REG.120168.97-Sup

REG.120168.97-Sup.doc

REG-120168-97 (Final) Preparer Due Diligence Requirements for Determining Earned Income Credit Eligibility

OMB: 1545-1570

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT




1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Section 6695(g), as added by section 1085(a)(2) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105‑34, 111 Stat. 788 (August 5, 1997), imposes a $100 penalty on a preparer with respect to any return or claim for refund for each failure to comply with the due diligence requirements imposed by regulations with respect to determining a taxpayer's eligibility for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EIC) or the amount of any allowable EIC. This new penalty is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1996, and is in addition to any other penalty imposed under present law.


In Notice 97‑65, 1997‑51 I.R.B. 14 (December 22, 1997), the IRS set forth the preparer due diligence requirements for 1997 returns and claims for refund involving the EIC. The temporary regulations do not substantially change the due diligence requirements of Notice 97‑65. Preparers satisfying the due diligence requirements in this temporary regulation will avoid the imposition of the penalty under §6695(g) of the Internal Revenue code for income tax returns and claims for refund for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997.


For federal income tax returns and claims for refund for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997, a preparer that complies with the following requirements involving the EIC will have exercised due diligence and will not be liable for the penalty under §6695(g). A preparer who fails to comply with one or more of the following requirements will be liable for the §6695(g) penalty:


(1) the preparer must ask specific questions regarding the taxpayer's eligibility for the EIC. For this purpose, the preparer must either complete the Eligibility Record or ask questions that solicit the same information;


(2) the preparer must obtain the information necessary to compute the EIC (Computation Record). For this purpose, the preparer must either complete the Computation Record or otherwise obtain the same information;


(3) the preparer must retain (a) the completed Eligibility Record (or a record of the questions asked and responses received), (b) a copy of the Computation Record (or a record of the information obtained); and (c) a record of the identity of the person furnishing the responses and information and the date furnished. These items must be retained for three years after the June 30th following the date the return was presented to the taxpayer for signature, and may be retained on magnetic media consistent with Rev. 1981 C.B. 621, or in an electronic storage media system consistent with Rev. 97-22, 1997-13 I.R.B. 9; and


(4) the preparer must not know or have reason to know that any responses or information provided is incorrect. The preparer may not ignore the implications of information furnished to, or known by, the preparer, and must make reasonable inquiries if the information furnished or known appears to be incorrect, inconsistent or incomplete.


2. USE OF DATA


The IRS will use this information to determine whether income tax return preparers met their due diligence obligation described in §6695(g).

3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


We have no plans to offer electronic filing. IRS publication, regulations, notices and letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency

wherever possible.


5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


Not applicable.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not applicable.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE

INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not applicable.


8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON

AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY

OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


The notice of proposed rulemaking(63 FR 70357) was published simultaneously with temporary regulations (63 FR 70339)in the Federal Register on December 21, 1998. No public hearing was held or requested. The final regulations were published in the Federal Register on October 17, 2000 (65 FR 61268).


We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register Notice dated February 8, 2008 (73 FR 7630).

9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO

RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


Not applicable.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 1.6695-2 provides that, in order to avoid imposition of the penalty under section 6695(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, income tax return preparers (preparers) who prepare returns or claims for refund involving the Earned Income Credit (EIC) must meet the following due diligence requirements: 1) complete the Eligibility Checklist in Form 8867, “Paid Preparer’s Earned Income Credit Checklist” (Checklist), 2) complete the “Earned Income Credit Worksheet” (Worksheet) in the instructions to Form 1040, 3) have no knowledge that the information used to complete either the Checklist or Worksheet is false, and 4) retain the records for three years after the June 30th following the date the return or claim was presented to the taxpayer. Preparers are not required to complete the actual Checklist and Worksheet. Instead, preparers can meet the due diligence requirements by recording the information necessary to complete the Checklist and/or Worksheet in their paper or electronic files (alternative method).


We estimate that 1,200,000 preparers will complete EIC affected returns and, accordingly, will be subject to the paperwork requirements of the Form 8867, the “Earned Income Credit Worksheet” contained in the Form 1040, and the alternative method contained in the regulation. The 1,200,000 preparers will prepare 9,128,447 EIC returns and claims. Of the 1,200,000 preparers, we estimate that 1,100,000 preparers will choose to use the Form 8867 and the "Earned Income Credit Worksheet" to meet their due diligence requirements. The burden for Form 8867 and the "Earned Income Credit Worksheet" is reflected in the burden estimate for Form 8867 and Form 1040 respectively.

We estimate that the remaining 100,000 preparers will choose to use the alternative method. These 100,000 preparers will prepare 760,704 returns and claims. We estimate that it will take each preparer 40 minutes per return or claim to complete the alternative method. Accordingly, we estimate that the total annual burden will be 507,136 hours for preparers who choose to use the alternative method. We estimate that the annual burden per preparer will be 5 hours 4 minutes. The estimated total annual recordkeeping burden is 507,136 hours.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.

13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register Notice dated

February 8, 2008 (73 FR 7630), requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any response from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


Not applicable.


15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS

INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is

inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading

taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the

expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that

the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval

and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


18. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.




Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorJ11FB
Last Modified ByJ11FB
File Modified2008-04-28
File Created2008-04-28

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy