In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is withholding approval at this time. Prior to publication of the final rule, the agency should submit to OMB a summary of all comments related to the information collection contained in the proposed rule and the agency response. The agency should clearly indicate any changes made to the information collection as a result of these comments.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
06/30/2009
36 Months From Approved
06/30/2009
134
0
134
52,930
0
52,930
6,141,000
0
6,141,000
FERC is obligated by statute to regulate key economic aspects of the electric, natural gas and oil industries. The law requires the CommissionÂs economic regulatory activity because the transmission of electricity, natural gas, and oil has often been a natural monopoly. In enacting Part II of the Federal Power Act (FPA) in 1935, one of the primary Congressional goals was to protect electric ratepayers from abuses of market power. To accomplish this goal, Congress directed the FERC to oversee sales for resale and transmission service provided by public utilities in interstate commerce. Under Section 203 of the FPA, the FERC must review proposed mergers, acquisitions and dispositions of jurisdictional facilities by public utilities, if the value of facilities exceeded $50,000, (now $10 million for certain transactions due to EPACT 2005, see above) and must approve such transactions if they are consistent with the public interest. Today, one of FERCÂs overarching goals is to promote competition in wholesale power markets, having determined that effective competition, as opposed to traditional forms of price regulation, can best protect the interests of ratepayers. Market power, however, can be exercised to the detriment of effective competition and exercise of market power in bulk power markets.
Market power can be created or enhanced by mergers. Mergers can eliminate a competitor from the market and concentrate control of generating assets. Mergers can also enhance vertical market power, by giving the merged company a new or increased ability or incentive to restrict inputs to power production. The Commission considers market power issues in reviewing applications for mergers or other jurisdictional acquisitions or dispositions of assets. If a merger will create market power or enhance the applicantÂs market power significantly, mitigation of these effects is required in order to ensure that the merger is consistent with the public interest.
Section 203 of the FPA provides that FERC approval is required for transactions in which a public utility disposes of jurisdictional facilities, merges such facilities with facilities owned by another person, or acquires the securities of another public utility. Under the statute, FERC must find that the proposed transaction will be consistent with the public interest. The filing requirements under review and define the terms of information necessary to investigate the possible impact of the proposed transaction on public interest.
The basis for current practices with respect to Section 203 applications is Federal Power Commission Opinion No. 507 issued in the 1966 Commonwealth Edison Company, proceeding, 36 FPC 907. In that proceeding FERC set forth the criteria to be applied when determining whether the proposed transaction is consistent with the public interest.
This proposed rule proposes codification of a limited blanket authorization under FPA section 203(a)(1), providing for a category of jurisdictional transactions under section 203(a)(1) for which the Commission would not require applications seeking before-the-fact approval.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.