Primary Caregiver Report (Appendix V)

Social and Character Development Research Program National Evaluation (KI)

SACD Appendix V_Primary Caregiver Report_fin

Primary Caregiver Report (Appendix V)

OMB: 1850-0792

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf


APPENDIX V


PRIMARY CAREGIVER REPORT ON STUDENTS





A. Parent and Teacher Involvement Measure


Citation: CPPRG (1991). Parent-Teacher Involvement Measure (Online). Available: http://www.fasttrackproject.org/


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Items:


  1. You asked your child’s teacher questions or made suggestions about your child.

  2. You helped your child at home with subjects (such as reading, math, science) that he/she is having difficulty with.

  3. You took your child to the library.

  4. You made sure that your child got his/her homework done.

  5. You volunteered at your child’s school.

  6. You called your child’s teacher.

  7. You wrote your child’s teacher a note or email.

  8. You were invited to attend a parent-teacher conference.

  9. You attended a parent-teacher conference.


Scale: 0: Never

1: Once or twice

2: Almost every week

3: More than once a week


Revisions and Notes:


    • Items 2 and 4 were constructed by IES/CDC.

    • (Reading, Math, Science)” was added to Item 2.

    • Item 7 did not contain a reference to email in the original version of the instrument.

  • Several items in the original measure were dropped because (a) of concerns about a primary caregiver’s ability to report about behaviors in those items, (b) of concerns about generalization to diverse populations, and (c) the items did not reflect the primary caregiver’s degree of involvement.

  • The original 5-point response scale for the selected items (Never, Once or twice a year, Almost every month, Almost every week, More than once per week) was based on the past year; this was changed to a 4-point response scale based on the past 30 days.




B. Social Competence


Citation: Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1999). Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems I: The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 631-647.


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Items:


  1. Can accept things not going his/her way.

  2. Copes well with failure.

  3. Accepts legitimate imposed limits.

  4. Expresses needs and feelings appropriately.

  5. Thinks before acting.

  6. Resolves peer problems on his/her own.

  7. Can calm down when excited or all wound up.

  8. Can wait in line patiently when necessary.

  9. Is very good at understanding other people’s feelings.

  10. Is aware of the effect of his/her behavior on others.

  11. Works well in a group.

  12. Plays by the rules of the game.

  13. Controls temper when there is a disagreement.

  14. Shares materials with others.

  15. Cooperates with peers without prompting.

  16. Is helpful to others.

  17. Listens to others’ points of view.

  18. Can give suggestions and opinions without being bossy.

  19. Acts friendly towards others.


Scale: 1: Never

2: Sometimes

3: Often

4: Almost Always


Revisions and Notes:


    • The original 5-point response scale (Not at all, A little, Moderately well, Well, Very well) was not time-dependent and was constructed for teacher report.

    • The time frame was changed to cover the child’s behavior in the past 30 days.

C. Responsibility Scale


Citation: IES/CDC constructed scale


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Items:


  1. Asks before borrowing or taking something

  2. Takes responsibility for own actions.

  3. Apologizes when he/she has done something wrong.

  4. Takes care of borrowed belongings or materials.

  5. Denies wrongdoing even when confronted with evidence.

  6. Tries to get away with things that he or she knows are wrong.

  7. Returns borrowed belongings or materials.

  8. Takes care of own things.


Scale: 1: Never

2: Sometimes

3: Often

4: Almost Always


Revisions and Notes:


    • The time frame is based on the child’s behavior in the past 30 days.



D. BASC Aggression Subscale


Citation: Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (1998). Behavioral Assessment System for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service Inc.


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Number of items: 13


Items:


The items in the Aggression Subscale are part of a copyrighted instrument and thus not displayed in this package. The scale consists of 13 items to which the respondent reports how often the child engages in physical, verbal, and relational aggressive acts. Items are rated on a scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 3 (Almost Always).



Revisions and Notes:


    • Items from the BASC are copyrighted. Permission required from the American Guidance Service for use and reproduction. Administration fee required.

E. BASC Conduct Problems Subscale


Citation: Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (1998). Behavioral Assessment System for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service Inc.


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Number of items: 11


Items:


The items in the Conduct Problems Subscale are part of a copyrighted instrument and thus not displayed in this package. The scale consists of 11 items to which the respondent reports how often the child engages in socially deviant and disruptive behaviors. Items are rated on a scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 3 (Almost Always).


Revisions and Notes:


    • Items from the BASC are copyrighted. Permission required from the American Guidance Service for use and reproduction. Administration fee required.

    • The original 4-point scale (Never, Sometimes, Often, Always) was based on the child’s behavior in the last 6 months; this was slightly reworded to a 4-point scale based on the past 30 days.




F. Altruism Scale, Primary Caregiver Version


Citation: Solomon, D., Battistich, V., Watson, M., Schaps, E., & Lewis, C. (2000). A six-district study of educational change: Direct and mediating effects of the Child Development Project. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 3-51.


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report, Teacher Report on Child (adapted from Child Report)


Number of items: 8


Items:


  1. Helped someone who was hurt.

  2. Cheered up someone who was feeling sad.

  3. Helped someone who was being picked on.

  4. Helped someone who fell down.

  5. Got help for someone who was hurt.

  6. Helped an older person.

  7. Stopped a kid from hurting another kid.

  8. Helped a younger child who was lost.


Scale: 0: Never

1: Sometimes

2: Often

3: Almost Always


Revisions and Notes:


  • This scale was developed as a child report, but has been adopted for use as a Primary Caregiver report for the SACD study.

  • Items for the child report were obtained from the authors for use in the Social and Character Development Evaluation only. For item and scale information, contact Dr. Victor Battistich, Division of Educational Psychology, Research, and Evaluation, College of Education, University of Missouri – St. Louis.




G. Alabama Parenting Questionnaire


Citation: Shelton, K.K., Frick, P.J., & Wootton, J. (1996). Assessment of parenting practices in families of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 317-329.


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Items:


  1. You let your child know when he/she is doing a good job with something.

  2. You reward or give something extra to your child for obeying you or behaving well.

  3. You compliment your child when he/she does something well.

  4. You praise your child if he/she behaves well.

  5. You hug or kiss your child when he/she has dome something well.

  6. You tell your child that you like it when he/she helps around the house.

  7. Your child fails to leave a note or let you know where he or she is going.

  8. Your child stays out in the evening past the time he/she is supposed to be home.

  9. Your child is out with friends you do not know.

  10. Your child goes out without a set time to be home.

  11. Your child is out after dark without an adult with him/her.

  12. You get so busy that you forget where your child is and what he or she is doing.

  13. You don’t check that your child comes home from school when he/she is supposed to.

  14. You forget to tell your child where you are going.

  15. Your child comes home from school more than an hour past the time you expect him/her.

  16. Your child is at home without adult supervision.


Scale: 1: Never

2: Sometimes

3: Often

4: Almost Always


Revisions and Notes:


    • Only 2 subscales from the original scale were selected: Positive Parenting and Poor Monitoring/Supervision.

    • Additional subscales dropped include Involvement, Inconsistent Discipline, Corporal Punishment, and Other Discipline Practices.

    • Minor wording changes were made to items 1 and 6.

    • The original 5-point response scale (Never…Always) was modified.




H. Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale


Citation: Matheny, A.P., Wachs, T.D., Ludwig, J.L., & Phillips, K. (1995). Bringing order out of chaos: Psychometric characteristics of the Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 16, 429-444.


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Items:


  1. There is very little commotion in our home.

  2. We can usually find things when we need them.

  3. We almost always seem to be rushed.

  4. We are usually able to stay on top of things.

  5. No matter how hard we try, we always seem to be running late.

  6. At home we can talk to each other without being interrupted.

  7. There is often a fuss going on at our home.

  8. No matter what our family plans, it usually doesn’t seem to work out.

  9. You can’t hear yourself think in our home.

  10. I often get drawn into other people’s arguments at home.

  11. Our home is a good place to relax.

  12. The telephone takes up a lot of our time at home.

  13. The atmosphere in our home is calm.

  14. First thing in the day, we have a regular routine at home.


Scale: 1: Strongly disagree

2: Disagree

3: Neither agree nor disagree

4: Agree

5: Strongly agree


Notes and Revisions:


    • Deleted one item: It’s a real zoo in our home.



I. Community Risks


Citation: Forehand, R., Brody, G.H., & Armistead, L., et al. (2000). The role of community risks and resources in the psychosocial adjustment of at-risk children: An examination across two community contexts and two informants. Behavior Therapy, 13, 395-414.


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Items:


1. Litter and trash pickup is a problem in the neighborhood.

2. In the neighborhood you can find groups of people who roam the streets and carry weapons.

3. Individuals or gangs fight in the neighborhood.

4. Fights in the neighborhood occur where people are injured or killed with guns or knives.

5. Drugs are sold and used by some people in the neighborhood.

6. Many houses and apartments in the neighborhood are in poor condition (e.g., dirty, bug infested).

7. Many people in the neighborhood live in houses or apartments that have a lot of people in a few

rooms.


Scale: 1: Not at all

2: A little

3: Somewhat

4: A lot


Revisions and Notes:


    • The original article used the items as a simple presence/absence checklist. For this evaluation, a 4-point response scale was used.

    • Items 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 represent item revisions due to concern over respondent reactivity. One item was deleted.



J. Community Resources


Citation: IES/CDC constructed scale


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Items:


  1. There are nearby libraries for children and families to go to

  2. There are safe outdoor parks for children to play in

  3. There is a community center in the neighborhood where children and their families can join in activities (such as a YMCA, boys and girls club, public community center)

  4. Health centers and/or health services are easily located in the neighborhood

  5. Programs are available in the neighborhood for kids and families to get involved in


Scale: 1: Not at all

2: A little

3: Somewhat

4: A lot


Revisions and Notes:




K. Child-Centered Social Control and Intergenerational Closure


Citation: Sampson, R.J., Morenoff, J.D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633-660.


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Items:


[Child-Centered Social Control]

In your neighborhood, how likely is it that the neighbors could be counted on to “do something” if the following things happened:


  1. Neighbors would do something if children were skipping school and hanging out on a street corner.

  2. Neighbors would do something if children were spray-painting graffiti on a local building.

  3. Neighbors would do something if children were showing disrespect to an adult.

  4. Neighbors would do something if a child was hurt.

  5. Neighbors would do something if a neighbor was in need.


Scale: 1: Very unlikely

2: Unlikely

3: Cannot judge

4: Likely

5: Very likely


[Intergenerational Closure]

  1. Parents in the neighborhood know their children’s friends

  2. There are adults in the neighborhood that kids can look up to

  3. Adults know the kids in the neighborhood.


Scale: 1: Not at all

2: A little

3: Somewhat

4: A lot


Notes and Revisions:


    1. The original 5-point response scales (Very likely, Likely, Neither likely nor unlikely, Unlikely, or Very unlikely) were revised.

    2. Two “filler” items were added to the Child-Centered Social Control reduce the negativity of the scale: [In your neighborhood, how likely is it that the neighbors could be counted on to “do something” if the following things happened?] A child was hurt; A neighbor was in need.

    3. Two items were dropped from the Intergenerational Closure scale.

L. Background Questionnaire


Citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Respondent: Primary Caregiver Report


Items:


  1. What is the child’s date of birth?

  2. Is this child of Hispanic or Latino origin?

  3. What is this child’s race? (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, White)

  4. What is your date of birth?

  5. Are you of Hispanic or Latino origin?

  6. What is your race? (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, White)

  7. What is the highest grade or year of school that you have completed?

8th grade or less

Some high school (but did not graduate)

High school equivalency (GED)

High school graduate

Vocational, trade, or business school after completing or leaving high school

Some college but did not receive a degree

Associates degree (AA or other 2-year degree)

Bachelor’s degree

Post-graduate education or degree

Other (specify)

  1. Which category best describes your employment?

Employed or self-employed full time

Employed or self-employed part time

Homemaker or caregiver

Out of work or unable to work

Student

Student and employed

Retired

Other (specify)

  1. What is your marital status?

Single

Married

Separated

Divorced

Widowed

Living together

Other (specify)

  1. What is your relationship to this child?

  2. Does the child live in one or multiple households?

  3. Does this child live with you in your household?

  4. Who lives with you in this household and how are they related to the child?

  5. In all, how many people live in your household?

  6. What is the highest grade or year of school that anyone in your household, including yourself, has completed?

  7. What was your total household income from all sources before taxes in 2003?

Under $5,000

$5,000 to $9,999

$10,000 to $19,999

$20,000 to $29,000

$30,000 to $39,999

$40,000 to $49,999

$50.000 to $59,000

$60,000 to $69,000

$70,000 or more


Revisions and Notes:

14

File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSocial and Character Development
Authortamara.haegerich
Last Modified ByDoED
File Modified2006-12-20
File Created2006-12-20

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy