Rule 17g-3: Annual financial reports to be furnished by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
A. Justification
1. Need For Information Collection
The Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 20061 (“Rating Agency Act”), enacted on September 29, 2006, defines the term “nationally recognized statistical rating organization,” or “NRSRO” and provides authority for the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) to implement registration, recordkeeping, financial reporting, and oversight rules with respect to registered credit rating agencies.
The Commission adopted rule amendments that will impose additional requirements on NRSROs in order to address concerns about the integrity of their credit rating procedures and methodologies in light of the role they played in determining credit ratings for securities collateralized by or linked to subprime residential mortgages.2
Rule 17g-3 contains reporting requirements. The collection of information obligations imposed by the rule is mandatory. The requirements of Rule 17g-3, however, apply only to credit rating agencies that are applying to register or are registered with the Commission as NRSROs, and registration is voluntary.
The Rating Agency Act added a new Section 15E, “Registration of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations,”3 to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Exchange Act Section 15E(k) requires an NRSRO to furnish to the Commission, on a confidential basis and at intervals determined by the Commission, such financial statements and information concerning its financial condition that the Commission, by rule, may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.4
The amendment to Rule 17g-3 requires an NRSRO to furnish the Commission with an unaudited report of the number of credit ratings actions (upgrades, downgrades, placements on credit watch, and withdrawals) taken during the fiscal year in each class of credit ratings for which the NRSRO is registered with the Commission.5
2. Purpose of, and Consequences of Not Requiring, the Information Collection
The collection of information included in Rule 17g-3 is necessary for Commission oversight of registered NRSROs. Specifically, this collection of information will aid the Commission in determining whether the initiation of a de-registration proceeding under Section 15E(d) of the Exchange Act would be appropriate.
3. Role of Improved Information Technology and Obstacles to Reducing Burden
The requirements of Rule 17g-3 are not designed to collect information through electronic submission. NRSROs will submit the report in paper format.
4. Efforts To Identify Duplication
No duplication is apparent.
5. Effects on Small Entities
Small entities may be affected by Rule 17g-3 because all NRSROs, regardless of size, will be required to submit the reports to the Commission on an annual basis.
6. Consequences of Less Frequent Collection
If this information were not collected as frequently, the Commission would be unable to ascertain, on an ongoing basis, whether a credit rating agency registered as an NRSRO “fails to maintain adequate financial and managerial resources to consistently produce credit ratings with integrity.”6
7. Inconsistencies With Guidelines In 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)
The collection of information would not be inconsistent with 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
8. Consultations Outside the Agency
All Commission rule proposals are published in the Federal Register for public comment. The comment period for the release that discussed the proposed amendment to Rule 17g-3 was 30 days.7 This comment period afforded the public an opportunity to respond to the proposal. The Commission received one comment on the cost estimate in the proposing release.
9. Payment or Gift to Respondents
Not applicable.
10. Assurance of Confidentiality
Pursuant to section 15E(k) of the Rating Agency Act, reports submitted to the Commission are submitted on a “confidential basis.”
11. Sensitive Questions
Not applicable. Questions of a sensitive nature are not asked.
12. Estimate of Respondent Reporting Burden
The number of respondents subject to the rule depends, in part, on the number of entities that meet the statutory requirements for eligibility for registration. Further, registration is voluntary, and, consequently, the number of respondents will also depend on the number of entities that choose to register with the Commission. The Commission estimates that approximately 30 credit rating agencies will register with the Commission as NRSROs under section 15E of the Exchange Act.
The Commission estimates that each NRSRO that registers with the Commission will take, on average, approximately 200 hours to prepare for and submit annual audited financial statements for a total of 6,000 hours (200 hours x 30 NRSROs).8
The Commission estimates that the average time necessary for an applicant or NRSRO to establish an internal process to conform its systems to generate a report in compliance with Rule 17g-3(a)(6) will be 100 hours per NRSRO, for a total one-time hour burden to the industry of 3,000 hours.9 The Commission believes, however, that once an NRSRO complies with the amendment to Rule 17g-3 in the first year, that preparation of the new annual report will become routine. To account for this one-time burden of 3,000 hours and the possibility that new credit rating agencies will register as NRSROs, the Commission is averaging this burden estimate over the three year approval period.
Consequently, the Commission is increasing the annual burden estimate by 1,000 hours for a total annual burden estimate for Rule 17g-3 of 7,000 hours (6,000 + 1,000).
13. Estimate of Total Annualized Cost Burden
The cost of an audit by an independent public accountant varies substantially with the size and complexity of the NRSRO. The current OMB estimate is that, on average, an NRSRO will pay an independent public accountant approximately $15,000 per year to perform an audit or audit procedures that are required by Rule 17g-3.10 Therefore, the annual cost burden to the industry is approximately $450,000.11
14. Estimate of Cost to Federal Government
There would be no additional costs to the Federal Government.
15. Explanation of Changes in Burden
The Commission increased the annual hour burden for Rule 17g-3 by 1,000 hours as a result of comments received from the proposing release.
16. Information Collection Planned for Statistical Purposes
Not applicable. There is no intention to publish the information for any purpose.
17. Explanation as to Why Expiration Date Will Not Be Displayed
Not applicable.
18. Exceptions to Certification
Not applicable.
B. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods
The collection of information does not employ statistical methods, nor would the implementation of such methods reduce the burden or improve the accuracy of results.
1 Pub. L. No. 109-291.
2 Exchange Act Release No. 59342 (February 2, 2009), 74 FR 6456 (February 9, 2009).
3 15 U.S.C. 78o-7.
4 15 U.S.C. 78o-7(k).
5 See Rule 17g-3(a)(6).
6 15 U.S.C. 15E(d).
7 Exchange Act Release No. 59342 (February 2, 2009), 74 FR 6456 (February 9, 2009).
8 17 CFR 240.15c3-1 and 17i-5.
9 100 hours x 30 NRSROs = 3,000 hours.
10 Based on staff experience, it is estimated that the annual audit report for a small NRSRO will range from $3,000 - $5,000 while the annual audit report for a large NRSRO would be substantially greater.
11 $15,000 x 30 NRSROs = $450,000.
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | Rule 17g-1: Application for registration as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization |
| Author | wellsr |
| Last Modified By | swartzs |
| File Modified | 2009-02-11 |
| File Created | 2009-02-10 |