This ICR is
approved consistent with revised supporting statement, revised
burden estimates, revised instrument, and FDA memo of 9/24/09. FDA
has clarified that policy decisions will not flow directly from
this study alone, as it is a qualitative study on a very small
sample and is more akin to a formative or "proof of concept"
investigation. As such, FDA is encouraged to engage in further,
more rigorous study (e.g. a peer review process or expert
solicitation process) in order to establish more reliably what the
best methodologies may be for assessing the safety of a proprietary
drug name, particularly if FDA is considering making such
methodologies mandatory on the part of industry. We understand that
rulemaking would be required before such data analysis and
submission can be made mandatory. Finally, FDA is reminded that the
cost and burden estimates provided in the supporting statement
should match that which is submitted through ICRAS/ROCIS.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
09/30/2012
36 Months From Approved
45
0
0
9,613
0
0
0
0
0
FDA also agreed to develop and
implement a voluntary pilot program to enable pharmaceutical firms
participating in the pilot to evaluate proposed proprietary names
and to submit the data generated from those evaluations to the FDA
for review. The concept paper is intended to help pharmaceutical
firms choose appropriate proprietary names for their drug and
biological products before submitting marketing applications to FDA
and describes how pharmaceutical firms may use "best practices" to
carry out their own proprietary name reviews and provide FDA with
the data that result from those reviews.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.