Attachment 4 - Nonsubstantive comment

Attachment 4 comment.pdf

Personal Flotation Devices (PFGs) and Commercial Fishermen: Preconceptions and Evaluation in Actual Use

Attachment 4 - Nonsubstantive comment

OMB: 0920-0787

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
file:////fnio-dsr-anc/Link/fok1/My Documents/Commercial Fishing/National ...otocol Attachments/RE public comment on federal register of 81607 vol 72

From: Lucas, Devin L. (CDC/NIOSH/DSR)
Attachment 4: Public Comments and
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 12:06 PM
Responses to FRN
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: OMB-Comments (CDC); OMB Clearance (CDC); Griffin, Mary (CDC/NIOSH/OD); Sawyer, Tamela
(CDC/NIOSH/OD); Lincoln, Jennifer M. (CDC/NIOSH/DSR)
Subject: RE: public comment on federal register of 8/16/07 vol 72 #158 pg 46083 dhs cdc
Dear b sachau:
Thank you for your comments concerning the CDC 60 day Federal Register Notice for the project
"Personal Flotation Devices (PFDs) and Commercial Fishermen: Preconceptions and Evaluation in Actual
Use." We have given the concerns you described careful consideration. For futher information regarding
the unique mission of CDC, please refer to our website at www.cdc.gov.
Thank you for your continued interest in CDC.
Sincerely,
Devin Lucas, MS
Health Statistician

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 6:57 AM
To: OMB-Comments (CDC); [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: public comment on federal register of 8/16/07 vol 72 #158 pg 46083 dhs cdc
60 day 07 07 bl commercial fishermen
a lot of these issues we already know. we know that commercial fishermen dont like to wear them. why
dont we turn this project over to a manufacturer of commercial floatating devices to do instead of
spending american tax dollars on this. why are we spending us tax dollars for this when a manufcturer
profiteer can probebly do a better job. the costs to do this by a us govt agency will cost far far more
than allowing a private company to do this - just give them the idea and let them run with it. then the
outcome can be evaluated by taxpayers, rather than taxpayers paying for this stage of development. i
am sure there are personal flotation device mfrs that would love to make the money from this kind of
development.
b sachau
15 elm st
florham park nj 07932

file:////fnio-dsr-anc/Link/fok1/My Documents/Commercial F...ts/RE public comment on federal register of 81607 vol 72 (1 of 2)10/12/2007 12:56:06 PM


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Titlefile:////fnio-dsr-anc/Link/fok1/My Documents/Commercial Fishing/National CommFish Project/PFD RATINGS/OMB/Protocol Attachments/R
File Modified2007-10-18
File Created2007-10-12

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy