Upon EPA's next
request for OMB's approval, EPA should address the public comments
submitted on the information collection associated with this rule.
In particular, EPA should address the National Mining Association
comments on the burden estimates and consultation with a broader
sample of affected industries.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
01/31/2008
01/31/2008
07/31/2008
37,690
0
37,690
75,929
0
75,929
8,932,000
0
8,932,000
The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing revisions to the definition of solid
waste that would exclude certain hazardous secondary materials from
regulation under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended. Specifically, EPA is proposing to
amend 40 CFR Part 261 to provide that hazardous secondary materials
reclaimed under the control of the generator are not solid wastes
if specified conditions are met. EPA also is proposing that
hazardous secondary materials that are generated and then
transferred to another person for the purpose of reclamation are
not solid waste, provided that specified conditions are met. In
addition, EPA is proposing requirements for the export of excluded
materials, as specified. Finally, EPA is proposing other amendments
to address particular issues (e.g., it is proposing standards in
Part 260 to enable a person to apply to EPA for a formal
determination that a material is clearly not discarded and
therefore not a solid waste). The purpose of the proposed
amendments is to encourage recycling and resource conservation and
to respond to several court decisions concerning the definition of
solid waste. The proposed action is a supplement to the Agency's
proposal of October 28, 2003 (68 FR 61558).
US Code:
42 USC 6921-6924 Name of Law: Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976
The proposed rule would place
necessary conditions on generators and reclaimers in managing the
excluded hazardous materials. The proposed paperwork requirements
would result in a burden of 11,645 hours to respondents annually.
However, the rule would relieve these respondents of existing RCRA
paperwork requirements in handling the excluded material, resulting
in a savings to them. As shown in the ICR supporting statement, EPA
estimates that these savings would more than offset the burden of
the proposed paperwork requirements. No change in burden other than
the placehold of 1 hour/$1 has been submitted with this ICR since
the rule is currently at the proposal stage and the burden
associated with this rule will not go into effect until the rule
goes final.
$51,395
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
David Eberly 703
308-8645
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.