Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Assessing the Environmental Effects Abroad of EPA Actions (Final Rule)

ICR 200709-2020-001

OMB: 2020-0033

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2007-06-07
ICR Details
2020-0033 200709-2020-001
Historical Active 200609-2020-001
EPA/OECA 2243.04
Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Assessing the Environmental Effects Abroad of EPA Actions (Final Rule)
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 09/20/2007
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 09/20/2007
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
08/31/2010 36 Months From Approved 09/30/2007
313 0 313
48,147 0 54,597
8,673 0 9,550

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is amending its procedures for implementing the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). For EPA actions subject to NEPA, the Responsible Official may determine that the proposed action does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and may, therefore, be categorically excluded (CE, categorical exclusion) from further NEPA review. If the proposed action is not categorically excluded, the Responsible Official may prepare an environmental assessment (EA) in order to determine whether to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) or a finding of no significant impact (FONSI). If necessary, the Responsible Official must prepare an EIS if the proposed action will have a significant effect on the human environment. For applicant-proposed actions, the applicant may submit information to the Responsible Official regarding the applicability of a CE and request a determination by the Responsible Official. Unless the applicant-proposed action is categorically excluded, the Responsible Official may gather the information and prepare the NEPA document without assistance from the applicant, or have the applicant prepare an environmental information document (EID) or a draft EA and supporting documents or implement a third-party agreement with the applicant generally for preparation of an EIS. Applicants generally are grant applicants applying to EPA for funding of special projects identified in EPA's State and Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG) account authorized by Congress through the Agency's annual Appropriations Act, and permit applicants applying to EPA for issuance of new source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The final rule also includes minor, technical amendments to the Agency's procedures for implementing Executive Order 12114, "Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions" (E.O.). EPA's E.O. procedures further the purpose of NEPA and provide that EPA may be guided by its NEPA procedures to the extent they are applicable. For this Information Collection Request (ICR), applicant-proposed projects subject to either NEPA or E.O. 12114 (and that are not addressed in other EPA programs' ICRs) are addressed through the NEPA process.

EO: EO 12114 Name/Subject of EO: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions
   US Code: 41 USC 4321-4347 Name of Law: National Environmental Policy Act
  
None

2020-AA42 Final or interim final rulemaking 72 FR 53652 09/19/2007

No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 313 313 0 0 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 48,147 54,597 0 -6,450 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 8,673 9,550 0 -877 0 0
Yes
Changing Regulations
Yes
Changing Regulations
The burden is reduced by decreasing the use of EA/FONSIs and increasing the use of CEs for project documentation. For grant applicants, an EA will generally cost $40 and take 260 hours to complete, while a CE costs approximately $17 and uses 45 hours. The reduction in burden is created by estimating that with this final rule, the use of a CE to document a project will increase to 60% from 50%, and the use of an EA will decrease from 50% to 40%. For more detail, please refer to the Supporting Statement, Section 6(d).

$1,510,600
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Robert Hargrove 202 564-7157 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
06/14/2007


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy