National Science Foundation Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Form 428A Proposal Reviewer Form Form and Instruction	Modified
Form NSF Form 1 Proposal Review Form Form and Instruction	Modified
Form CCR Central Contractor Registration Database Form and Instruction	New
CCRJustificationstatementemergency clearance.doc Supplementary Document	2007-08-16
0058 SupportingStatement.doc Supporting Statement A	2006-11-13

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
45997	Proposal Reviewer Form Form and Instruction	Modified
45996	Grant Proposal Guide Instruction	Modified
45994	Proposal Review Form Form and Instruction	Modified
181694	Central Contractor Registration Database Form and Instruction	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 3145-0058	ICR Reference No: 200708-3145-002
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200611-3145-002
Agency/Subagency: NSF	Agency Tracking No:
Title: National Science Foundation Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Emergency	Approval Requested By: 09/20/2007
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 09/26/2007
	Date Received in OIRA: 08/22/2007
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	03/31/2008	6 Months From Approved	01/31/2010
Responses	325,184	0	325,000
Time Burden (Hours)	6,751,063	0	6,750,833
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: NSF receives more than 40,000 proposals annually for new or renewal support for research in math/science/engineering education projects and makes approximately 10,500 new awards. The Foundation exercises its authority primarily by making merit-based grants and cooperative agreements and providing other forms of assistance to individual researchers and groups, in partnership with over 2800 colleges, universities and other institutions – public and private, state, local and federal – throughout the United States.

Emergency Justfication: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006 (P.L. 109-282) requires agencies to make award and sub-award information available to be searched by the public in a single searchable website developed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The impetus for this Act was the lack of a single source of accurate, complete and timely information on federal government spending. The requirements and residual technical and policy impacts of FFATA were unanticipated at the time the prior information clearance package was cleared by OMB. In order to meet the legislative mandate and Congressional intent of FFATA, NSF needs a reliable source of data and the ability to validate the accuracy of that data. The change that is being proposed by NSF, therefore, is essential to ensuring compliance with FFATA requirements. If NSF cannot collect and validate the accuracy of award data, NSF will miss the deadline imposed by Congress to make award data publicly available by January 1, 2008. NSF is committed to providing citizens accurate, complete, and timely information regarding the expenditure of taxpayer funds. The policy change for which NSF is seeking approval will enable the Foundation to accomplish this goal. If NSF must follow the normal OIRA clearance review process, the result will be incomplete and inaccurate award data on OMB’s single searchable website.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 42 USC 1861 Name of Law: The National Science Foundation
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	72 FR 46666	08/21/2007
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? Yes

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 4

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Central Contractor Registration Database	CCR	CCR
Proposal Reviewer Form	428A	Proposal Reviewer Form
Grant Proposal Guide
Proposal Review Form	NSF Form 1	Proposal Review Form

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	325,184	325,000	0	184	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	6,751,063	6,750,833	0	230	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Changing Regulations

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006 (P.L. 109-282)requires agencies to make award and sub-award information available to be searched by the public in a single searchable website developed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This requirement is adding burden to the overall collection.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 08/21/2007

---