60_Day_FR_Notice

35412

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 121 / Monday, June 23, 2008 / Notices

others. If a person believes that one or
more of these issues warrant a hearing,
the individual should so state and
summarize the reasons for this belief.
Persons wishing to request a hearing
should note that such requests must be
written and manually signed; requests
for a hearing will not be accepted via
electronic means. In the event that
comments or objections to this proposal
raise one or more issues which the
Deputy Administrator finds warrant a
hearing, the Deputy Administrator shall
order a public hearing by notice in the
Federal Register, summarizing the
issues to be heard and setting the time
for the hearing as per 21 CFR 1315.13(e).
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator hereby
certifies that this action will not have a
significant economic impact upon small
entities whose interests must be
considered under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The
establishment of the assessment of
annual needs for ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine and
phenylpropanolamine is mandated by
law. The assessments are necessary to
provide for the estimated medical,
scientific, research and industrial needs
of the United States, for lawful export
requirements, and the establishment
and maintenance of reserve stocks.
Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator
has determined that this action does not
require a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that notices of
assessment of annual needs are not
subject to centralized review under
Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This action does not preempt or
modify any provision of state law; nor
does it impose enforcement
responsibilities on any state; nor does it
diminish the power of any state to
enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this
action does not have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13132.

mmaher on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Executive Order 12988
This action meets the applicable
standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil
Justice Reform.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This action will not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $120,000,000 or more

VerDate Aug<31>2005

01:51 Jun 21, 2008

Jkt 214001

in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action is not a major rule as
defined by Section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This action will
not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Dated: June 6, 2008.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8–14108 Filed 6–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2008–0020]

Slings; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits comments
concerning its proposal to extend OMB
approval of the information collection
requirements contained in the Standard
on Slings (29 CFR 1910.184). The
collection of information (paperwork)
provisions of the Standard specify
affixing identification tags or markings
on slings, developing and maintaining
inspection records, and retaining proof
testing certificates.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
August 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may
submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer

PO 00000

Frm 00047

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit
three copies of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office,
Docket No. OSHA–2008–0020, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail,
messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the ICR (OSHA–
2008–0020). All comments, including
any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information(e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor,
RoomN–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202) 693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program

E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM

23JNN1

mmaher on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 121 / Monday, June 23, 2008 / Notices
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the Act
or for developing information regarding
the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The Slings Standard (29 CFR
1910.184) specifies several collection of
information (paperwork) requirements,
depending on the type of sling. The
purpose of each of these requirements is
to prevent employees from using
defective or deteriorated slings, thereby
reducing their risk of death or serious
injury caused by sling failure during
material handling.
Paragraph (e) of the Standard covers
alloy steel chain slings. Paragraph (e)(1)
requires that alloy steel chain slings
have permanently affixed and durable
identification stating the size, grade,
rated capacity, and reach of the sling.
The information, supplied by the
manufacturer, is typically marked on a
metal tag and affixed to the sling.
Paragraph (e)(3)(i) requires the
employer to make a thorough periodic
inspection of alloy steel chain slings in
use on a regular basis, but at least once
a year. Paragraph (e)(3)(ii) requires the
employer to make and maintain a record
of the most recent month in which each
alloy steel chain sling was thoroughly
inspected, and make this record
available for examination.
Paragraph (e)(4) requires the employer
to retain certificates of proof testing.
Employers must ensure that before use,
each new, repaired, or reconditioned
alloy steel chain sling, including all
welded components in the sling
assembly, has been proof tested by the
sling manufacturer or an equivalent
entity. The certificates of proof testing
must be retained by the employer and
made available for examination.
Paragraph (f) of the Standard covers
wire rope slings. Paragraph (f)(4)(ii)
requires that all welded end
attachments of wire rope slings be proof
tested by the manufacturer at twice their
rated capacity prior to initial use, and
that the employer retain a certificate of

VerDate Aug<31>2005

01:51 Jun 21, 2008

Jkt 214001

the proof test and make it available for
examination.
Paragraph (g) of the Standard covers
metal mesh slings. Paragraph (g)(1)
requires each metal mesh sling to have
a durable marking permanently affixed
that states the rated capacity for vertical
basket hitch and choker hitch loadings.
Paragraph (g)(8)(ii) requires that once
repaired, each metal mesh sling be
permanently marked or tagged, or a
written record maintained to indicate
the date and type of the repairs made,
and the person or organization that
performed the repairs. Records of the
repairs shall be made available for
examination.
Paragraph (i) of the Standard covers
synthetic web slings. Paragraph (i)(1)
requires that synthetic web slings be
marked or coded to show the rated
capacities for each type of hitch and the
type of synthetic web material used in
the sling.
Paragraph (i)(8)(i) prohibits the use of
repaired synthetic web slings until they
have been proof tested by the
manufacturer or an equivalent entity.
Paragraph (i)(8)(ii) requires the
employer to retain a certificate of the
proof test and make it available for
examination.
The information on the identification
tags, markings, and codings assist the
employer in determining whether the
sling can be used for the lifting task. The
sling inspections enable early detection
of faulty slings. The inspection and
repair records provide employers with
information about when the last
inspection was made and about the type
of the repairs made. This information
provides some assurance about the
condition of the slings. These records
also provide the most efficient means
for an OSHA compliance officer to
determine that an employer is
complying with the Standard. Proof
testing certificates give employers,
employees, and OSHA compliance
officers assurance that slings are safe to
use. The certificates also provide the
compliance officers with an efficient
means to assess employer compliance
with the Standard.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;

PO 00000

Frm 00048

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

35413

• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend
its approval of the information
collection requirements contained in the
Standard on Slings (29 CFR 1910.184).
OSHA is proposing to decrease the
existing burden hour estimate for the
collection of information requirements
specified by the Standard from 19,167
hours to 17,760 hours, a total decrease
of 1,407 hours. The decrease occurred
because, although there was an increase
in the total number of slings, there was
a decrease in the number of alloy steel
chain slings. The Agency will
summarize the comments submitted in
response to this notice and will include
this summary in the request to OMB.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Slings (29 CFR 1910.184).
OMB Number: 1218–0223.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits; Not-for-profit organizations;
Federal Government; State, Local, or
Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 1,000,000.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Average Time Per Response: Varies
from 1 minute (.02 hour) to maintain a
certificate to 30 minutes (.50 hour) for
a manufacturing employee to acquire
information from a manufacturer for a
new tag, make a new tag, and affix it to
a sling.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
17,760.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on this Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (FAX); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the
ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2008–0020).
You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional

E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM

23JNN1

35414

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 121 / Monday, June 23, 2008 / Notices

materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, messenger, or courier service,
please contact the OSHA Docket Office
at (202) 693–2350 (TTY (877) 889–
5627).
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and date of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through this Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://
www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is
available at the Web site’s ‘‘UserTips’’
link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office
for information about materials not
available through the Web site, and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate
docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 5–2007 (72 FR 31159).
Signed at Washington, DC, on June 12,
2008.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E8–14073 Filed 6–20–08; 8:45 am]

mmaher on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

VerDate Aug<31>2005

01:51 Jun 21, 2008

Jkt 214001

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2008–0018]

Forging Machines; Extension of the
Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) Approval of Information
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits comments
concerning its proposal to extend OMB
approval of the information collection
requirements contained in the Forging
Machines Standard (29 CFR 1910.218).
The paperwork provisions of the
Standard specify requirements for
developing and maintaining inspection
records, and identifying manually
operated valves and switches.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
August 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit
three copies of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office,
Docket No. OSHA–2008–0018, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail,
messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the ICR (OSHA–
2008–0018). All comments, including
any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.

PO 00000

Frm 00049

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the Act
or for developing information regarding
the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The following sections describe who
uses the information collected under
each requirement, as well as how they
use it. The purpose of these
requirements is to reduce employees’
risk of death or serious injury by
ensuring that forging machines used by
them are in safe operating condition,
and that they are able to clearly and

E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM

23JNN1