Sections 1.30002 and 1.30003, Disturbance of AM Broadcast Station Antenna Patterns

ICR 200812-3060-004

OMB: 3060-1121

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2008-12-05
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
3060-1121 200812-3060-004
Historical Inactive
FCC MB
Sections 1.30002 and 1.30003, Disturbance of AM Broadcast Station Antenna Patterns
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Comment filed on proposed rule 01/15/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 12/08/2008
COMMENT: OMB files this comment in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.11( c ). This OMB action is not an approval to conduct or sponsor an information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This action has no effect on any current approvals. If OMB has assigned this ICR a new OMB Control Number, the OMB Control Number will not appear in the active inventory. For future submissions of this information collection, reference the OMB Control Number provided. Resubmit when proposed rule is finalized.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

On September 24, 2008, the Commission adopted the Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of An Inquiry Into the Commission's Policies and Rules Regarding AM Radio Service Directional Antenna Performance Verification, MM Docket No. 93-177, FCC 08-228. The Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposes new rules concerning tower construction near AM stations. In AM radio, the tower itself functions as the antenna. Consequently, a nearby tower may become an unintended part of the AM antenna system, reradiating the AM signal and distorting the authorized AM radiation pattern. Thus, our rules contain several sections concerning tower construction near AM antennas that are intended to protect AM stations from the effects of such tower construction., specifically, Sections 73.1692, 22.371, and 27.63. These existing rule sections impose differing requirements on the broadcast and wireless entities, although the issue is the same regardless of the types of antennas mounted on a tower. Other rule parts, such as Part 90 and Part 24, entirely lack provisions for protecting AM stations from possible effects of nearby tower construction. The proposed new rules would consolidate existing rules regarding tower construction near AM stations, and would also incorporate moment method techniques in the analysis of the impact of nearby structures on the AM station.

US Code: 47 USC 154(i) Name of Law: Communications Act of 1934, as amended
  
None

3060-AJ17 Proposed rulemaking 73 FR 75376 12/11/2008

  73 FR 75376 12/11/2008
No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Disturbance of AM Broadcast Station Antenna Patterns

Yes
Changing Regulations
No
On September 24, 2008, the Commission adopted the Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of An Inquiry Into the Commission's Policies and Rules Regarding AM Radio Service Directional Antenna Performance Verification, MM Docket No. 93-177, FCC 08-228. The Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposes new rules concerning tower construction near AM stations. Due to the adoption of the proposed new rules the Commission has a program change of +1,670 hours and +$601,800 total cost burden. There no adjustments to this information collection.

$14,997
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Uncollected
Ann Gallagher 2024182716

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
12/08/2008


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy