Supporting Statement

Supporting Statement.doc

REG-106542-98 (Final), Election to Treat Trust as Part of an Estate

OMB: 1545-1578

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT




1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Section 1305 of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-34, 111 Stat. 788 (1997) added §646 to the Internal Revenue Code to permit an election to treat and tax certain revocable trusts as part of an estate. Section 646 was redesignated section 645 by section 6013(a) of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Public Law 105-206, 112 Stat. 685 (1998). Rev. Proc. 98-13, 1998-1 C.B. 370, provides the procedures and requirements for making the §645 election. When these proposed regulations go final, they will replace Rev. Proc. 98-13.


2. USE OF DATA


Section 1.645-1 of the regulation requires that taxpayers must submit the information in order to make the §645 election. The information will be used by the I.R.S for tax administration purposes.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


Not Applicable.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not Applicable.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not Applicable.





  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


REG-106542-98 (Final) was published in the Federal Register on December 18, 2000 (65 FR 79015). A public hearing was scheduled for April 11, 2001, but was cancelled when no one requested to speak. The final regulations were published in the Federal Register on December, 24, 2002 (67FR 78371).


In response to the Federal Register Notice ( 72 FR 7511), dated February 15, 2007, we received no comments during the comment period.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and return information are confidential as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


Not applicable.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 1.645-1 of the proposed regulation requires a statement to be completed and attached to the Form 1041, U.S. Income Tax Return for Estates and Trusts, filed for the estate for its first taxable year. We estimate that the election will be made for approximately 10,000 trusts and that it will take approximately one half hour to complete the election. The total burden for this requirement will be 5,000 hours.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the burden shown are not available at this time.






13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice dated February 15, 2007, requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any responses from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration data is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the information collection sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be ware a that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.














  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.



Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.

File Typeapplication/msword
Last Modified Byqhrfb
File Modified2007-04-25
File Created2007-04-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy