Dear Community Members,
Congratulations on completing your New Community TA Visit! I hope that the information, resources and strategies will prove to be beneficial to you in your system of care role.
The Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health (TA Partnership) would like to hear from you regarding the effectiveness of the New Community TA Visit planning process and implementation. Please click on the link [survey link] to be taken to a survey where you can share feedback about the visit with the TA Partnership. The TA Partnership will use this information to examine the current visit planning process, purpose, and procedures, and recommend changes to enhance the activity’s effectiveness and efficiency.
Please complete the form as soon as possible and no later than [date].
Thank you very much in advance for your feedback. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at [email protected] or (202) 403-5575.
OMB No. 0930-0197
Expiration Date: 01/31/11
|
New Community Technical Assistance Visit Quality Improvement Survey |
Public Burden Statement: An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this project is 0930-0197. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per respondent, per year, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 8-1099, Rockville, Maryland, 20857. |
Purpose:
This survey
solicits your feedback on the planning, implementation, and
follow-up of the New Community Technical Assistance (TA) Visit.
The Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental
Health (TA Partnership) will use this information to examine the
current visit planning process, purpose, and procedures and recommend
changes to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of this
activity.
Directions:
Please respond
to the questions openly and honestly to provide information about
activities that went well during your New Community TA Visit and
activities that could be improved. We are asking the
principal investigator, project director, TA coordinator, clinical
director, family lead, youth coordinator, cultural and linguistic
competence coordinator, social marketer, and evaluator from each
community (if these roles exist in the community) to complete the
form. If you are the community’s principal
investigator or project director, we encourage you to ask these staff
members to complete this survey.
Conditions of
Privacy:
Your completion of this survey is voluntary and the
TA Partnership will protect your identity to the extent possible.
Only a handful of staff of the TA Partnership will have access to
your individual responses – any TA Partnership staff who
participated on this visit will not have access to individual
responses. The TA Partnership will summarize the responses for your
site and revise any recommendations and comments that may reveal the
identities of respondents. The TA Partnership will send an
aggregate summary of the results (not individual survey
responses) to the New Community TA Visit Team, and TA
Partnership senior management. We appreciate your time and
effort providing this needed and valuable feedback.
For
more information about this survey, you may contact Ivonn
Ellis-Wiggan of the TA Partnership at 202.652.2390 or
[email protected]. If you have concerns or questions about
your rights as a participant in this activity, you can contact
the American Institute for Research’s Institutional Review
Board (which is responsible for the protection of project
participants) by email at [email protected],
or by phone toll free at 1-800-634-0797 or mail c/o IRB, 1000 Thomas
Jefferson Street, NW, Washington, DC 20007.
Survey
Planning
A. How effective was the planning process for the New Community TA Visit to your community?
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
B. To what extent were staff from your system of care initiative involved in coordinating the planning process?
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
C. Did staff from your system of care and national TA provider staff (i.e. TA Coordinator, Content Specialist, etc.) use the System of Care Implementation Self Assessment (Self-Assessment) to guide the development of the visit agenda?
1 = Yes
2 = No If NO, skip to Section II.
3 = Don’t know If DON’T KNOW, skip to Section II
D. How helpful was the Self-Assessment in identifying your community’s technical assistance needs?
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
E. How helpful was the Self-Assessment in developing your community’s New Community TA Visit agenda?
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
F. Please list your recommendation(s) to improve the planning process and (or) planning materials.
II. The New Community TA Visit Team
How well did the New Community TA Visit Team address the needs of your system of care initiative? (e.g., complete understanding of its strengths and the challenges)?
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
To what extent were staff from your system of care involved in selecting the membership of your New Community TA Visit Team?
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
To what extent did the New Community TA Visit Team membership align with the needs of your system of care initiative?
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
Please rate how much you agree with each of the following statements:
The New Community TA Visit Team conducted the visit in a respectful manner (e.g., visitors were respectful of staff including family members and youth).
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
The New Community TA Visit Team conducted the visit in a culturally and linguistically competent manner.
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
The New Community TA Visit Team conducted the visit in a family-friendly manner (limited the use of acronyms and jargon, used family inclusive language).
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
The New Community TA Visit Team conducted the visit in a youth-friendly manner (limited the use of acronyms and jargon, used youth inclusive language).
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
Please list any recommendation(s) that would improve the New Community TA Visit Team and their work with a system of care initiatives like yours.
III. The New Community Visit
Please rate how much you agree with each of the following statements:
The New Community TA Visit Team worked with members of my community to set a date and time for the visit that was most beneficial to my community
1 = Strongly disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neither disagree nor agree
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly agree
6 = Unable to rate
The New Community TA Visit team worked with members from my community to develop an agenda that included TA needs identified in advance (through Self-Assessment process) of the visit.
1 = Strongly disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neither disagree nor agree
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly agree
6 = Unable to rate
The New Community TA Visit supported my community’s understanding of Year One grant requirements.
1 = Strongly disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neither disagree nor agree
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly agree
6 = Unable to rate
During the visit, the New Community TA Visit Team worked with my community to discuss community strengths and needs to develop
initial strategies, and identify TA resources to support those strategies.
1 = Strongly disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neither disagree nor agree
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly agree
6 = Unable to rate
The New Community TA Visit provided my community with the opportunity to introduce your community partners to the resources and supports available from the TA Partnership and other national TA providers (i.e. Communications Campaign, Georgetown, Federation of Families, etc.).
1 = Strongly disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neither disagree nor agree
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly agree
6 = Unable to rate
Please list any recommendation(s) that would improve the New Community TA Visit for system of care initiatives like yours.
IV. New Community TA Visit Activities
Was the schedule of activities appropriate (i.e. did it include a family meeting, youth meeting)?
Was enough time allotted for each activity?
How well did the visit activities allow key staff and stakeholders to contribute meaningfully to the discussions?
1 = Not at all
2 = A little
3 = Somewhat
4 = Quite a bit
5 = A great deal
6 = Unable to rate
V. Other Comments
Please share any recommendations or comments that you would like to offer.
If applicable, list the visit’s benefits to you and your colleagues.
List any activities that you believe could be improved.
Please share any recommendations you have to improve this survey.
Dear Community Members,
This is a reminder that the deadline for completing the New Community TA Visit Survey is today. If you have not already done so, please complete the form by the end of the day today.
Please click on the link [survey link] to be taken to the survey. The Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health will use this information to examine the current visit planning process, purpose, and procedures, and recommend changes to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of these visits.
Thank you very much for your feedback. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at [email protected] or (202) 403-5575.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Jeffrey Poirier |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-02-05 |