Supporting Statement

Supporting Statement.doc

Rev. Proc. 2002-32 Waiver of 60-month Bar on Reconsolidation after Disaffiliation; Rev. Proc. 2006-21- Modifications to Rev. Proc. 2002-32

OMB: 1545-1784

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

(Revenue Procedure 2006-21)




  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


This revenue procedure provides qualifying taxpayers with a waiver of the general rule of § 1504(a)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code barring corporations from filing consolidated returns as a member of a group of which it had been a member for 60 months following the year of disaffiliation. The collection of information is necessary to determine if the taxpayer qualifies for the waiver.


  1. USE OF DATA


The information is to be used by revenue agents and by employees of the Office of Chief Counsel to determine if the taxpayer qualifies for the waiver granted to qualifying taxpayers by the revenue procedure, by, among other things, determining whether the taxpayer obtained a tax benefit by means of the disaffiliation and reconsolidation (in which case the taxpayer would not qualify for the waiver).

  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


Not applicable.


  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not applicable.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not applicable.


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


Revenue Procedure 2002-32 was published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin on May 20, 2002 (2002-20 IRB 959).


We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register notice (73 FR 22006), dated April 23, 2008.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


Not applicable.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


The collection of information is in Sections 5 and 7 of this revenue procedure. Taxpayers that qualify for the automatic waiver described in this revenue procedure obtain the waiver by attaching a statement to their tax return. Taxpayers that do not qualify for the automatic waiver may request a waiver in the form of a private letter ruling. The information will be used to determine whether taxpayers qualify for the waiver. The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is 100 hours. The estimated annual burden per respondent/recordkeeper varies from 2 hours to 8 hours, depending on individual circumstances, with an estimated average of 5 hours. The estimated number of respondents is 20.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.

  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice dated April 23, 2008, requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any response from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change to total taxpayer burden.


We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the revenue procedure sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.




Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorJ11FB
Last Modified Byqhrfb
File Modified2008-06-19
File Created2008-04-09

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy