60 Day Federal Register Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 120 / Friday, June 22, 2007 / Notices

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
TA–W–61,415; American & Efird, Inc.,
d/b/a Robison Anton Textile Co,
Bloomsburg, PA: April 23, 2006.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–61,368; Kraft Foods Global, Inc.,
Post Cereals Division, Battle Creek,
MI: April 12, 2006.
TA–W–61,589; Hi-Craft Engineering
Incorporated, Fraser, MI: May 25,
2006.
TA–W–61,426; Badger Attachments,
Div., Paladin Corporation, Wausau,
WI: April 30, 2006.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–61,549; Molex, Inc., Fiber Optics
Division, Downers Grove, IL.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA–W–61,267; Fox River Paper FR, LLC,
Formerly Fox River Paper
Company, Housatonic, MA.
TA–W–61,486; Thompson Steel
Company, Inc., Franklin Park, IL.
TA–W–61,547; McMurray Fabrics, Inc.,
Lincolnton, NC.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–60,333; Intel Corporation, Jones
Farm Campus, Hillsboro, OR.
TA–W–60,334; Intel Corporation,
Cornell Oaks Campus, Beaverton,
OR.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:51 Jun 21, 2007

Jkt 211001

TA–W–60,335; Intel Corporation, Ronler
Acres Campus, Hillsboro, OR.
TA–W–60,338; Intel Corporation, Elam
Young Campus, Hillsboro, OR.
TA–W–60,339; Intel Corporation, Aloha
Campus, Aloha, OR.
TA–W–60,340; Intel Corporation, Amber
Glen Campus, Beaverton, OR.
TA–W–60,341; Intel Corporation,
Evergreen Campus, Hillsboro, OR.
TA–W–60,514; Intel Corporation,
Hawthorn Farm Campus, Hillsboro,
OR.
TA–W–60,880; Vantage Industries, LLC,
Hamilton, IN.
TA–W–61,242; Visteon Corporation
Regional Assembly, Interiors Div.,
Visteon Corp., Manpower, Chicago,
IL.
TA–W–61,309; Shiloh Industries,
Mansfield Division, Mansfield, OH.
TA–W–61,425; Oak Mine, Inc. (The),
Grant Pass, OR.
TA–W–61,397; Hamlin Tool & Machine
Co., Inc., Workers Producing Seat
Belt Brackets, Rochester, MI.
TA–W–61,405; Jarden Consumer
Solutions, d/b/a Sunbeam Products
Incorporated, Testing Lab, Milford,
MA.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–61,279; Lexmark International,
Inc., U.S. Customer Services,
Lexington, KY.
TA–W–61,351; Low Country Cotton
Service, LLP, Greenville, SC.
TA–W–61,427; Iron Age Footwear, A
Subsidiary of Iron Age Corp.,
Greensboro, NC.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the period
of June 4 through June 8, 2007. Copies of
these determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210 during normal
business hours or will be mailed to persons
who write to the above address.
Dated: June 15, 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–12076 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P

PO 00000

Frm 00058

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

34483

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2007–0055]

Construction Records for Rigging
Equipment; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comment concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the
information collection requirements
contained in paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(6)(i),
(b)(6)(ii), (c)(15)(ii), (e)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii)
and (f)(2) of the Rigging Equipment for
Construction Standard (29 CFR
1926.251). These paragraphs require
affixing identification tags or markings
on rigging equipment, developing and
maintaining inspection records, and
retaining proof-testing certificates.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
August 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit
three copies of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office,
Docket No. OSHA–2007–0055, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail,
messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the ICR (OSHA–
2007–0055). All comments, including
any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.

E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM

22JNN1

34484

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 120 / Friday, June 22, 2007 / Notices

For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Stewart
Burkhammer at the address below to
obtain a copy of the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stewart Burkhammer, Directorate of
Construction, OSHA, U.S. Department
of Labor, Room N–3468, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH
Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The following section identifies and
describes the information collection
requirements contained in the Rigging
Equipment in Construction Standard
(i.e., ‘‘the Standard’’). The purpose of

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:51 Jun 21, 2007

Jkt 211001

each of these requirements is to prevent
employees from using defective or
deteriorated equipment, thereby
reducing their risk of death or serious
injury caused by equipment failure
during material handling.
• Alloy Steel Chains, Paragraph (b)
Paragraph (b)(1) requires that alloy
steel chains have permanently affixed
durable identification tags stating size,
grade, rated capacity and sling
manufacturer. Paragraph (b)(6)(i)
requires the employer to make a
thorough periodic inspection of alloy
steel chain slings in use on a regular
basis, but at least once a year. Paragraph
(b)(6)(ii) requires the employer to make
and maintain a record of the most recent
month in which each alloy steel chain
was inspected and make the record
available for examination.
• End Attachments, Paragraph (c)
Paragraph (c)(15)(ii) requires that all
welded end attachments of wire rope
slings be proof-tested by the
manufacturer at twice their rated
capacity prior to initial use, and that the
employer retain a certificate of the proof
test and make it available for
examination.
• Synthetic Webbing (Nylon, Polyester,
and Polypropylene), Paragraph (e)
Paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii)
require that synthetic web slings be
marked or coded to show the
manufacturer’s name or trademark, the
rated capacity for the type of hitch and
the type of synthetic webbing material.
• Shackles and Hooks, Paragraph (f)
Paragraph (f)(2) requires that all hooks
for which no applicable manufacturer’s
recommendations are available be tested
twice before they are put into use. The
employer shall maintain a record of the
dates and results of the tests.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.

PO 00000

Frm 00059

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend
its approval of the information
collection requirements contained in the
Rigging Equipment Standard (29 CFR
1926.251). The Agency will summarize
the comments submitted in response to
this notice and will include this
summary in the request to OMB.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved information
collection requirements.
Title: Rigging Equipment for Material
Handling (29 CFR 1926.25(b)(1),
(b)(6)(i), (b)(6)(ii), (c)(15)(ii), (e)(1)(i),
(ii), and (iii), and (f)(2).
OMB Number: 1218–0233.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents: 1,327,370.
Frequency: On occasion.
Average Time Per Response: Average
3 minutes (.05 hour) for an employer to
maintain and disclose a certificate to 30
minutes (.50 hour) for an employer to
acquire information and make a tag for
a sling.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
56,335.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $-0-.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (FAX); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the
ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2007–0055).
You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, messenger, or courier service,
please contact the OSHA Docket Office
at (202) 693–2350 (TTY (877) 889–
5627).

E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM

22JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 120 / Friday, June 22, 2007 / Notices
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and date of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through this Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://
www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is
available at the Web site’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office
for information about materials not
available through the Web site, and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate
docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 5–2002 (67 FR 65008).
Signed at Washington, DC, on June 14,
2007.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E7–12050 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (07–049)]

Dated: June 18, 2007.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and
Management.
[FR Doc. E7–12063 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am]

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive
License
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of intent to grant
exclusive license.

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

AGENCY:

BILLING CODE 7510–13–P

SUMMARY: This notice is issued in
accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(1) and
37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby
gives notice of its intent to grant an
exclusive license worldwide to practice
the inventions described and claimed in
U.S. Patent Nos. 6,261,844, entitled
‘‘Urine Preservative’’; 6,133,036,
entitled ‘‘Preservation Of Liquid
Biological Samples’’; and 6,716,392,
entitled ‘‘Preservation Of Liquid
Biological Samples’’, to Antlers Plus
LLC., having its principal place of
business in Henley, Missouri. The fields

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:51 Jun 21, 2007

Jkt 211001

of use may be limited to deer hunting.
The patent rights in these inventions
have been assigned to the United States
of America as represented by the
Administrator of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration.
The prospective exclusive license will
comply with the terms and conditions
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
DATES: The prospective exclusive
license may be granted unless, within
fifteen (15) days from the date of this
published notice, NASA receives
written objections including evidence
and argument that establish that the
grant of the license would not be
consistent with the requirements of 35
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
Competing applications completed and
received by NASA within fifteen (15)
days of the date of this published notice
will also be treated as objections to the
grant of the contemplated exclusive
license.
Objections submitted in response to
this notice will not be made available to
the public for inspection and, to the
extent permitted by law, will not be
released under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
ADDRESSES: Objections relating to the
prospective license may be submitted to
Patent Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel,
Mail Code AL, 2101 NASA Parkway,
Houston, TX 77058, (281) 483–4871;
(281) 483–6936 [Facsimile].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt
G. Hammerle, Patent Attorney, Office of
Chief Counsel, Johnson Space Center,
Mail Code AL, 2101 NASA Parkway,
Houston, TX 77058, (281) 483–1001;
(281) 483–6936 [Facsimile]. Information
about other NASA inventions available
for licensing can be found online at
http://technology.nasa.gov/.

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission to OMB for
Review; Comment Request
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Request for comment.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: The NCUA is resubmitting the
following information collection to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under

PO 00000

Frm 00060

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

34485

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
This information collection is published
to obtain comments from the public.
DATES: Comments will be accepted until
July 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments to
NCUA Clearance Officer listed below:
Clearance Officer: Mr. Neil
McNamara, National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314–3428, Fax No.
703–837–2861, E-mail:
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or a
copy of the information collection
request, should be directed to Tracy
Sumpter at the National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314–3428, or at (703)
518–6444.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal
for the following collection of
information:
OMB Number: 3133–0032.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Reinstatement, with
change, of a previously approved
collection.
Title: Records Preservation under 12
CFR Part 749.
Description: Part 749 of NCUA
Regulations directs each credit union to
have a vital records preservation
program that includes procedures for
maintaining duplicate vital records at a
location far enough from the credit
union’s offices to avoid the
simultaneous loss of both sets of records
in the event of a disaster. A proposed
regulatory amendment requires the
program be in writing and include
emergency contact information for
employees, officials, regulatory offices,
and vendors used to support vital
records.
Respondents: All credit unions.
Estimated No. of Respondents/Record
keepers: 8,420.
Estimated Burden Hours Per
Response: 2 hours.
Frequency of Response:
Recordkeeping, reporting and on
occasion.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 16,930.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$842,000.

By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on June 18, 2007.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7–12059 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P

E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM

22JNN1