1076-0018 Justification Revised2

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

Tribal Colleges and Universities Grant Application Form,

25 CFR 41.8

OMB Control Number 1076-0018

Terms of Clearance: None.

General Instructions

A Supporting Statement, including the text of the notice to the public required by 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(i)(iv) and its actual or estimated date of publication in the Federal Register, must accompany each request for approval of a collection of information. The Supporting Statement must be prepared in the format described below, and must contain the information specified in Section A below. If an item is not applicable, provide a brief explanation. When statistical methods are used, Section B "Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods" must be completed. OMB reserves the right to require the submission of additional information with respect to any request for approval.

Specific Instructions

A. Justification

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.

The annual collection of information is required by the Tribally Controlled Community College Assistance Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-471), which provides for grants to tribally controlled community colleges for the purpose of ensuring continued and expanded educational opportunities for Indian students. The implementing regulations, at 25 CFR 41.8, establish the process for tribally controlled community colleges to apply for such grants, and provides that “[e]]ach Community College…shall be entitled to apply for financial assistance under this subpart.” A copy of the statute and implementing regulation are attached.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection. [Be specific. If this collection is a form or a questionnaire, every question needs to be justified.]

The collection of information is conducted each year by tribal colleges and universities and reported to the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) as required by Public Law 95-471. The information will be used by the Director to determine if the respondent meets the requirements for a grant as specified in 25 CFR 41.8. The form used to collect information has 2 pages:

• The first page of the form requires information that identifies the institution and its accreditation, relationship to the tribe, and how the institution is governed. It also requires a report on data on the number of Indian and non-Indian governing board members. Also required is a head count of Indian students for each term.

• The second page asks for enrollment information, degrees granted (e.g., Master Arts/Master Science, Bachelor Arts/Science; Associate Arts/Science, Two Year Certificate). The school must also supply: Average Class Size; Number of Instructors; FTE Instructors, and PTE Instructors.

BIE uses the head count and degrees conferred to document the number of students that are likely to be served in the following year and determine the amount of grant funding it will allocate to that institution. While this information is similar to that provided on the Annual Report Form (see 1076-0105), it is necessary for BIE to get these basic numbers by the July 1 deadline to allow sufficient time to allocate the appropriate grant amount to the institution. The more detailed information on head count and degrees conferred that is required as part of the Annual Report Form is not due until December 1, allowing the institution sufficient time to account for the numbers of male, female, Indian, and non-Indian students.

The Chairman of the Board and the institution’s president must certify the accuracy of the information on the form. The institution must also supply a proposed budget; copies of the institution’s policy statement; charter; by-laws; catalog, which includes a copy of the institution’s current curriculum; and a description of the accounting procedures used for grants received under Public Law 95-471.

BIE uses this information to determine if the institution meets the regulatory definitions of a “community college” and an “institution of higher education” (25 CFR 41.3) and whether the institution meets the regulatory requirements for eligibility (25 CFR 41.4). Once BIE reviews the application, the Director of BIE and the Chief, Division of Contracts & Grants Administration must certify that the institute meets eligibility requirements for funding.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden [and specifically how this collection meets GPEA requirements.].

Institutions are currently developing the ability to utilize electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques to gather this information from tribal colleges and universities. BIE is working with technology offices to develop the system for automated, electronic responses from colleges and universities. Currently, the colleges and universities submit their grant applications via fax or mail; however, the Department anticipates that 100% of the colleges and universities will submit electronically once the appropriate software is put in place.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

The information collected is not similar to other data because the data is updated each year for each grant application submitted. At various times, other Federal agencies have offered grants to tribal colleges that are specific to certain subject matter (e.g., the National Science Foundation offers grants to tribal colleges and universities, among others, for enhancement of science, technology, engineering and mathematical research and curricula); however, only the PL 95-471 grants help defray the annual, general operating expenses of education programs at tribally controlled community colleges.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize burden.

Tribes are not considered to be small entities for purposes of applicable laws and executive orders; however, BIE has attempted to minimize the burden on the tribally controlled community colleges and universities by collecting the information only once a year, rather than on a semester-by-semester basis.

6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

BIE could not award the grants to tribally controlled community colleges and universities if it could not collect the information required by Public Law 95-471.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

* requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

Respondents are not required to report information to the agency more than annually.

• requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

Respondents are not required to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt.

• requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

Respondents are not required to submit more than one original and two copies of any document.

• requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years;

Respondents are not required to retain records relevant to their grant applications for more than three years.

• in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;

Respondents are not required to report in a statistical format other than the arithmetic culmination of graduation rates, tuition costs, and a numerical description of enrollment students.

• requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

Respondents are not required to use a statistical data classification that is not approved by OMB.

• that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

• requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

BIE does not include a pledge of confidentiality or collect proprietary trade secrets or other such information that is protected by law.

8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice [and in response to the PRA statement associated with the collection over the past three years] and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.

The notice for a 60 day comment period appeared in the Federal Register on March 11, 2009, (74 FR 10609). A copy of that notice is attached. No comments were received. We have used the form several years but have never received comments.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.

BIE contacted the following individuals to obtain their views:

• Veronica Van Sloten, Registrar, Bay Mills Community College (906) 248-3354;

• Leslie Evertz, Admissions, Dull Knife Memorial College, (406) 477-6215; and

• Joe McDonald, President, Salish Kootenai College, (406) 275-4801.

These individuals indicated that burden of collection is sufficient in scope, the data is available and easily accessible, frequency of the collection is amenable, and the instructions are easily understood. These individuals did not have any comments on the format of the application form.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.

There are no gifts or payments provided to respondents for reporting this information.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

Any personal identifying information is kept confidential as required by the Privacy Act and as detailed in 25 CFR 276.5(Recordkeeping).

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

The information collection request does not require submission or disclosure of any information of a sensitive nature.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:

* Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

* If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.

* Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting-out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 13.

BIE estimates that 25 tribal colleges and universities submit grant applications annually. Each application is estimated to require 6 hours to complete.

25 respondents x 6 hours = 150 burden hours

The estimated salary for respondents is $45.61, based on the September 2008 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employer Cost of Employee Compensation, Table 2, for civilian category “junior colleges, colleges and universities.” Including a multiplier of 1.5* for benefits results in an hourly salary of $68.42.

$45.61/hour x 1.5 benefits = $68.42

The total salary cost at $68.42/hour for the estimated 150 burden hours is $10,263.

$68.42/hour x 150 burden hours = $10,263

* BLS news release USDL: 08-1802, December 10, 2008

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual [non-hour] cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14).

* The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information [including filing fees paid]. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.

* If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.

* Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.

No capital or start up costs associated with this collection. The grants operating under contract for BIE are provided administrative cost funds. The provisions of 25 CFR 276.5 allow the tribes to store necessary data in a manner that is best for them; they may send the information collected to BIE for storage unless they will continue to need it for ongoing use.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

It is estimated that a GS-12/1 will be reviewing the grant applications at an hourly salary of $28.45, under the January 2009 GS Salary Schedule. Including a multiplier of 1.5* for benefits results in a salary cost of

$28.45/hour x 1.5 benefits = $42.68/hour

It is also estimated that approximately 16 hours are needed for BIE to collect and analyze data from each respondent.

$42.68/hour x 16 hours = $683

With 25 respondents, the total estimated cost to the Federal government is estimated to be $17,075.

$683 x 25 = $17,075

* BLS news release USDL: 08-1802, December 10, 2008

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.

There are no program changes or adjustments.

15. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

There are no plans to publish the information unless a summary becomes part of a budget justification, which would not identify individual respondents.

15. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

No waiver is being sought concerning display of the OMB Control number and the expiration date.

15. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in 5 CFR 1320.9 (hourly and cost burden) and 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3) (the questions we ask commenters to address).

No exceptions are being requested to the certification statement.

Page 8