Supporting Statement

14

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

Desert Land Entry Application (43 CFR Part 2520)

OMB Control Number 1004-0004

Terms of Clearance: None

A. Justification:

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) uses the information to determine if an individual is eligible to make a desert-land entry for agricultural purposes. The Desert Land Act of March 3, 1877 (19 Stat. 377); 43 U.S.C. 321-323), as amended by the Act of March 3, 1891 (26 Stat. 1096; 43 U.S.C. 321, 323, 325, 327-329), authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to allow individuals to apply for a desert-land entry to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate arid and semiarid public lands in the States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. The regulations at 43 CFR Part 2520 include criteria and procedures for making desert-land entries under the act. The BLM collects no similar information from the same universe of respondents.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection. [Be specific. If this collection is a form or a questionnaire, every question needs to be justified.]

The BLM collects and uses the applicant's information once to determine if the applicant meets all requirements of the act and regulations to make a desert-land entry. The BLM uses the information on Form 2520-1 as follows:

Item #1: Name, address, township, range, meridian, section, subdivision, state, and total acres. The BLM uses the name and address to identify and communicate with the applicant. The BLM needs the description of the lands to identify the location of the lands and determine if the lands meet the requirements of the act and regulations

Item #2: Enclose filing fee of $15.00 plus advance payment of 25 cents per acre. A non-refundable application service fee of $15 must accompany all applications including a total or partial payment of 25 cents per acre for the lands described in the application.

Item #3a: Are you at least 21 years old? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant is eligible to apply for a desert-land entry. The applicant must be 21 years old.

Item #3b: Of what state are you a bona fide resident? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant is eligible to apply for a desert-land entry. The applicant must be a bona fide resident of the State in which the lands are located (no State residency is required in Nevada).

Item #3c: Are you a citizen of the United States? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant is eligible to apply for a desert-land entry. The applicant must be a citizen or naturalized citizen of the United States.

Item #3d: If not a citizen, have you filed a Declaration of Intention to become a citizen of the United States? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant is eligible to apply for a desert-land entry. Non-citizens must have declared their intention to become a citizen.

Item #3e: Are you an employee, the spouse, or an agent of an employee of the department of the Interior? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant is eligible to apply for a desert-land entry. The applicant must not have a conflict of interest.

Item #4a: Have you made an application under the Desert Land act? The BLM uses the information to determine if the lands the applicant applied for, received by assignment, or claim under any of the non-mineral public land laws since August 30, 1890, exceeds the acreage limitation. The act limits the applicant to 320 acres, or 480 acres if the applicant has an enlarged homestead entry of 320 acres.

Item #4b: Have you ever received by assignment any lands under the Desert land Act? The BLM uses the information to determine if the lands the applicant applied for, received by assignment, or claim under any of the non-mineral public land laws since August 30, 1890, exceeds the acreage limitation. The act limits the applicant to 320 acres, or 480 acres if the applicant has an enlarged homestead entry of 320 acres.

Item #4c: Have you entered, acquired title, or are now claiming an entry under any of the nonmineral public land laws since August 30, 1890? The BLM uses the information to determine if the lands the applicant applied for, received by assignment, or claim under any of the non-mineral public land laws since August 30, 1890, exceeds the acreage limitation. The act limits the applicant to 320 acres, or 480 acres if the applicant has an enlarged homestead entry of 320 acres.

Item #5: Have you made a personal on-the-ground examination of every legal subdivision of the above-described land? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant is personally familiar with the location and character of the lands. The applicant's responses must be based on personal knowledge. The act does not allow agents or representatives to respond to the collection on the behalf of the applicant.

Item #6a: Have you, or to your knowledge has any other person, ever worked any of the subdivision for minerals? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant examined the lands for the presence of minerals. The applicant is required to make a superficial examination of the lands or the presence of minerals.

Item #6b: Are these lands within any mining claim or other claim of record under the United States mining laws of the mining laws of the State? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant examined the lands for the presence of minerals. The applicant is required to make a superficial examination of the lands or the presence of minerals.

Item #6c: Do you know of any vein or lode of quartz or other rocks in place, bearing gold, silver, cinnabar, lead, tin, or copper, or any deposit of coal, placer deposits, other valuable mineral deposits, salt deposit, or salt springs? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant examined the lands for the presence of minerals. The applicant is required to make a superficial examination of the lands or the presence of minerals.

Item #7a: Is this application for lands that will produce cultivated crops without application of water for irrigation? The BLM uses this information to determine if the lands applied for meet the requirements of the act. The lands must be incapable of producing an agricultural crop without irrigation, and must be more valuable for agricultural purposes than for raising native forage crops.

Item #7b: Do the lands in their natural state produce enough native grass for cutting hay? The BLM uses this information to determine if the lands applied for meet the requirements of the act. The lands must be incapable of producing an agricultural crop without irrigation, and must be more valuable for agricultural purposes than for raising native forage crops.

Item #7c: Are the lands applied for occupied or improved by you or any other person, association, or corporation? The BLM uses this information to determine if the lands applied for meet the requirements of the act. The lands must be incapable of producing an agricultural crop without irrigation, and must be more valuable for agricultural purposes than for raising native forage crops.

Item #8: Are the lands applied for irrigated or watered, or overflowed at any season of the year? The BLM uses this information to determine if the lands applied for meet the requirements of the act. The lands must be unimproved, arid and semiarid in character.

Item#9: Show in the chart below the soil characteristics of each subdivision. The BLM uses this information to determine what percentage of the lands applied for is capable of producing an agricultural crop. The applicant must properly irrigate and cultivate one-eighth of the lands in the desert-land entry.

Item #10a: Total acres irrigable? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicants proposed water delivery system to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate one-eighth the lands is well-planned, adequate, economical, and practical.

Item #10b: Type of crop to be grown? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicants proposed water delivery system to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate one-eighth the lands is well-planned, adequate, economical, and practical.

Item #10c: Water requirements per acre? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicants proposed water delivery system to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate one-eighth the lands is well-planned, adequate, economical, and practical.

Item #10d: Source of water? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicants proposed water delivery system to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate one-eighth the lands is well-planned, adequate, economical, and practical.

Item #10e: Well data: (1) Dept of stat water; (2) Diameter, (3) Complete costs; (4) Pump requirements; (5) Type of pump; and (6) Cost of pump? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicants proposed water delivery system to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate one-eighth the lands is well-planned, adequate, economical, and practical.

Item #10f: Cost of sprinkler system? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicants proposed water delivery system to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate one-eighth the lands is well-planned, adequate, economical, and practical.

Item #10g: Costs of leveling, ditches, and canals? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicants proposed water delivery system to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate one-eighth the lands is well-planned, adequate, economical, and practical.

Item #10h: Costs of other installations? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicants proposed water delivery system to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate one-eighth the lands is well-planned, adequate, economical, and practical.

Item #11: Attach a complete plan of irrigation that shows at least the following: (a) Map showing location of lands applied for by legal land description, and an accurate detailed diagram of the entire proposed irrigation system to be used in the permanent reclamation and production of agricultural crops in this proposed entry; (b) Topography, shown by contour interval of 10 feet or less, if a gravity irrigation system is planned; (c) Location and source of permanent water supply, including the type, size, dimensions, and location of all facilities for transporting the water from its source to the lands, such as, river pump stations, penstocks, pipelines, holding ponds, etc.;(d) Location, type, size, and gradient in percent, of any water distribution ditches and laterals necessary to irrigate all irrigable portions of each legal subdivision adequately; and (e) Location, type, size, and dimensions of all other installations necessary for the irrigation of the lands, such as, sprinkler systems, mainlines, etc? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant's proposed project is well planned, adequate, effective, realistic, and practical. The Act requires the applicant to file a map showing the complete irrigation plan for the entire desert-land entry.

Item #12a: Is there adequate water supply of suitable quality available to you for the irrigation of all the irrigable portions of the lands? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant has acquired or taken the appropriate steps to obtain the right to use a permanent and sufficient water delivery system to reclaim all irrigable portions of lands applied for.

Item #12b: Have you proceeded as far as possible toward acquiring by appropriation, purchase, or contract, a right to the permanent use of sufficient water to irrigate and reclaim permanently all of the irrigable portions of each of the legal subdivisions applied for? The BLM uses this information to determine if the applicant has acquired or taken the appropriate steps to obtain the right to use a permanent and sufficient water delivery system to reclaim all irrigable portions of lands applied for.

Item #13a: Is reclamation and permanent cultivation of the lands in this application economically sound? The BLM uses this information to determine if the high cost of delivering water to the lands prevents the applicant from establishing an economic farm unit. The Act requires that the applicant must be able to satisfactorily manage the lands as an economic farm unit.

Item #13b: Complete and make a part of this application an estimated farm budget showing annual costs and returns that would be involved in the permanent reclamation and cultivation of the lands in this application: (1) Include the estimated Annual Production Costs for Farm automobiles and trucks; Machinery and tractors; Irrigation system; Farm buildings, fences, and other improvements in operation of farm, not including irrigation system and residence; Seed, fertilizer, herbicides, insecticides; Water costs; Cash wages to hire labor; Interest on borrowed money; Taxes, Cost of marketing; and Other (itemize). (2) Include the estimated Annual Income for Crop; Acres of production; Units per acre; and Price per unit. (3) Include the estimated Annual Net Income? The BLM uses this information to determine if the high cost of delivering water to the lands prevents the applicant from establishing an economic farm unit. The Act requires that the applicant must be able to satisfactorily manage the lands as an economic farm unit.

Item #13c: Are the lands in this application accessible to a farm produce market? The BLM uses this information to determine if the high cost of delivering water to the lands prevents the applicant from establishing an economic farm unit. The Act requires that the applicant must be able to satisfactorily manage the lands as an economic farm unit.

Item #13d: Does it show the initial continuing annual operations and production costs? The BLM uses this information to determine if the high cost of delivering water to the lands prevents the applicant from establishing an economic farm unit. The Act requires that the applicant must be able to satisfactorily manage the lands as an economic farm unit.

Item #14: If any subdivisions of the lands of this application are noncontiguous, or do not lie in as compact a form as possible, attach and make a part of this application an explanation of the economic feasibility of farming all the lands applied for as an economic unit? If the tracts of land applied for are not sufficiently close to each other, the applicant must justify the economic feasibility of farming the lands as an economic unit. The Act provides that one or more tracts of land may be included in a desert-land entry. The tracts must be sufficiently close to each other to be satisfactorily managed as an economic unit, and as compact as possible.

Item #15: If you had assistance in completing this application five the following information: Name and address; Assistance given; and Date? The BLM needs this information to determine who should be contacted when the economic analysis is prepared.

Item #16: If the lands described in this application have not been classified as suitable for desert entry pursuant to the provisions of Section 7, of the Taylor Grazing Act of June 28, 1934, as amended, (43 U.S.C. 315F), and the requirements of the regulations in 43 CFR part 2400, please consider the application as a petition for such classification? The BLM uses this statement to eliminate the petition for classification form from the collection.

Item #17: Attach a statement or declaration explaining in detail all arrangements that you have made or that you plan to make with regard to financing, irrigation, reclamation, or cultivation of the lands for which you are applying. To test the sincerity and good faith of applicants under the desert land laws and to prevent the segregation of the public lands by applicants who have no intention to reclaim the land, the Act requires the applicant to file a declaration of his or her intention to reclaim, irrigate and cultivate the lands.

Statement of Witness: The Act requires that the applicant to submit the statements of two creditable witnesses who are acquainted with the character of the lands, who personally examined the lands and is able to testify to the character of the lands, and who has no interest in the lands.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden [and specifically how this collection meets GPEA requirements].

The Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) requires Federal agencies, by October 21, 2003, to provide individuals or entities the option to submit information or transact with the agency electronically and to maintain records electronically when practicable. The GPEA specifically states that electronic records and their related electronic signatures are not to be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability merely because they are in electronic form. It also encourages Federal government use of a range of electronic signature alternatives.

The BLM has issued a Federal Register notice that: “effective October 1, 2004, the BLM will accept as ‘‘properly filed’’ any form in electronic format that was previously available only in paper format. If you choose to file on-line, you must use the forms available from (http://www.nc.blm.gov/blmforms/index.htm). The BLM will not accept as ‘‘properly filed’’ the use of electronic forms in other formats or from other sources. In addition to using the form from the BLM Forms web site, the user must also have a Federal Bridge Trusted credential. The public may continue to use, and the BLM will continue to accept, filings on paper forms. In many cases, our existing regulations require a written signature and filing of a paper form in a specific office. The GPEA supersedes these regulations. Our intention is to propose regulations to address the inconsistency and to clarify that digital signatures and on-line filing (when performed as described above) is an acceptable way to file applications and other documents.”

The eForms project is a cost containment and performance improvement measure. It is a web-based forms application which constitutes a part of the BLM’s eAuthentication Project and supports the implementation of the GPEA. The goal of eForms is to replace paper-based processes with secured, auditable electronic records. Specifically, eForms will replace paper forms used within BLM with a common application that supports editing, submitting, and digitally signing forms. eForms is made up of three components: Individual Forms; Forms Central, a form repository that supports any number of form file formats; and Signature Server, a web application that provides a visual representation of a digital signature. Together these components provide an easy to use form system.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

The information collection is unique to the Desert Land Act and regulations. The BLM is the only agency collecting this information. The BLM is unable to use or modify existing information collections to process new applications because the applicant's responses are distinct, unrelated, and specific to their individual proposal to reclaim, irrigate, and cultivate the public lands.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, then describe any methods used to minimize burden.

Table 5-1 - Affected Public: Applicants who apply for desert land entries are citizens of the United States in various occupations and industries. The BLM does not collect information from applicants regarding their occupation, industry of employment, or employment status because the Desert Land Entry Act does not require the BLM to collect such information. Because we have no data pertaining to applicant’s occupation or industry of employment, we are using “all full-time workers in private industry” as the affected public. We estimate in the Information Service Center (RISC) and Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) Combined Information System (ROCIS) that all of the applicants during this collection period may qualify in the small business or small entity category. There are no special methods used to minimize the burden because the information collection methods are uniform throughout the BLM regardless of the size of the entity. The information collected by the BLM is limited to only the information required for an applicant to meet the statutory requirements of the Act and regulations.

Table 5-1:
Affected Public by Industry	Annual Responses
(a) Full time workers in private industry	3

6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

The BLM is the only agency responsible for carrying out the provisions of the Desert Land Act. The Act authorizes the BLM to allow individuals to make desert-land entries for agricultural purposes. Less frequent collection would mean no collection at all. Reducing the burden will preclude the collection of sufficient information to determine if the applicant meets the statutory requirements of the Act and regulations.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

*requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

*requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

*requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

*requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years;

*in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;

*requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

*that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

*requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

There are no special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with 5 CFR 1320.5.

8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice [and in response to the PRA statement associated with the collection over the past three years] and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. [Please list the names, titles, addresses, and phone numbers of persons contacted.]

Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years — even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

Federal Register Notice: No comments were received in response to the 60-day Federal Register notice published on September 23, 2008 (73 FR 54850). The formal public comment period closed on November 24, 2008. A copy of the notice is provided in ROCIS.

Consultation Results: The applicants indicated that the data required for the application was obtained without a great deal of difficulty; one application was required; instructions on the application were clear; and the cost and hour burden are fairly accurate. (See Table 12-2)

Applicants Consulted:

(1) – Darald Cheeney, PO Box 264, Ten Sleep, Wyoming 82447, 307-366-2432.

(2) – Robert F. Huntsman, PO Box 1157, Lucerne Valley, California 92356, 740-248-6838.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.

The applicant receives no payments or gifts.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

The applicant's confidentiality is protected to the extent consistent with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

The applicant is not required to answer questions of a sensitive nature.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:

Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.

Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.

Table 12-1 – Hourly Cost Calculations: The hourly mean wage in Table 12-1, below, is based on data for “all full-time workers in private industry” workers on page 21 Table 11 of Bureau of Labor Statistics News Release USDL: 09-0247 (“Employer Costs for Employee Compensation – December 2008”(dated March 12, 2009)), at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf. The multipliers are based on data on page 4, Chart A of the same News Release.

Table 12-1
Affected Public	Mean Hourly Wage	Benefits Multiplier	Total Mean Hourly Wage (including benefits)
(a) Private Industry	$21.64	1.4	$30.29

Table 12-2 – Estimates of Hour and Costs Burden: The burden estimates are based on the average number of applications received within a three-year collection period from Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 through FY-2008 (10/01/2005 through 09/30/2008). The hour and cost burden is based on information obtained from the applicants and the BLM's experience with the information collection. The hour and costs burden includes the time it takes an applicant to read instructions, gather information, and answer questions.

Table 12-2
Data Category	Burden
(a) Annual applications for collection	3 applications
(b) Frequency of application	Once
(c) Response time (hours) per applicant	2 hours
(d) Response time for collection (3 applications ) x (2 hours)	6 hours
(g) Hourly cost per applicant	$30.29
(h) Costs for one application (2 hours) x ($30.29)	$60.58
(h) Costs to applicants for collection ($60.58) x (3 applications)	$181.74

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14).

The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information [including filing fees paid]. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.

If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.

Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.

Table 13-1 - Annual Cost Burden to Respondents or Recordkeepers: Applicants incur no annual capital or start-up costs, and no recurring annual costs to prepare or respond to the information collection. Applicants are not required to purchase any computer software or hardware to comply with this information collection.

Table 13-1
Data Category	Burden
(a) Total capital and start-up cost	$0
(b) Total operation/maintenance and purchase service cost	$0

Table 13-2 - Application Service Fee: Pursuant to 43 CFR 2520.2 all applications must be accompanied by a one-time non-refundable service fee of $15. The burden estimates are based on the average number of applications received within a three-year collection period from Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 through FY-2008 (10/01/2005 through 09/30/2008).

Table 13-2
Data Category	Totals
(a) Annual applications for collection	3 applications
(b) Application service fee per application	$15
(c) Application service fee for collection ($15) x (3 applications)	$45

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal Government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

Table 14-1 – Federal Government Hourly Cost Per Position: Time spent to process an application is based on the BLM's experience with the information collection. The hourly cost to the Federal Government is based on the U.S. Office of Personnel Management 2009 General Pay Schedule located at the following web site: http://www.opm.gov/oca/09tables/indexGS.asp. The benefits multiplier of 1.5 (Chart A, page 4) were based on the U.S. Department of Labor (USDL), Bureau of Labor Statistics, USDL: 09-0247, For Release 10:A.M. EDT Thursday, March 12, 2009, located at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf.

Table 14-1
Position	Grade (Step1)	Hourly Wage	Benefit Multiplier	Hourly Wage (including benefits)
(a) Clerical	GS-7	$16.04	1.5	$24.06
(b) Technical	GS-11	$23.74	1.5	$35.61
(c) Manager	GS-13	$33.84	1.5	$50.76

Table 14-2 - Federal Government Costs and Time to Process One Application: Time spent to process an application is based on the BLM's experience with the information collection. The hourly cost to the Federal Government is based on the U.S. Office of Personnel Management 2009 General Pay Schedule located at the web site http://www.opm.gov/oca/09tables/indexGS.asp.

Table 14-2
Position	(a) Hourly Wage (including benefits)	(b) Time to Process one application (hours)	(c) Cost (a x b)
(a) Clerical	$24.06	1	$24.06
(b) Technical	$35.61	8	$284.88
(c) Managers	$50.76	1	$50.76
(d) Total Time and Cost for One Application		10	$359.70

Table 14-3 – Federal Government Cost and Time for Collection:

Table 14-3
Data Category	Burden
(a) Annual applications for collection	3 applications
(b) Number of hours to evaluate one application	10 hours
(c) Cost to evaluate one application	$359.70
(d) Cost to evaluate 3 applications ($359.70) x (3 applications)	$1,079.10
(e) Annual application service fee for collection	$45.00
(f) Annual cost for the collection ($1,079.10) - $45.00)	$1,034.10

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.

Table 15-1
Data Category for Collection	Previous Collection	This Collection	Difference	Explanation
(a) Annual applications	4	3	-1	Adjustment
(b) Applicants burden hours	8 hours	6 hours	-2	Adjustment
(c) Applicants burden costs	$160	$181.14	+$21.14	Adjustment
(d) Application Service Fee	$60	$45	-$15	Adjustment
(e) Costs to Federal Government	$940	$1,034.10	+$94.10	Adjustment

Table 15-1(a) – Annual Applications: Program adjustment for this collection is due to the decrease in the number of applications the BLM receives annually.

Table 15-1(b) – Applicants’ Burden Hours: Program adjustment for this collection is due to the decrease in the number of applications the BLM receives annually.

Table 15-1(c) – Applicants’ Burden Costs: Program adjustment for this collection is due the mandatory requirement to use Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data to calculate the costs. The BLM did not use nor were we required to use BLS data to calculate the costs for the previous collection.

Table 15-1(d) – Application Service Fee: Program adjustment for this collection is due to the decrease in the number of applications the BLM receives annually.

Table 15-1(e) – Costs to Federal Government: Program adjustment for this collection is due to the mandatory requirement to use the U.S. Office of Personnel Management 2009 General Pay Schedule to calculate costs. The BLM did not use nor were we required to use BLS data to calculate the costs for the previous collection.

16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

We have no plans to publish this information collection.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

We are not requesting approval to not display the expiration date.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19, "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions," of OMB Form 83-I.

There are no exceptions identified in Item 19 of OMB Form 83-I.