REL Southwest OMB Supporting Statement (B#2) - Studies 1.1.1 1.1.2

REL Southwest OMB Supporting Statement (B#2) - Studies 1.1.1 1.1.2.doc

Priority Needs for Educational Research Needs of the Southwest and Establishing a Baseline for REL Southwest Performance

OMB: 1850-0829

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

REL Southwest Contract No. ED-06-CO-0017

B. COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS


1. Describe (including a numerical estimate) the potential respondent universe and any sampling or other respondent selection methods to be used. Data on the number of entities (e.g., establishments, State and local government units, households, or persons) in the universe covered by the collection and in the corresponding sample are to be provided in tabular form for the universe as a whole and for each of the strata in the proposed sample. Indicate expected response rates for the collection as a whole. If the collection has been conducted previously, include the actual response rate achieved during the last collection.


The respondents participating in this survey will consist of educators/educational administrators, parents and business leaders from the REL Southwest five state region (including Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas). According to 2006 estimates from Market Data Retrieval’s (MDR) 2005-2006 Educator Database, a prominent national level educator data collector, the total count of educators (having the specific titles selected for this study) is 563,947.


The chart below details the potential respondent universe as a whole as well as for each educator title that will be targeted in the proposed study. The response rate for the data collection is estimated to be at 5%. Because this is a new project, no previous collection existed, so no statistical response rate achieved during a previous collection can be provided.


Market Data Retrieval’s Educator 2005-2006 Population Database

AR

LA

NM

OK

TX

Total Populations

Superintendents

253

75

92

566

1,070

2,056

Asst. Superintendent

49

31

29

52

400

561

Special Education Director

245

85

92

509

976

1,907

Curriculum Director

288

156

83

417

1,061

2,005

Testing/Assessment Director

138

43

35

251

467

934

ELL/Bilingual Director

75

23

36

118

443

695

Principal/Assistant Principal

1,815

2,725

1,152

2,296

16,311

24,299

Teachers

36,737

55,473

20,297

46,011

338,178

496,696

Librarian

925

1,131

567

1,033

6,326

9,982

Higher Education 2 YR (Deans, Administrators and Dept. Heads)

520

568

483

645

3,326

5,542

Higher Education 4 YR (Deans, Administrators and Dept. Heads)

1,111

1,776

522

1,360

5,633

10,402

Higher Education Grad (Deans, Administrators and Dept. Heads)

756

1,570

497

1,127

4,918

8,868

Total Count

 

 

 

 

 

563,947


*Note that true population counts for parents and business leaders are estimates only. However, these are groups that we will be targeting on a scale that is sufficient to reliably project to their respective populations across REL Southwest’s five state region.


2. Describe procedures for the collection of information including: statistical methodology for stratification and sample selection; estimation procedure; degree of accuracy needed for the purpose described in the justification; unusual problems requiring specialized sampling procedures; and any use of periodic (less frequent than annual) data collection cycles to reduce burden.


A combination of secondary and primary research efforts will be undertaken for this study. The secondary research will be conducted prior to launching the primary research. Through secondary research, most current estimates of the actual constituent populations will be identified for each of the 5 REL Southwest states. This secondary research will be used to guide the stratification and development of quotas to be used in the primary methodology. Data collection will occur every year. In the primary phase, a survey will be deployed to fulfill project research objectives. The survey will be deployed via the internet. For identified constituents who do not have access to the internet, a phone survey may be deployed to meet quota targets if necessary. For example, a phone survey may be deployed to meet survey quota targets in hard to reach places in hurricane-impacted Louisiana or rural schools/districts or with parents who do not have access to the internet and thus cannot complete an online survey.

  • Stratified random sampling will be done of the entire survey population to ensure collection of statistically projectable data that is representative of all educators involved in elementary, secondary and higher education in the southwest.

  • Stratified random sampling will also be done to ensure collection of statistically projectable data that is representative of all parents and business leaders involved in elementary, secondary and higher education in the southwest.

  • Survey sampling and quotas will be set to fulfill 95% confidence level limits (at +/-10% confidence interval).

  • Sampling of the populations will be done using the below listed two part formula. The first part calculates the sample size as though the population is infinite. This is defined as n. The second part corrects for the population size.
    1) n=(z/m)^2*p*(1-p) where:

  • z is the standard normal statistic

  • m is the desired error

  • p is the probability of the outcome

  • ^2 means "the square of the resulting number"

2) n'=n/(1-n/N) where:

  • n is the result from the equation in part 1) above

  • N is the population size


  • Accuracy of sampling will be maintained by using educator contact information that is accurate and reflects accurate information for 2006, from renowned and prestigious list providers such as Quality Education Data (QED) and Market Data Retrieval (MDR).

  • Below are stratification details for each targeted educator title. All sample counts have been based on Market Data Retrieval’s Educator 2005-2006 Population Count.


(Chart note: *MDR Population = Market Data Retrieval’s 2005-2006 Educator Database)


Segment

Sub Segment

Title

AR

LA

NM

OK

TX

Sub Total

Total Sample Required

Pre K-12

Rural

Superintendents

67

31

44

80

85

_

307

 

Rural

*MDR Population

p=217

p=45

p=80

p=481

p=742

_

 

 

Urban/Suburban

Superintendents

25

22

11

45

74

_

177

 

Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=34

p=29

p=12

p=83

p=321

_

 

 

Rural

Special Education Director

66

34

44

79

84

_

307

 

Rural

*MDR Population

p=207

p=51

p=81

p=426

p=669

_

 

 

Urban/Suburban

Special Education Director

26

25

10

44

73

_

178

 

Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=36

p=33

p=11

p=80

p=298

_

 

 

Rural

Curriculum Director

68

48

40

74

83

_

313

 

Rural

*MDR Population

p=231

p=95

p=67

p=326

p=620

_

 

 

Urban/Suburban

Curriculum Director

35

37

14

47

79

_

212

 

Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=54

p=60

p=16

p=91

p=431

_

 

 

Rural

Testing/Assessment Director

53

21

23

67

74

_

238

 

Rural

*MDR Population

p=118

p=27

p=30

p=222

p=318

_

 

 

Urban/Suburban

Testing/Assessment Director

17

14

5

22

58

_

116

 

Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=20

p=16

p=5

p=28

p=145

_

 

 

Rural

ELL/Bilingual Director

36

12

23

48

73

_

192

 

Rural

*MDR Population

p=56

p=13

p=30

p=94

p=306

_

 

 

Urban/Suburban

ELL/Bilingual Director

15

9

6

19

56

_

105

 

Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=17

p=10

p=6

p=23

p=133

_

 

 

Rural

Principal/Asst. Principal

88

88

83

89

94

_

442

 

Rural

*MDR Population

p=992

p=1,042

p=592

p=1,175

p=3,558

_

 

 

Urban/Suburban

Principal/Asst. Principal

86

91

80

89

95

_

441

 

Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=790

p=1,681

p=487

p=1,116

p=12,541

_

 


Rural

Teachers (all grades, all subject areas, all pre-school, elementary, middle, high)

96

96

95

96

96

_

479

 

Rural

*MDR Population

p=20,988

p=19,985

p=9,620

p=23,216

p=73,760

_

 

 

Urban/Suburban

Teachers (all grades, all subject areas, all pre-school, elementary, middle, high)

95

96

95

96

96

_

478

 

Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=15,212

p=35,462

p=9,355

p=22,692

p=260,189

_

 

 

Rural/Urban/Suburban

Librarian

87

89

82

88

95

_

441

 

Rural/Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=913

p=1,131

p=535

p=1,030

p=6,242

_

 

Higher Education

Rural/Urban/Suburban

Higher Education 2 Year Colleges (College Department Chair, Dean, College Admissions Director, College Student Affairs Director)

81

82

79

84

93

_

419

 

Rural/Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=503

p=568

p=426

p=645

p=3,291

_

 

 

Rural/Urban/Suburban

Higher Education 4 Year and Graduate Colleges (College Department Chair, Undergraduate/ Graduate Dean, College Admissions Director, College Student Affairs Director)

89

93

88

92

95

_

457


Rural/Urban/Suburban

*MDR Population

p=1,291

p=3,318

p=1,019

p=2,227

p=10,041

_

 

Pre K-12 and Higher Education

Rural

Parents

 

 

 

 

 

1,125

 

 

Urban/Suburban

Parents

 

 

 

 

 

1,125

 

 

Ethnicity - Caucasian

Parents

75

75

75

75

75

375

 

 

Ethnicity- Black/African-American

Parents

75

75

75

75

75

375

 

 

Ethnicity- Asian/Pacific Islander

Parents

75

75

75

75

75

375

 

 

Ethnicity- Hispanic

Parents

75

75

75

75

75

375

 

 

Ethnicity- Native American

Parents

75

75

75

75

75

375

 

 

Ethnicity- Multiracial

Parents

75

75

75

75

75

375

 

 

Education Level - Less than High School

Parents

 

 

 

 

 

1,125

 

 

Education Level - High School or more

Parents

 

 

 

 

 

1,125

 

 

Total Parents

Parents

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,250

 

Business Leaders in Rural/Urban/Suburban

Business Leaders

100

100

100

100

100

_

500

Total Surveys Completed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,052


3. Describe methods to maximize response rates and to deal with issues of non-response. The accuracy and reliability of information collected must be shown to be adequate for intended uses. For collections based on sampling, a special justification must be provided for any collection that will not yield “reliable” data that can be generalized to the universe studied.


Expected response rate is 5%.


Maximizing response rates:

  • Multiple email blasts will be sent if response rate is low.

  • Email invitation will be kept short and will provide only one link to the survey.

  • Email invitation will identify who we are and briefly define:

    • Purpose of study

    • Length of survey

    • Privacy statement

    • Short/concise instructions

    • Explanation of how we will use responses

    • Clarity of instructions, purpose and questions

  • Respondents will be informed that research is being conducted to aid the Department of Education in fulfilling its education research objectives.

  • Respondents will also be informed that participation in the survey is voluntary.

  • All respondents will be informed about the confidential nature of this survey and data collection and will be assured of the usage of this information for research purposes only.

  • Survey will include a limited number of questions to reduce time respondents will need to complete.

  • Majority of questions will be closed/multiple choice with limited number of open-ended questions.

  • The primary survey will be deployed via the internet. For identified constituents who do not have access to the internet, a phone survey may be deployed to meet quota targets. All data will be presented at 95% confidence level with +/-10% confidence interval.


Non-response issues:

  • If response rates for any specific population segment are found to be low, then those specific segments will be contacted by a phone survey to collect their responses and complete survey quotas.


Accuracy and Reliability:

  • Stratified random sampling will be done of the entire survey population to ensure collection of statistically projectable data that is representative of all educators, parents and business leaders involved in elementary, secondary and higher education in the southwest.

  • Accuracy of sampling will be maintained by using educator contact information data from renowned and prestigious list providers such as Quality Education Data (QED) and Market Data Retrieval (MDR).

  • Accuracy of data collection will be maintained by embedding multiple screeners and skip patterns within the survey. Doing so will help to ensure that only targeted respondents, who meet our selection criteria (such as professional title, current involvement in pre-K through Higher Education, etc.) are able to complete the survey.

  • Data cleaning” will be done when all data collection has been completed, and inconsistent or incomplete responses will not be included in the research analysis.


4. Describe any tests of procedures or methods to be undertaken. Testing is encouraged as an effective means of refining collections of information to minimize burden and improve utility. Tests must be approved if they call for answers to identical questions from 10 or more respondents. A proposed test or set of tests may be submitted for approval separately or in combination with the main collection of data.


The pilot is tentatively scheduled for January 4, 2007.


No pilot or data collection with more than 9 people will occur until OMB project approval has been granted. Therefore, pilot date is subject to change. (Please see pilot and data collection schedule on page 13 of Supporting Statement, Part A.)


A pilot of the survey will be conducted prior to launching the survey to the entire sample. In this pilot, data will be collected from less than 9 respondents and results will be reviewed to “minimize burden and improve utility” by testing the average time it takes to complete the survey using the online version and testing among a range of titles, to ensure that questions are clear and understandable to the person taking the survey; and to help ensure that the online survey taking process runs smoothly and without technical problems.


5. Provide the name and telephone number of individuals consulted on statistical aspects of the design and the name of the agency unit, contractor(s), grantee(s), or other person(s) who will actually collect and/or analyze the information for the agency.


Vendor name: Galloway Research

Vendor contact: John Ucab

Title: Director, Telephone Survey Department

Role: Responsible for monitoring client phone survey and ensuring that data collection is done according to client guidelines.

Phone: 210-734-4346


Vendor name: Market Data Retrieval

Vendor contact: Beth Shields

Title: Account Manager, Market Data Retrieval

Role: Responsible for providing contact information of educators, for data collection.

Phone: 312-345-4355

5


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleEstablishing a Baseline for SWREL Performance and Identifying Customer Needs: Project Outline V
AuthorNitin Sharma
Last Modified ByDoED
File Modified2006-10-19
File Created2006-10-19

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy