Supporting Statement A_CAPTAP_Final

Supporting Statement A_CAPTAP_Final.doc

Critical Infrastructure Key Resources (CIKR) Asset Protection Technical Assistance Program (CAPTAP) Survey

OMB: 1670-0011

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf


Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions


Title: Critical Infrastructure Key Resources CIKR Asset Protection Technical Assistance Program (CAPTAP) Survey


OMB Control Number: 1670-NEW


PRA 1670_ CAPTAP Survey Supporting Statement A


A. Justification


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.

The Critical Infrastructure Key Resources (CIKR) Asset Protection Technical Assistance Program (CAPTAP) offers State and local first responders, emergency managers, and other homeland security officials training to develop comprehensive CIKR protection programs in their respective jurisdictions; access to the Constellation/Automated Critical Asset Management System (C/ACAMS) tools for using CIKR asset data, prevention and protection information, and incident response and recovery plans to make their communities safer. The survey measures customer satisfaction with the training provided through the CAPTAP service. The C/ACAMS Program Management Office (PMO) is administered out of the Infrastructure Information Collection Division (IICD) in the Office of Infrastructure Protection (IP). The survey data collected is for internal C/ACAMS PMO, IICD and IP use only.


2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


The survey data collected is for internal C/ACAMS PMO, IICD and IP use only. The C/ACAMS PMO evaluates the CAPTAP customer survey to determine levels of customer satisfaction with the CAPTAP training and experience with the C/ACAMS tool. The survey supports data-based decision-making because it evaluates quantitative and qualitative data to identify improvements and identify significant issues based on what customers’ experience. Obtaining current fact-based actionable data about training and tool features allows the program to recalibrate its resources to address new or emerging issues. Information already collected has allowed the C/ACAMS PMO to rework the CAPTAP course to more effectively and efficiently provide course content and improve the C/ACAMS tool.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


The survey is administered using a Web-based survey tool, Vovici Enterprise Feedback Management (EFM). Automating the CAPTAP survey reduces the staff burden of manually administering a survey, accurately collecting data and integrating the survey as part of the training course. Since the survey is part of the course and not a separate activity, response rates are expected to be high. Automation also captures participants typed comments, eliminating time-consuming transcription and manual inaccuracies.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.



This information is not currently collected in any form, and therefore is not duplicated elsewhere.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize.


This information collection does not have an impact on small businesses or other small entities.


6. Describe the consequence to Federal/DHS program or policy activities if the collection of information is not conducted, or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


Without collecting information as requested, the CAPTAP service will be unable to evaluate and improve training to fulfill customer requirements and provide an updated C/ACAMS tool.


7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


(a) Requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly.

(b) Requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it.

(c) Requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document.

(d) Requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years.

(e) In connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study.

(f) Requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB.

(g) That includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use.

(h) Requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.



This information collection is conducted in a manner consistent with the guidelines in 5CFR 1320.5(d) (2).


8. Federal Register Notice:

a. Provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.



On March 28, 2008, the Department published a 60 Day Federal Register Notice (73 FR 16695). There were no comments received.


On June 3, 2008, the Department published a 30 Day Federal Register Notice (73 FR 31705).



9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


There is no offer of monetary or material value for this information collection.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.



The survey instrument states that the information will be kept private or anonymous to the extent allowable by law. The CAPTAP survey does not collect sensitive or proprietary information. It is a voluntary survey, not requiring nor imposing any conditions for participation. Data collected is for internal C/ACAMS PMO, IICD and IP use only.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


There are no questions of a sensitive nature.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:



a. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desired. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

c. Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.


During a pretest of the survey instrument is was determined that completion time, depending on the amount of comments, is approximately 10 minutes.


Table A.12: Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs

Type of Respondent

Form Name

No. of Respondents

No. of

Responses per

Respondent

Avg. Burden per Response (in hours)

Total Annual Burden (in hours)

Average Hourly Wage Rate

Total Annual Respondent Cost

CAPTAP Training Participants

CAPTAP Survey

400

1

.1667

66.7

$29.60

$1,974.32

Total


400



66.7


$1,974.32



The average hourly wage reflects varied skill sets from managers and analysts to first responders who would reasonably be expected to attend CAPTAP training and use the tool. The $29.60 hourly wage rate was derived by averaging the mean hourly wage estimates of typical CAPTAP participants ($26.82/hr. for 33-051 series and $32.38/hr for 33-1021 series) from Bureau of Labor Statistics Wage Data as of May 2007 (http://www.bls.gov/bls/wages.htm).


13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)


There are no record keeping, capital, start-up or maintenance costs associated with this information collection.


14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal Government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing and support staff), and any other expense that would have been incurred without this collection of information. You may also aggregate cost estimates for Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.



IICD has purchased access to a Web-based survey programming tool, Vovici EFM Feedback, which allows for survey programming, administration, and basic data analysis. The financial costs for collecting information will decrease dependent on the number of surveys automated using this tool. The initial application cost $1,250.00 with an annual $1,000 maintenance fee. However, these fees cover the CAPTAP survey and surveys for other IICD programs. The cost per survey will diminish as the tool is used for other surveys. However, if no other surveys use the application in FY08, the cost will total $2,250.00.


The other cost to the Federal Government will be the salary of the Federal and contract/support staff that design, administer and review this material. The level of staff that design, administer, and analyze the collected materials may vary from a GS-11 to a GS-13 salary. The average hourly wage for GS-11/GS-12/GS-13 personnel from GS Salary tables for 2008 Washington, D.C. area locality pay is $38.74. Estimates are that it takes 40 hours to review, analyze and create each quarterly report (4 reports) and annual report (1 report) and 100 hours for survey design and administration.


Cost Category

Form Name

Hours for Design/

Administration

Hours per

Report

Number of

Reports

Total

Annual

Burden

(in hours)

Average Hourly Wage Rate

Total

Annual Cost

Programming tool

CAPTAP survey

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

$2,250

GS 11/12/13 personnel

CAPTAP survey

100

40

5

300

$38.74

$11,622.00

Total





300


$13,872.00



15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I. Changes in hour burden, i.e., program changes or adjustments made to annual reporting and recordkeeping hour and cost burden. A program change is the result of deliberate Federal government action. All new collections and any subsequent revisions of existing collections (e.g., the addition or deletion of questions) are recorded as program changes. An adjustment is a change that is not the result of a deliberate Federal government action. These changes that result from new estimates or actions not controllable by the Federal government are recorded as adjustments.



This is a new information collection request.


16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.



The C/ACAMS PMO program will not publish the CAPTAP survey results and they are for internal use only. All survey reporting is internal to IP, IICD, and the C/ACAMS PMO. Survey results will be used at the IP level for reporting of performance metrics. The CAPTAP survey will be analyzed using frequencies and cross tabulations in SPSS statistical software. Weighting will not be performed because population parameters are unknown and data is not estimated to the population. Data is aggregated quarterly and annually to identify areas in need of improvement and identify trends. Data is collected on a continuous basis with surveys administered at the conclusion of each instructor-led training session which are scheduled throughout the year.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain reasons that display would be inappropriate.



IICD will display the expiration date for OMB approval of this information collection.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19 “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions,” of OMB Form 83-I.



IICD does not request an exception to the certification of this information collection.


6

File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
Authorfema user
Last Modified Bycmagee
File Modified2008-09-22
File Created2008-09-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy