Highly Migratory Species Dealer Reporting Family of Forms

ICR 200712-0648-003

OMB: 0648-0040

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change
2007-12-06
Supporting Statement A
2007-10-02
ICR Details
0648-0040 200712-0648-003
Historical Active 200704-0648-007
DOC/NOAA
Highly Migratory Species Dealer Reporting Family of Forms
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 12/20/2007
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 12/10/2007
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
10/31/2010 10/31/2010 10/31/2010
37,418 0 37,418
6,148 0 6,148
7,408 0 7,408

This information collection consists of a mandatory dealer reporting program for domestic landings and international trade of highly migratory species. Catch and trade monitoring is required under provisions of the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act, Tunas Convention Act, and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Information collected through this program is essential for the United States to meet its reporting obligations to the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas and the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. A proposed rule would: 1) adjust NMFS regulations to indicate that reports associated with the HMS ITP and Atlantic Tunas Dealer Permit holder biweekly reporting must be received via mail or fax by a date certain rather than postmarked by a date certain, and would clarify when the use of fax was appropriate for report submission; 2)clarify that HMS ITP holders who export a domestically landed bluefin tuna would NOT be required to file a biweekly report if all the relevant information was reported by another permit holder, for example, the Atlantic tunas dealer permit (ATDP) holder who landed the fish.

PL: Pub.L. 109 - 479 104 Name of Law: Magnuson_Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  71 FR 78406 12/29/2006
72 FR 28673 05/22/2007
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 37,418 37,418 0 0 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 6,148 6,148 0 0 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 7,408 7,408 0 0 0 0
No
No
The number of respondents has decreased because better estimates are available for International Trade permits (ITPs) since program implementation in 2005. In addition, the number of tuna permit holders decreased in 2005. The number of shark or swordfish permit holders was used in the current collection package rather than the additive number of shark and swordfish permit holders to avoid double-counting. The number of responses fell in this renewal package because of the direct correlation between the number of respondents and number of responses for certain reporting forms such as biweekly reports. In addition, landings and trade may vary from one year to the next. The reporting burden has fallen for these reasons and because of the new fax-in validation service which is more time efficient (15 minutes compared to 2 hours in previous collection) than the previous method. The total annual costs for this renewal are adjusted down by $11,000 due to the reduction in number of responses, and the recently begun use of postage-paid envelopes by the SER under this renewal. The "agency discretion" removals shown are due to having removed the current "lumped together" IC moved to ROCIS by OMB, and the substitution of several ICs in its place.

$17,392
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Margo Schulz-Haugen 301 713-0234

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
12/10/2007


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy