303, unless
otherwise noted.

5. Section 27.4 is amended by adding
the following definition to read as
follows:

■

§ 27.4

Terms and definitions.

*

*
*
*
*
Commercial EBS licensee. A licensee
authorized to operate on EBS channels
pursuant to the provisions of
§ 27.1201(c) contained in the edition of
47 CFR parts 20 to 39, revised as of
October 1, 2005, or §§ 74.990 through
74.992 contained in the edition of 47
CFR parts 70 to 79, revised as of October
1, 2004, of this chapter, and that does
not meet the eligibility requirements of
§ 27.1201(a).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 27.5 by revising
paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2)(ii), (i)(2)(iii), the
note to paragraph (i)(2), and paragraph
(i)(3) to read as follows:
§ 27.5

Frequencies.

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

*

*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(1) Pre-transition frequency
assignments.
RS Channel 1: 2150–2156 MHz or 2496–
2500 MHz
BRS Channel 2: 2156–2162 MHz or
2686–2690 MHz
BRS Channel 2A: 2156–2160 MHz
EBS Channel A1: 2500–2506 MHz
EBS Channel B1: 2506–2512 MHz
EBS Channel A2: 2512–2518 MHz
EBS Channel B2: 2518–2524 MHz
EBS Channel A3: 2524–2530 MHz
EBS Channel B3: 2530–2536 MHz
EBS Channel A4: 2536–2542 MHz
EBS Channel B4: 2542–2548 MHz
EBS Channel C1: 2548–2554 MHz
EBS Channel D1: 2554–2560 MHz
EBS Channel C2: 2560–2566 MHz
EBS Channel D2: 2566–2572 MHz
EBS Channel C3: 2572–2578 MHz
EBS Channel D3: 2578–2584 MHz
EBS Channel C4: 2584–2590 MHz
EBS Channel D4: 2590–2596 MHz
BRS Channel E1: 2596–2602 MHz
BRS Channel F1: 2602–2608 MHz
BRS Channel E2: 2608–2614 MHz
BRS Channel F2: 2614–2620 MHz
BRS Channel E3: 2620–2626 MHz
BRS Channel F3: 2626–2632 MHz
BRS Channel E4: 2632–2638 MHz
BRS Channel F4: 2638–2644 MHz
EBS Channel G1: 2644–2650 MHz
BRS Channel H1: 2650–2656 MHz
EBS Channel G2: 2656–2662 MHz

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

BRS Channel H2: 2662–2668 MHz
EBS Channel G3: 2668–2674 MHz
BRS Channel H3: 2674–2680 MHz
EBS Channel G4: 2680–2686 MHz
I Channels: 2686–2690 MHz
(2) * * *
(ii) Middle Band Segment (MBS): The
following channels shall constitute the
Middle Band Segment:
EBS Channel A4: 2572–2578 MHz
EBS Channel B4: 2578–2584 MHz
EBS Channel C4: 2584–2590 MHz
EBS Channel D4: 2590–2596 MHz
EBS Channel G4: 2596–2602 MHz
BRS/EBS Channel F4: 2602–2608 MHz
BRS/EBS Channel E4: 2608–2614 MHz
(iii) Upper Band Segment (UBS): The
following channels shall constitute the
Upper Band Segment:
BRS Channel KH1: 2614.00000–
2614.33333 MHz
BRS Channel KH2: 2614.33333–
2614.66666 MHz
BRS Channel KH3: 2614.66666–
2615.00000 MHz
EBS Channel KG1: 2615.00000–
2615.33333 MHz
EBS Channel KG2: 2615.33333–
2616.66666 MHz
EBS Channel KG3: 2615.66666–
2616.00000 MHz
BRS Channel KF1: 2616.00000–
2616.33333 MHz
BRS Channel KF2: 2616.33333–
2616.66666MHz
BRS Channel KF3: 2616.66666–
2617.00000 MHz
BRS Channel KE1: 2617.00000–
2617.33333 MHz
BRS Channel KE2: 2617.33333–
2617.66666 MHz
BRS Channel KE3: 2617.66666–
2618.00000 MHz
BRS Channel 2: 2618–2624 MHz
BRS/EBS Channel E1: 2624–2629.5 MHz
BRS/EBS Channel E2: 2629.5–2635 MHz
BRS/EBS Channel E3: 2635–2640.5 MHz
BRS/EBS Channel F1: 2640.5–2646 MHz
BRS/EBS Channel F2: 2646–2651.5 MHz
BRS/EBS Channel F3: 2651.5–2657 MHz
BRS Channel H1: 2657–2662.5 MHz
BRS Channel H2: 2662.5–2668 MHz
BRS Channel H3: 2668–2673.5 MHz
BRS Channel G1: 2673.5–2679 MHz
BRS Channel G2: 2679–2684.5 MHz
BRS Channel G3: 2684.5–2690 MHz
Note to paragraph (i)(2): No 125 kHz
channels are provided for channels in
operation in this service. The 125 kHz
channels previously associated with these
channels have been reallocated to Channel
G3 in the upper band segment.

(3) During the transition (see
§§ 27.1230–27.1239) EBS and BRS
licensees may exchange channels to
effectuate the transition of the 2.5 GHz
band in a given BTA.
*
*
*
*
*

PO 00000

Frm 00047

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

35189

7. Amend § 27.14 by adding a new
paragraph (e) to read as follows:

■

§ 27.14 Construction requirements;
Criteria for comparative renewal
proceedings.

*

*
*
*
*
(e) BRS and EBS licensees must make
a showing of ‘‘substantial service’’ no
later than May 1, 2011. Incumbent BRS
licensees must file their ‘‘substantial
service’’ showing with their renewal
application. ‘‘Substantial service’’ is
defined as service which is sound,
favorable, and substantially above a
level of mediocre service which just
might minimally warrant renewal.
Substantial service for BRS and EBS
licensees is satisfied if a licensee meets
the requirements of paragraph (e)(1) or
(e)(2) of this section. If a licensee has
not met the requirements of paragraph
(e)(1) or (e)(2) of this section, then
demonstration of ‘‘substantial service’’
shall proceed on a case-by-case basis.
All substantial service determinations
will be made on a license-by-license
basis. Except for BTA licenses, BRS
licensees must file their ‘‘substantial
service’’ showing with their renewal
applications. Failure by any licensee to
meet this requirement will result in
forfeiture of the license and the licensee
will be ineligible to regain it.
(1) A BRS or EBS licensee has
provided ‘‘substantial service’’ by:
(i) Constructing six permanent links
per one million people for licensees
providing fixed point-to-point services;
(ii) Providing coverage of at least 30
percent of the population of the licensed
area for licensees providing mobile
services or fixed point-to-multipoint
services;
(iii) Providing service to ‘‘rural areas’’
(a county (or equivalent) with a
population density of 100 persons per
square mile or less, based upon the most
recently available Census data) and
areas with limited access to
telecommunications services:
(A) For mobile service, where
coverage is provided to at least 75% of
the geographic area of at least 30% of
the rural areas within its service area; or
(B) For fixed service, where the BRS
or EBS licensee has constructed at least
one end of a permanent link in at least
30% of the rural areas within its
licensed area.
(iv) Providing specialized or
technologically sophisticated service
that does not require a high level of
coverage to benefit consumers; or
(v) Providing service to niche markets
or areas outside the areas served by
other licensees.
(2) An EBS licensee has provided
‘‘substantial service’’ when:

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

35190

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

(i) The EBS licensee is using its
spectrum (or spectrum to which the EBS
licensee’s educational services are
shifted) to provide educational services
within the EBS licensee’s GSA;
(ii) The EBS licensee’s license is
actually being used to serve the
educational mission of one or more
accredited public or private schools,
colleges or universities providing formal
educational and cultural development
to enrolled students; or
(iii) The level of service provided by
the EBS licensee meets or exceeds the
minimum usage requirements specified
in § 27.1214.
(3) An EBS or BRS licensee may be
deemed to provide substantial service
through a leasing arrangement if the
lessee is providing substantial service
under paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
The EBS licensee must also be
otherwise in compliance with this
chapter (including the programming
requirements in § 27.1203).
■ 8. Amend § 27.53 by revising the
introductory text of paragraph (l) to read
as follows:
§ 27.53

*

*
*
*
*
(l) For BRS and EBS stations, the
power of any emissions outside the
licensee’s frequency bands of operation
shall be attenuated below the
transmitter power (P) measured in
watts. BRS and EBS stations that are not
in compliance with the standards
below, after receiving a documented
interference complaint from an adjacent
channel licensee, have 60 days to
coordinate with the affected licensee
and meet a mutual resolution before
both parties employ a more rigorous
emission mask.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 27.1201 by revising
paragraph (a) introductory text,
removing and reserving paragraph (c),
and adding a new paragraph (d) to read
as follows:

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

EBS Eligibility.

(a) A license for an Educational
Broadband Service station will be
issued only to an accredited institution
or to a governmental organization
engaged in the formal education of
enrolled students or to a nonprofit
organization whose purposes are
educational and include providing
educational and instructional television
material to such accredited institutions
and governmental organizations, and
which is otherwise qualified under the
statutory provisions of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
*
*
*
*
*

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

10. Amend § 27.1202 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:

■

§ 27.1202

Cable/BRS cross-ownership.

*

Emission limits.

§ 27.1201

(d) This paragraph applies to EBS
licensees and applications licensed or
filed pursuant to the provisions of
§ 27.1201(c) contained in the edition of
47 CFR parts 20 to 39, revised as of
October 1, 2005, or §§ 74.990 through
74.992 contained in the edition of 47
CFR parts 70 to 79, revised as of October
1, 2004, of this chapter, and that do not
meet the eligibility requirements of
paragraph (a) of this section. Such
licensees may continue to operate
pursuant to the terms of their existing
licenses, and their licenses may be
renewed, assigned, or transferred, so
long as the licensee is otherwise in
compliance with this chapter.
Applications filed pursuant to the
provisions of former § 27.1201(c) or
§ § 74.990 through 74.992 of this chapter
may be processed and granted, so long
as such applications were filed prior to
July 19, 2006.

Jkt 208001

*
*
*
*
(c) Applications for new stations,
station modifications, assignments or
transfers of control by cable operators of
BRS stations shall include a showing
that no portion of the GSA of the BRS
station is within the portion of the
franchise area actually served by the
cable operator’s cable system, or of any
entity indirectly affiliated, owned,
operated, controlled by, or under
common control with the cable
operator. Alternatively, the cable
operator may certify that it will not use
the BRS station to distribute
multichannel video programming.
*
*
*
*
*
11. Amend § 27.1203 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:

■

§ 27.1203

EBS programming requirements.

*

*
*
*
*
(b) Educational Broadband Service
stations are intended primarily through
video, data, or voice transmissions to
further the educational mission of
accredited public and private schools,
colleges and universities providing a
formal educational and cultural
development to enrolled students.
Authorized educational broadband
channels must be used to further the
educational mission of accredited
schools offering formal educational
courses to enrolled students.
*
*
*
*
*
12. Amend § 27.1213 by revising
paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:

■

PO 00000

Frm 00048

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

§ 27.1213 Designated entity provisions for
BRS in Commission auction commencing
prior to January 1, 2004.

*

*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Conditions and obligations. See
§ 1.2110(g)(4) of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Amend § 27.1214 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1) and (c) and adding
new paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 27.1214 EBS spectrum leasing
arrangements and grandfathered leases.

*

*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The licensee must reserve a
minimum of 5% of the capacity of its
channels for educational uses consistent
with § 27.1203 paragraphs (b) and (c),
and may not enter into a spectrum
leasing arrangement involving this
reserved capacity. In addition, before
leasing excess capacity, the licensee
must provide at least 20 hours per
licensed channel per week of EBS
educational usage. This 5% reservation
and this 20 hours per licensed channel
per week EBS educational usage
requirement shall apply spectrally over
the licensee’s whole actual service area.
However, regardless of whether the
licensee has an educational receive site
within its GSA served by a booster, the
licensee may lease excess capacity
without making at least 20 hours per
licensed channel per week of EBS
educational usage, provided that the
licensee maintains the unabridgeable
right to recapture on one months’
advance notice such capacity as it
requires over and above the 5%
reservation to make at least 20 hours per
channel per week of EBS educational
usage.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) All spectrum leasing arrangements
involving EBS spectrum must afford the
EBS licensee an opportunity to purchase
or to lease dedicated or common EBS
equipment used for educational
purposes in the event that the spectrum
leasing arrangement is terminated.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The maximum permissible term of
an EBS spectrum leasing arrangement
entered into on or after July 19, 2006
(including the initial term and all
renewal terms that commence
automatically or at the sole option of the
lessee) shall be 30 years. In furtherance
of the educational purposes for which
EBS spectrum is primarily allocated,
any spectrum leasing arrangement in
excess of 15 years that is entered into on
or after July 19, 2006 must include
terms which provide the EBS licensee
on the 15th year and every 5 years

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
thereafter, with an opportunity to
review its educational use requirements
in light of changes in educational needs,
technology, and other relevant factors
and to obtain access to such additional
services, capacity, support, and/or
equipment as the parties shall agree
upon in the spectrum leasing
arrangement to advance the EBS
licensee’s educational mission.
■ 14. Add § 27.1216 to read as follows:
§ 27.1216 Grandfathered E and F group
EBS licenses.

(a) Except as noted in paragraph (b) of
this section, grandfathered EBS
licensees authorized to operate E and F
group co-channel licenses are granted a
geographic service area (GSA) on July
19, 2006. The GSA is the area bounded
by a circle having a 35 mile radius and
centered at the station’s reference
coordinates, and is bounded by the
chord(s) drawn between intersection
points of that circle and those of
respective adjacent market, co-channel
licensees.
(b) If there is more than 50 percent
overlap between the calculated GSA of
a grandfathered EBS license and the
protected service area of a co-channel
BRS license, the licensees shall not be
immediately granted a geographic
service area. Instead, the grandfathered
EBS license and the co-channel BRS
licensee must negotiate in good faith to
reach a solution that accommodates the
communication needs of both licensees.
If the co-channel licensees reach a
mutually agreeable solution on or before
October 17, 2006, then the GSA of each
co-channel license shall be as
determined pursuant to the agreement
of the parties. If a mutually agreeable
solution between co-channel licensees
is not reached on or before October 17,
2006, then each co-channel licensee
shall receive a GSA determined
pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section
and § 27.1206(a).
■ 15. Amend § 27.1221 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

§ 27.1221

Interference protection.

(a) Interference protection will be
afforded to BRS and EBS on a stationby-station basis based on the heights of
the stations in the LBS and UBS and
also on height benchmarking, although
the heights of antennas utilized are not
restricted.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Revise § 27.1230 to read as
follows:
§ 27.1230 Conversion of the 2500–2690
MHz band.

BRS and EBS licensees in the 2500–
2690 MHz band on the pre-transition A-

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

I Channels will be transitioned from the
frequencies assigned to them under
§ 27.5(i)(1) to the frequencies assigned
to them under § 27.5(i)(2). The
transition, which will be undertaken by
one or more proponent(s), will occur in
the following five phases: initiating the
transition process (see § 27.1231),
planning the transition (see § 27.1232),
reimbursing transition costs (see
§§ 27.1233 and 27.1237–1239),
terminating existing operations in
transitioned markets that do not
comport with § 27.5(i)(2) (see § 27.1234),
and filing the post-transition
notification (see § 27.1235). Licensees
may also self-transition (see § 27.1236).
■ 17. Revise § 27.1231 to read as
follows:
§ 27.1231

Initiating the transition.

(a) Transition areas. Unless paragraph
(b) of this section applies, the transition
will occur by Basic Trading Area (BTA).
BTAs are based on the Rand McNally
1992 Commercial Atlas & Marketing
Guide, 123rd Edition, at pages 38–39,
that identifies 487 BTAs based on the 50
States; it also includes the following
additional BTA-like areas: American
Samoa; Guam; Northern Mariana
Islands; Mayaguez/Aguadilla-Ponce,
Puerto Rico; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and
the United States Virgin Islands, for a
total of 493 BTAs. The Mayaguez/
Aguadilla-Ponce BTA-like area consists
of the following municipios: Adjuntas,
Aguada, Aguadilla, Anasco, Arroyo,
Cabo Rojo, Coamo, Guanica, Guayama,
Guayanilla, Hormigueros, Isabela,
Jayuya, Juana Diaz, Lajas, Las Marias,
Maricao, Maunabo, Mayaguez, Moca,
Patillas, Penuelas, Ponce, Quebradillas,
Rincon, Sabana Grande, Salinas, San
German, Santa Isabel, Villalba, and
Yauco. The San Juan BTA-like area
consists of all other municipios in
Puerto Rico. The BTA associated with
the Gulf of Mexico will not be
transitioned.
(b) Overlapping GSAs. When a
Geographic Service Area (GSA) overlaps
two or more BTAs:
(1) The proponents of the adjacent
BTAs may agree on how to transition a
GSA that overlaps their respective
BTAs.
(2) If an agreement has not been
reached between or among the
proponents of the adjacent BTAs:
(i) Each proponent must transition all
of the facilities associated with the GSA
that are inside the GSA and inside the
proponent’s BTA if all of the adjacent
BTAs are transitioning; or
(ii) The proponent of the BTA that is
transitioning must transition all of the
facilities associated with the GSA that

PO 00000

Frm 00049

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

35191

are within the GSA but outside the BTA,
if the adjacent BTA is not transitioning.
(c)(1) Proponent(s). The proponent or
co-proponent must:
(i) Be a BRS or EBS licensee or BRS
or EBS lessee;
(ii) Send a Pre-Transition Data
Request (see paragraph (d) of this
section) and a Transition Notice (see
paragraph (e) of this section) to every
BRS and EBS licensee in the BTA, using
the contact information in the
Commission’s Universal Licensing
System; and
(iii) Be first to file an Initiation Plan
(see paragraph (f) of this section) with
the Secretary of the Commission.
(2) Before filing an Initiation Plan,
BRS or EBS licensees or BRS or EBS
lessees may agree to be co-proponents.
After the Initiation Plan is filed the
proponent may accept a co-proponent at
its sole discretion.
(d) Pre-Transition Data Request. The
Pre-Transition Data Request must
include the potential proponent’s full
name, postal mailing address, contact
person, e-mail address, and phone and
fax numbers.
(1) BRS and EBS licensees that receive
a Pre-Transition Data Request must
provide the following information to the
potential proponent within 45 days of
receiving the Pre-Transition Data
Request:
(i) The BRS or EBS licensee’s full
name, postal mailing address, contact
person, e-mail address, and phone and
fax number.
(ii) The location (by street address and
by geographic coordinates) of every
constructed EBS receive site that, as of
the date of receipt of the Pre-Transition
Data Request, is entitled to a
replacement downconverter (see
§ 27.1233(a)). The response must:
(A) Specify whether the
downconverting antenna is mounted on
a structure attached to the building or
on a free-standing structure;
(B) Specify the approximate height
above ground level of the
downconverting antenna; and
(C) Specify, if known, the adjacent
channel D/U ratio that can be tolerated
by any receiver(s) at the receive site.
(iii) The location (street address and
geographic coordinates) of the main
station or booster serving each EBS
receive site entitled to protection,
including:
(A) The make and model of the
antenna for that main station or booster,
along with the radiation pattern if it is
not included within the Commission’s
database;
(B) The ground elevation, above mean
sea level (AMSL), of the building or
antenna supporting structure on which

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

35192

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

the main station or booster transmission
antenna is installed;
(C) The height above ground level
(AGL) of the center of radiation of the
transmission antenna;
(D) The orientation of the main lobe
of the transmission antenna;
(E) Any mechanical beamtilt or
electrical beamtilt not reflected in the
radiation pattern provided or included
within the Commission’s database;
(F) The bandwidth of each channel or
subchannel, the emission type for each
channel or subchannel, and the EIRP
measured in the main lobe for each
channel or subchannel; and
(G) The make and model of the
receive antenna installed at that site,
along with the radiation pattern if it is
not included within the Commission’s
database.
(iv) The number and identification of
EBS video programming or data
transmission tracks the EBS licensee is
entitled to receive in the MBS and
whether the EBS licensee will accept
fewer tracks in the MBS (see
§ 27.1233(b)).
(v) Whether it will seek or has sought
a waiver from the Commission as a
Multichannel Video Programming
Distributor (MVPD).
(2) BRS and EBS licensees that do not
respond to the Pre-Transition Data
Request within 45 days of its receipt
may not object to the Transition Plan.
(e) The Transition Notice. The
potential proponent(s) must send a
Transition Notice to all BRS and EBS
licensees in the BTA(s) being
transitioned. The potential proponent(s)
must include the following information
in the Transition Notice:
(1) The potential proponent(s)’s full
name; postal mailing address, contact
person, e-mail address, and phone and
fax numbers;
(2) The identification of the BRS and
EBS licensees that will be transitioned;
(3) Copies of the most recent response
to the Pre-Transition Data Request for
each participant in the process; and
(4) A certification that the potential
proponent(s) has the funds available to
pay the reasonably expected costs of the
transition based on the information in
the Pre-Transition Data Request.
(f) Initiation Plan. To initiate a
transition, a potential proponent(s) must
submit an Initiation Plan to the
Commission at the Office of the
Secretary in Washington, DC within 30
months of July 19, 2006.
(1) An Initiation Plan must contain
the following information:
(i) A list of the BTA(s) that the
proponent(s) is transitioning;
(ii) A list by call sign of all of the BRS
and EBS licensees in the BTA(s) that are
being transitioned;

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

(iii) A ‘‘best estimate’’ of when the
transition will be completed;
(iv) A statement indicating that an
agreement has been concluded with the
proponent(s) of the adjoining or
adjacent BTA(s) when a licensee or
licensees in an adjacent or adjoining
BTA must be transitioned to avoid
interference to licensees in the BTA
being transitioned, or in lieu of an
agreement, the proponent(s) may
provide an alternative means of
transitioning the licensees in an
adjacent or adjoining BTA;
(v) A statement indicating that an
agreement has been concluded with
another proponent(s) on how a BTA will
be transitioned when there are two or
more proponents seeking to transition
the same BTA and they agree to be coproponents before the Initiation Plan is
filed, and a statement that identifies the
specific portion of the BTA each
proponent will be responsible for
transitioning; and
(vi) A certification that the proponent
or joint proponents have the funds
available to pay the reasonable expected
costs of the transition based on the
information contained in the PreTransition Data Request (see paragraph
(d) of this section).
(2) A proponent, at its own discretion,
may withdraw from transitioning a BTA
by notifying the Commission and all
affected BRS and EBS licensees in the
BTA that it is withdrawing the Initiation
Plan.
(3) A proponent may amend an
Initiation Plan after it has been filed
with the Commission to correct minor
or inadvertent errors.
(g) MVPD waiver requests. MVPD
licensees that seek to opt-out of the
transition must seek a waiver within 60
days after the proponent files the
Initiation Plan or on or before April 30,
2007, whichever occurs first.
■ 18. Amend § 27.1232 by revising
paragraph (a), the introductory text of
paragraph (b), and (c)(1), the first
sentence of paragraph (d)(1), and the
first two sentences of paragraph (d)(2),
and adding new paragraphs (d)(3) and
(d)(4) to read as follows:
§ 27.1232

Planning the Transition.

(a) The Transition Planning Period.
The Transition Planning Period is a 90day period that commences on the day
after the proponent(s) files the Initiation
Plan with the Commission.
(b) The Transition plan. The
proponent(s) must provide to each BRS
and EBS licensee within a BTA, a
Transition Plan no later than 30 days
prior to the conclusion of the Transition
Planning Period.
*
*
*
*
*

PO 00000

Frm 00050

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

(c) * * *
(1) Accept the counterproposal,
modify the Transition Plan accordingly,
and send the modified Transition Plan
to all EBS and BRS licensees in the
BTA;
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Safe harbor No. 1. This safe harbor
applies when the default high-power
channel assigned to each channel group
is authorized to operate after the
transition with the same transmission
parameters (coordinates, antenna
pattern, height of center radiation, EIRP)
as the downstream facilities before the
transition. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Safe harbor No. 2. This safe harbor
applies when an EBS licensee has
channel-shifted its single video
programming or data transmission track
to spectrum licensed to another
licensee. Under § 27.5(i)(2), that track
must be on the high-power channel
licensed to the EBS licensee upon
completion of the transition. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Safe harbor No. 3. This safe harbor
applies when a four-channel group is
shared among multiple licensees in a
given geographic area. Absent an
agreement otherwise, a proponent may:
(i) Secure a 6 MHz MBS channel for
each licensee in exchange for the nonMBS channels assigned to the group.
Following the channel swap(s)
necessary to secure those additional
MBS channels, the Transition Plan can
provide for the licensing of the
remaining channels in the LBS, UBS,
and Guard Bands on a pro rata basis
(with channel(s) in each segment being
disaggregated when and if necessary to
provide each with its pro rata share of
the spectrum in each segment);
(ii) Provide for pro rata segmentation
of the default MBS channel for the
group, provided that the proponent
commits to provide each of the licensees
with the technology necessary for its
EBS video programming or data
transmissions to be digitized,
transmitted and received utilizing the
provided bandwidth. The non-MBS
channels would be divided among the
sharing licensees on a pro rata basis
(with channel(s) in each segment being
disaggregated when and if necessary to
provide each with its pro rata share of
the spectrum in each segment); or
(iii) Assign the default MBS channel
assigned to the channel group to one of
the licensees, if that licensee is the only
one that elects to migrate video
programming or data transmission
tracks to the MBS. The remaining
spectrum assigned to the group may be

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
allocated among the licensees on a pro
rata basis, with the 6 MHz in the MBS
counting against that licensee’s portion.
To the extent necessary, the non-MBS
spectrum can be disaggregated when
and if necessary to provide each with its
pro rata share of the spectrum in each
segment. If the proponent chooses to
effectuate a channel swap to provide
more than one channel in the MBS, the
remaining channels assigned to the
group (after considering that one or
more LBS/UBS channels and associated
Transition Band channels will have
been swapped away to provide the
additional MBS channel) can be
allocated among the licensees on a pro
rata basis (with channel(s) in each
segment being disaggregated when and
if necessary to provide each with its pro
rata share of the spectrum in each
segment).
(4) Safe harbor No. 4. This safe harbor
applies when an EBS licensee uses one
or more of its channels for studio-totransmitter links. The proponent may
provide for one of the following options:
(i) The use of the LBS and/or UBS
band for the point-to-point transmission
of the EBS video or data (through
superchannelization of the licensee’s
contiguous LBS or UBS channels),
provided the proponent commits to
retune the existing point-to-point
equipment to operate on those channels
or to replace the existing equipment
with new equipment tuned to operate
on those channels and the proposal
complies with the LBS/UBS technical
and interference protection rules;
(ii) The migration of the EBS
programming to the MBS by retuning
the existing point-to-point equipment to
operate in the MBS or replacing it with
equipment tuned to operate in the MBS;
or
(iii) The replacement of the point-topoint link with point-to-point
equipment licensed to the EBS licensee
in alternative spectrum, so long as the
replacement facilities meet the
definition of ‘‘comparable facilities’’ set
out in § 101.75(b) of this chapter.
■ 19. Amend § 27.1233 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (b)(3)(ii) and
removing paragraph (c) and to read as
follows:

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

§ 27.1233 Reimbursement costs of
transitioning.

(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) A reception system was installed at
that site on or before the date the EBS
licensee receives its Pre-Transition Data
Request (see § 27.1231(d));
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

(ii) Adjacent Channel D/U Ratio. The
actual adjacent channel D/U must equal
or exceed the lesser of 0 dB or the actual
pre-transmission D/U ratio. However, in
the event that the receive site uses
receivers or is upgraded by the
proponent(s) as part of the Transition
Plan to use receivers that can tolerate
negative adjacent channel D/U ratios,
the actual adjacent channel D/U ratio at
such receive site must equal or exceed
–10 dB. Provided that the receive site
receiver is not upgraded and cannot
tolerate –10 dB, the adjacent channel D/
U ratio would be 0dB.
■ 20. Amend § 27.1235 by revising the
introductory text and paragraph (a) and
adding a new paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 27.1235

Post-transition notification.

The proponent(s) must certify to the
Commission at the Office of the
Secretary, Washington, DC, that the
Transition Plan has been fully
implemented.
(a) The notification must provide the
identification of the licensees that have
transitioned to the band plan in
§ 27.5(i)(2) and the specific frequencies
on which each licensee is operating.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) A BRS or EBS licensee must file
any objection to the post-transition
notification within 30 days from the
date the post-transition notification is
placed on Public Notice.
■ 21. Add §§ 27.1236 through 27.1239
to subpart M to read as follows:
§ 27.1236

Self-transitions.

(a) If an Initiation Plan is not filed
within 30 months of July 19, 2006 for
a BTA, BRS and EBS licensees in that
BTA may self-transition by relocating to
their default channel locations specified
in § 27.5(i)(2) and complying with
§§ 27.50(h), 27.53, 27.55 and 27.1221.
(b) To self-transition, a BRS or EBS
licensee must:
(1) Notify the Secretary of the
Commission on or before 90 days after
the Initiation Plan must be filed with
the Commission that it will selftransition (see paragraph (a) of this
section);
(2) Send a Self-Transition Notification
(see paragraph (c) of this section) to
other BRS and EBS licensees in the BTA
where the self-transitioning licensee’s
GSA geographic center point is located
that it is self-transitioning;
(3) Notify other licensees whose GSAs
overlap with the self-transitioning
licensee that it is self-transitioning.
(4) Address interference concerns
with other BRS and EBS licensees in the
BTA that are also self-transitioning;

PO 00000

Frm 00051

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

35193

(5) File a modification application
with the Commission, and
(6) Complete the self-transition within
57 months of July 19, 2006.
(c) Self-Transition Notification. The
Self-Transition Notification must
include the EBS licensee’s full name,
postal mailing address, contact person,
e-mail address, and phone and fax
numbers. A self-transitioning EBS
licensee must provide the following
information to all BRS and EBS
licensees located in the BTA where the
self-transitioning licensees GSA
geographic center point is located:
(1) The location (by street address and
by geographic coordinates) of every
constructed EBS receive site that, as of
the date the Self-Transition Notification
is sent, is entitled to a replacement
downconverter (see § 27.1233(a)). The
response must:
(i) Specify whether the
downconverting antenna is mounted on
a structure attached to the building or
on a free-standing structure;
(ii) Specify the approximate height
above ground level of the
downconverting antenna; and
(iii) Specify, if known, the adjacent
channel D/U ratio that can be tolerated
by any receiver(s) at the receive site.
(2) The location (street address and
geographic coordinates) of the main
station or booster serving each EBS
receive site entitled to protection,
including:
(i) The make and model of the
antenna for that main station or booster,
along with the radiation pattern if it is
not included within the Commission’s
database;
(ii) The ground elevation, above mean
sea level (AMSL), of the building or
antenna supporting structure on which
the main station or booster transmission
antenna is installed;
(iii) The height above ground level
(AGL) of the center of radiation of the
transmission antenna;
(iv) The orientation of the main lobe
of the transmission antenna;
(v) Any mechanical beamtilt or
electrical beamtilt not reflected in the
radiation pattern provided or included
within the Commission’s database;
(vi) The bandwidth of each channel or
subchannel, the emission type for each
channel or subchannel, and the EIRP
measured in the main lobe for each
channel or subchannel; and
(vii) The make and model of the
receive antenna installed at that site,
along with the radiation pattern if it is
not included within the Commission’s
database.
(3) The number and identification of
EBS video programming or data
transmission tracks the EBS licensee is

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

35194

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

§ 27.1237
costs.

Pro rata allocation of transition

(a) Self-transitions. EBS licensees that
self-transition may seek reimbursement
for their costs to replace eligible
downconverters (see § 27.1233(a)) and
to migrate video programming and data
transmission tracks (see § 27.1233(b))
from BRS licensees and lessees, EBS
lessees, and commercial EBS licensees
in the BTA where the center point of the
EBS licensee’s GSA is located. In
addition, BRS licensees and lessees,
EBS lessees, and commercial EBS
licensees in the LBS or UBS must
reimburse the self-transitioning EBS
licensee a pro rata share of the eligible
costs of transitioning EBS licensees,
based on the formula in paragraph (c) of
this section. Eligible costs are listed in
§ 27.1238.
(b) Proponent-driven transitions. BRS
licensees and lessees, entities that lease
EBS spectrum for a commercial
purpose, and commercial EBS licensees
must pay their own transition costs. In
addition, except for MVPD operators
that opt-out of the transition, BRS
licensees and lessees, EBS lessees, and
commercial EBS licensees in the LBS or
UBS must reimburse the proponent a
pro rata share of the eligible costs of
transitioning EBS licensees, based on
the formula in paragraph (c) of this
section. Eligible costs are listed in
§ 27.1238.
(c) Formula. The pro rata share shall
be based on the following formula:

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES

R=

L × LP
T × TP

(1) R equals the pro rata share;
(2) L equals the amount of spectrum
used by a BRS licensee or lessee or
commercial EBS licensee or lessee to
provide a commercial service, either
directly or through a lease agreement
with an EBS or BRS licensee;
(3) T equals the total amount of
spectrum licensed or leased for
commercial purposes in the BTA;
(4) LP equals the population of the
geographic service area or BTA served
by the BRS licensee or lessee or
commercial EBS licensee or lessee based
on the data in the 2000 United States
Census; and
(5) TP equals the population of the
BTA based on the data in the 2000
United States Census.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:59 Jun 16, 2006

Jkt 208001

Eligible costs.

(a) The costs listed in paragraphs (b)
through (f) of this section are eligible
costs.
(b) Pre-transition costs:
(1) Engineering/Consulting
(i) Evaluation of equipment;
(ii) RX site identification;
(iii) EBS Programming plan covering
the BTA;
(iv) Market Analysis (MHz per POP
Study);
(v) RF study (interference analysis);
and
(vi) Transition Plan creation and
support;
(2) Project management (may be
sourced external);
(3) Filing fees;
(4) Legal fees;
(5) Site acquisition fees-contractor;
and
(6) Arbitrator fee;
(c) Transmission facility—analog
conversion costs:
(1) Transmitter upgrading or retuning;
(2) Combiner re-tuning or new;
(3) Power divider/circulator adjacent
channel combiner hardware;
(4) STL/fiber relocation;
(5) Miscellaneous material costs
(including cabling and connectors);
(6) Contract labor:
(i) Tower;
(ii) Building modifications;
(iii) Electrical/HVAC; and
(iv) Mechanical
(7) Engineering:
(i) Structural; and
(ii) Pathway Interference Analysis.
(8) Equipment disposal/shipping
(9) Program Management (third party
or internal costs to manage the BTA
conversion); and
(10) Travel and Per Diem Cost.
(d) Transmission facility-digital
conversion costs:
(1) New transmitter or retuning;
(2) Digital compression equipment-TX
site (including encoders, controller, and
software);
(3) Combiners-new or retune;
(4) Power divider/circulator adjacent
channel combiner hardware;
(5) Cabinets, cabling, feedline and
connectors;
(6) STL—fiber digital upgrade;
(7) Installation cost due to adding
additional broadcast antenna (4 or more
digital channels required);
(8) Contract labor:
(i) Tower;
(ii) Building modifications;
(iii) Electrical/HVAC; and
(iv) Mechanical.
(9) Proof of performance testing (may
be contracted);
(10) Engineering:
(i) Structural; and

PO 00000

Frm 00052

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

(ii) Path engineering analysis.
(11) Equipment disposal/shipping;
(12) Training;
(13) Program management (third party
or internal costs to manage BTA
conversion);
(14) Travel and per diem costs.
(e) Qualified receive-sites onlymodifications (analog and digital):
(1) Digital set top boxes;
(2) Downconverters (with filtering)/
antennas (replacement downconverters);
(3) Contract labor:
(i) Antenna change/DC install
(antenna change may be necessary); and
(ii) Electrical; and mechanical
(4) Project management (third party or
internal costs to manage the BTA
conversion);
(5) Proof of performance testing (may
be contracted);
(6) Mini headend (cost effective
distribution method):
(i) Modulators, combiners;
(ii) Equipment racks; and
(iii) Amplifiers
(7) Cable, connectors; and
(8) Training.
(f) Miscellaneous transition fees. (1)
Filing fees;
(2) Arbitrator fee; and
(3) Legal fees.
§ 27.1239

Reimbursement obligation.

(a) A proponent may request
reimbursement from BRS licensees and
lessees, EBS lessees, and commercial
EBS licensees in a BTA after the
Transition Notification has been filed
with the Secretary of the Commission
and the proponent has accumulated the
documentation to substantiate the full
and accurate cost of the transition. A
self-transitioning licensee may request
reimbursement from BRS licensees and
lessees, EBS lessees, and commercial
EBS licensees in a BTA where its GSA
geographic center point is located after
it has completed the self-transition and
has filed a modification application
with the Commission and has
accumulated the documentation to
substantiate the full and accurate cost of
the transition.
(b) If a license is assigned, transferred,
partitioned, or disaggregated, all parties
to the assignment, transfer,
disaggregation, or partition are jointly
and severally liable for paying the
reimbursement obligation until that
obligation is paid.
[FR Doc. E6–9276 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM

19JNR1

ER19JN06.000

§ 27.1238

entitled to receive in the MBS (see
§ 27.1233(b)).