NOT-102132-05_Sup Stmnt

NOT-102132-05_Sup Stmnt.doc

Notice 2005-10, Domestic Reinvestment Plans and Other Guidance under Section 965 (NOT-102132-05)

OMB: 1545-1926

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

(NOT-102132-05)




1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


This document provides guidance under new section 965 enacted by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-357). In general, and subject to limitations and conditions, section 965(a) provides that a corporation that is a U.S. shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) may elect, for one taxable year, an 85 percent dividends received deduction (DRD) with respect to certain cash dividends it receives from its CFCs. Section 965(f) provides that taxpayers may elect the application of section 965 for either the taxpayer’s last taxable year which begins before October 22, 2004, or the taxpayer’s first taxable year which begins during the one-year period beginning on October 22, 2004. In general, a taxpayer elects to apply section 965 to a taxable year by filing Form 8895 with its timely-filed tax return (including extensions) for such taxable year. If, however, a taxpayer files its tax return for the taxable year to which the taxpayer intends to elect section 965 to apply prior to the issuance of Form 8895, the election must be made on a statement that is attached to its timely-filed tax return (including extensions) for such taxable year. In addition, because the taxpayer must establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that it has satisfied the conditions to take the DRD, the taxpayer is required under this guidance to report specified information and provides specified documentation.


2. USE OF DATA


The collection of information is required to elect to apply section 965 and for audit and examination purposes. In particular, this information is required to provide the IRS sufficient information to determine whether a taxpayer has properly elected to apply section 965 to a taxable year, to determine whether a dividend has been invested in the United States pursuant to a domestic reinvestment plan under section 965(b)(4), and to determine whether a taxpayer has properly applied certain transition rules. The collections of information are required to obtain the benefit of section 965 for a taxable year. The likely respondents will be U.S. corporations that directly or indirectly own 10 percent or greater interests in foreign corporations.

  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


We expect to offer electronic filing on Form 8895.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


Not applicable.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not applicable.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE

INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not applicable.


8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON

AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY

OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


Periodic meetings are held between IRS personnel and representatives of the American Bar Association, the National Society of Public Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and other professional groups to discuss tax law and tax forms. During these meetings, there is an opportunity for those attending to make comments regarding Notice-102132-05.


In response to the Federal Register Notice dated April 10, 2008 (73 FR 19589), we received no comments regarding Notice–102132-05.


9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO

RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


Not applicable.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


The collection of information in this notice is based upon section 965(f) of the Internal Revenue Code. The collection of information relates to the requirement that qualifying taxpayers may elect to deduct 85 percent of certain dividends received, provided that such dividends are invested in the United States pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan. This collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the IRS because it notifies the IRS whether taxpayers have claimed and are entitled to the deduction. The likely respondents will be U.S. corporations that directly or indirectly own 10 percent or greater interests in foreign corporations.


A taxpayer elects to apply section 965 to a taxable year by filing Form 8895 with its timely-filed tax return (including extensions) for such taxable year. If, however, a taxpayer files its tax return for the taxable year to which the taxpayer intends to elect section 965 to apply prior to the issuance of Form 8895, the election must be made on a statement that is attached to its timely-filed tax return (including extensions) for such taxable year. In addition, because the taxpayer must establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that it has satisfied the conditions to take the dividends received deduction, the taxpayer is required under this guidance to report specified information and provide specified documentation regarding investments of the amount of the dividends. We estimate that approximately 25,000 taxpayers will elect to deduct their dividends under section 965 and that it will take each taxpayer approximately 150 hours to prepare the documentation. The total reporting burden is estimated to be 3,750,000 hours.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.





13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register Notice dated April 10, 2008 (73 FR 19589), requested public comments on estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any response from taxpayers, during the comment period on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


After consultation with various functions within the Service, we have determined that the cost of developing, printing, processing, distribution and overhead for the form is $1,500.


15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


Not applicable.


16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS

INAPPROPRIATE


We believe the public interest will be better served by not printing an expiration date on the form(s) in this package.


Printing the expiration date on the form will result in increased costs because of the need to replace inventories that become obsolete by passage of the expiration date each time OMB approval is renewed. Without printing the expiration date, supplies of the form could continue to be used.


The time period which the current edition of the form(s) in this package will continue to be usable cannot be predicted. It could easily span several cycles of review and OMB clearance renewal. In addition, usage fluctuates unpredictably. This makes it necessary to maintain a substantial inventory of forms in the supply line at all times. This includes supplies owned by both the Government and the public. Reprinting of the form cannot be reliably scheduled to coincide with an OMB approval expiration date. This form may be privately printed by users at their own expense. Some businesses print complex and expensive marginally punched continuous versions, at the expense, for use in their computers. The form may be printed by commercial printers and stocked for sale. In such cases, printing the expiration date on the form could result in extra costs to the users.


Not printing the expiration date on the form(s) will also avoid confusion among taxpayers who may have identical forms with different expiration dates in their possession.


For the above reasons we request authorization to omit printing the expiration date on the form(s) referred to in this package.


18. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.




Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.

File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorCarol
Last Modified By5pqgb
File Modified2008-06-12
File Created2008-06-10

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy