Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
30 CFR Parts 202, 206, and 207, Indian Oil and Gas Valuation
OMB Control Number 1010-0103
Forms MMS-4109, Gas Processing Allowance Summary Report;
MMS-4110, Oil Transportation Allowance Report;
MMS-4295, Gas Transportation Allowance Report;
MMS-4410, Accounting for Comparison [Dual Accounting]; and
MMS-4411, Safety Net Report
(Expiration Date: June 30, 2009)
Terms of Clearance: None.
General Instructions
The Supporting Statement, including the text of the notice to the public required by 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(i)(iv) and its actual or estimated date of publication in the Federal Register, must accompany each request for approval of a collection of information. The Supporting Statement must be prepared in the format described below, and must contain the information specified in Section A below. If an item is not applicable, provide a brief explanation. When statistical methods are employed, Section B of the Supporting Statement must be completed. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reserves the right to require the submission of additional information with respect to any request for approval.
Specific Instructions
A. Justification
1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior is responsible for mineral resource development on Federal and Indian lands and the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). The Secretary is required by various laws to manage mineral resource production on Federal and Indian lands and the OCS, collect the royalties and other mineral revenues due, and distribute the funds in accordance with those laws.
The Secretary also has a trust responsibility to manage Indian lands and seek advice and information from Indian beneficiaries. The Minerals Management Service (MMS) performs the minerals revenue management functions and assists the Secretary in carrying out the Department’s trust responsibility for Indian lands.
When a company or an individual enters into a lease to explore, develop, produce, and dispose of minerals from Federal or Indian lands, that company or individual agrees to pay the lessor a share in an amount or value of production from the leased lands. The lessee is required to report various kinds of information to the lessor relative to the disposition of the leased minerals. Such information is generally available within the records of the lessee or others involved in developing, transporting, processing, purchasing, or selling of such minerals. We collect this information to ensure that royalties are accurately valued and appropriately paid.
Indian tribes and individual Indian mineral owners receive all royalties generated from their lands. Determining product value is essential to ensure that Indian tribes and individual Indian mineral owners receive payment on the full value of the minerals removed from their lands. Failure to collect the data described in this information collection could result in the undervaluation of leased minerals on Indian lands. All data reported is subject to subsequent audit and adjustment.
Applicable laws pertaining to mineral leases on Indian lands include 25 U.S.C. 396d (Chapter 12—Lease, Sale, or Surrender of Allotted or Unallotted Lands); 25 U.S.C. 2103 (Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982); and Pub. L. 97-451—Jan. 12, 1983 (Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 [FOGRMA]). Laws pertaining to mineral leases on Federal and Indian lands are posted on our Web site at http://www.mrm.mms.gov/Laws_R_D/PublicLawsAMR.htm.
This information collection request (ICR) covers information collections (ICs) under 30 CFR part 202, subparts C and J, which pertain to royalties; part 206, subparts B and E, which govern the valuation of oil and gas produced from leases on Indian lands; and part 207, which pertains to recordkeeping.
2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection. [Be specific. If this collection is a form or a questionnaire, every question needs to be justified.]
The MMS is requesting OMB's approval to continue to collect the information described below. Not collecting this information would limit the Secretary's ability to discharge his/her duties and may also result in loss of royalty payments to Indian tribes and individual Indian mineral owners. All data collected is necessary to perform the MMS regulatory functions as discussed in detail below.
Indian Oil
Regulations at 30 CFR part 206, subpart B, govern the valuation for royalty purposes of all oil produced from Indian oil and gas leases (tribal and allotted), except leases on the Osage Indian Reservation, and must be consistent with mineral leasing laws, other applicable laws, and lease terms. Generally, the regulations provide that lessees determine the value of oil based upon the higher of (1) the gross proceeds under an arm’s-length contract; or (2) major portion analysis. These oil valuation methods are eligible for applicable transportation allowances.
Form MMS-4110, Oil Transportation Allowance Report
(submitted on occasion)
Under certain circumstances, the regulations authorize lessees to deduct from royalty payments the reasonable actual costs of transporting the royalty portion of produced minerals from the lease to a sales point not in the immediate lease area. The regulations establish a limit on transportation allowances for oil at 50 percent of the value of the oil at the point of sale. From information collected on Form MMS-4110, MMS (1) verifies transportation allowances to determine if the lessee reported and paid the proper royalty amount; and (2) MMS and tribal personnel evaluate whether the transportation allowances reported and claimed by lessees are within regulatory allowance limitations and are calculated in accordance with applicable regulations. Form MMS-4110 is used for both arm’s-length and non-arm’s-length contracts.
To receive an oil transportation allowance, lessees must submit Form MMS-4110 before or in the same month that they report the transportation allowance on Form MMS-2014, Report of Sales and Royalty Remittance (OMB Control Number 1010-0140, expires November 30, 2009). After the initial reporting period and for succeeding reporting periods, lessees must submit page one of Form MMS-4110 (and Schedule 1) within 3 months after the end of the calendar year, or after the applicable contract or rate terminates or is modified or amended, whichever is earlier, unless MMS approves a longer period. Lessees summarize actual operating, maintenance, and overhead costs, as well as depreciation and undepreciated capital investment costs, on Form MMS-4110 and applicable schedules.
Indian Gas
Regulations at 30 CFR part 206, subpart E, govern the valuation for royalty purposes of natural gas produced from Indian oil and gas leases (tribal and allotted). The regulations apply to all gas production from Indian oil and gas leases, except leases on the Osage Indian Reservation.
Form MMS-4410, Accounting for Comparison [Dual Accounting]
(submitted on occasion)
Most Indian leases contain the requirement to perform accounting for comparison (dual accounting) for gas produced from the lease. Lessees must elect to perform actual dual accounting as defined in 30 CFR 206.176 or alternative dual accounting as defined in 30 CFR 206.173.
According to 30 CFR 206.176, dual accounting is defined as the greater of the following two values:
(1) The value of gas prior to processing, less any applicable allowances, or
(2) The combined value of residue gas and gas plant products resulting from processing the gas, less any applicable allowances, plus any drip condensate associated with the processed gas recovered downstream of the point of royalty settlement, without resorting to processing, less applicable allowances.
Lessees use Form MMS-4410 to certify that dual accounting is not required on an Indian lease or to make an election for actual or alternative dual accounting for Indian leases.
Form MMS-4410 (Part A), Certification for Not Performing Dual Accounting, requires lessees to identify the MMS-designated areas where the leases are located and provide specific justification for not performing dual accounting. Part A is a one-time notification, until any changes occur in gas disposition. Part A lists the following acceptable reasons for not performing dual accounting: (1) the lease terms do not require dual accounting; (2) none of the gas from the lease is ever processed; (3) gas has a Btu content of 1,000 Btu's per cubic foot or less at lease's facility measurement point(s); (4) none of the gas from the lease is processed until after gas flows into a pipeline with an index located in an index zone; and (5) none of the gas from the lease is processed until after gas flows into a mainline pipeline not located in an index zone.
Form MMS-4410 (Part B), Election to Perform Actual Dual Accounting or Alternative Dual Accounting, allows MMS to collect the lessee’s elections to perform actual dual accounting or alternative dual accounting. A lessee makes an election by checking either the actual or alternative dual accounting box for each MMS-designated area where its leases are located. Part B also includes the lessee’s lease prefixes within each MMS-designated area to assist lessees in making the appropriate election. The election to perform actual or alternative dual accounting applies to all of a lessee's Indian leases in each MMS-designated area. The first election to use the alternative dual accounting is effective from the time of election through the end of the following calendar year. Thereafter, each election to use the alternative dual accounting methodology must remain in effect for 2 calendar years. However, lessees may return to the actual dual accounting methodology only at the beginning of the next election period or with written approval from MMS and the tribal lessors for tribal leases, and from MMS for Indian allotted leases in the MMS-designated area (30 CFR 206.173(a)).
Form MMS-4411, Safety Net Report
(submitted annually)
The safety net calculation establishes the minimum value, for royalty purposes, of natural gas production from Indian oil and gas leases. This reporting requirement ensures that Indian lessors receive all royalties due and aids MMS compliance efforts.
The regulations require lessees to submit Form MMS-4411 when gas production from an Indian oil or gas lease is sold beyond the first index pricing point. The lessee submits safety net prices, for the previous calendar year, to MMS annually (by June 30) using this form.
Form MMS-4295, Gas Transportation Allowance Report
(submitted annually)
Under certain circumstances, the regulations authorize lessees to deduct from royalty payments the reasonable actual costs of transporting the royalty portion of produced minerals from the lease to a processing or sales point not in the immediate lease area. The regulations establish a limit on transportation allowance deductions for gas at 50 percent of the value of the gas at the point of sale. From information collected on Form MMS-4295, MMS (1) verifies transportation allowances to determine if the lessee reported and paid the proper royalty amount; and (2) MMS and tribal personnel evaluate whether the transportation allowances reported and claimed by lessees are within regulatory allowance limitations and are calculated in accordance with applicable regulations. To take a non-arm’s-length or no contract transportation deduction, a lessee must submit Form MMS-4295 within 3 months after the end of the 12-month period to which the allowance applies.
Form MMS-4109, Gas Processing Allowance Summary Report
(submitted annually)
When gas is processed for the recovery of gas plant products, lessees may claim a processing allowance. The regulations establish a limit of 66⅔ percent of the value of each gas plant product as an allowable gas processing deduction.
The MMS normally accepts the cost as stated in the lessee's arm's-length processing contract as being representative of the cost of the processing allowance. In those instances where gas is being processed through a lessee-owned plant, the lessee must base processing costs on the actual plant operating and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a reasonable return on investment. The allowance is expressed as a cost per unit of individual gas plant products. Lessees may take processing allowances as a deduction from royalty payments.
From information collected on Form MMS-4109, MMS (1) verifies processing allowances to determine if the lessee reported and paid the proper royalty amount; and (2) MMS and tribal personnel evaluate whether the processing allowances reported and claimed by lessees are within regulatory allowance limitations and are calculated in accordance with applicable regulations. To take a non-arm’s-length or no contract processing deduction, lessees must submit Form MMS-4109 within 3 months after the end of the 12-month period to which the allowance applies.
Indian Oil and Gas
Form MMS-4393, Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation
(submitted on occasion)
Form MMS-4393 is used for both Federal and Indian leases. Most of the burden hours are incurred on Federal leases; therefore, the form is approved under OMB Control Number 1010-0136 (expires June 30, 2009). Burden hours for Indian leases using this form are included in this ICR.
Upon receiving proper application from the lessee, MMS may approve an oil or gas transportation allowance in excess of 50 percent (Federal or Indian) or a gas processing allowance in excess of 66⅔ percent (Federal only). To request permission to exceed a regulatory allowance limit, lessees must submit a letter to MMS explaining why a higher allowance limit is necessary and provide supporting documentation, including a completed Form MMS-4393. This form provides MMS with the data necessary to make a decision whether to approve or deny the request and track deductions on royalty reports.
3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden [and specifically how this collection meets GPEA requirements].
We offer electronic copies of Forms MMS-4109, MMS-4110, MMS-4295, MMS-4410, and MMS-4411 on our Internet Web site for respondents to print and complete. We have a reasonable expectation that 5 percent may use an e-mail option in the future.
Further information technology enhancements are not applicable for this information collection at this time because we receive very few submissions per year. Most of the information collected applies to exceptions to standard procedures, which are relatively few, infrequent, and non-standard and, therefore, not conducive to electronic submission. It is not cost effective to enhance the current computer system design to process a minimum number of forms.
4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.
No other Federal or state agency collects the same or similar information. The primary information necessary for the evaluation of specific transportation and/or processing proposals is available only within the records of the applicant, and the use of such data is unique to our mission. No other Federal agency collects similar information that can be modified for this collection. The information is not available from any other source.
5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.
Small organizations are among the potential respondents. The MMS has carefully analyzed its requirements to ensure that the information requested is the minimum necessary and places the least possible burden on industry. There are no special reporting provisions or significant economic impacts on small businesses or other small entities. We provide toll-free telephone assistance and schedule annual training free of charge in various geographic areas to assist reporters in complying with valuation and reporting requirements.
6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.
By delegation of the Secretary's trust responsibilities under Indian lease terms, MMS is responsible for ensuring the proper valuation of production from Indian leases. Not collecting the information may result in loss of royalty payments to the Indian lessor due to royalties not being collected properly.
7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:
(a) requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly.
Not applicable in this collection.
(b) requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it.
Not applicable in this collection.
(c) requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document.
Not applicable in this collection.
(d) requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than 3 years.
In accordance with 30 U.S.C. 1713(b), Indian oil and gas records must be maintained for 6 years after the records are generated unless the Secretary notifies the record holder that such records must be maintained for a longer period due to an ongoing audit or investigation.
(e) in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study.
Not applicable in this collection.
(f) requiring the use of statistical data classification that has been reviewed and approved by OMB.
There are no special circumstances with respect to 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)(v) through (viii) as the collection is not a statistical survey and does not use statistical data classification.
(g) that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use.
This collection does not include a pledge of confidentiality not supported by statute or regulation.
(h) requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.
This collection does not require proprietary, trade secret, or other confidential information not protected by agency procedures.
8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice [and in response to the PRA statement associated with the collection over the past 3 years] and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.
Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. [Please list the names, titles, addresses, and phone numbers of persons contacted.] Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.
As required in 5 CFR 1320.8(d), MMS published a 60-day notice in the Federal Register on August 1, 2008 (73 FR 45055). (The Federal Register printed an additional notice on August 8, 2008, correcting the submission date for comments (73 FR 46367).) We did not receive any comments in response to the Federal Register notice. We also contacted the companies listed below by e-mail but received no comments on our burden hour estimates or any other aspect of this collection.
Maritta Perkins
ConocoPhillips
Marvinette Ponder
Devon Energy
Susan Martinez
El Paso Corporation
9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.
We will not provide any payment or gift to respondents in this collection.
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.
Commercial or financial information provided to MMS, relative to minerals removed from Federal and Indian leases, may be proprietary. Trade secrets and proprietary and other information are protected in accordance with standards established by FOGRMA, as amended (30 U.S.C. 1733), and the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)) and its implementing regulations (43 CFR 2).
In addition, the Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982 (25 U.S.C. 2103) provides that all information related to any Indian minerals agreement covered by the Act in the possession of the Department shall be held as privileged proprietary information. Storage of proprietary information and access to it are controlled by strict security measures.
11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.
The collection does not include sensitive or private questions.
12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:
(a) Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.
There are approximately 302 potential Indian oil and gas lessees who may submit the required information annually and on occasion (see charts below for breakout of data by form and by information collection). Based on current data, we estimate the average number of annual responses is 140, and the annual reporting burden is 1,074 hours. The burden estimates include the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. We have not included in our estimates certain requirements performed in the normal course of business and considered usual and customary.
(b) If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens.
Reference 30 CFR |
Form Number |
Hour Burden per Response |
Annual Responses |
Annual Burden Hours |
206.180(b)(1)(ii) |
MMS-4109 |
20 |
5 |
100 |
206.57(c)(1)(i) and (iii) 206.57(c)(2)(i) and (iii) |
MMS-4110 Arm’s-length contract (AL) Non-arm’s length contract (NAL) |
4 6 |
8 4 |
56 (32 AL + 24 NAL) |
206.178(b)(1)(ii) |
MMS-4295 |
15 |
3 |
45 |
206.56(b)(2) |
MMS-43931 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
206.172(b)(1)(ii) |
MMS-4410 |
4 |
25 |
100 |
206.172(e)(6)(i) and (iii) |
MMS-4411 |
3 |
10 |
30 |
1Form MMS-4393 is used for both Federal and Indian leases and is approved under ICR 1010-0136 for Federal leases, where most of the burden hours for this form are incurred. Form MMS-4393 citations and burden hours for Indian leases were previously included in ICR 1010-0136, but now are listed in this ICR in the estimated burden hours chart under §206.56(b)(2).
(c) Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.
Reference 30 CFR |
Information Collections (IC) |
Require-ment to Respond |
Frequency of Response |
Number of Responses |
Annual BurdenHours |
Annual Cost ($45/hr)1 |
206.180 cites2 and 206.181(c) |
1. Indian Gas Processing Allowance (Form MMS-4109 and any other required documentation) |
Obtain a benefit |
Annually |
25 |
255 |
11,475 |
206.57 cites2 |
2. Indian Oil Transportation Allowance (Form MMS-4110 and any other required documentation) |
Obtain a benefit |
On occasion |
20 |
256 |
11,520 |
206.178 cites2 |
3. Indian Gas Transportation Allowance (Form MMS-4295 and any other required documentation) |
Obtain a benefit |
Annually |
35 |
270 |
12,150 |
206.56 (b)(2); 206.177 (c)(2) and (c)(3) |
4. Exceed Transportation Allowance (Oil and Gas) (Form MMS-4393 and any other required documentation) |
Obtain a benefit |
On occasion |
1 |
4 |
180 |
206.172 (b)(1)(ii); 206.173 (a)(1) |
5. Indian Gas Valuation (No Dual Accounting, Actual Dual Accounting, or Alternative Method) (Form MMS-4410 and any other required documentation) |
Mandatory |
On occasion |
44 |
138 |
6,210 |
206.172 (e)(6)(i) and (iii) |
6. Indian Gas Valuation (Safety Net Reporting) (Form MMS-4411 and any other required documentation) |
Mandatory |
Annually |
10 |
30 |
1,350 |
206.59 |
7. Indian Oil Valuation |
Obtain a benefit |
On occasion |
1 |
20 |
900 |
206.172 (f)(1)(ii), (f)(2), and (f)(3) |
8. Indian Gas Valuation (Exclusion or Termination of Exclusion from Valuation) (Required documentation; no form) |
Obtain a benefit |
On occasion |
1 |
40 |
1,800 |
206.174(f) |
9. Indian Gas Valuation Guidance (Required documentation; no form) |
Obtain a benefit |
On occasion |
1 |
40 |
1,800 |
202.551 (c); 206.175 (d)(4) |
10. Indian Gas Production (Request to Report Entitlements or Request Different Allocation of Gas) (Required documentation; no form) |
Obtain a benefit |
On occasion |
2 |
21 |
945 |
TOTAL |
140 |
1,074 |
$48,330 |
1Cost estimates are based on the expectation that all requirements will be performed by an accountant. See calculations for hourly costs for industry accountants below.
2See chart below for complete listing of citations for this IC.
We estimate the total annual reporting burden is 1,074 hours. The total cost to industry is $48,330, based on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) May 2007 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates (http://www.bls.gov/bls/wages.htm) for industry accountants in a metropolitan area. The estimated hourly labor cost is $45 ($32.43 hourly mean wage x 1.4 benefit cost factor = $45.4, rounded to $45). Note: A multiplier of 1.4 (based on BLS news release USDL 07-1883, December 11, 2007) was added for benefits. Based on a cost factor of $45 per hour for industry accountants, we estimate the total annual cost to industry is $48,330 ($45 x 1,074 hours = $48,330).
There are no additional recordkeeping costs. The following chart shows the estimated burden hours by CFR section and paragraph:
Respondents’ Estimated Annual Burden Hours
Note: AUDIT PROCESS—The Office of Regulatory Affairs determined that the audit process is
exempt from the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 because MMS staff asks non-standard questions to
resolve exceptions.
13. Provide an estimate of the total annual [non-hour] cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14).
(a) The cost estimate should be split into two components: (1) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and (2) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information [including filing fees paid]. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.
(b) If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burden and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.
(c) Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.
We have identified no “non-hour” cost burdens for this collection of information.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal Government. Also, provide a
description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any
other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.
Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.
We estimate the total annual reporting burden for industry is 1,074 hours, and we estimate the Federal Government will require 1 hour of a Government accountant’s time for each burden hour for industry. Based on the United States 2008 General Schedule, Grade 12/Step 5 pay scale for the average Government accountant in the Denver, Colorado, area, our estimated hourly labor cost is $57 ($37.93 per hour x 1.5 benefit cost factor = $56.90, rounded to $57). Based on a cost factor of $57 per hour for Government accountants, we estimate the total annual cost to the Government is $61,218 ($57 per hour x 1,074 hours = $61,218).
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.
The currently approved OMB inventory is 1,276 annual burden hours. We are decreasing the inventory to 1,074 hours. The decrease of 202 burden hours is an adjustment primarily due to a decrease in the number of annual responses.
16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.
The MMS will not publish the data.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.
Not applicable to this collection.
18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19, “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submission.”
To the extent that the topics apply to this collection of information, we are not making any exceptions to the “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.”
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions |
Author | Royalty Managment Program |
Last Modified By | Minerals Revenue Management |
File Modified | 2009-01-22 |
File Created | 2009-01-22 |