Control Technology Determinations for Equivalent Emission Limitations by Permit under section 112(j) of Clean Air Act

ICR 200710-2060-001

OMB: 2060-0266

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2007-10-04
Supporting Statement A
2007-10-04
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
24352
Modified
182266
New
ICR Details
2060-0266 200710-2060-001
Historical Inactive 200202-2060-006
EPA/OAR 1648.01
Control Technology Determinations for Equivalent Emission Limitations by Permit under section 112(j) of Clean Air Act
Reinstatement without change of a previously approved collection   No
Emergency 10/18/2007
Withdrawn 04/14/2008
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 10/04/2007
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
6 Months From Approved
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

This is an emergency information collection request renewal for the section 112(j) regulations. EPA will prepare an ICR renewal through the normal process, including public notice and comment, during the period this emergency ICR is in effect. The previous ICR, OMB Control No. 2060-0266 (EPA ICR #1648.04), was allowed to expire May 2005. At that time, it appeared that the underlying 112(j) rule for which this ICR was necessary would no longer be utilized to collect information as all the major source MACT standards had either been promulgated or were to be promulgated before any application would be due under the 112(j) regulations. Thus, it appeared that the section 112(j) regulations had essentially become unnecessary as the need for applications for case-by-case MACT no longer existed. However, EPA did not envision the consequence of completely vacated MACT standards on the section 112(j) regulations. A series of court decisions have vacated standards for 4 MACT source categories: 1) polyvinyl chloride and copolymers production, 2) brick and structural clay products manufacturing, 3) clay ceramics manufacturing, and 4) industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters. The complete vacatur of these rules triggers the requirements of CAA section 112(j) and reinstates the need for the 112(j) regulations. Thus, there is a need for renewal of the ICR. Renewing an ICR using the normal process would take several months and entail two Federal Register notices and a public comment period. Such a delay would hamper the ability of the states and EPA to get case-by-case MACT limits into source permits and would result in a period of uncertainty for States, the regulated industry, and the public in terms of their respective obligations and/or enforcement authorities. It would also be inconsistent with the statutory requirements of section 112(j). This ICR supports the regulations to implement section 112(j) (40 CFR part 63, subpart B, 63.50-56). It addresses the information collection burden (hours and costs) to industry respondents subject to these provisions; State and Local agencies that review applications made under these provisions; and the EPA oversight review of a percentage of State/Local decisions.
This is an emergency information collection request renewal for the section 112(j) regulations. EPA will prepare an ICR renewal through the normal process, including public notice and comment, during the period this emergency ICR is in effect. The previous ICR, OMB Control No. 2060-0266 (EPA ICR #1648.04), was allowed to expire May 2005. At that time, it appeared that the underlying 112(j) rule for which this ICR was necessary would no longer be utilized to collect information as all the major source MACT standards had either been promulgated or were to be promulgated before any application would be due under the 112(j) regulations. Thus, it appeared that the section 112(j) regulations had essentially become unnecessary as the need for applications for case-by-case MACT no longer existed. However, EPA did not envision the consequence of completely vacated MACT standards on the section 112(j) regulations. A series of court decisions have vacated standards for 4 MACT source categories: 1) polyvinyl chloride and copolymers production, 2) brick and structural clay products manufacturing, 3) clay ceramics manufacturing, and 4) industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters. The complete vacatur of these rules triggers the requirements of CAA section 112(j) and reinstates the need for the 112(j) regulations. Thus, there is a need for renewal of the ICR. Renewing an ICR using the normal process would take several months and entail two Federal Register notices and a public comment period. Such a delay would hamper the ability of the states and EPA to get case-by-case MACT limits into source permits and would result in a period of uncertainty for States, the regulated industry, and the public in terms of their respective obligations and/or enforcement authorities. It would also be inconsistent with the statutory requirements of section 112(j). This ICR supports the regulations to implement section 112(j) (40 CFR part 63, subpart B, 63.50-56). It addresses the information collection burden (hours and costs) to industry respondents subject to these provisions; State and Local agencies that review applications made under these provisions; and the EPA oversight review of a percentage of State/Local decisions. This ICR includes about 60,500 affected sources, estimated to be potentially subject to the section 112(j) rule, that we anticipate may need to perform the reporting that the rule requires. We estimate up to about 60,500 affected sources may have to prepare and submit Part 1 and Part 2 title V permit applications. It should be noted that the number of affected sources is greater than the number of facilities or plant sites affected, since a plant site can contain numerous affected sources and be affected by multiple MACT standards. We have determined estimated costs based on the number of affected sources; however, we believe that the actual cost will be somewhat less for facilities that contain several affected sources. The average administrative cost per affected source to perform the reporting is estimated to be $2,163. Total estimated administrative costs for existing sources may be up to $130,880,000 for all affected sources in all affected source categories over the next three years.

None
None

Not associated with rulemaking

No

2
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Section 112(j): Respondents
Section 112(j): State/Local/Tribal

Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
Reinstatement of a previously approved ICR

$120,839
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Rick Colyer 919 541-5262 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/04/2007


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy