ED Response on Response Rates for Study (OMB Q8)

TABLE 1 (continued)

comparison of response rates fall 2004 through spring 2006

(Based on Consent Children)

		Teacher Report on Students (%)					Teacher Report on Classroom and School (%)					Primary Caregiver Report (%)
		Fall ‘04	Spring ‘05	Fall ‘05	Spring ‘06		Fall ‘04	Spring ‘05	Fall ‘05	Spring ‘06		Fall ‘04	Spring ‘05	Fall ‘05	Spring ‘06
Buffalo		94	99	100	100		95	92	98	94		89	75	83	72
Chicago		95	98	94	100		88	84	91	86		92	77	77	74
Maryland		100	100	94	100		92	96	97	97		96	87	89	88
North Carolina		96	99	97	100		84	79	92	89		86	80	83	82
NYC 14		94	97	99	99		96	96	98	100		73	79	81	71
Rochester		97	100	99	100		94	96	95	96		92	85	85	80
Tennessee		98	100	98	100		89	96	91	92		95	81	90	83
All Sites		96	99	98	100		92	93	96	94		86	80	84	79

Note: Fall 2005 and Spring 2006 based on both Cohort 1 & 2 schools

comparison of response rates fall 2004 through spring 2006 (continued)

(Based on Consent Children)

	Child Report (%)					Principal Interview (%)
	Fall ‘04	Spring ‘05	Fall ‘05	Spring ‘06		Fall ‘04	Spring ‘05	Fall ‘05*	Spring ‘06
Buffalo	93	98	99	96		100	100	100	100
Chicago	95	93	92	92		100	100	100	100
Maryland	96	100	99	100		100	100	100	100
North Carolina	93	98	99	98		100	100	100	100
NYC 14	97	96	97	92		100	100	100	100
Rochester	90	96	98	97		100	100	100	100
Tennessee	92	92	93	94		100	100	100	100
All Sites	94	95	97	96		100	100	100	100

*Principal interview only at Cohort 2 schools