SSEABHostMaterialfromCanada0125

Revised October 2007

Supporting Statement

Importation of Emerald Ash Borer Host Material from Canada

OMB No. 0579-0319

A. Justification

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), is responsible for preventing plant diseases or insect pests from entering the United States, preventing the spread of pests and noxious weeds not widely distributed in the United States, and eradicating those imported pests when eradication is feasible.

Under the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 – 7772), the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to prohibit or restrict the importation, entry, or movement of plants and plant pests to prevent the introduction of plant pests into the United States or their dissemination within the United States.

The regulations in 7 CFR Part 319, “Foreign Quarantine Notices,” prohibit or restrict the importation of certain plants and plant products to prevent the introduction or dissemination of plant pests and noxious weeds into the United States.

The regulations contained in “Subpart-Nursery Stock, Plants, and Roots, Bulbs, Seeds, and Other Plant Products,” §§ 319.37 through 319.37 (referred to as the regulations), restrict, among other things, the importation of living plants, plant pests, and seeds for propagation.

APHIS is establishing regulations to prohibit or restrict the importation of certain articles from Canada that present a risk of being infested with emerald ash borer (EAB). This is necessary to prevent the artificial spread of plant pests from infested areas in Canada to noninfested areas of the United States and to prevent further introduction of plant pests into the United States.

The EAB (Agrilus planipennis) is a destructive wood-boring insect that attacks ash trees (Fraxinus spp., including green ash, white ash, and several horticultural varieties of ash). The insect, which is indigenous to Asia and known to occur in China, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, the Russian Far East, and Taiwan, eventually kills healthy ash trees after it bores beneath their bark and disrupts their vascular tissues.

APHIS is asking OMB to approve its use of this information collection for an additional 3 years, associated with its efforts to prevent the introduction and spread of EAB into noninfested areas of the United States.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

Phytosanitary Certificate (foreign) and PPQ Form 587 (Application for Permit to Import Plants or Plant Products - Ash wood chips or bark chips 1 inch (2.54 cm) or less in diameter that originate in an EAB- regulated county within a Province or Territory that is regulated for EAB by the Canadian Government require a permit and must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate that the wood or bark chip in the shipment were ground to 1 inch (2.54 cm) or less in diameter in any two dimensions.

Ash wood chips or bark chips that originate in a county not regulated for EAB within a Territory or Province regulated for EAB by the Canadian Government require a permit and must be accompanied by a certificate with an additional declaration stating that the articles in the shipment were produced/harvested in a county where the EAB does not occur, based on official surveys.

APHIS requires that some plants or plant products be accompanied by a phytosanitary inspection certificate that is completed by plant health officials in the originating or transiting country. APHIS uses the information on the certificate to determine the pest condition of the shipment at the time of inspection in the foreign country. This information is used as a guide to the intensity of the inspection APHIS conducts when the shipment arrives. Without this information, all shipments would need to be inspection very thoroughly, thereby requiring considerably more time. This would slow the clearance of international shipments.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.

APHIS has no control or influence over when foreign countries will automate Canadian Phytosanitary Certificates.

PPQ Form 587 and instructions for this form are automated and posted at www.aphis.usda.gtov/permits/ppq_epermits.shtml

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purpose described in item 2 above.

The information APHIS collects is exclusive to its mission to prevent the introduction of plant pests and plant diseases into the United States. The information is not available from any other source.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.

The information APHIS collects is the minimum needed to protect the United States from the introduction of EAB and other plant diseases.

6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

If APHIS did not collect this information or if APHIS collected this information less frequently, EAB could damage ash trees and cause economic losses to nursery stock

and nursery industry.

7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.

This information collection is conducted in a manner consistent with the guidelines established in 5 CFR 1320.5.

8. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting form, and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice, soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.

The following individuals were consulted during 2007:

Ms. Margie Beacock

Flowers Canada, Inc.

45 Speedvale Ave, Unit 7

Guelph ON N141J2

519-836-5495, X223

Ms. Rita Weerdenburg

Canadian Nursery Landscape Association

7856 5^th Line S., RR 4

Milton ON L9P2X

1-888-446-3499, X50

Mr. Michael J. Gale

Bylands Nurseries. LTD

1600 Byland Rd.

Kelowna, BC V1Z1H6

250-769-4466

APHIS’ Interim Rule and Request for Comments (APHIS 2006-0125) published on Friday, June 1, 2007, pages 30458-30460, describing its information gathering requirements and also providing a 60-day comment period. During that time, interested members of the public had the opportunity to provide APHIS with their input concerning the usefulness, legitimacy, and merit of information collection activities. Two responses were received; however, neither of the comments were in regard to paperwork.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than reenumeration of contractors or grantees.

This information collection activity involves no payments or gifts to respondents.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in stature, regulation, or agency policy.

No additional assurance of confidentiality was provided with this information collection. However, the confidentiality of information is protected under 5 U.S.C. 552a.

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and others that are considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

This information collection activity asks no questions of personal or sensitive nature.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated.

. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.

See APHIS Form 71 for hour burden estimates.

. Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.

3 burden hours X 15.00 (estimated wage) = $45.00.

The hourly rate is derived from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics June 2003 Report – National Compensation Survey; Occupational Wages in the US, July 2002 (http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncb10539.pdf).

13. Provide estimates of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information, (do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in items 12 and 14). The cost estimates should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component annualized over its expected useful life; and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component.

There is zero annual cost burden associated with capital and start-up, operation and maintenance, and purchase of services in connection with this program.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Provide a description of the method used to estimate cost and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.

The estimated cost to the Federal Government is $ 4,862.05 (see APHIS Form 79).

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I.

This is a continuation of a previously approved program. There are no changes in burden for this information collection.

16. For collections of information whose results are planned to be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.

APHIS has no plans to tabulate or publish the information collected.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

If forms were to be discarded because of an outdated OMB expiration date, but otherwise usable, higher printing costs would be incurred by the Federal Government. Therefore, APHIS is seeking approval to not display the OMB expiration date on its forms.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act.”

APHIS is able to certify compliance with all the provisions in the Act.

B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods.

Statistical methods are not used in this information collection.