60-Day Preclearance Federal Register Notice (09-06-2007)

60dayFRN_1218-0226(09-06-07).pdf

Standard on Manlifts (29 CFR 1910.68(e))

60-Day Preclearance Federal Register Notice (09-06-2007)

OMB: 1218-0226

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Notices
Alternative 4, the NPS preferred
alternative, was developed with the aid
of a process called ‘‘Choosing By
Advantages’’ in which the planning
team identifies and compares the
relative advantages of each alternative
according to a set of factors. This
process also establishes the relationship
between the advantages and costs of
each alternative. This information is
used to combine the best attributes of
the preliminary alternatives into the
preferred alternative giving the NPS the
greatest overall benefit for the most
reasonable cost.
Alternative 4 would provide visitor
services at the visitor center, the
Gambrill Mill, and the stone house on
the Thomas Farm. In addition, exhibits
would be provided at the secondary
house on the Best Farm and at the
Worthington House. Parking at each
location would be developed. There
would be no alternative transportation
system. Visitors would access the site
via personal automobile. The
maintenance facility would remain in
its current structure. An existing trail
from the Gambrill Mill would be
extended to the site of Wallace’s
headquarters, a major feature of the
battlefield currently not open to visitors.
Administration offices would be in the
rehabilitated Thomas House. Safer
access to the 14th New Jersey
Monument and a designated
commemorative zone for possible new
monuments would be developed.
Instead of a deck across I–270
connecting the Worthington and
Thomas farmsteads, a small pedestrian
deck would be created to allow visitors
to cross between the two sites.
Dated: August 13, 2007.
Joseph M. Lawler,
Regional Director, National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. E7–17594 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–57–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
National Mall & Memorial Parks; Notice
of Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement and Plan for the
National Mall
Department of the Interior,
National Park Service.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement and
Plan for the National Mall.

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

AGENCY:

SUMMARY: In accordance with section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, the National Park
Service (NPS) will be preparing an

VerDate Aug<31>2005

18:25 Sep 05, 2007

Jkt 211001

Environmental Impact Statement and
Plan for the National Mall to develop a
long term vision plan for the use and
management of the National Mall,
which has been defined by Congress as
a ‘‘substantially completed work of civic
art,’’ and for Pennsylvania Avenue
National Historic Park. In the January
16, 2007 Federal Register (72 FR 1763),
the NPS announced it was developing
this plan. The NPS was already holding
public meetings and engaging with
other government agencies. The NPS
has since determined it will proceed to
producing an Environmental Impact
Statement as part of the planning
process.
DATES: Information related to public
involvement opportunities will be
provided at the following park Web site:
http://www.nps.gov/nationalmallplan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Project Executive Susan Spain, who
may be contacted at National Mall &
Memorial Parks, 900 Ohio Drive, SW.,
Washington, DC 20024, by telephone at
(202) 245–4692, or by e-mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
planning effort will include compliance
with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act and other laws
and requirements. The National Mall
Plan will differ from an NPS General
Management Plan in that it will cover a
longer-term time frame and is not a plan
for the entirety of the National Mall &
Memorial Parks. National Mall &
Memorial Parks includes many national
park units throughout the Nation’s
Capital and this plan will address only
the National Mall, which is comprised
of West Potomac Park, the Washington
Monument and the Mall, and the related
Pennsylvania Avenue National Historic
Park. A map of the study area is
available at http://www.nps.gov/
nationalmallplan. In cooperation with
the agencies with jurisdiction over
properties adjoining the National Mall,
attention will also be given to
cumulative impacts outside its
boundaries that affect the integrity of
the National Mall.
The Environmental Impact Statement
and Plan for the National Mall will
address visitor use issues such as civic
space, events management, national
celebrations, education, programs and
recreation; and will identify types,
locations, and character of needed
visitor facilities and services, which
could include food service, seating,
lighting, restrooms, recreation, signage
(orientation/way finding/education),
and crowd management. The
Environmental Impact Statement and
Plan for the National Mall could also

PO 00000

Frm 00042

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

51253

identify desired site improvements,
such as floral displays, water features,
and other embellishments that are not
commemorative in nature. Additional
issues may be defined or added
throughout planning.
Public involvement and civic
engagement will continue to be key
components in the preparation of the
Environmental Impact Statement and
Plan for the National Mall. As a result
of the decision to conduct an
Environmental Impact Statement, there
will be public scoping meetings and
opportunities on a range of alternatives
and other topics, concurrent with
publication of several reports and
newsletters addressing public comment
and a draft range of alternatives. The
thousands of comments already
received by the NPS are also being
considered in this process along with
the information provided by cooperating
agencies and others.
Dated: August 16, 2007.
Joseph M. Lawler,
Regional Director, National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. E7–17593 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–39–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2007–0020]

Standard on Manlifts; Extension of the
Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) Approval of Information
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comment concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the
information collection requirements
specified in its Standard on Manlifts (29
CFR 1910.68(e)).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
November 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.

E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM

06SEN1

51254

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Notices

Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit
three copies of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office,
OSHA Docket No. OSHA–2007–0020,
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail,
messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
EST.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the ICR (OSHA–
2007–0020). All comments, including
any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled ‘‘Supplementary
Information.’’
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time

VerDate Aug<31>2005

18:25 Sep 05, 2007

Jkt 211001

and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the Act
or for developing information regarding
the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The Standard specifies two
paperwork requirements. The following
sections describe who uses the
information collected under each
requirement as well as how they use it.
The purpose of the requirements is to
reduce employees’ risk of death or
serious injury by ensuring that manlifts
are in safe operating condition.
Periodic Inspections and Records
(paragraph (e)). This provision requires
that each manlift be inspected at least
once every 30 days. The manlift
inspection is to cover at least the
following items: Steps; step fastenings;
rails; rail supports and fastenings;
rollers and slides; belt and belt tension;
handholds and fastenings; floor
landings; guardrails; lubrication; limit
switches; warning signs and lights;
illumination; drive pulley; bottom (boot)
pulley and clearance; pulley supports;
motor; driving mechanism; brake;
electrical switches; vibration and
misalignment; and any ‘‘skip’’ on the up
or down run when mounting a step
(indicating worn gears). A certification
record of the inspection must be made
upon completion of the inspection. The
record must contain the date of the
inspection, the signature of the person
who performed the inspection, and the
serial number or other identifier of the
inspected manlift.
Disclosure of Inspection Certification
Records. Employers are to maintain the
certification record and make it
available to OSHA compliance officers.
This record provides assurance to
employers, employees, and compliance
officers that manlifts were inspected as
required by the Standard. The
inspections are made to keep equipment
in safe operating condition, thereby
preventing manlift failure while
carrying employees to elevated
worksites. These records also provide
the most efficient means for the
compliance officers to determine that an

PO 00000

Frm 00043

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

employer is complying with the
Standard.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend
its approval of the information
collection requirements contained in the
Standard on Manlifts (29 CFR
1910.68(e)). The Agency is requesting to
retain its current burden hour total of
37,801 associated with this Standard.
The Agency will summarize the
comments submitted in response to this
notice and will include this summary in
the request to OMB.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Standard on Manlifts (29 CFR
1910.68(e)).
OMB Number: 1218–0226.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents: 3,000.
Frequency: On occasion; Monthly.
Average Time Per Response: Varies
from 2 minutes (.03 hour) for an
employer to disclose the inspection
certification record to 1 hour to inspect
a manlift.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
37,801.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (FAX); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the
ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2007–0020).
You may supplement electronic

E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM

06SEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Notices
submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ‘‘Addresses’’). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, messenger, or courier service,
please contact the OSHA Docket Office
at (202) 693–2350 (TTY (877) 889–
5627).
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and date of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through this Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://
www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is
available at the Web site’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office
for information about materials not
available through the Web site, and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate
docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 5–2002 (67 FR 65008).
Signed at Washington, DC, on August 21,
2007.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E7–17569 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

VerDate Aug<31>2005

18:25 Sep 05, 2007

Jkt 211001

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–461]

Amergen Energy Company, LLC;
Notice of Withdrawal of Application for
Amendment to Facility Operating
License

51255

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day
of August, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Stephen P. Sands,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III–
2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E7–17600 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) has
granted the request of AmerGen Energy
Company, LLC (the licensee) to
withdraw its November 16, 2006,
application for proposed amendment to
Facility Operating License No. NPF–62
for the Clinton Power Station, Unit No.
1, located in DeWitt County, Illinois.
The proposed amendment would
have revised the facility technical
specifications (TSs) pertaining to TS
3.6.5.1, ‘‘Drywell,’’ surveillance
requirement, 3.6.5.1.3, to delay the
performance of the next drywell bypass
leakage rate test from the current
requirement of November 23, 2008, to
prior to startup from the Clinton Unit 1,
refueling outage 12 (C1R12), projected
for January 2010; and TS 5.5.13,
‘‘Primary Containment Leakage Rate
Testing Program,’’ to delay the
performance of the next primary
containment Type A integrated leak rate
test from the current requirement of no
later than November 23, 2008, to prior
to startup from the C1R12 refueling
outage.
The Commission had previously
issued a Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of Amendment published in
the Federal Register on January 30,
2007 (72 FR 4306). However, by letter
dated April 30, 2007, the licensee
withdrew the proposed change.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for
amendment dated November 16, 2006,
and the licensee’s letter dated April 30,
2007, which withdrew the application
for license amendment. Documents may
be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at
the NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publicly available records
will be accessible electronically from
the Agencywide Documents Access and
Management Systems (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, http://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons
who do not have access to ADAMS or
who encounter problems in accessing
the documents located in ADAMS
should contact the NRC PDR Reference
staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209,
or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to
[email protected].

PO 00000

Frm 00044

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[DOCKET NOS. 50–272 AND 50–311]

PSEG Nuclear LLC; Notice of
Withdrawal of Application for
Amendment to Facility Operating
License
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) has
granted the request of PSEG Nuclear
LLC (the licensee) to withdraw its
application dated August 4, 2006, as
supplemented by letter dated March 8,
2007, for proposed amendment to
Facility Operating License Nos. 50–272
and 50–311 for the Salem Nuclear
Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2,
located in Salem County, New Jersey.
The proposed amendment would
have revised Technical Specification
3/4.9.3, ‘‘Decay Time,’’ to allow the
movement of irradiated fuel in the
reactor pressure vessel to commence at
24 hours after shutdown or at the decay
time calculated using the licensee’s
spent fuel pool integrated decay heat
management program, whichever is
later. The Commission had previously
issued a Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of Amendment published in
the Federal Register on December 19,
2006 (71 FR 75999). However, by letter
dated August 13, 2007, the licensee
withdrew the proposed change.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for
amendment dated August 4, 2006, as
supplemented by letter dated March 8,
2007, and the licensee’s letter dated
August 13, 2007, which withdrew the
application for license amendment.
Documents may be examined, and/or
copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area O1
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible electronically
from the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management Systems
(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading
Room on the internet at the NRC Web
site, http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents

E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM

06SEN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleDocument
SubjectExtracted Pages
AuthorU.S. Government Printing Office
File Modified2007-10-30
File Created2007-09-06

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy