Request for Hearing By Administrative Law Judge

ICR 200706-0960-003

OMB: 0960-0269

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
ICR Details
0960-0269 200706-0960-003
Historical Active 200702-0960-007
SSA
Request for Hearing By Administrative Law Judge
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 08/22/2007
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 06/29/2007
To further minimize burden on the public, upon next submission, SSA should report on the different ways they have considered to narrow the discrepancy between the average burden associated with the electronic form (22 minutes) and the paper version (10 minutes) between now and next submission. SSA will also continue to obtain updated data on the percentage of Medicare Part B affected benes who request an appeals hearing and report this data on next submission.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
08/31/2010 36 Months From Approved 05/31/2010
669,469 0 669,469
178,525 0 111,578
0 0 0

The information collected on Form HA-501-U5 is used by SSA to document and initiate the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing process for determining eligibility or entitlement to Social Security benefits (Title II), Supplemental Security Income payments (Title XVI), Special Veterans Benefits (Title VIII), Medicare (Title XVIII), and of initial determinations regarding Medicare Part B income-related premium subsidy reductions. The methods for filing a request for an ALJ hearing are being expanded to include the internet. If an individual receives a notice of denial of his/her disability claim and the notice provides rights to an ALJ hearing, he/she will have the option of filing for the ALJ hearing over the internet. The individual will complete the appropriate appeal screens and submit the appeal to SSA for processing. The respondents are individuals filing for an ALJ hearing.

PL: Pub.L. 108 - 173 1350 & 931 Name of Law: Medicare Modernization Act of 2003
   PL: Pub.L. 106 - 169 251 & 809 Name of Law: Foster Care Independence Act of 1999
   PL: Pub.L. 103 - 296 105(a)(2)(B) Name of Law: Social Security Independence and Program Improvements Act
   US Code: 42 USC 405 Name of Law: null
   US Code: 42 USC 1320c-4 Name of Law: null
   US Code: 42 USC 1383 Name of Law: null
   US Code: 42 USC 1395ff Name of Law: null
   US Code: 42 USC 1395r Name of Law: null
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  72 FR 17980 04/10/2007
72 FR 35293 06/27/2007
Yes

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 669,469 669,469 0 0 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 178,525 111,578 0 66,947 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
Yes
Using Information Technology
The increase in the public reporting burden is due to the estimated increase in completion time for the new i501 (Internet version) as a part of the new iAppeals Program. The decrease in the public reporting burden for the paper HA-501 is due to SSA's anticipation that half of our current respondents will switch to the new iAppeals Internet version (i501) after implementation of the new program.

$2,653,906
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Elizabeth Davidson 411-965-0454 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
06/29/2007


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy