Appendix 3: Analysis of Section 26.207
Overview
Section 26.207 of the final worker fatigue provisions establishes new waiver requirements. Among other provisions, the section restricts the granting of waivers from work hour requirement guidelines to cases where the waiver is needed to mitigate or prevent a condition adverse to safety or to maintain security. The rule also clarifies that work hour limits apply only to workers who perform safety-related functions, which will eliminate the need to grant waivers to other staff. This appendix describes a methodology for estimating the incremental costs and savings associated with eliminating waivers that would no longer be permitted under the final rule.
NRC used this methodology to estimate the net cost per week of the new waiver requirements. The resulting estimate of $1,087 per week while at-power and $25,689 per week during plant shutdowns are used as inputs to the cost analysis of §26.207, which is presented in Appendix A2-15. Table 3-1 provides a summary of the waiver data used in this appendix. Table 3-2 provides a breakdown of these data by work-hour provision.
The methodology is based on a review of selected 2003 - 2004 waiver data from six facilities. The analysis categorizes each waiver into one of eight groups and calculates the cost or saving associated with that waiver based on how the situation would be addressed under the final rule. Results for the six facilities are summed and averaged to calculate the net weekly cost of the provision for the average facility (1) while at power, and (2) during an outage.
The remainder of this appendix describes how the analysis estimates the cost or saving of each type of waiver. The discussion is organized into nine sections:
Waivers No Longer Required Under the Final Rule;
Waivers Unaffected by the Final Rule;
Outage Shift Changes that Will Not Meet the New Final Waiver Requirements;
Outage Activities Without Direct Impact on Critical Path;
Outage Activities With Critical Path Impact;
At-Power Costs Associated With Individuals Who Will Not Meet the Final Waiver Requirements;
At-Power Costs Associated With Individuals Involved in Tests or Integrated Evolution Who Will Not Meet the Final Waiver Requirements;
At-Power Costs Associated With Individuals Involved in Return to Full Power Who Will Not Meet the Final Waiver Requirements; and
Generic Costing Assumptions
Table 3-1
Waiver Data Summary
Description |
Total |
Plants |
||||||
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
|||
|
Outage Days |
295 |
76 |
64 |
30 |
62 |
34 |
29 |
|
At-Power Days |
452 |
30 |
301 |
31 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
A3.1 |
Waivers No Longer Required* |
506 |
114 |
81 |
6 |
48 |
25 |
232 |
A3.2 |
Waivers Unaffected* |
20 |
15 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
A3.3 |
Outage Shift Change* |
158 |
133 |
0 |
5 |
18 |
1 |
1 |
A3.4 |
Outage Activities without Direct Impact on Critical Path* |
827 |
150 |
6 |
56 |
330 |
112 |
173 |
A3.5 |
Outage Activities with Critical Path Impact* |
300 |
40 |
4 |
14 |
186 |
36 |
20 |
A3.6 |
At-Power Activities* |
28 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
A3.7 |
At-Power Activities associated with Test and Integrated Activities* |
16 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
A3.8 |
At-Power Activities Impacting Return to Full Power* |
10 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
TOTAL* |
1,865 |
465 |
101 |
95 |
603 |
174 |
427 |
* The numbers in these rows represent the number of personnel with authorized work-hour rule waivers. Consecutively issued waivers for personnel working 12-hour days without an off-day were counted as one occurrence per person for each 7-day period when allowed by the available data.
Table 3-2
Work-hour Provision Breakdown
Provision |
Personnel Waived |
Percent of Waivers where only a Single Provision is Waived |
Percent of Total* |
8-hour break |
18 |
6% (1 of 18) |
1% |
16-hours in 24-hour period |
175 |
28% (49 of 175) |
9% |
24-hours in a 48-hour period |
434 |
44% (192 of 434) |
23% |
72-hours in a 7-day period |
1536 |
71% (1333 of 1536) |
82% |
Total Waived |
1865 |
84% (1575 of 1865) |
100% |
* Note that since 16% of the waivers address multiple provisions, the sum of provision percentages exceeds 100%.
A3.1 Waivers No Longer Required Under the Final Rule
Numerous work hour waivers that were granted prior to the final rule will no longer be needed (i.e., waivers for engineering staff, waivers that would be eliminated due to the 26-hour in 48-hour rule change and for work not adverse to safety). Licensees will be free to use staff as they did under these waivers, but they will realize incremental savings because they will not have to undertake the administrative exercise of granting the waiver.
The facility savings per waiver result from the saved management costs as follows:
HOURSManager x WAGEManagement
Parameter |
Description |
HOURSManager |
Manager labor saved for each waiver that no longer needs to be processed (described in assumptions below) |
WAGEManagement |
Hourly management labor rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumption:
Manager labor saved as a result of reduced planning, coordination and administration for each waiver processed: 1 hour.
A3.2 Waivers Unaffected by the Final Rule
Some of the work hour waivers examined will not be affected by the final rule. These are waivers that satisfy the two required elements of the final rule: (a) the activity is necessary to mitigate or prevent a condition adverse to safety or security and (b) there is reasonable assurance that the individual will be able to safely and competently perform his or her duties during the additional work period. There are no incremental costs or savings associated with this category.
A3.3 Outage Shift Changes that Will Not Meet the Final Waiver Requirements
Another group of work hour waivers includes those granted to accommodate a shift schedule change that will not meet the new waiver requirements. This group includes waivers associated with:
Shifting between day and night schedules or other outage schedule changes; and
Shifting personnel due to down-staffing.
All but two of the 158 waivers in this category (99%) authorize a variance from the 72-hour work hour control requirement. Due to the limited information provided on many waiver authorization forms, it is often unclear whether the 72-hour limit is exceeded by only a few hours or an entire shift. In addition to the 72-hour limit, about 23% of these waivers also allow individuals to exceed the 16-hours in 24-hour limit.
Contractor - Local Craft
This category estimates the cost associated with eliminating work hour waivers addressing an outage shift change that will not meet the final waiver requirements. The category applies to local contractors supporting an outage that do not require travel or per diem. Activities addressed by this category are not associated with a test or integrated evolution.
The management cost of this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The additional management burden for waivers that address a single person is assumed to be 1 hour. For waivers that address more than one person, this analysis assumes that the additional management burden will be 2 hours.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMLocal Craft x HOURSLocal Craft x WAGELocal Craft x CONTINGENCYShift_Schedule_Change)
- (NUMLocal Craft x HOURSLocal Craft x WAGELocal Craft)
The management cost of this waiver is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
If waiver addresses one person, then (1 hour x WAGEManager)
If waiver addresses multiple people, then (2 hours x WAGEManager)
Parameter |
Description |
NUMLocal Craft |
The number of local craft workers impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSLocal Craft |
Hours worked per local craft worker that exceeded the work hour requirements under one waiver |
CONTINGENCYShift_Schedule_Change |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with shift schedule changes (described in assumptions below) |
WAGELocal Craft |
The estimated hourly rate of local craft labor (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumption:
A scaling factor is used to adjust baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final waiver provisions. For this equation, the contingency factor value equals 1. Effective management planning should avoid the need for waivers associated with changes in shift schedules.
Contractor - Specialty Vender
This category estimates the cost associated with eliminating work hour waivers addressing an outage shift change. The category is applicable to contractors supporting an outage that are expected to incur transportation and per diem costs.
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. Although transportation and per diem costs are likely for this labor category, these costs are excluded from the cost estimate because it is assumed that effective management planning should avoid such a burden.
The management cost of this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The additional management burden for waivers that address a single person is assumed to be 1 hour. For waivers that address more than one person, this analysis assumes that the additional management burden will be 2 hours.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMSpecialty Vender x HOURSSpecialty Vender x WAGESpecialty Vender
x CONTINGENCYShift_Schedule_Change) - (NUMSpecialty Vender x HOURSSpecialty Vender x WAGESpecialty Vender)
The management cost of this waiver is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
If waiver addresses one person, then (1 hour x WAGEManager)
If waiver addresses multiple people, then (2 hours x WAGEManager)
Parameter |
Description |
NUMSpecialty Vender |
The number of specialty venders impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSSpecialty Vender |
Hours worked per specialty vender that exceeded the work hour requirements under one waiver |
CONTINGENCYShift_Schedule_Change |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with shift schedule changes (described in assumptions below) |
WAGESpecialty Vender |
The estimated hourly rate of specialty vender labor (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumption:
A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. For this equation, the contingency factor value equals 1. Effective management planning should avoid the need for waivers associated with changes in shift schedules.
Utility
This category estimates the cost associated with eliminating work hour waivers addressing an outage shift change. The category is applicable to utility workers supporting an outage. Activities addressed by this category are not associated with a test or integrated evolution that requires a formal job brief.
The management cost represented by this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The additional management burden for waivers that address a single person is assumed to be 1 hour. For waivers that address more than one person, this analysis assumes that the additional management burden will be 2 hours.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMUtility Worker x HOURSUtility Worker x WAGEUtility Worker x CONTINGENCYShift_Schedule_Change) - (NUMUtility Worker x HOURSUtility Worker x WAGEUtility Worker)
The management cost represented by this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
If waiver addresses one person, then (1 hour x WAGEManager)
If waiver addresses multiple people, then (2 hours x WAGEManager)
Parameter |
Description |
---|---|
NUMUtility Worker |
The number of utility workers impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSUtility Worker |
Hours worked per utility worker that exceeded the work hour requirements |
CONTINGENCYShift_Schedule_Change |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with shift schedule changes (described in assumptions below |
WAGEUtility Worker |
The estimated hourly rate of utility labor (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumption:
A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. For this equation, the contingency factor value equals 1. Effective management planning should avoid the need for waivers associated with changes in shift schedules.
A3.4 Outage Activities Without Direct Impact on Critical Path
Contractor - Local Craft
This category estimates the cost associated with eliminating work hour waivers addressing an outage activity that extends beyond a shift. The category is applicable to local contractors supporting an outage that do not require travel or per diem. Activities addressed by this category are not associated with a test or integrated evolution and do not have a direct critical path impact. This group includes waivers associated with:
Continuation of on-going work activities (not identified or assessed as critical path);
Equipment de-contamination and temporary shielding activities; and
Worker contingency actions (personnel on standby).
The management cost of this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The additional management burden for waivers that address a single person is assumed to be 2 hours. For waivers that address more than one person, this analysis assumes that the additional management burden will be 4 hours.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMLocal Craft x HOURSLocal Craft x WAGELocal Craft x CONTINGENCYNon-Critical Path)
- (NUMLocal Craft x HOURSLocal Craft x WAGELocal Craft)
The management cost of this waiver is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
If waiver addresses one person, then (2 hours x WAGEManager)
If waiver addresses multiple people, then (4 hours x WAGEManager)
Parameter |
Description |
NUMLocal Craft |
The number of local craft workers impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSLocal Craft |
Hours worked per local craft worker that exceeded the work hour requirements under one waiver |
CONTINGENCYNon-Critical Path |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with non-critical path resources changes (described in assumptions below) |
WAGELocal Craft |
The estimated hourly rate of local craft labor (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumption:
A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. The contingency factor value in this equation is assumed to be equal to 2. The contingency factor value is based on an evaluation of special conditions, including individuals’ level of specialization, potential difficulty in establishing alternative arrangements, the likelihood of cost premiums like travel per diem and the potential impact to outage duration. In this section of the appendix, the contingency value ranges from 1 to 5. For this category, the contingency factor equals 2 due to the low level of specialization, local availability of labor and limited impact on the outage critical path.
Contractor - Specialty Vender
This category estimates the cost associated with eliminating work hour waivers addressing an outage activity that extends beyond a shift. The category is applicable to contractors supporting an outage that are expected to incur transportation and per diem cost. Activities addressed by this category are not associated with a test or integrated evolution and do not have a direct critical path impact. This group includes waivers associated with:
Continuation of on-going work activities (not identified or assessed as critical path);
Motor-operated valve and air-operated valve testing; and
Worker contingency actions (personnel on standby).
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The contingency cost includes the expected additional per diem cost. The analysis also assumes that a travel cost of $1,000 per person per waiver will be incurred.
The management cost of this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The additional management burden for waivers that address a single person is assumed to be 2 hours. For waivers that address more than one person, this analysis assumes that the additional management burden will be 4 hours.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMSpecialty Vender x HOURSSpecialty Vender x WAGESpecialty Vender
x CONTINGENCYNon-critical Path ) + (NUMSpecialty Vender x COSTTravel)
- (NUMSpecialty Vender x HOURSSpecialty Vender x WAGESpecialty Vender)
The management cost of this waiver is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
If waiver addresses one person, then (2 hour x WAGEManager)
If waiver addresses multiple people, then (4 hours x WAGEManager)
Parameter |
Description |
---|---|
NUMSpecialty Vender |
The number of specialty venders impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSSpecialty Vender |
Hours worked per specialty vender that exceeded the work hour requirements under one waiver |
CONTINGENCYNon-Critical Path |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with shift schedule changes (described in assumptions below) |
WAGESpecialty Vender |
The estimated hourly rate of specialty vender labor (described in Section A3.9) |
COSTTravel |
The estimated round trip travel fee used for specialty venders (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumption:
A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. The contingency factor value in this equation is assumed to be equal to 4. The contingency factor value is based on an evaluation of special conditions, including individuals’ level of specialization, potential difficulty in establishing alternative arrangements, the likelihood of cost premiums like travel per diem and the potential impact to outage duration. In this section of the appendix, the contingency value ranges from 1 to 5. For this category, the contingency factor equals 4 due to the high level of specialization, potential difficulty in making alternative arrangements, likely need to pay a premium, and the limited impact on the outage critical path.
Utility
This category estimates the cost associated with eliminating work hour waivers addressing an outage activity that extends beyond a shift. The category is applicable to utility workers supporting an outage. Activities addressed by this category are not associated with a test or integrated evolution and do not have a direct critical path impact. This group includes waivers associated with:
Continuation of on-going work activities (not identified or assessed as critical path);
Operations outage support (valve manipulations, clearing danger tags, surveillance support, etc.);
Health Physics survey and job coverage support; and
Training and qualification support (welders).
The management cost represented by this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The additional management burden for waivers that address a single person is assumed to be 2 hours. For waivers that address more than one person, this analysis assumes that the additional management burden will be 4 hours.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMUtility Worker x HOURSUtility Worker x WAGEUtility Worker x CONTINGENCYNon-critical Path) - (NUMUtility Worker x HOURSUtility Worker x WAGEUtility Worker)
The management cost represented by this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
If waiver addresses one person, then (2 hours x WAGEManager)
If waiver addresses multiple people, then (4 hours x WAGEManager)
Parameter |
Description |
---|---|
NUMUtility Worker |
The number of utility workers impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSUtility Worker |
Hours worked per utility worker that exceeded the work hour requirements |
CONTINGENCYNon-critical Path |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with shift schedule changes (described in assumptions below |
WAGEUtility Worker |
The estimated hourly rate of utility labor (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumption:
A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. The contingency factor value in this equation is assumed to be equal to 2. The contingency factor value is based on an evaluation of special conditions, including individuals’ level of specialization, potential difficulty in establishing alternative arrangements, the likelihood of cost premiums like travel per diem and the potential impact to outage duration. In this section of the appendix, the contingency value ranges from 1 to 5. For this category, the contingency factor equals 2 due to the assignment flexibility of in-house staff and limited impact on the outage critical path.
A3.5 Outage Activities With Critical Path Impact
Contractor - Local Craft
This section estimates the local contractor cost associated with activities that have a critical path impact. The category is applicable to local contractors supporting an outage that do not require travel or per diem. This group includes waivers associated with:
Support of critical path activities (only 4 waivers were identified as being applicable to the Local Craft portion of this category).
The management cost of this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The additional management burden for waivers that address a single person is assumed to be 2 hours. For waivers that address more than one person, this analysis assumes that the additional management burden will be 4 hours.
The outage portion of this section is used to represent the cost associated with extending the outage as a result of allocating resources without the availability of a waiver. This waiver cost section addresses the potential impact of the job brief on the critical path.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMLocal Craft x HOURSLocal Craft x WAGELocal Craft x CONTINGENCYCritical Path)
- (NUMLocal Craft x HOURSLocal Craft x WAGELocal Craft)
The management cost represented by this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
If waiver addresses one person, then (2 hours x WAGEManager)
waiver addresses multiple people, then (4 hours x WAGEManager)
The outage portion of this section represents the cost associated with extending the outage as a result of allocating resources without the availability of a waiver. The outage cost is calculated as follows:
HOURSTurnover x HCOSTOutage
If the waiver is associated with the 72-hour provision, then this analysis assumes that there is no cost for critical path turnover. The analysis makes this assumption because the 72-hour provision is typically exceeded for a seventh 12-hour day in 7 days. As a result, a brief would be required regardless of whether this provision is waived or not.
Parameter |
Description |
---|---|
NUMLocal Craft |
The number of local craft workers impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSLocal Craft |
Hours worked per local craft worker that exceeded the work hour requirements |
HOURSTurnover |
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing (described in assumptions below) |
CONTINGENCYCritical Path |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with critical path activities (described in assumptions below) |
WAGELocal Craft |
The estimated hourly rate of local craft labor (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
HCOSTOutage |
The hourly cost of delaying the completion of an outage (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumptions:
• A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. The contingency factor value in this equation is assumed to be equal to 3. The contingency factor value is based on an evaluation of special conditions, including individuals’ level of specialization, potential difficulty in establishing alternative arrangements, the likelihood of cost premiums like travel per diem and the potential impact to outage duration. In this section of the appendix, the contingency value ranges from 1 to 5. For this category, the contingency factor equals 3 due to the low level of specialization, local availability of labor but a potential impact on the outage critical path.
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing: 0.5 hours.
Contractor - Specialty Vender
This section estimates the specialty cost associated with activities that have a critical path impact that will not meet the new waiver requirements. This group includes waivers associated with:
Refueling path (fuel off-load, on-load, equipment repair, etc.);
Steam generator eddy current testing;
Reactor mid-loop operations; and
Critical path repair/maintenance activities.
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The cost estimate includes a travel cost of $1,000 per person per waiver.
The management cost of this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The additional management burden for waivers that address a single person is assumed to be 2 hours. For waivers that address more than one person, this analysis assumes that the additional management burden will be 4 hours.
The outage portion of this section is used to represent the cost associated with extending the outage as a result of allocating resources without the availability of a waiver. This waiver cost section addresses the potential impact of the job brief on the critical path.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMSpecialty Vender x (HOURSSpecialty Vender + HOURSTurnover x 2 )x WAGESpecialty Vender
x CONTINGENCYCritical Path ) + (NUMSpecialty Vender x COSTTravel)
- (NUMSpecialty Vender x HOURSSpecialty Vender x WAGESpecialty Vender)
The management cost represented by this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
If waiver addresses one person, then (2 hours x WAGEManager)
If waiver addresses multiple people, then (4 hours x WAGEManager)
The outage portion of this section represents the cost associated with extending the outage as a result of allocating resources without the availability of a waiver. The outage cost is calculated as follows:
HOURSTurnovers x HCOSTOutage
If the waiver is associated with the 72-hour provision, then this analysis assumes that there is no cost for critical path turnover. The analysis makes this assumption because the 72-hour provision is typically exceeded for a seventh 12-hour day in 7 days. As a result, a brief would be required regardless of whether this provision is waived or not.
Parameter |
Description |
---|---|
NUMSpecialty Vender |
The number of specialty vender impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSSpecialty Vender |
Hours worked per specialty vender that exceeded the work hour requirements |
HOURSTurnover |
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing (described in assumptions below) |
CONTINGENCYCritical Path |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with shift schedule changes (described in assumptions below) |
WAGESpecialty Vender |
The estimated hourly rate of specialty vender labor (described in Section A3.9) |
COSTTravel |
The estimated round trip travel fee used for contractor workers (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
HCOSTOutage |
The hourly cost of delaying the completion of an outage (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumptions:
• A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. The contingency factor value in this equation is assumed to be equal to 5. The contingency factor value is based on an evaluation of special conditions, including individuals’ level of specialization, potential difficulty in establishing alternative arrangements, the likelihood of cost premiums like travel per diem and the potential impact to outage duration. In this section of the appendix, the contingency value ranges from 1 to 5. For this category, the contingency factor equals the maximum value of 5 due to the high level of specialization, potential difficulty in making alternative arrangements, likely need to pay a premium, and the potential impact on the outage critical path.
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing: 0.5 hours
Utility
This category addresses utility workers and estimates the cost associated with an outage test or integrated evolution that will not meet the new waiver requirements. This group includes waivers associated with:
Refueling path (fuel off-load, on-load, equipment repair, etc.);
Steam generator eddy current testing;
Reactor mid-loop operations;
Reactor startup activities; and
Critical path repair/maintenance activities.
The management cost represented by this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The additional management burden for waivers that address a single person is assumed to be 2 hours. For waivers that address more than one person, this analysis assumes that the additional management burden will be 4 hours.
The outage portion of this equation is used to represent the cost associated with extending the outage as a result of allocating resources without the availability of a waiver. This waiver cost section includes the potential impact of the job brief on the critical path. The full weight of this additional activity is included in this cost estimate.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost of this waiver is the difference between the cost of labor for the extended period under the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMUtility Worker x (HOURSUtility Worker + HOURSTurnover x 2) x WAGEUtility Worker x CONTINGENCYCritical Path) - (NUMUtility Worker x HOURSUtility Worker x WAGEUtility Worker)
The management cost represented by this section is the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
If waiver addresses one person, then (2 hours x WAGEManager)
If waiver addresses multiple people, then (4 hours x WAGEManager)
The outage portion of this section represents the cost associated with extending the outage as a result of allocating resources without the availability of a waiver. The outage cost is calculated as follows:
HOURSTurnover x HCOSTOutage
If the waiver is associated with the 72-hour provision, then this analysis assumes that there is no cost for critical path turnover. The analysis makes this assumption because the 72-hour provision is typically exceeded for a seventh 12-hour day in 7 days. As a result, a brief would be required regardless of whether this provision is waived or not.
Parameter |
Description |
---|---|
NUMUtility Worker |
The number of utility workers impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSUtility Worker |
Hours worked per utility worker that exceeded the work hour requirements |
HOURSTurnover |
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing (described in assumptions below) |
CONTINGENCYCritical Path |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with shift schedule changes (described in assumptions below) |
WAGEUtility Worker |
The estimated hourly rate of utility worker labor (described in Section A3.9) |
HCOSTOutage |
The hourly cost of delaying the completion of an outage (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumptions:
• A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. The contingency factor value in this equation is assumed to be equal to 3. The contingency factor value is based on an evaluation of special conditions, including individuals’ level of specialization, potential difficulty in establishing alternative arrangements, the likelihood of cost premiums like travel per diem and the potential impact to outage duration. In this section of the appendix, the contingency value ranges from 1 to 5. For this category, the contingency factor equals 3 due to the assignment flexibility of in-house staff and the potential impact on the outage critical path.
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing: 0.5 hours.
A3.6 At-Power Costs Associated with Individuals Who Will Not Meet the Final Waiver Requirements
This category addresses a general estimate of the at-power cost associated with individuals who will not meet the new waiver requirements. This group includes waivers associated with training, meetings and other miscellaneous activities.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost associated with a shift schedule change that will not meet the new waiver requirements is the difference between the cost of labor for the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMUtility Worker x HOURSUtility Worker x WAGEUtility Worker x CONTINGENCYPower) - (NUMUtility Worker x HOURSUtility Worker x WAGEUtility Worker)
The management cost associated with a shift schedule change that will not meet the new waiver requirements is the cost of the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
(1 hour x WAGEManager)
Parameter |
Description |
---|---|
NUMUtility Worker |
The number of utility workers impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSUtility Worker |
Hours worked per utility worker that exceeded the work hour requirements |
CONTINGENCYPower |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with at-power activities (described in assumptions below |
WAGEUtility Worker |
The estimated hourly rate of utility worker labor (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumptions:
A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. The contingency factor value in this equation is assumed to be equal to 2. The contingency factor value is based on an evaluation of special conditions, including individuals’ level of specialization, potential difficulty in establishing alternative arrangements, the likelihood of cost premiums like travel per diem and the potential impact on at-power operation. In this section of the appendix, the contingency value ranges from 1 to 5. For this category, the contingency factor equals 2 due to the assignment flexibility of in-house staff and the lack of impact on at-power operation.
The estimated level of effort to process an at-power waiver is 1 hour.
A3.7 At-Power Costs Associated With Individuals Involved in Tests or Integrated Evolution Who Will Not Meet the Final Waiver Requirements
This category addresses an estimate of the at-power cost associated with individuals involved in test or integrated evolution who will not meet the new waiver requirements. This group includes waivers associated with testing and other operational activities.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost associated with a shift schedule change that will not meet the new waiver requirements is the difference between the cost of labor for the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMUtility Worker x (HOURSUtility Worker + HOURSTurnover x 2) x WAGEUtility Worker x CONTINGENCYPower_Test) - (NUMUtility Worker x HOURSUtility Worker x WAGEUtility Worker)
The management cost associated with a shift schedule change that will not meet the new waiver requirements is the cost of the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
(1 hour x WAGEManager)
Parameter |
Description |
---|---|
NUMUtility Worker |
The number of utility workers impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSUtility Worker |
Hours worked per utility worker that exceeded the work hour requirements |
CONTINGENCYPower_Test |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with at-power test activities (described in assumptions below |
WAGEUtility Worker |
The estimated hourly rate of utility worker labor (described in Section A3.9) |
HOURSTurnover |
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing (described in assumptions below) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumptions:
A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. The contingency factor value in this equation is assumed to be equal to 3. The contingency factor value is based on an evaluation of special conditions, including individuals’ level of specialization, potential difficulty in establishing alternative arrangements, the likelihood of cost premiums like travel per diem and the potential impact on at-power operation. In this section of the appendix, the contingency value ranges from 1 to 5. For this category, the contingency factor equals 3 due to the assignment flexibility of in-house staff and the increased importance of on-going operational activities.
The estimated level of effort to process an at-power waiver is 1 hour.
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing: 0.5 hours.
A3.8 At-Power Costs Associated With Individuals Involved in Return to Full Power Who Will Not Meet the Final Waiver Requirements
This category addresses an estimate of the at-power cost associated with individuals involved in activities that are associated with the return to full power who will not meet the new waiver requirements. This group includes waivers for individuals involved in repair activities that are not associated with technical specification equipment and that likely result in a power reduction. This analysis assumes that a facility will operate at 75% of its capacity.
The facility cost per waiver results from the sum of the following factors:
The labor cost associated with a shift schedule change that will not meet the new waiver requirements is the difference between the cost of labor for the final rule and the cost of labor pre-rule. The labor cost is calculated as follows:
(NUMUtility Worker x (HOURSUtility Worker + HOURSTurnover x 2) x WAGEUtility Worker x CONTINGENCYReturn to Rull Power) - (NUMUtility Worker x HOURSUtility Worker x WAGEUtility Worker)
The management cost associated with a shift schedule change that will not meet the new waiver requirements is the cost of the additional management burden for planning and coordination. The management cost is calculated as follows:
(1 hour x WAGEManager)
The return to power cost associated with operating at a reduced power level is the cost of allocating resources without the availability of a waiver. The return to power cost is calculated as follows:
HOURSTurnovers x REDUCED_POWER x HCOSTOutage
Parameter |
Description |
---|---|
NUMUtility Worker |
The number of utility workers impacted by shift schedule changes that will no longer be allowed |
HOURSUtility Worker |
Hours worked per utility worker that exceeded the work hour requirements |
CONTINGENCYReturn to Full Power |
Contingency factor measuring the significance of expected resource loading associated with return to full power activities (described in assumptions below) |
WAGEUtility Worker |
The estimated hourly rate of utility worker labor (described in Section A3.9) |
HOURSTurnover |
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing (described in assumptions below) |
REDUCED_POWER |
Percent of total power lost per hour from operating at a reduced power level (described in assumptions below) |
HCOSTOutage |
The hourly cost of delaying the completion of an outage (described in Section A3.9) |
WAGEManager |
Average manager wage rate (described in Section A3.9) |
Assumptions:
A scaling factor is used to increase baseline costs to reflect higher costs under the final provision. The contingency factor value in this equation is assumed to be equal to 5. The contingency factor value is based on an evaluation of special conditions, including individuals’ level of specialization, potential difficulty in establishing alternative arrangements, the likelihood of cost premiums like travel per diem and the potential impact on at-power operation. In this section of the appendix, the contingency value ranges from 1 to 5. For this category, the contingency factor equals 5 due to the direct impact waivers have on production output.
The estimated amount of time (in hours) associated with a turnover job briefing: 0.5 hours.
The estimated level of effort to process an at-power waiver is 1 hour.
Percent of total power lost per hour from operating at a reduced power level: 25%.
A3.9 Generic Costing Assumptions
Management labor rate: $100/hour.
The estimated hourly rate of utility craft labor: $40/hour.
The estimated hourly rate of specialty contractors: $80/hour.
The estimated hourly rate of local labor: $25/hour.
The effectiveness of additional resources relative to those that are being augmented: 100%.
The hourly cost of delaying the completion of an outage: $10,000.
The estimated round trip travel fee used for contractor workers: $1,000.
The estimated level of effort to process a waiver is 1 hour.
File Type | application/octet-stream |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 0000-00-00 |