0648-0369 Supplemental Questions

0369M Supp Cost Earnings 022610.pdf

Economic Surveys for U.S. Commercial Fisheries

0648-0369 Supplemental Questions

OMB: 0648-0369

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
West Coast Commercial Fishing Vessel Cost Earnings Survey
Responses to Supplemental Questions for PRA Clearance
OMB Review of Individual Instruments

1. The potential respondent universe and any sampling or other respondent selection
method to be used and the expected response rate.
Potential Respondent Universe
The population of interest for this survey is all non-tribal commercial fishing vessels with (1) at
least $1,000 of West Coast landings during 2009, (2) no limited entry permit, and (3) groundfish,
salmon, crab, or shrimp landings accounting for at least 33% of revenue. Landings data obtained
through the Pacific Coast Fisheries Information Network (PacFIN) system indicate that there
were 2017 vessels in the population of interest.
Sampling and Other Respondent Selection Methods
This survey sample will include all 2017 members of the survey population. That is, there will be
no sampling to determine which vessels in the population of interest receive the survey. Each of
the 2017 members of the survey sample will be assigned to either the in-person sample or the
mail sample. All members of the survey population for which a telephone number is available
will be assigned to the in-person sample, from which data will be collected through an in-person
interview. All members of the survey population for which a telephone number is not available
will be assigned to the mail sample, from which data will be collected through a mail
questionnaire. A search of public records is expected to produce telephone numbers for 60% of
the vessel owners in the survey population. As a result, the in-person sample contains 1210
vessel owners, and the mail sample contains 807 vessel owners.
Expected Response Rate
The Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NWFSC) and Pacific States Marine Fisheries
Commission (PSMFC) have fielded three previous cost earnings surveys among West Coast
vessel owners. The limited entry survey fielded in 2005 and 2006 utilized in-person interviews
for a census of the survey population and obtained a 58% response rate. The open access
groundfish and salmon troller survey fielded in 2007 obtained a 39% response rate from inperson interviews and a 25% response rate from telephone interviews. An update to the limited
entry survey conducted this year is in the final stages of fielding, so a response rate is not yet
available: at this time a preliminary overall response rate appears similar to the 58% obtained by
the previous limited entry survey.
In each of these previous surveys, response rates have been positively related to the scale of
vessel operations. Higher response rates are consistently obtained from vessel owners who had
higher levels of landings. The survey population consists of the open access groundfish and
salmon troller vessels covered by the 2007 survey, plus crabbers/shrimpers not covered by the
previous survey (i.e., crabbers and shrimpers with no salmon or groundfish landings) and salmon
netters. Because of the large size of operations for crabbers which make up nearly half of the
vessels being added to the previous survey population, the expected response rate is somewhat
1

higher than the 39% previously obtained from the in-person interview sample for the 2007
survey. For this survey, a response rate of 60% is expected from the in-person interview sample.
Since the in-person interview sample is expected to contain 1210 vessels (based on the
assumption of obtaining telephone numbers for 60% of the vessels in the survey population), a
total of 726 responses from vessels in the interview sample is expected.
The expected response rate from vessel owners in the mail sample is considerably lower. Vessel
owners have consistently expressed their dislike for mail surveys, finding them too impersonal.
Given the dislike of vessel owners for mail surveys and the fact that respondents can only be
prompted for responses through additional mailings, a response rate of 25% is expected from the
807 vessels in the mail sample. A total of 202 responses is expected from the 807 members of
the mail sample. 1
A total of 928 responses (726 from the interview sample and 202 from the mail sample) is
expected from the 2017 vessels in the survey population. This implies an overall survey
response rate of 46%.
2. Data collection procedures, including the statistical methodology for stratification and
sample selection, the estimation procedure, the degree of accuracy needed for the intended
purpose, expected dates of survey implementation, and any unusual problems requiring
specialized sampling procedures.
Stratification and Sample Selection
The population of interest for this survey is all non-tribal commercial fishing vessels with (1) at
least $1,000 of West Coast landings during 2009, (2) no limited entry permit, and (3) at least one
33% of revenue from groundfish, salmon, crab, or shrimp landings. Active fishing vessels are
defined as having at least $1,000 of West Coast (Washington, Oregon, and California) landings
during 2008. All 2017 vessels in the population will receive the survey.
Desired Accuracy Needed for the Intended Purpose
Important objectives of survey design include data accuracy and data precision. Data precision
is discussed in the next sub-section. Measuring and minimizing non-response bias (an important
aspect of assuring accurate data) is addressed under Question 3. The degree of accuracy needed
1

Data collection has been limited to in-person interviews and mail questionnaires without any attempt to collect data via
telephone interviews (as was done in the cost earnings survey of the open access groundfish and salmon troller fleets conducted
in 2007). The NWFSC and PSMFC found that conducting telephone interviews (1) involved substantial up front costs due to the
cost of developing a CATI (computer aided telephone interview) questionnaire from the survey instrument and (2) response rates
for the telephone interview sample was not significantly higher than the response rate expected from a mail survey. Response
rates from previous cost earnings surveys on the West Coast suggest that fishermen place a high value on in-person contact, and a
telephone call is not viewed as being significantly different from a letter in the mail. As a result, the NWFSC and PSMFC have
chosen to focus available budget dollars on conducting in-person interviews which have a proven record of generating response
rates. Because of budget constraints and the high cost of conducting in-person interviews, the 807 vessel owners for which
telephone numbers are not available are not being offered the option of calling to schedule an in-person interview. Offering such
an option would not only create considerable uncertainty regarding survey fielding costs, but would also make it difficult to
implement survey fielding in sweep pattern (where fielding begins at one end of the West Coast and gradually moves along the
coast in an effort to minimize backtracking by interviewers and fielding costs). Sending mail surveys to all vessel owners not
having a telephone number with follow-up mailings will give everyone in the survey population an opportunity to respond to the
survey, generate additional survey response information, and preserve most of the survey funding for conducting in-person
interviews.

2

is not established by economic theory or legislative mandates. Data collected through this
survey will be used for both statistical inference of population values from sample respondents
and for estimation of econometric models used for policy making purposes. While more
accurate data is clearly preferred, standards do not exist regarding the accuracy of data required
for estimation of an econometric model. Factors such as the minimization of model specification
error also contribute the quality of the empirical results obtained using survey data. It is not
possible to state a level of accuracy that is required for all uses and applications of data collected
by this survey. As discussed in the response to Question 3, data on vessel characteristics and
landings (location, timing, species, weight, and revenue) is available for both survey respondents
and non-respondents, and will be used to test the representativeness of survey respondents. This
data will also be used to adjust the models and/or data for any response bias that is detected.
Desired Precision and Response Rate
The desired degree of precision, and corresponding desired response rate, depends upon the
application for which the data is being used. Some applications may use data from all survey
respondents, while others applications will only use data from vessels that operate in specific
fisheries or geographic locations. A basic application of the survey data will be the inference of
population mean values from the respondent’s mean values. While we do not have any
information about the cost variables which will be collected in the survey, we do already know
revenue from West Coast landings for all members of the survey population. Using this revenue
data, we can calculate the number of vessels from which revenue data would be needed in order
to infer revenue for the entire population of vessels, based on the mean value and variation in
revenue across vessels. The following table shows the number of responses (and corresponding
response rate) needed to get a response sample mean for per vessel landings revenue within 10%,
15%, and 25% of the population mean of per vessel annual landings revenue at the 95%
confidence level. In this calculation, revenues associated with West Coast landings (which are
known for all vessels) are used as a proxy for revenues from other sources and for expenditures
(which are not known and are the focus of this survey).
N
Population

N
10%

N
15%

N
25%

2017

1324

926

472

Response
Rate
10%
66%

Response
Rate
15%
46%

Response
Rate
25%
23%

As shown in the accompanying table, having a sample mean within 15% of the population mean
at the 95% confidence level requires a response rate of 46%. Since 928 response are expected,
this survey is expected to provide estimates within 15% of survey population means at the 95%
confidence level. At least two reasons can be identified for desiring higher response rates than
those needed to support inference of population means from sample means:
1) Data from this survey will be used to develop a variety of economic models covering
applications such as fleet efficiency and fishery participation. In these applications, error
will arise not only from the representativeness of data used for model development, but
also from model specification and estimation. Since it is not possible to completely
avoid specification and estimation error in model development, there is good reason to
desire a higher response rate and higher degree of accuracy in the data collection process.
3

2) Future applications of the data may require further disaggregating the population into
smaller groups according to factors such as state of operation or species targeted.
Identification of all such future disaggregated data needs is not possible at the present
time. A higher response rate and higher degree of accuracy in the current data collection
process will facilitate such future population disaggregation.
Survey Fielding
The PSMFC and its subcontractors will field the survey. For members of the in-person sample,
the PSMFC will send an initial mailing with a cover letter, a copy of the questionnaire, and an
explanation of how data collected by the survey will be used by economists. This will provide
survey recipients with an opportunity to (i) see first-hand the data being collected by the survey
prior to in-person interviews and (ii) collect the requested data prior to the in-person interview.
About two weeks after the letter/questionnaire mailing, PSMFC will begin making telephone
calls to schedule in-person interviews with survey recipients for data collection. During the
following three weeks, up to six additional attempts will be made to contact each member of the
survey population until an interview data is scheduled.
PSMFC will send a letter to all 807 members of the mail sample describing the survey and its
purpose. The letter will also include a copy of the questionnaire and a self addressed stamped
envelope for returning the questionnaire. About two weeks after the mailing, PSMFC will send a
reminder letter to all non-respondents. A second reminder letter will be send about four weeks
after the initial mailing to non-respondents. A copy of the questionnaire will be included in all
reminder letters.
For purposes of survey fielding, information on the vessel owner and mailing address will be
taken from federal permit and registration files.
Expected Dates of Survey Implementation
Seasonal patterns of activity vary by vessel, depending upon the species targeted most frequently
and geographic location. Vessels targeting groundfish are most active during the summer
months while crabbers are most active between December and February. The period between
March and May avoids peak season for most members of the survey population. The target
period for survey fielding begins in March 2010.
3. The methods used to maximize response rates and address non-response. The accuracy and
reliability of the information collected must be shown to be adequate for the intended uses.
Methods Used To Maximize Response Rates
A number of methods were used to maximize survey response during the previous surveys of the
limited entry fleet, and will also be used during this survey:
1. The survey is short, consisting of only four pages in written form.
2. Respondents are asked only to provide information about major cost and earnings
categories, thus avoiding what may seem to survey respondents like unnecessary detail.
4

3. Data will be collected through in-person interviews whenever a telephone number is
available for the vessel owner. In-person interviews typically have higher response rates
than mail or telephone surveys.
4. There will be extensive follow-up telephone calls and mailings after the initial
letter/questionnaire mailing in order to schedule in-person interviews and obtain
responses. These follow-up telephone calls to non-respondents in the in-person sample
will be distributed among weekend/weekday and day/evening time periods to maximize
the likelihood of reaching the contact person. About one week after the questionnaire is
mailed to all members of the survey population, attempts to schedule in-person interview
dates by telephone will begin. Up to six attempts to schedule an interview will be made
for each member of the in-person survey. Up to three attempts (including the initial
mailing) will be made to obtain responses from each member of the mail survey sample.
Addressing Non-Response
Testing for non-response bias will be based on the considerable amount of data that is available
for all members of the survey population. Variables that will be used for non-response bias
testing fall into the categories of vessel physical characteristics and vessel landings.
Vessel physical characteristics provide an indication if whether the data collected through the
survey on fixed cost items such as repair, maintenance, and improvements is likely to differ for
survey respondents and survey non-respondents. Other vessel characteristics such as engine
horsepower indicate whether variable costs such as fuel consumption vary between survey
respondents and non-respondents.
Tests for non-response bias will be based not only on vessel physical characteristics, but also on
vessel landings. PacFIN provides vessel level information on West Coast (Washington, Oregon,
and California) landings by date, species, and port for all vessels in the survey population. As a
result, it is possible to compare respondents and non-respondents with regard to seasonal
patterns, species landed, and location of landings.
Data on vessel landings makes possible a comparison between respondents and non-respondents
of species targeted, location of landings, and gear type. Available landings data will allow testing
for differences between respondents and non-respondents for total dollar value and weight of
landings, dollar value and weight of groundfish landings, dollar value and weight of whiting
landings, dollar value and weight of crab landings, dollar value and weight of shrimp landings,
and dollar value and weight of salmon landings.
If non-response bias is detected, procedures will be used to reweight the data or the estimated
model to correct for any known bias.
Adequacy of Accuracy and Reliability of Information for Intended Uses
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) needs to measure the economic performance of West
Coast commercial fisheries in order to meet legal and regulatory requirements, support fisheries
management decision making, and undertake economic research. Currently available cost
earnings data for 2008 and 2009 from non-survey sources is very limited and does not meet these
needs. The NWFSC’s Cost Earnings Program will collect the additional data that is needed to
5

construct key economic performance measures such as profitability, capacity utilization,
efficiency, productivity, and economic impacts. The data gathered and performance measures
constructed will be used to address a wide range of issues; these issues include (but are not
limited to) the effect of alternative catch share programs and predicting fishery participation
under alternative regulatory regimes. While the data will be used to comply with legal and
regulatory requirements, these requirements do not specify a level of data accuracy.
4. How the survey instrument was developed, including the steps taken to validate the
questionnaire design.
The survey instrument is an updated version of the survey instrument used for the previous open
access groundfish and salmon troller survey fielded in 2007. Since the survey development
process for the prior surveys has already been documented in prior Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) submissions, it is provided in a footnote in this document. 2
The process of reviewing and updating the previous questionnaire began with distribution of the
previous questionnaire to a group of economists and survey researchers employed by the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) Northwest Fisheries Science
Center (NWFSC), NOAA’s Northwest Regional Office (NWR), NOAA’s Southwest Fisheries
Science Center (SWFSC), and the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC).
Changes made to the survey include (1) adding parts h through o of question 11 in response to
comments from survey respondents that the previous survey did not capturing all cost categories
with our previous survey, and (2) adding question 17 about fuel use per day on groundfish trips
to provide trip level information on groundfish trips for both labor expenses and fuel expenses
(the two major expense categories on a trip level).
These changes were reviewed with industry participants and personnel who serve as industry
representatives on advisory committees to the Pacific Fisheries Management Council. The
wording and content of questions was revised until deemed acceptable by both agency
economists and industry participants and representatives.

2

Survey development for the previous open access groundfish and salmon troller survey began with the formulation of the Cost
Earnings Program Plan. This plan outlines the reasons for collecting cost earnings data, identifies the population(s) of interest
among west coast vessel owners, and prioritizes data needs. Based on this long-term plan, objectives for this survey and survey
content were developed through a series of meetings by representatives of the (NWFSC), Northwest Regional Office (NWR),
Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC), and Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC). These meetings
identified key objectives as collecting data which could be used to measure fisheries profitability, economic impacts, efficiency,
and economic benefits of regulatory measures. The academic literature, both within and outside of fisheries, was reviewed in
order to determine the data requirements of models which would likely be used to measure fisheries profitability, economic
impacts, efficiency, and economic benefits of regulatory measures.
This process allowed prioritization of data needs and choice of survey content. After survey content was determined, a draft
questionnaire was prepared. This draft questionnaire was discussed with members of the limited entry trawl fleet by PSMFC
personnel. In addition, NOAA personnel provided a presentation on survey content and timing to the Pacific Fisheries
Management Council Groundfish Advisory Panel (a group of fishing industry members including harvesters and processors) and
the Council’s Scientific and Statistical Committee (a group responsible for reviewing the methodology used in scientific and
statistical studies) . Comments received through these discussions and presentations improved questionnaire content and format.

6

5. The reporting and use of the results of the survey.
Use of Survey Results
NMFS needs to measure the economic performance of West Coast commercial fisheries in order
to meet legal and regulatory requirements, support fisheries management decision making, and
undertake economic research. The NWFSC’s Cost Earnings Program is an on-going program
that collects data, which when combined with other existing sources of data, provides data that
is needed to construct key economic performance measures such as profitability, capacity
utilization, efficiency, productivity, and regional economic impacts. Analysis of data collected
by previous surveys conducted by the NWFSC and PSFMC has played a key role in evaluating
the likely impact (in terms of vessel consolidation and cost reduction) of implementing a catch
share management regime in the limited entry trawl fishery, the economic impact of the 2006
reductions in salmon harvest on the economic welfare of fishery participants. Another key factor
is the development of an IMpact analysis for PLANning, Minnesota IMPLAN Group (IMPLAN)
based regional economic model, for evaluation of the effect of fishery management measures on
economic conditions in coastal communities.
Reporting of Survey Results
A descriptive summary of results from the survey will be prepared and posted on the PSMFC
web site. This summary will include descriptive statistics (such as mean and standard deviation)
of the various cost and earnings categories being collected. This descriptive summary will also
be distributed to survey respondents via paper mail.
Survey results will be reported over time through a series of studies prepared for fisheries
management. It is anticipated that results will also be reported through academic publications,
presentations at conferences, and technical guides. All reporting of survey results will conform
to data confidentiality requirements.
Information Quality Guidelines and Confidentiality
It is anticipated that the information collected will be disseminated to the public or used to
support publicly disseminated information. As explained in the previous paragraphs, the
information gathered has utility. NMFS will retain control over the information and safeguard it
from improper access, modification, and destruction, consistent with NOAA standards for
confidentiality, privacy, and electronic information. In particular, the data collected will be kept
confidential as required by section 402(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens and NOAA Administrative
Order 216-100, Confidentiality of Fisheries Statistics, and will not be released for public use
except in aggregate statistical form without identification as to its source.
The information collection is designed to yield data that meet all applicable information quality
guidelines. Prior to dissemination, the information will be subjected to quality control measures
and a pre-dissemination review pursuant to Section 515 of Public Law 106-554.

7

6. Contact information for agency coordinator and principle investigator.
Agency Coordinator:
Carl Lian
Northwest Fisheries Science Center
2725 Montlake Boulevard East
Seattle, WA 98112
(206) 302-2414 (voice)
(206) 860-6792 (fax)
[email protected] (email)
Principal Investigator:
Dave Colpo
Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
205 SE Spokane Street
Portland, OR 97202
(503) 595-3100 (voice)
(503) 595-3232 (fax)
[email protected] (email)
7. Estimated burden and number of respondents.
Reviewing the survey, collecting requested data, and completing the survey (either through an
in-person interview or the mail questionnaire) is expected to take one hour per respondent. A
total of 928 responses are expected from the in-person sample and the mail sample. As a result,
the survey is expected to impose a total of 928 burden hours on the west coast limited entry trawl
fleet.

8


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleOMB Review of Individual Instruments
AuthorCarl Lian
File Modified2010-02-22
File Created2010-02-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy