0463 ss ren 011609rev

0463 ss ren 011609rev.pdf

Pacific Islands Region Coral Reef Ecosystems Permit Form

OMB: 0648-0463

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
PACIFIC ISLANDS REGION CORAL REEF ECOSYSTEMS PERMIT FORM
OMB CONTROL NO. 0648-0463
A.

JUSTIFICATION

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson Act) established
regional fishery management councils, including the Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council), to develop fishery management plans for fisheries in the United States (U.S.)
exclusive economic zone (EEZ). These plans, if approved by the Secretary of Commerce, are
implemented by Federal regulations, which are enforced by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), in cooperation with
State agencies to the extent possible. The fishery management plans are intended to regulate
fishing to ensure sustained productivity and achievement of optimum yield from the resources
for the benefit of the United States.
The Council prepared, and the Secretary partially approved and implemented by National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) through regulations at 50 CFR Part 665, a Fishery Management Plan
for Coral Reef Ecosystems of the Western Pacific Region (FMP). Key management measures of
the FMP include the establishment of a Federal permit program for harvesting coral reef
management unit species; record keeping and reporting requirements; no-take and low-use
Marine Protected Areas (MPA); gear restrictions and listings of allowed and prohibited fishing
gear; mitigation requirements addressing wreck removals and pollution mitigation for fishing
vessels operating in or traversing any MPA; and a framework procedure for making regulatory
adjustments to the Western Pacific coral reef ecosystems management program.
This request is for an extension of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control No. 06480463.
2. Explain how, by whom, how frequently, and for what purpose the information will be
used. If the information collected will be disseminated to the public or used to support
information that will be disseminated to the public, then explain how the collection
complies with all applicable Information Quality Guidelines.
Information is collected via a permit application process (Special Coral Reef Ecosystem Fishing
Permit). Any person, who intends to fish for coral reef management unit species in a low-use
MPA, target Potentially Harvested Coral Reef Taxa in the EEZ, or transship coral reef
management unit species, must have a special coral reef fishing permit issued under the FMP.
Permits are valid for one calendar year and may be renewed annually.
The information from the permit application form will allow the NMFS Pacific Islands Region,
in consultation with the Council, to determine whether the permit applicant qualifies for a special
permit. Vessel-related information such as vessel size, name of the operator, vessel’s insurer,
etc., may be used by NMFS to determine whether the applicant is an owner of a U.S.
documented/registered vessel. The information, which profiles the current fishery, may also be
used by NMFS enforcement and other offices of NMFS, USCG and the Council. Other
1

information requested in the application form will be used to assess the impact fishing activity on
harvested stocks of coral reef biota and their habitat. The data include location of fishing
grounds; types of fishing gear and method of collection used; fishing effort, target and incidental
species; and disposition of the catch. The permit applicant is also asked to furnish general
information on the objectives of the harvesting operation and a description of possible impacts
on protected species, habitat, and the ecosystem. This information enables NMFS and the
Council to gain a broad perspective on the harvesting operation if a permit is granted.
As requested, summaries of permit application information are provided to the Council and
interested parties to generally describe the fishery and give an overview of the nature and
magnitude of the impacts of the FMP regulations on the permit holders.
This collection also includes information involving appeals of permit denials. The appellant
must provide documentation to show why a special permit should have been granted. The
information is used by the NMFS Regional Administrator in making a final determination on
permit issuance under the FMP. The frequency of appeals for permit denials is expected to be no
more than 2 per year.
The information will not be disseminated to the public except in non-confidential or aggregate
form in summary and analytical reports. Any information that might be used to support publicly
disseminated information would first be aggregated and/or summarized to maintain the
confidentiality of the information pertaining to the individual vessels.
As explained in the preceding paragraphs, the information gathered has utility. NMFS will retain
control over the information and safeguard it from improper access, modification, and
destruction, consistent with Federal law and regulations, and NOAA policies for confidentiality,
privacy, and electronic information. See response to Question 10 of this Supporting Statement
for more information on confidentiality and privacy. The information collection is designed to
yield data that meet all applicable information quality guidelines. Prior to dissemination, the
information will be subjected to quality control measures and a pre-dissemination review
pursuant to Section 515 of Public Law 106-554.
3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological techniques or other forms of
information technology.
None of the federal permit application forms for Western Pacific fisheries, including this
collection, are currently submitted in electronic form, although facsimile transmission is used to
a considerable extent. NMFS is developing a web-based permits program that would allow
applicants to apply for permits, including special coral reef ecosystem permits. It is expected
that such a program may be implemented within the next year.
In the meantime, fillable permit applications may be downloaded from
http://www.fpir.noaa.gov/SFD/SFD_permits_11.html.

2

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication.
During the course of developing the FMP, NMFS and the Council worked with representatives
of the State of Hawaii and U.S. Pacific Island government fisheries agencies to craft a permit
application form with intent to minimize duplication with respective information collections.
These agencies offered advice in the final specifications for the application form itself, as well as
the information elements being recorded. However, in no instance was it possible to use
state/territorial collections to replace the federal special coral reef fishing permit form.
5. If the collection of information involves small businesses or other small entities, describe
the methods used to minimize burden.
All of the vessels in the Western Pacific fisheries under the management purview of NMFS and
the Council, including fishers who harvest coral reef resources, are small business entities of
similar size and are affected comparably. No special measures are needed to accommodate
different sized businesses. Only a minimum amount of data needed for permit issuance and
consistent with this collection is sought in the permit application process.
6. Describe the consequences to the Federal program or policy activities if the collection is
not conducted or is conducted less frequently.
If the permit application data are not available or are collected less frequently, NMFS and the
Council will not be able to properly evaluate an application for a special permit issued under the
FMP. Also, it would be difficult to monitor the fishery and its participants, determine entry and
exit patterns, and provide information needed to ensure full impact analysis for the coral reef
ecosystems management program. Fisheries enforcement agents will not be assured of being
able to identify the current participants in the fishery for purposes of compliance monitoring and
enforcement of the regulations. Contact between NMFS and fishermen will be less frequent;
NMFS will be unable to consult with permit holders on coral reef fishery-related issues or advise
them of regulatory changes.
7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a
manner inconsistent with OMB guidelines.
N/A.
8. Provide information on the PRA Federal Register Notice that solicited public comments
on the information collection prior to this submission. Summarize the public comments
received in response to that notice and describe the actions taken by the agency in response
to those comments. Describe the efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain
their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions
and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be
recorded, disclosed, or reported.
A Federal Register Notice published on October 10, 2008 (73 FR 60244) solicited public
comments on this submission. No public comments were received.

3

9. Explain any decisions to provide payments or gifts to respondents, other than
remuneration of contractors or grantees.
N/A.
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for
assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.
Under Section 402(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended in 2006, and NOAA
Administrative Order 216-100, information submitted in accordance with regulatory
requirements under the Act is confidential. This includes personal and proprietary information
contained in the permit application. These assurances are included on the permit application
form.
11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual
behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered
private.
No questions of a sensitive nature are asked.
12. Provide an estimate in hours of the burden of the collection of information.
Annual Burden:
(Hours)
a) 12 respondents (permit applicants) x 2 hr/response
b) 2 respondents (appellants) x 3 hr/response

= 24
= 6
Total

= 30

The total annual cost to respondents for personnel time is estimated at $750 per year. This was
derived by multiplying the number of hours of burden each year (30 hours) times an hourly cost
rate of $25 (estimated rate of a vessel operator or designated agent of a vessel owner).
13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to the respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection (excluding the value of the burden hours in Question
12 above).
There is no “start up” capital cost for complying with this requirement. The estimated cost to
respondents to mail (i.e., postage) and make file copies of the application form, permit, appeal
documents, etc. is $100 per year.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government.
The estimated cost of this collection to the Federal government is about $70 per permit or appeal
action. This entails reviewing the application/appeal, determining sufficiency of respondents’
documents, awarding the permit, coordinating appeal actions, organizing application and appeal4

related information, sending out permit renewal timing notices, responding to inquiries, etc. The
total Federal cost is estimated at $1000 per year.
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.
N/A.
16. For collections whose results will be published, outline the plans for tabulation and
publication.
No formal scientific publications based on these collections are planned at this time. However,
the information contained in the permit application will be analyzed by NMFS and the Council
to determine eligibility for permit issuance and the need for management changes to conserve
coral reef stocks and protect endangered or threatened marine animals and their habitats.
Subsequent use of the data collected over a series of years may include scientific papers and
publications.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the
information collection, explain the reasons why display would be inappropriate.
N/A.
18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19 of the
OMB 83-I.
N/A.

B.

COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS

This collection does not employ statistical methods.

5


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT
AuthorWalterI
File Modified2009-02-04
File Created2009-02-04

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy