INTL-45-86.SUP.wpd

INTL-45-86.SUP.wpd

INTL-45-86 (Final) TD 8125 Foreign Management and Foreign Economic Processes Requirements of a Foreign Salee Corporation.

OMB: 1545-0904

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

(INTL-45-86)



  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Section 801 of the Tax Reform Act of 1984 added sections 924 and 925 to the Internal Revenue Code. Under these provisions of the code, a corporation that meets certain requirements, including the performance of certain activities abroad, is exempt from federal income tax on a portion of its export profits. The regulations require the maintenance of records to verify that the necessary activities were actually performed outside the United States.


  1. USE OF DATA


The taxpayer will maintain the records required under the regulation to substantiate the FSC benefits it claims on its income tax return.

  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


Not applicable.


  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not applicable.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not applicable.








  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


A notice of proposed rulemaking cross-reference to temporary regulations (TD 7994) were published in the Federal Register on December 12, 1984 (49 FR 48321, 48273). A public hearing was held on May 13, 1985. The final regulations were published in the Federal Register on February 19, 1987 (52 FR 5084).


We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register notice dated June 4, 2007 (72 FR 30915).

  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


Not applicable.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 1.924(d)-1(b)(2) provides for complying with foreign management and foreign economic process requirements to enable foreign sales corporations to produce foreign trading gross receipts and qualify for reduced tax rates. The records must be kept to verify that the necessary activities were actually performed outside the United States. It is estimated that 11,001 foreign sales corporations are expected to be affected annually by the recordkeeping requirements and that it will take approximately 2 hours to maintain the necessary books and records for each year. Accordingly the estimated recordkeeping burden is 22,001 hours.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.






  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice dated June 4, 2007 (72 FR 30915), requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any response from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulations sunset as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.


Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.




File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorTQ1FB
Last Modified ByJ11FB
File Modified2007-08-10
File Created2004-08-23

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy