Distribution of Offsite Consequence Analysis Information under Section 112(r)(7)(H) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (Renewal)

ICR 200610-2050-001

OMB: 2050-0172

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2007-01-09
ICR Details
2050-0172 200610-2050-001
Historical Active 200309-2050-002
EPA/OLEM 1981.03
Distribution of Offsite Consequence Analysis Information under Section 112(r)(7)(H) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (Renewal)
Extension without change of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved with change 01/11/2007
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 11/27/2006
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
01/31/2010 36 Months From Approved 01/31/2007
5,220 0 4,417
9,595 0 15,840
100 0 1,000

This information collection request (ICR) supports the final rule, Accidental Release Prevention Requirements; Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act Section 112(r)(7); Distribution of Off-Site Consequence Analysis Information, under CAA section 112(r) as amended by the Chemical Safety Information, Site Security, and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act (P.L.106-40). CAA section 112(r)(7) required EPA to promulgate reasonable regulations and appropriate guidance to provide for the prevention and detection of accidental releases and for responses to such releases. The regulations include requirements for submittal of a risk management plan (RMP) to EPA. The RMP includes information on offsite consequence analyses (OCA) as well as other elements of the risk management program. EPA has made all RMP data except the OCA information available to the public on the Internet through a system called RMP*Info. The final rule will provide access to OCA information for governmental officials and the members of the public. This ICR includes the burden placed on the members of the public requesting OCA information (providing personal identification and sign-in at federal reading rooms). This ICR also includes burden on state and local officials deciding to obtain OCA information (must submit a written request to EPA for OCA information and may provide reading rooms for the public to view OCA information for local facilities).

US Code: 42 USC 7412(r) Name of Law: null
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  71 FR 40093 07/14/2006
71 FR 67558 11/22/2006
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 5,220 4,417 0 30 773 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 9,595 15,840 0 0 -6,245 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 100 1,000 0 0 -900 0
No
No
There is an adjustment decrease in burden and costs from the previous ICR. This is due to using actual data for of the state and local officials requesting OCA data and the public visiting reading rooms. The previous ICR estimated that all 50 states plus U.S. territories and D.C. and at least 1,000 of the 1,500 active LEPCs will be requesting OCA data. However, EPA only received requests for OCA data fro 9 LEPCs and 240 state officials in the past three years. The public burden and costs have also decreased for the previous ICR, due to the actual number of people that have visited the federal, state and local reading rooms.

$150,000
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Sicy Jacob 202 564-8019 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
11/27/2006


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy