1018-0123 30-day notice

1018-0123 30-day notice published.pdf

International Conservation Grant Programs

1018-0123 30-day notice

OMB: 1018-0123

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices
lands of the Ute Indian Tribe along the
Duchesne River in Utah as partial
mitigation for these Bonneville Unit
impacts. The LDWP has been planned
in conjunction with the Ute Indian
Tribe and is intended to fulfill a longstanding commitment to mitigate for
impacts to Ute Indian tribal wetlandwildlife resources and to provide
additional wetland/wildlife benefits to
the Ute Indian Tribe.
Notice of Intent to initiate public
scoping and prepare a Draft EIS was
published in the Federal Register on
April 25, 2001 (66 FR 20827). Scoping
was accomplished by means of three
public meetings convened in Ft.
Duchesne, Roosevelt and Salt Lake City,
Utah in May 2003. The DEIS was filed
with the EPA by the Joint Lead Agencies
on November 17, 2003. Notice of
Availability of the DEIS was announced
in the Federal Register on November 24,
2003 (68 FR 65943). Three public
meetings were held in Ft. Duchesne,
Roosevelt and Salt Lake City, Utah in
December 2003, to receive public
comment on the DEIS. Comments
received during the public comment
period from November 17, 2003 to
February 17, 2004, were considered
during preparation of the FEIS.
Publication of a Record of Decision
for the LDWP will occur no sooner than
30 days from the date of this notice.
Proposed Action—Approximately
4,807 acres of land composed of 3,215
acres of Ute Indian Tribal trust lands,
and 1,592 acres of fee lands to be
acquired by the Federal Government,
would be acquired and/or developed
into cohesive wetlands management
units. A portion of the water currently
managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs
for the Ute Indian Tribe under the
existing Uinta Indian Irrigation Project
would be utilized, along with water that
may be acquired with fee land
acquisitions, to create, restore and
enhance wetlands throughout the
project area. Lands acquired in fee title

(except lands acquired by eminent
domain) would be transferred to the Ute
Indian Tribe. All project lands
(dedicated tribal and acquired lands)
would be managed for project purposes
by the Ute Indian Tribe under
management agreements with the Joint
Lead Agencies to achieve the prescribed
wetlands-associated fish and wildlife
benefits, and for other wetland/wildliferelated tribal benefits.
Alternatives—Two action alternatives
were developed and evaluated. The
alternatives included in the FEIS are
similar to the Proposed Action, differing
only in the acreage amounts and
locations.
No Action—No lands or waters would
be acquired or managed for wetland
habitat improvements or tribal benefits.
This Central Utah Project, Bonneville
Unit mitigation commitment to the Ute
Indian Tribe would remain unfulfilled.
The Commission would undertake
additional planning to develop an
acceptable alternative means to
complete this mitigation commitment.
Reed R. Murray,
Program Director, Department of the Interior.
Michael C. Weland,
Executive Director, Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–7810 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–RK–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Information Collection Sent to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for Approval; OMB Control No.
1018–0123; International Conservation
Grant Programs
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: We (Fish and Wildlife
Service) have sent an Information

Number of annual
respondents

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Activity

19867

Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for
review and approval. This ICR revises
OMB Control No. 1018–0123 to include
our new Wildlife Without Borders
Africa Grant Program. The ICR, which is
summarized below, describes the nature
of the collection and the estimated
burden and cost. We may not conduct
or sponsor and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before May 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments and
suggestions on this ICR to the Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Interior at OMB-OIRA at (202) 395–6566
(fax) or [email protected]
(e-mail). Please provide a copy of your
comments to Hope Grey, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and
Wildlife Service, MS 222–ARLSQ, 4401
North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA
22203 (mail); (703) 358–2269 (fax); or
[email protected] (e-mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Hope Grey by mail, fax,
or e-mail (see ADDRESSES) or by
telephone at (703) 358–2482.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 1018–0123.
Title: International Conservation
Grant Programs.
Service Form Number(s): 3–2338.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Domestic and
nondomestic Federal, State, and local
governments; nonprofit,
nongovernmental organizations; public
and private institutions of higher
education; and any other organization or
individual with demonstrated
experience deemed necessary to carry
out the proposed project.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: Annually.

Number of annual
responses

Completion time
per response

Annual burden
hours

Grant Application (cover page and narrative) .........................
Report (mid-term and final) .....................................................

539*
126*

539
252

12 hours ..........
30 hours ..........

6,468
7,560

Totals ................................................................................

665

791

.....................

14,028

*Of the 539 applicants, we estimate
that 137 will be domestic and 402 will
be nondomestic. Of the 126 grantees
submitting reports, we estimate that 32
will be domestic and 94 will be
nondomestic.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

19:21 Apr 10, 2008

Jkt 214001

Abstract: The Division of
International Conservation awards
grants funded under the:
(1) African Elephant Conservation Act
(16 U.S.C. 4201–4245).
(2) Asian Elephant Conservation Act
of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 4261).

PO 00000

Frm 00066

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

(3) Great Apes Conservation Act of
2000 (Pub. L. 106–411).
(4) Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation
Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 5306).
(5) Marine Turtle Conservation Act
(Pub. L. 108–266).

E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM

11APN1

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

19868

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices

(6) Wildlife Without Borders
Programs - Mexico, Latin America and
the Caribbean, and Russia.
OMB has approved the information
collection associated with the above
grants and assigned control number
1018–0123. We have asked OMB to
approve our proposed information
collection associated with the Africa
Grant Program, which will be our
newest area of focus under the Wildlife
Without Borders programs.
Africa’s magnificent wildlife
resources are under increasing pressure
from human activities. The proposed
Africa grant initiative aims to provide
training opportunities for African
conservationists, educators, and
policymakers to strengthen wildlife
management in and around protected
areas. For the purpose of this fund,
protected areas are defined as sites that
are publicly or privately owned with
recognized legal status accorded by
national, provincial, or local
government, containing primarily
unmodified natural systems managed
for long-term protection. Examples
include: national parks, forest reserves,
buffer zones, community reserves, and
privately held land conservancies. Of
particular interest are projects that
provide training to:
(1) Raise capacity in and around
protected areas to mitigate the impact of
extractive industries, climate change,
human /wildlife conflict, illegal trade in
bushmeat, and/or wildlife disease.
(2) Strengthen the administrative
capacity (human resource management,
financial management, vehicle and
facility maintenance, grant writing and
project implementation, community
outreach and education, conflict
resolution, and coalition building) of
protected areas.
(3) Strengthen university, college, and
other conservation training programs
that address protected area
management.
(4) Strengthen decisionmakers’
knowledge of concepts relevant to
protected area legislation, policy, and
finance and the importance of
harmonizing these with other national
sectoral policies.
By providing wildlife professionals
with opportunities for training, we can
help empower a generation of local
people to address key conservation
issues such as the threat to wildlife from
extractive industries, illegal hunting,
human/wildlife conflict, and wildlife
disease.
Applicants submit proposals for
funding in response to Notices of
Funding Availability that we will
publish on Grants.gov. We plan to
collect the following information:

VerDate Aug<31>2005

19:21 Apr 10, 2008

Jkt 214001

(1) Cover page with basic project
details (FWS Form 3–2338).
(2) Project summary and narrative.
(3) Letter of appropriate government
endorsement.
(4) Brief curricula vitae for key project
personnel.
(5) Complete Standard Forms 424 and
424b (nondomestic applicants do not
submit the standard forms).
Proposals may also include, as
appropriate, a copy of the organization’s
Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement
(NIRCA) and any additional
documentation supporting the proposed
project.
The project summary and narrative
are the basis for this information
collection request for approval. A panel
of technical experts reviews each
proposal to assess how well the project
addresses the priorities identified by
each program’s authorizing legislation.
As all of the on-the-ground projects
funded by this program will be
conducted outside the United States, the
letter of appropriate government
endorsement ensures that the proposed
activities will not meet with local
resistance or work in opposition to
locally identified priorities and needs.
Brief curricula vitae for key project
personnel allow the review panel to
assess the qualifications of project staff
to effectively carry out the project goals
and objectives. As all Federal entities
must honor the indirect cost rates an
organization has negotiated with its
cognizant agency, we require all
organizations with a NICRA to submit
the agreement paperwork with their
proposals to verify how their rate is
applied in their proposed budget.
Applicants may provide any additional
documentation that they believe best
supports their proposal.
Comments: On October 30, 2007, we
published in the Federal Register (72 FR
61363) a notice of our intent to request
that OMB approve our proposed
collection of information for the African
Grant Program. In that notice, we
solicited comments for 60 days, ending
on December 31, 2007. We did not
receive any comments in response to
that notice.
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on:
(1) whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
(3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and

PO 00000

Frm 00067

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

(4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask OMB in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that it will be done.
Dated: February 12, 2008
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Fish and Wildlife Service.
FR Doc. E8–7648 Filed 4-10–08; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2008–N0071; 20124–1113–
0000–F2]

Draft Safe Harbor Agreement and
Application for an Enhancement of
Survival Permit for the Beautiful
Shiner, Chiricahua Leopard Frog,
Huachuca Water Umbel, Yaqui Catfish,
Yaqui Chub, and Yaqui Topminnow in
Cochise County, Arizona
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; receipt of
application.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: Alysa F. Bennett, 99 Bar
Ranch Limited Liability Limited
Partnership, and Mr. Josiah and Mrs.
Valer Austin, owners of the Bar Boot
Ranch (Applicants), have applied to the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
for an enhancement of survival permit
(TE–160629–0)pursuant to Section
10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species
Act (Act), as amended. The requested
permit, which is for a period of 50 years,
would authorize incidental take of the
threatened beautiful shiner (Cyprinella
formosa), threatened Chiricahua leopard
frog (Rana chiricahuensis), endangered
Huachuca water umbel (Lilaeopsis
schaffneriana var. recurva), threatened
Yaqui catfish (Ictalurus pricei),
endangered Yaqui chub (Gila purpurea),
and endangered Yaqui topminnow
(Poeciliopsis occidentalis sonoriensis) as
a result of conservation actions, ongoing livestock operations, recreation,
land treatments, and other existing land-

E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM

11APN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleDocument
SubjectExtracted Pages
AuthorU.S. Government Printing Office
File Modified2008-04-11
File Created2008-04-11

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy