PDUFA Pilot Project Proprietary Name Review

ICR 200907-0910-001

OMB: 0910-0648

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2009-09-24
Supplementary Document
2009-09-24
Supplementary Document
2009-06-24
Supporting Statement A
2009-09-24
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
190782 New
189782
New
ICR Details
0910-0648 200907-0910-001
Historical Active
HHS/FDA
PDUFA Pilot Project Proprietary Name Review
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved with change 09/25/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 07/01/2009
This ICR is approved consistent with revised supporting statement, revised burden estimates, revised instrument, and FDA memo of 9/24/09. FDA has clarified that policy decisions will not flow directly from this study alone, as it is a qualitative study on a very small sample and is more akin to a formative or "proof of concept" investigation. As such, FDA is encouraged to engage in further, more rigorous study (e.g. a peer review process or expert solicitation process) in order to establish more reliably what the best methodologies may be for assessing the safety of a proprietary drug name, particularly if FDA is considering making such methodologies mandatory on the part of industry. We understand that rulemaking would be required before such data analysis and submission can be made mandatory. Finally, FDA is reminded that the cost and burden estimates provided in the supporting statement should match that which is submitted through ICRAS/ROCIS.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
09/30/2012 36 Months From Approved
45 0 0
9,613 0 0
0 0 0

FDA also agreed to develop and implement a voluntary pilot program to enable pharmaceutical firms participating in the pilot to evaluate proposed proprietary names and to submit the data generated from those evaluations to the FDA for review. The concept paper is intended to help pharmaceutical firms choose appropriate proprietary names for their drug and biological products before submitting marketing applications to FDA and describes how pharmaceutical firms may use "best practices" to carry out their own proprietary name reviews and provide FDA with the data that result from those reviews.

PL: Pub.L. 110 - 121 823 Name of Law: FDAAA
  
Statute at Large: 110 Stat. 823 Name of Statute: null

Not associated with rulemaking

  73 FR 78813 12/23/2008
74 FR 28706 06/17/2009
Yes

2
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Registration
PDUFA Pilot Project Proprietary Name Review

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 45 0 20 25 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 9,613 0 9,600 13 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
This is a new collection.

$3,332
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Eliazabeth Berbakos 3018271482

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
07/01/2009


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy