Obsolescent Parts survey

OMB Control Number:
Expiration Date: --/--/--

DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE ASSESSMENT:
Nonrecurring Cost Metrics Survey

RESPONSE TO THIS SURVEY IS REQUIRED BY LAW
A response to this survey is required by law (50 U.S.C. app. Sec. 2155). Failure to respond can result in a maximum fine of $10,000, imprisonment
of up to one year, or both. Information furnished herewith is deemed confidential and will not be published or disclosed except in accordance with
Section 705 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C App. Sec. 2155). Section 705 prohibits the publication or disclosure of
this information unless the President determines that its withholding is contrary to the national defense. Information will not be shared with any nongovernment entity, other than in aggregate form. The information will be protected pursuant to the appropriate exemptions from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), should it be the subject of a FOIA request.
Not withstanding any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
BURDEN ESTIMATE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENT
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information to BIS Information Collection Officer, Room 6883,
Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project (OMB Control No. 0694-0119), Washington, D.C. 20503.
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act

1

Section II
Scope of the Assessment
With the success and universal acceptance of the DMEA Nonrecurring Cost Metrics for Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages
(DMSMS) Resolutions originally published in 1999, DMEA is interested in updating the metrics with more current data. There have been so many
changes in technology and production processes since then, that the metrics are in need of reflecting the current costs associated with these
changes. In addition, there has been significant refinement of the resolution categories that also need to be included in the update.
DMEA is asking that your organization participate in a survey to update the cost metrics. The attached spreadsheet contains several tabbed
sheets. Each sheet relates to a commonly used resolution. After you complete and submit the survey, it will be combined with other organizations’
submittals and used to establish a consensus of what the new metrics should include and how we will proceed in developing the new cost.

Your company/organization must report the resolution costs for all DMSMS redesigns for 2006-2008 and the average cost for all other
resolutions during that time. Some organizations may not have a formal DMSMS program and we recognize that this survey is not
limited to DMSMS resolutions. Your company/organization may not call them DMSMS resolutions, therefore any of the following are
example items triggered by an obsolete, hard-to-find, or no-bids are applicable:
Engineering change proposals
Non-standard part requests
Substitute part requests
Alternate part drawing or bill of material updates
Request for technical assistance to qualify alternate part
Supply Item Change Requests
Time Compliance Technical Orders
No-bid logistics and engineering requests
DLA request for engineering (339) for alternate, replacement, or substitute parts
Research conducted to source obsolete parts
The costs associated with the above items should be reported.
Your participation is critical to ensuring that the legacy of these useful cost factors is maintained and that they continue to be the
“gold standard” in DMSMS cost analysis.
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act

2

Section III
Table of Contents
Cover
Page
I
Scope of the Assessment
II
Table of Contents
III
General Instructions
IV
1.a-c Organization/Company Information
Reclamation
2
Alternate
3
4.a-d Substitute
Aftermarket Manufacturing
5
Emulation
6
7.a-g Redesign
8.a-e Other Resolutions
Certification Page
9
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act

3

Section IV
General Instructions
Your company is required to complete this survey using an Excel template, which can be downloaded from the BIS website. At your
request, BIS staff will e-mail the Excel survey template directly to your company. For your convenience, a PDF version of the survey is
A. available on the BIS website to aid internal data collection. PLEASE DO NOT submit the PDF version of your company’s response to
BIS.
B. For the purposes of this survey, all incidents should be reported based on the calendar year.
Questions related to this questionnaire should be directed to:

C.

Christopher Nelson, Trade and Industry Analyst, [email protected], (202) 482-4727
Teresa Telesco, Trade and Industry Analyst, [email protected], (202) 482-4959
For information on OTE’s defense industrial base surveys, please contact:
Brad Botwin, Director, Industrial Studies, at [email protected] or (202) 482-4060

D. Upon completion, review and certification of the survey, transmit the survey via e-mail to [email protected].
For letter correspondence to the Office of Technology Evaluation (OTE), please write to:
Brad Botwin, Director, Industrial Studies
Office of Technology Evaluation, Room 1093
E. U.S. Department of Commerce
1401 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20230
Please do not submit completed surveys to this address; all surveys must be submitted electronically.
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act

4

Section 1.a
Company/Organization Information
Company/Organization Name
Street Address
City
State
Zip Code
Website
Phone Number
Fax Number
Primary point(s) of contact regarding this survey's completion.
Name(s)
Title
Phone Number

State

E-mail Address

Comments:
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act

5

Section 1.b
System/Program Information
Indicate the system and the type of system your company/organization has responsibility for:
A.
System
Type of System
List the platform(s) and platform type(s) that this system is included in. You may include multiple
platforms per platform type.
Platform(s)
Type of Platform
1.
2.
3.
B. 4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act

6

Section 1.c

Number of Resolutions
2006
2007
2008
Be sure to review the 'Scope of the Assessment' page to ensure you
are accurately accounting for all relevant incidents.

For 2006-2008, indicate how many resolution incidents were
performed for the system included in this survey:

Comments:
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act

7

Section 2

Reclamation
Reclamation takes DMSMS parts from marginal or out-of-service equipment or, when economical, from equipment that is in a long
Definition:
or potential excess position. This assumes the end item has not been transferred to Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service
(DRMS) for disposal.
Provide the average cost and number of incidents common to all platforms for the following cost elements, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
Shipping
Refurbishment
Testing
A.
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
0
$
0
$
0
Provide average additional cost elements that pertain to a particular platform, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Description of Cost
Platform Type
Platform(s)
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
B.

C. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

8

Section 3

Alternate
Alternate sources may include a smaller company that might undertake production that is no longer profitable for a larger
Definition:
company. The buyer must ensure that the alternate source is providing certified parts.
Provide the average cost and number of incidents common to all platforms for the following cost elements, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
Shipping
Refurbishment
Testing
A.
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
0
$
0
$
0
Provide average additional cost elements that pertain to a particular platform, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Description of Cost
Platform Type
Platform(s)
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
B.

C. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

9

Section 4.a

Existing Substitute - Administrative
Existing substitute items may perform fully (in terms of form, fit, and function) in place of the DMSMS item. Substitute items may
Definition:
be further broken down to (from lower anticipated cost to higher anticipated cost). An administrative substitute involves clerical
changes only (i.e., company name change).
Provide the average cost and number of incidents common to all platforms for the following cost elements, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
Clerical Costs
Other cost (specify)
A.
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
0
$
0
$
0
Provide average additional cost elements that pertain to a particular platform, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Description of Cost
Platform Type
Platform(s)
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
B.

C. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

10

Section 4.b

Existing Substitute - Desktop
Existing substitute items may perform fully (in terms of form, fit, and function) in place of the DMSMS item. Substitute items may
Definition:
be further broken down to (from lower anticipated cost to higher anticipated cost). A desktop substitute involves engineering
evaluation of technical data package (TDP) suffices (i.e., use the high-reliability version of the same part).
Provide the average cost and number of incidents common to all platforms for the following cost elements, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
Engineering Evaluation
Technical Data Package Update
A. Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
0
$
0
$
0
Provide average additional cost elements that pertain to a particular platform, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Description of Cost
Platform Type
Platform(s)
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
B.

C. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

11

Section 4.c

Existing Substitute - Normal
Existing substitute items may perform fully (in terms of form, fit, and function) in place of the DMSMS item. Substitute items may
Definition:
be further broken down to (from lower anticipated cost to higher anticipated cost). A normal substitute involves validating a
known part candidate that requires engineering investigation, testing and update of TDP.
Provide the average cost and number of incidents common to all platforms for the following cost elements, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
Engineering Evaluation
Testing
Technical Data Package Update
A.
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
0
$
0
$
0
Provide average additional cost elements that pertain to a particular platform, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Description of Cost
Platform Type
Platform(s)
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
B.

C. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

12

Section 4.d

Existing Substitute - Complex
Existing substitute items may perform fully (in terms of form, fit, and function) in place of the DMSMS item. Substitute items may
be further broken down to (from lower anticipated cost to higher anticipated cost). A complex substitute involves selecting and
Definition:
validating a new part candidate that requires engineering investigation, F3I part testing, system testing, QCI testing, and update of
TDP.
Provide the average cost and number of incidents common to all platforms for the following cost elements, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
Engineering Evaluation
F3I Part Testing
Screening
System Testing
A.
Qualification Conformance Inspection (QCI) Testing
Technical Data Package Update
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
0
$
0
$
0
Provide average additional cost elements that pertain to a particular platform, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Description of Cost
Platform Type
Platform(s)
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
B.

C. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

13

Section 5

Aftermarket
Aftermarket manufacturing (or reverse engineering) seeks an aftermarket producer to obtain and maintain the design, equipment,
and process rights to manufacture the component after the original manufacturer either has ceased production or ceases
Definition:
production in the future. Ensure the manufacturer is qualified, by appropriate service authorities, to produce the part.
Provide the average cost and number of incidents common to all platforms for the following cost elements, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
Engineering Investigations
Testing
Technical Data Package Update
A.
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
0
$
0
$
0
Provide average additional cost elements that pertain to a particular platform, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Description of Cost
Platform Type
Platform(s)
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
B.

C. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

14

Section 6

Emulation
Emulation is a manufacturing process that produces a substitute form, fit, function, and interface (F3I) item for the unobtainable
materiel. Through microcircuit emulation, inventory reduction can be achieved because obsolete items can be replaced with stateDefinition:
of-the-art devices that emulate the original and can be manufactured and supplied on demand.
Provide the average cost and number of incidents common to all platforms for the following cost elements, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
Engineering Investigations
F3I Testing
Screening
System Testing
A.
Qualification Conformance Inspection (QCI) Testing
Technical Data Document Update
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
0
$
0
$
0
Provide average additional cost elements that pertain to a particular platform, if applicable.
2006
2007
2008
Description of Cost
Platform Type
Platform(s)
Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents Average Cost # of Incidents
B.

C. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

15

Section 7.a

Redesign - Minor A
Redesign involves designing a DMSMS item out of the system. A Minor Type A redesign specifically involves adding a wire or
Definition:
discrete component to an existing CCA. For example, adding a resistor to adjust the bias for an alternate component.
Special Instructions: Answer the following questions for your individual resolution incidents. Be sure to indicate the appropriate year of the resolution. If
you have more than six Redesigns of Minor Type A, contact:
Incident 1
Incident 2
Incident 3
Incident 4
Incident 5
Incident 6
Platform Type
A.
Platform(s)
B.
Year
C.
Reliability
D.
Enhancement(s)
Maintainability
Performance
E. Indicate percent of component re-use:
F. Were software updates required?
Provide the cost for each incident for the following cost elements, if applicable.
Program Management
Systems Engineering
Design Engineering
Other Engineering
Software Costs
CCA Testing
Environmental Testing
G.
System Qualification Tests
Platform Tests (e.g., flight tests, etc.)
Technical Data (documentation) Compilation
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
H. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

16

Section 7.b

Redesign - Minor B
Redesign involves designing a DMSMS item out of the system. A Minor Type B redesign specifically involves a re-layout of an
Definition:
existing CCA to accommodate a different package type or size.
Special Instructions: Answer the following questions for your individual resolution incidents. Be sure to indicate the appropriate year of the resolution. If
you have more than six Redesigns of Minor Type B, contact:
Incident 1
Incident 2
Incident 3
Incident 4
Incident 5
Incident 6
Platform Type
A.
Platform(s)
B.
Year
C.
Reliability
D.
Enhancement(s)
Maintainability
Performance
E. Indicate percent of component re-use:
F. Were software updates required?
Provide the cost for each incident for the following cost elements, if applicable.
Program Management
Systems Engineering
Design Engineering
Other Engineering
Software Costs
CCA Testing
Environmental Testing
G.
System Qualification Tests
Platform Tests (e.g., flight tests, etc.)
Technical Data (documentation) Compilation
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
H. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

17

Section 7.c

Redesign - Minor C
Redesign involves designing a DMSMS item out of the system. A Minor Type C redesign specifically involves re-manufacturing an
Definition:
exact F3I replacement card using the same design but more than 10% substitute components.
Special Instructions: Answer the following questions for your individual resolution incidents. Be sure to indicate the appropriate year of the resolution. If
you have more than six Redesigns of Minor Type C, contact:
Incident 1
Incident 2
Incident 3
Incident 4
Incident 5
Incident 6
Platform Type
A.
Platform(s)
B.
Year
C.
Reliability
D.
Enhancement(s)
Maintainability
Performance
E. Indicate percent of component re-use:
F. Were software updates required?
Provide the cost for each incident for the following cost elements, if applicable.
Program Management
Systems Engineering
Design Engineering
Other Engineering
Software Costs
CCA Testing
Environmental Testing
G.
System Qualification Tests
Platform Tests (e.g., flight tests, etc.)
Technical Data (documentation) Compilation
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
H. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

18

Section 7.d

Redesign - Minor D
Redesign involves designing a DMSMS item out of the system. A Minor Type D redesign specifically involves design of a new
Definition:
(replacement) F3I circuit card using state-of-the-art technology. For example, using a system on a chip to build a F3I replacement,
thus reducing the original component count.
Special Instructions: Answer the following questions for your individual resolution incidents. Be sure to indicate the appropriate year of the resolution. If
you have more than six Redesigns of Minor Type D, contact:
Incident 1
Incident 2
Incident 3
Incident 4
Incident 5
Incident 6
Platform Type
A.
Platform(s)
B.
Year
C.
Reliability
D.
Enhancement(s)
Maintainability
Performance
E. Indicate percent of component re-use:
F. Were software updates required?
Provide the cost for each incident for the following cost elements, if applicable.
Program Management
Systems Engineering
Design Engineering
Other Engineering
Software Costs
CCA Testing
Environmental Testing
G.
System Qualification Tests
Platform Tests (e.g., flight tests, etc.)
Technical Data (documentation) Compilation
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
H. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

19

Section 7.e

Redesign - Minor E
Redesign involves designing a DMSMS item out of the system. A Minor Type E redesign specifically involves design of a new F3I
Definition:
circuit card that could be used in multiple applications within the same system.
Special Instructions: Answer the following questions for your individual resolution incidents. Be sure to indicate the appropriate year of the resolution. If
you have more than six Redesigns of Minor Type E, contact:
Incident 1
Incident 2
Incident 3
Incident 4
Incident 5
Incident 6
Platform Type
A.
Platform(s)
B.
Year
C.
Reliability
D.
Enhancement(s)
Maintainability
Performance
E. Indicate percent of component re-use:
F. Were software updates required?
Provide the cost for each incident for the following cost elements, if applicable.
Program Management
Systems Engineering
Design Engineering
Other Engineering
Software Costs
CCA Testing
Environmental Testing
G.
System Qualification Tests
Platform Tests (e.g., flight tests, etc.)
Technical Data (documentation) Compilation
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
H. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

20

Section 7.f

Redesign - Major F1
Redesign involves designing a DMSMS item out of the system. A Major Type F involves redesign or technology refreshment using
Definition:
commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) technology. Type F1 insolves COTS replacement using existing host system interfaces (databus)
and architechtures.
Special Instructions: Answer the following questions for your individual resolution incidents. Be sure to indicate the appropriate year of the resolution. If
you have more than six Redesigns of Major Type F1, contact:
Incident 1
Incident 2
Incident 3
Incident 4
Incident 5
Incident 6
Platform Type
A.
Platform(s)
B.
Year
C.
Reliability
D.
Enhancement(s)
Maintainability
Performance
E. Indicate percent of component re-use:
F. Were software updates required?
Provide the cost for each incident for the following cost elements, if applicable.
Program Management
Systems Engineering
Design Engineering
Other Engineering
Software Costs
CCA Testing
Environmental Testing
G.
System Qualification Tests
Platform Tests (e.g., flight tests, etc.)
Technical Data (documentation) Compilation
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
H. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

21

Section 7.g

Redesign - Major F2
Redesign involves designing a DMSMS item out of the system. A Major Type F involves redesign or technology refreshment using
Definition:
commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) technology. Type F2 involves COTS replacement that requires modification to the host system
interfaces or architecture.
Special Instructions: Answer the following questions for your individual resolution incidents. Be sure to indicate the appropriate year of the resolution. If
you have more than six Redesigns of Major Type F2, contact:
Incident 1
Incident 2
Incident 3
Incident 4
Incident 5
Incident 6
Platform Type
A.
Platform(s)
B.
Year
C.
Reliability
D.
Enhancement(s)
Maintainability
Performance
E. Indicate percent of component re-use:
F. Were software updates required?
Provide the cost for each incident for the following cost elements, if applicable.
Program Management
Systems Engineering
Design Engineering
Other Engineering
Software Costs
CCA Testing
Environmental Testing
G.
System Qualification Tests
Platform Tests (e.g., flight tests, etc.)
Technical Data (documentation) Compilation
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Other cost (specify)
Total $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
H. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

22

Section 8.a
Other Resolutions
Specify any other resolutions your company/organization performed from 2006-2008.
Year
Platform Type
Platform(s)
Description of Cost

Average Cost

# of Incidents

A.
B. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

23

Section 8.b
Other Resolutions (cont.)
Specify any other resolutions your company/organization performed from 2006-2008.
Description of Cost
Year
Platform Type
Platform(s)

Average Cost

# of Incidents

A.
B. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

24

Section 8.c
Other Resolutions (cont.)
Specify any other resolutions your company/organization performed from 2006-2008.
Description of Cost
Year
Platform Type
Platform(s)

Average Cost

# of Incidents

A.
B. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

25

Section 8.d
Other Resolutions (cont.)
Specify any other resolutions your company/organization performed from 2006-2008.
Description of Cost
Year
Platform Type
Platform(s)

Average Cost

# of Incidents

A.
B. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

26

Section 8.e
Other Resolutions (cont.)
Specify any other resolutions your company/organization performed from 2006-2008.
Description of Cost
Year
Platform Type
Platform(s)

Average Cost

# of Incidents

A.
B. Indicate the average duration time for resolution (in weeks):
Comments:

27

Section 9
Certification
The undersigned certifies that the information herein supplied in response to this questionnaire is complete and correct to the best of
his/her knowledge. It is a criminal offense to willfully make a false statement or representation to any department or agency of the United
States Government as to any matter within its jurisdiction (18 U.S.C.A. 1001 (1984 & SUPP. 1197))
Company/Organization Name
Company's/Organization's Internet Address
Name of Authorizing Official
Title of Authorizing Official
E-mail Address
Phone Number and Extension
Date Certified
If POC is different from the above named, include below:
Point of Contact Name
Title of Point of Contact
E-mail Address
Phone Number and Extension
Would you like a free copy of the final report?
In the box below, please provide any additional comments or any other information you wish to include regarding your experience with
counterfeit products or other related issues.

How many hours did it take to complete this survey?
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act

28