Comparison of Proposed Gas Transmission Incident Form to Current Approved

ComparisonCurrenttoProposedGasTransmIncidForm.pdf

Incident and Annual Reports for Gas Pipeline Operators

Comparison of Proposed Gas Transmission Incident Form to Current Approved

OMB: 2137-0522

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Corrected to read 191 for gas form.
NOTICE: This report is required by 49 CFR Part 195. Failure to report can result in a civil penalty not to exceed
$100,000 for each violation for each day that such violation persists except that the maximum civil penalty shall not
exceed $1,000,000 as provided in 49 USC 60122.

OMB NO: XXXX-XXXX
EXPIRATION DATE: mm/dd/yyyy 

Report Date

INCIDENT REPORT – GAS TRANSMISSION AND
GATHERING PIPELINE SYSTEMS

U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration

No.
(DOT Use Only)

A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is XXXX-XXXX. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately (X) minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering
the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory.
Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this
burden to: Information Collection Clearance Officer, PHMSA, Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP-30) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington,
D.C. 20590.
INSTRUCTIONS

Important:
Please read the separate instructions for completing this form before you begin. They clarify the
information requested and provide specific examples. If you do not have a copy of the instructions, you can obtain
one from the PHMSA Pipeline Safety Community Web Page at http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline.
PART A – KEY REPORT INFORMATION

 Original

Report Type: (select all that apply)

1. Operator’s OPS-issued Operator Identification Number (OPID):

/

/

/

/

/

 Supplemental

 Final

/

2. Name of Operator: ______________________________________________________________________________________
3. Address of Operator:
3.a _______________________________________________________________________
(Street Address)

3.b ___________________________________________________

Moved physical address questions
for the incident to Part B, items 2-4.

(City)

3.c State: /

/

/

3.d Zip Code: /

/

/

/

/

/ - /

/

/

/

/

4. Local time (24-hr clock) and date of the Incident:
/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

/

/

/

/

Month

5. Location of Incident:
Latitude:
/ / / . / /
Longitude: - / / / / . /

/

6. National Response Center Report Number:
/

Day

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Year

7. Local time (24-hr clock) and date of initial telephonic report to the
National Response Center (if applicable):
/
/

/
/

/
/

/
/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

/
Month

/

/

/
Day

/

/

/

/

Year

8. Incident resulted from:
 Unintentional release of gas
 Intentional release of gas
 Reasons other than release of gas
9. Gas released: (select only one, based on predominant volume released)







Natural Gas
Propane Gas
Synthetic Gas
Hydrogen Gas
Other Gas



Name:

10. Estimated volume of gas released unintentionally:

/

/

/,/

/

/

/ Thousand Cubic Feet (MCF)

11. Estimated volume of intentional and controlled release/blowdown :

/

/

/,/

/

/

/ Thousand Cubic Feet (MCF)

12. Estimated volume of accompanying liquid released:

/

/

/,/

/

/

/ Barrels

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 1 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

13. Were there fatalities?  Yes  No
If Yes, specify the number in each category:

 Yes  No

14. Were there injuries requiring inpatient hospitalization?
If Yes, specify the number in each category:

13.a Operator employees

/

/

/

/

/

14.a Operator employees

/

/

/

/

/

13.b Contractor employees
working for the Operator

/

/

/

/

/

14.b Contractor employees
working for the Operator

/

/

/

/

/

13.c Non-Operator
emergency responders

/

/

/

/

/

14.c Non-Operator
emergency responders

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

13.d Workers working on the
right-of-way, but NOT
associated with this Operator

/

/

/

/

/

14.d Workers working on the
right-of-way, but NOT
associated with this Operator

13.e General public

/

/

/

/

/

14.e General public

/

/

/

/

/

13.f Total fatalities (sum of above)

/

/

/

/

/

14.f Total injuries (sum of above)

/

/

/

/

/

15. Was the pipeline/facility shut down due to the incident?
 Yes  No  Explain: ______________________________________________________________________________
If Yes, complete Questions 15.a and 15.b: (use local time, 24-hr clock)
15.a Local time and date of shutdown

/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

15.b Local time pipeline/facility restarted

/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

16. Did the gas ignite?

 Yes

 No

17. Did the gas explode?

 Yes

 No

18. Number of general public evacuated: /

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

Month

/

/

/

/

Day

/

/

Month

/

/

/

Year

/

/

Day

/

/

 Still shut down*
(*Supplemental Report required)

Year

/___/___/

19. Time sequence: (use local time, 24-hour clock)
19.a Local time operator identified Incident

/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

19.b Local time operator resources arrived on site

/

/

/
Hour

/

/

/

Month

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Day

/

/

Month

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

/
Day

/

/

Year

/

/

/

/

Year

Page 2 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART B – ADDITIONAL LOCATION INFORMATION
1. Was the origin of the Incident onshore?
 Yes (Complete Questions 2-12)

 No

(Complete Questions 13-15)

If Onshore:
2. State: /

If Offshore:
/

/

13. Approximate water depth (ft.) at the point of the Incident:

3. Zip Code: /___/___/___/___/___/ - /
4 ________________________

/

/

/

5________________________

City

/ _ /,/_

/

County or Parish

/_

/

14. Origin of Incident:



6. Operator designated location: (select only one)
 Milepost/Valve Station (specify in shaded area below)

 Survey Station No.

/_

In State waters
 Specify: State: / / /
Area: ___________________
Block/Tract #: /___/___/___/___/

(specify in shaded area below)

Nearest County/Parish: ________________
/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/



7. Pipeline/Facility name: ________________________________

Block #: /___/___/___/___/

8. Segment name/ID: ___________________________________
9. Was Incident on Federal land, other than the Outer Continental
 Yes  No
Shelf (OCS)?
10. Location of Incident: (select only one)




Operator-controlled property
Pipeline right-of-way

On the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
 Specify: Area: ___________________

15. Area of Incident: (select only one)








Shoreline/Bank crossing or shore approach
Below water, pipe buried or jetted below seabed
Below water, pipe on or above seabed
Splash Zone of riser
Portion of riser outside of Splash Zone, including riser bend
Platform

11. Area of Incident (as found): (select only one)




Belowground storage or aboveground storage vessel,
including attached appurtenances
Underground  Specify:  Under soil

 Under a building
 Under pavement
 Exposed due to excavation
 In underground enclosed space (e.g., vault)
 Other ____________________________


Depth-of-Cover (in): / _ /,/ _ _/ _ /_
Aboveground  Specify:

/

 Typical aboveground facility piping or appurtenance
 Overhead crossing
 In or spanning an open ditch
 Inside a building
O Inside other enclosed space
O Other ____________________________
 Transition Area  Specify:  Soil/air interface  Wall
sleeve  Pipe support or other close contact area
 Other ____________________________
12. Did Incident occur in a crossing?  Yes  No
If Yes, specify type below:
 Bridge crossing  Specify:  Cased  Uncased



 (select all that apply)
 Uncased
 Bored/drilled
(select all that apply)

 Uncased
 Bored/drilled

Railroad crossing

 Cased


Road crossing



 Cased
Water crossing

Specify:  Cased
 Uncased
Name of body of water, if commonly known:
_____________________________________
Approx. water depth (ft) at the point of the Incident:



/ _ /,/_

/_

/_

/

(select only one of the following)






Shoreline/Bank crossing
Below water, pipe in bored/drilled crossing
Below water, pipe buried below bottom (NOT in
bored/drilled crossing)
Below water, pipe on or above bottom

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 3 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART C – ADDITIONAL FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Is the pipeline or facility:
 Interstate
 Intrastate
2. Part of system involved in Incident: (select only one)
 Belowground Storage, Including Associated Equipment and Piping
 Aboveground Storage, Including Associated Equipment and Piping
 Onshore Compressor Station Equipment and Piping
 Onshore Regulator/Metering Station Equipment and Piping
 Onshore Pipeline, Including Valve Sites
 Offshore Platform, Including Platform-mounted Equipment and Piping
 Offshore Pipeline, Including Riser and Riser Bend
3. Item involved in Incident: (select only one)



Pipe



Specify:

 Pipe Body

 Pipe Seam



3.a Nominal diameter of pipe (in):

/

/

/./___/___/___/

3.b Wall thickness (in):

/

/

/

/

/./

3.c SMYS (Specified Minimum Yield Strength) of pipe (psi):

/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

3.d Pipe specification: _____________________________
3.e Pipe Seam

 Specify:  Longitudinal ERW - High Frequency
 Longitudinal ERW - Low Frequency
 Longitudinal ERW – Unknown Frequency
 Spiral Welded ERW
 Spiral Welded SAW
 Lap Welded
 Seamless

 Single SAW
 DSAW

 Flash Welded
 Continuous Welded
 Furnace Butt Welded

 Spiral Welded DSAW
 Other ________________________

3.f Pipe manufacturer: _______________________________
3.g Year of manufacture: /
/
/
/
/
3.h Pipeline coating type at point of Incident
 Fusion Bonded Epoxy
 Specify:

 Coal Tar
 Asphalt
 Polyolefin
 Extruded Polyethylene  Field Applied Epoxy  Cold Applied Tape  Paint
 Composite
 None
 Other _______________________________
 Weld, including heat-affected zone  Specify:  Pipe Girth Weld  Other Butt Weld  Fillet Weld  Other_____________
 Valve
 Mainline  Specify:  Butterfly  Check  Gate  Plug  Ball  Globe
 Other __________________________
3.i Mainline valve manufacturer:
3.j Year of manufacture: /
/























__
/

/

/

 Relief Valve
 Auxiliary or Other Valve
Compressor
Meter
Scraper/Pig Trap
Separator/Separator Filter
Strainer/Filter
Dehydrator/Drier/Treater
Regulator/Control Valve
Drip/Drip Collection Device
Pulsation Bottle
Cooler
Repair Sleeve or Clamp
Hot Tap Equipment
Stopple Fitting
Flange
Relief Line
Auxiliary Piping (e.g. drain lines)
Tubing
Instrumentation
Underground Gas Storage or Cavern
Pressure Vessel
Other ___________________________________

4. Year item involved in Incident was installed:

/

/

/

/

/

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 4 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

5. Material involved in Incident: (select only one)





Carbon Steel
Plastic
Material other than Carbon Steel or Plastic



Specify: ____________________________________________

6. Type of Incident involved: (select only one)





Mechanical Puncture



Approx. size: /__/__/__/__/./__/in. (axial) by /__/__/__/__/./__/in. (circumferential)

 Pinhole
 Crack

Rupture  Select Orientation:  Circumferential
Leak

Select Type:



 Connection Failure
 Seal or Packing
 Other
 Longitudinal
 Other ________________________________

 Approx. size: /__/__/__/__/./__/ in. (widest opening) by /__/__/__/__/__/./__/in. (length circumferentially or axially)
 Other  Describe: ___________________________________________________________________

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 5 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART D – ADDITIONAL CONSEQUENCE INFORMATION
1. Class Location of Incident: (select only one)
 Class 1 Location





Class 2 Location
Class 3 Location
Class 4 Location

2. Did this Incident occur in a High Consequence Area (HCA)?
 No
 Yes  2.a Specify the Method used to identify the HCA:

 Method 1

3. What is the PIR (Potential Impact Radius) for the location of this Incident?

 Method 2

/___/,/___/___/___/ feet

4. Were any structures outside the PIR impacted or otherwise damaged by heat/fire resulting from the Incident?
5. Were any structures outside the PIR impacted or otherwise damaged NOT by heat/fire resulting from the Incident?
6. Were any of the fatalities or injuries reported for persons located outside the PIR?

 Yes
 Yes
 Yes

 No
 No
 No

7. Estimated cost to Operator:
7.a Estimated cost of public and non-Operator private property damage
paid/reimbursed by the Operator
$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

7.b Estimated cost of gas released unintentionally

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

7.c Estimated cost of gas released during
intentional and controlled blowdown

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

7.d Estimated cost of Operator’s property damage & repairs

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

7.e Estimated cost of Operator’s emergency response

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

7.f Estimated other costs

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

Describe ___________________________________________________
7.g Estimated total costs (sum of above)

$/

/

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 6 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART E – ADDITIONAL OPERATING INFORMATION
1. Estimated pressure at the point and time of the Incident (psig):

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

2. Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure (MAOP) at the point and time of the Incident (psig) :

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

3. Describe the pressure on the system or facility relating to the Incident: (select only one)
 Pressure did not exceed MAOP
 Pressure exceeded MAOP, but did not exceed 110% of MAOP
 Pressure exceeded 110% of MAOP
4. Not including pressure reductions required by PHMSA regulations (such as for repairs and pipe movement), was the system or facility
relating to the Incident operating under an established pressure restriction with pressure limits below those normally allowed by the MAOP ?

 No
 Yes  (Complete 4.a and 4.b below)
4.a Did the pressure exceed this established pressure restriction?

 Yes

 No

4.b Was this pressure restriction mandated by PHMSA or the State?

 PHMSA

 State

 Not mandated

5. Was “Onshore Pipeline, Including Valve Sites” OR “Offshore Pipeline, Including Riser and Riser Bend” selected in PART C, Question 2?

 No
 Yes 

(Complete 5.a – 5.f below)

5.a Type of upstream valve used to initially isolate release source:

 Manual

5.b Type of downstream valve used to initially isolate release source:

 Manual  Automatic
 Check Valve

5.c Length of segment isolated between valves (ft):

/

/

/

 Automatic

 Remotely Controlled
 Remotely Controlled

/,/___/___/___/

5.d Is the pipeline configured to accommodate internal inspection tools?




Yes
No  Which physical features limit tool accommodation? (select all that apply)








Changes in line pipe diameter
Presence of unsuitable mainline valves
Tight or mitered pipe bends
Other passage restrictions (i.e. unbarred tee’s, projecting instrumentation, etc.)
Extra thick pipe wall (applicable only for magnetic flux leakage internal inspection tools)
Other  Describe:__________________________________________________________________

5.e For this pipeline, are there operational factors which significantly complicate the execution of an internal inspection tool run?




No
Yes

 Which operational factors complicate execution?






(select all that apply)

Excessive debris or scale, wax, or other wall build-up
Low operating pressure(s)
Low flow or absence of flow
Incompatible commodity
Other  Describe:__________________________________________________________________

5.f Function of pipeline system: (select only one)
 Transmission System
 Type A Gathering
 Storage Gathering

 Transmission Line of Distribution System
 Type B Gathering

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 7 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

6. Was a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA)-based system in place on the pipeline or facility involved in the Incident?
 No
 Yes  6.a Was it operating at the time of the Incident?
 Yes
 No
6.b Was it fully functional at the time of the Incident?
 Yes
 No
6.c Did SCADA-based information (such as alarm(s), alert(s), event(s), and/or volume or pack calculations) assist with
 Yes
 No
the detection of the Incident?
6.d Did SCADA-based information (such as alarm(s), alert(s), event(s), and/or volume calculations) assist with the
 Yes
 No
confirmation of the Incident?
7. How was the Incident initially identified for the Operator? (select only one)

 SCADA-based information (such as alarm(s), alert(s), event(s), and/or volume or pack calculations)
 Static Shut-in Test or Other Pressure or Leak Test
 Controller
 Local Operating Personnel, including contractors
 Air Patrol
 Ground Patrol by Operator or its contractor
 Notification from Public
 Notification from Emergency Responder
 Notification from Third Party that caused the Incident
 Other _________________________________________________
7.a If “Controller”, “Local Operating Personnel, including contractors”, “Air Patrol”, or “Ground Patrol by Operator or its contractor” is
selected in Question 7, specify the following: (select only one)

 Operator employee

 Contractor working for the Operator

8. Was an investigation initiated into whether or not the controller(s) or control room issues were the cause of or a contributing factor to the
Incident? (select only one)



Yes, but the investigation of the control room and/or controller actions has not yet been completed by the operator (Supplemental
Report required)
 No, the facility was not monitored by a controller(s) at the time of the Incident
 No, the operator did not find that an investigation of the controller(s) actions or control room issues was necessary due to:
(provide an explanation for why the operator did not investigate)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 Yes, specify investigation result(s): (select all that apply)
 Investigation reviewed work schedule rotations, continuous hours of service (while working for the Operator) and other
factors associated with fatigue
 Investigation did NOT review work schedule rotations, continuous hours of service (while working for the Operator) and
other factors associated with fatigue (provide an explanation for why not)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
 Investigation identified no control room issues
 Investigation identified no controller issues
 Investigation identified incorrect controller action or controller error
 Investigation identified that fatigue may have affected the controller(s) involved or impacted the involved controller(s)
response
 Investigation identified incorrect procedures
 Investigation identified incorrect control room equipment operation
 Investigation identified maintenance activities that affected control room operations, procedures, and/or controller
response
 Investigation identified areas other than those above  Describe: ___________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 8 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART F – DRUG & ALCOHOL TESTING INFORMATION
1. As a result of this Incident, were any Operator employees tested under the post-accident drug and alcohol testing requirements of DOT’s
Drug & Alcohol Testing regulations?

 No
 Yes 



1.a Specify how many were tested:

/

/

/

1.b Specify how many failed:

/

/

/

2. As a result of this Incident, were any Operator contractor employees tested under the post-accident drug and alcohol testing requirements of
DOT’s Drug & Alcohol Testing regulations?

 No
 Yes 

2.a Specify how many were tested:

 2.b

Specify how many failed:

/

/

/

/

/

/

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 9 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART G – APPARENT CAUSE

Select only one box from PART G in the shaded column on the left representing the
APPARENT Cause of the Incident, and answer the questions on the right. Describe
secondary, contributing, or root causes of the Incident in the narrative (PART H).

G1 - Corrosion Failure – only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


External Corrosion

1. Results of visual examination:
Listed as "cause of corrosion"
 Localized Pitting  General Corrosion
on current form. Deleted
 Other _____________________________________________________________

"improper cathodic protection."
2. Type of corrosion: (select all that apply)
 Galvanic  Atmospheric  Stray Current  Microbiological  Selective Seam
 Other _____________________________________________________________
3. The type(s) of corrosion selected in Question 2 is based on the following: (select all that
apply)
 Field examination
 Determined by metallurgical analysis
 Other _____________________________________________________________
4. Was the failed item buried under the ground?
 Yes 4.a Was failed item considered to be under cathodic protection at the time of
the incident?
 Yes  Year protection started: / / / / /

 No

4.b Was shielding, tenting, or disbonding of coating evident at the point of
the incident?
 Yes  No
4.c Has one or more Cathodic Protection Survey been conducted at
the point of the incident?
 Yes, CP Annual Survey  Most recent year conducted:
/ / /

 Yes, Close Interval Survey  Most recent year conducted:
 Yes, Other CP Survey  Most recent year conducted:
 No
 No 

4.d Was the failed item externally coated or painted?

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

 Yes  No

5. Was there observable damage to the coating or paint in the vicinity of the corrosion?
 Yes  No



Internal Corrosion

6. Results of visual examination:
 Localized Pitting
 General Corrosion
 Not cut open
 Other ____________________________________________________________
7. Cause of corrosion: (select all that apply)
 Corrosive Commodity  Water drop-out/Acid  Microbiological  Erosion
 Other ____________ ________________________________________________
8. The cause(s) of corrosion selected in Question 7 is based on the following: (select all that
apply)
 Field examination
 Determined by metallurgical analysis
 Other _____________________________________________________________
9. Location of corrosion: (select all that apply)
 Low point in pipe  Elbow  Drop-out
 Other ____________________________________________________________
10. Was the gas/fluid treated with corrosion inhibitors or biocides?
11. Was the interior coated or lined with protective coating?

 Yes  No

 Yes  No

12. Were cleaning/dewatering pigs (or other operations) routinely utilized?
 Not applicable - Not mainline pipe
 Yes
 No
13. Were corrosion coupons routinely utilized?
 Not applicable - Not mainline pipe
 Yes

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

 No

Page 10 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

Complete the following if any Corrosion Failure sub-cause is selected AND the “Item Involved in Incident” (from PART C, Question 3) is
Pipe or Weld.
14. Has one or more internal inspection tool collected data at the point of the Incident?
 Yes  No
14.a. If Yes, for each tool used, select type of internal inspection tool and indicate most recent year run:

 Magnetic Flux Leakage Tool
 Ultrasonic
 Geometry
 Caliper
 Crack
 Hard Spot
 Combination Tool
 Transverse Field/Triaxial
 Other __________________________

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

15. Has one or more hydrotest or other pressure test been conducted since original construction at the point of the Incident?
 Yes  Most recent year tested: / / / / /
Test pressure (psig): /
/
/
/
/
/

 No

16. Has one or more Direct Assessment been conducted on this segment?
 Yes, and an investigative dig was conducted at the point of the Incident

 Yes, but the point of the Incident was not identified as a dig site
 No




Most recent year conducted: /

/

/

/

/

Most recent year conducted: /

/

/

/

/

17. Has one or more non-destructive examination been conducted at the point of the Incident since January 21, 2002?
 Yes  No
17.a If Yes, for each examination conducted since January 1, 2002, select type of non-destructive examination and indicate most recent
year the examination was conducted:

 Radiography
 Guided Wave Ultrasonic
 Handheld Ultrasonic Tool
 Wet Magnetic Particle Test
 Dry Magnetic Particle Test
 Other __________________________

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

G2 - Natural Force Damage - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Earth Movement, NOT due to
Heavy Rains/Floods

1. Specify:

 Earthquake  Subsidence  Landslide  Other __________________



Heavy Rains/Floods

2. Specify:

 Washout/Scouring  Flotation  Mudslide  Other _______________



Lightning

3. Specify:

 Direct hit  Secondary impact such as resulting nearby fires



Temperature

4. Specify:

 Thermal Stress
 Frozen Components



High Winds



Other Natural Force Damage

Separate item on current form.

 Frost Heave
 Other ________________________________

5. Describe: _________________________________________________

Complete the following if any Natural Force Damage sub-cause is selected.
6. Were the natural forces causing the Incident generated in conjunction with an extreme weather event?
6.a If Yes, specify: (select all that apply)

 Yes

 No

 Hurricane  Tropical Storm
 Tornado
 Other ______________________________

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 11 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

G3 – Excavation Damage - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Excavation Damage by Operator
(First Party)



Excavation Damage by Operator’s
Contractor (Second Party)



Excavation Damage by Third Party



Previous Damage due to Excavation
Activity

Complete Questions 1-5 ONLY IF the “Item Involved in Incident” (from PART C,
Question 3) is Pipe or Weld.
1. Has one or more internal inspection tool collected data at the point of the Incident?
 Yes  No
1.a If Yes, for each tool used, select type of internal inspection tool and indicate most
recent year run:

 Magnetic Flux Leakage
 Ultrasonic
 Geometry
 Caliper
 Crack
 Hard Spot
 Combination Tool
 Transverse Field/Triaxial
 Other _____________________

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

2. Do you have reason to believe that the internal inspection was completed BEFORE the
damage was sustained?  Yes  No
3. Has one or more hydrotest or other pressure test been conducted since original construction
at the point of the Incident?

 Yes Most recent year tested:

/
/

Test pressure (psig):

/
/

/
/, /

/

/
/

/

/

 No
4. Has one or more Direct Assessment been conducted on the pipeline segment?

 Yes, and an investigative dig was conducted at the point of the Incident
 Most recent year conducted: / / / / /
 Yes, but the point of the Incident was not identified as a dig site
 Most recent year conducted: / / / / /
 No
5. Has one or more non-destructive examination been conducted at the point of the Incident
since January 1, 2002?
 Yes  No
5.a If Yes, for each examination conducted since January 1, 2002, select type of nondestructive examination and indicate most recent year the examination was conducted:

 Radiography
 Guided Wave Ultrasonic
 Handheld Ultrasonic Tool
 Wet Magnetic Particle Test
 Dry Magnetic Particle Test
 Other __________________________
Complete the following if Excavation Damage by Third Party is selected as the sub-cause.
6. Did the operator get prior notification of the excavation activity?
6.a If Yes, Notification received from: (select all that apply)

 Yes  No
 One-Call System

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/
/

/

/

/

/

/

Date of notification was
removed.

 Excavator

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

/
/

 Contractor

 Landowner

Page 12 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

Complete the following mandatory CGA-DIRT Program questions if any Excavation Damage sub-cause is selected.
7. Do you want PHMSA to upload the following information to CGA-DIRT (www.cga-dirt.com)?

Yes

 No

8. Right-of-Way where event occurred: (select all that apply)

 Public  Specify:  City Street  State Highway  County Road  Interstate Highway  Other
 Private  Specify:  Private Landowner  Private Business  Private Easement
 Pipeline Property/Easement
 Power/Transmission Line
The CGA-DIRT section (#s7-17) is new
 Railroad
to the form although some items similar
 Dedicated Public Utility Easement
to the CGA-DIRT questions appear on
 Federal Land
the current form.
 Data not collected
 Unknown/Other
9. Type of excavator: (select only one)

 Contractor
 Railroad

 County
 State

 Developer
 Utility

 Farmer
 Municipality
 Data not collected

 Occupant
 Unknown/Other

10. Type of excavation equipment: (select only one)

 Auger
 Explosives
 Probing Device

 Backhoe/Trackhoe
 Farm Equipment
 Trencher

 Boring
 Grader/Scraper
 Vacuum Equipment

 Drilling
 Directional Drilling
 Hand Tools
 Milling Equipment
 Data not collected  Unknown/Other

11. Type of work performed: (select only one)

 Agriculture
 Drainage
 Grading
 Natural Gas
 Sewer (Sanitary/Storm)
 Telecommunications
 Data not collected

 Cable TV
 Curb/Sidewalk
 Driveway
 Electric
 Irrigation
 Landscaping
 Pole
 Public Transit Authority
 Site Development
 Steam
Traffic Signal
 Traffic Sign
 Unknown/Other

12. Was the One-Call Center notified?

 Yes

 Building Construction
 Engineering/Surveying
 Liquid Pipeline
 Railroad Maintenance
 Storm Drain/Culvert
 Water

 Building Demolition
 Fencing
 Milling
 Road Work
Street Light
 Waterway Improvement

 No

12.a If Yes, specify ticket number: /__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/
12.b If this is a State where more than a single One-Call Center exists, list the name of the One-Call Center notified:
_____________________________________________________________

 Contract Locator

 Data not collected

 Unknown/Other

14. Were facility locate marks visible in the area of excavation?

 No

 Yes

 Data not collected

 Unknown/Other

15. Were facilities marked correctly?

 No

 Yes

 Data not collected

 Unknown/Other

16. Did the damage cause an interruption in service?

 No

 Yes

 Data not collected

 Unknown/Other

13. Type of Locator:

 Utility Owner

16.a If Yes, specify duration of the interruption:

/___/___/___/___/ hours

(This CGA-DIRT section continued on next page with Question 17.)

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 13 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

17. Description of the CGA-DIRT Root Cause (select only the one predominant first level CGA-DIRT Root Cause and then, where available
as a choice, the one predominant second level CGA-DIRT Root Cause as well):



One-Call Notification Practices Not Sufficient: (select only one)

 No notification made to the One-Call Center
 Notification to One-Call Center made, but not sufficient
 Wrong information provided


Locating Practices Not Sufficient: (select only one)

 Facility could not be found/located
 Facility marking or location not sufficient
 Facility was not located or marked
 Incorrect facility records/maps


Excavation Practices Not Sufficient: (select only one)

 Excavation practices not sufficient (other)
 Failure to maintain clearance
 Failure to maintain the marks
 Failure to support exposed facilities
 Failure to use hand tools where required
 Failure to verify location by test-hole (pot-holing)
 Improper backfilling


One-Call Notification Center Error



Abandoned Facility



Deteriorated Facility



Previous Damage



Data Not Collected

 Other / None of the Above (explain)_____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 14 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

G4 - Other Outside Force Damage - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Nearby Industrial, Man-made, or
Other Fire/Explosion as Primary
Cause of Incident



Damage by Car, Truck, or Other
Motorized Vehicle/Equipment NOT
Engaged in Excavation

1. Vehicle/Equipment operated by: (select only one)
 Operator
 Operator’s Contractor



Damage by Boats, Barges, Drilling
Rigs, or Other Maritime Equipment or
Vessels Set Adrift or Which Have
Otherwise Lost Their Mooring

2. Select one or more of the following IF an extreme weather event was a factor:
 Hurricane
 Tropical Storm
 Tornado
 Heavy Rains/Flood
 Other ______________________________



Routine or Normal Fishing or Other
Maritime Activity NOT Engaged in
Excavation



Electrical Arcing from Other
Equipment or Facility



Previous Mechanical Damage NOT
Related to Excavation

 Third Party

Complete Questions 3-7 ONLY IF the “Item Involved in Incident” (from PART C,
Question 3) is Pipe or Weld.
3. Has one or more internal inspection tool collected data at the point of the Incident?
 Yes  No
3.a If Yes, for each tool used, select type of internal inspection tool and indicate most
recent year run:

 Magnetic Flux Leakage /
 Ultrasonic
/
 Geometry
/
 Caliper
/
 Crack
/
 Hard Spot
/
 Combination Tool
/
 Transverse Field/Triaxial
 Other
/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/
/

/

/
/

/

/

/

/

4. Do you have reason to believe that the internal inspection was completed BEFORE the
damage was sustained?  Yes  No
5. Has one or more hydrotest or other pressure test been conducted since original construction
at the point of the Incident?

 Yes Most recent year tested:
Test pressure (psig):

/
/

/
/

/
/,/

/

/
/

/

/

 No
6. Has one or more Direct Assessment been conducted on the pipeline segment?

 Yes, and an investigative dig was conducted at the point of the Incident
 Most recent year conducted: / / / / /
 Yes, but the point of the Incident was not identified as a dig site
 Most recent year conducted: / / / / /
 No
(This section continued on next page with Question 7.)

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 15 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

7. Has one or more non-destructive examination been conducted at the point of the Incident
since January 1, 2002?
 Yes  No
7.a If Yes, for each examination conducted since January 1, 2002, select type of nondestructive examination and indicate most recent year the examination was conducted:
 Radiography
/
/
/
/
/

 Guided Wave Ultrasonic
 Handheld Ultrasonic Tool
 Wet Magnetic Particle Test
 Dry Magnetic Particle Test
 Other __________________________

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/



Intentional Damage

8. Specify:



Other Outside Force Damage

9. Describe: _________________________________________________________

 Vandalism
 Terrorism
 Theft of transported commodity  Theft of equipment
 Other ________________________________________

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 16 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

Listed as "Material and Welds"
on current form.
Use this section to report material failures ONLY IF the “Item Involved in
Incident” (from PART C, Question 3) is “Pipe” or “Weld.”

G5 - Material Failure of Pipe or Weld

Only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column
1. The sub-cause selected below is based on the following: (select all that apply)

 Field Examination

 Determined by Metallurgical Analysis

 Other Analysis__________________________

 Sub-cause is Tentative or Suspected; Still Under Investigation


Construction-, Installation-, or
Fabrication-related



Original Manufacturing-related
(NOT girth weld or other welds
formed in the field)



Environmental Cracking-related

(Supplemental Report required)

2. List contributing factors: (select all that apply)
 Fatigue- or Vibration-related:
 Mechanically-induced prior to installation (such as during transport of pipe)
 Mechanical Vibration
 Pressure-related
 Thermal
 Other __________________________________
 Mechanical Stress
 Other __________________________________
3. Specify:  Stress Corrosion Cracking
 Sulfide Stress Cracking
 Hydrogen Stress Cracking
 Other ____________________________________

Complete the following if any Material Failure of Pipe or Weld sub-cause is selected.
4. Additional factors (select all that apply):  Dent  Gouge  Pipe Bend
 Lamination
 Buckle
 Wrinkle
 Misalignment
 Other __________________________________

 Arc Burn  Crack
 Burnt Steel

5. Has one or more internal inspection tool collected data at the point of the Incident?

 Lack of Fusion

 Yes  No

5.a If Yes, for each tool used, select type of internal inspection tool and indicate most recent year run:

 Magnetic Flux Leakage Tool
 Ultrasonic
 Geometry
 Caliper
 Crack
 Hard Spot
 Combination Tool
 Transverse Field/Triaxial
 Other __________________________

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

6. Has one or more hydrotest or other pressure test been conducted since original construction at the point of the Incident?
 Yes  Most recent year tested: / / / / /
Test pressure (psig): /
/
/,/
/
/
/

 No

7. Has one or more Direct Assessment been conducted on the pipeline segment?
 Yes, and an investigative dig was conducted at the point of the Incident

 Yes, but the point of the incident was not identified as a dig site
 No




Most recent year conducted:

/

/

/

/

/

Most recent year conducted:

/

/

/

/

/

8. Has one or more non-destructive examination(s) been conducted at the point of the Incident since January 1,2002?
 Yes  No
8.a If Yes, for each examination conducted since January 1, 2002, select type of non-destructive examination and indicate most recent
year the examination was conducted:

 Radiography
 Guided Wave Ultrasonic
 Handheld Ultrasonic Tool
 Wet Magnetic Particle Test
 Dry Magnetic Particle Test
 Other ________________________________

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 17 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

Listed as "Equipment and Operations" on
current gas transmission incident form.
G6 - Equipment Failure - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Malfunction of Control/Relief
Equipment

1. Specify: (select all that apply)
 Control Valve
 Instrumentation
 SCADA
 Communications  Block Valve
 Check Valve
 Relief Valve
 Power Failure
 Stopple/Control Fitting
 Pressure Regulator
 ESD System Failure
 Other ________________________________________________________



Compressor or Compressor-related
Equipment

2. Specify:  Seal/Packing Failure
 Body Failure
 Crack in Body
 Appurtenance Failure
 Pressure Vessel Failure
 Other _________________________________________________________



Threaded Connection/Coupling
Failure

3. Specify:

 Pipe Nipple
 Valve Threads
 Mechanical Coupling
 Threaded Pipe Collar  Threaded Fitting
 Other ________________________________________________________



Non-threaded Connection Failure

4. Specify:

 O-Ring
 Gasket
 Seal (NOT compressor seal) or Packing
 Other ________________________________________________________



Defective or Loose Tubing or Fitting



Failure of Equipment Body (except
Compressor), Vessel Plate, or other
Material



Other Equipment Failure

5. Describe: ___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

Complete the following if any Equipment Failure sub-cause is selected.
6. Additional factors that contributed to the equipment failure: (select all that apply)
 Excessive vibration

 Overpressurization
 No support or loss of support
 Manufacturing defect
 Loss of electricity
 Improper installation
 Mismatched items (different manufacturer for tubing and tubing fittings)
 Dissimilar metals
 Breakdown of soft goods due to compatibility issues with transported gas/fluid
 Valve vault or valve can contributed to the release
 Alarm/status failure
 Misalignment
 Thermal stress
 Other _______________________________________________________

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 18 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

G7 - Incorrect Operation - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Damage by Operator or Operator’s
Contractor NOT Related to
Excavation and NOT due to
Motorized Vehicle/Equipment
Damage



Underground Gas Storage, Pressure
Vessel, or Cavern Allowed or
Caused to Overpressure



Valve Left or Placed in Wrong
Position, but NOT Resulting in an
Overpressure

"Incorrect Operation" became its own cause category
so it is no longer a sub-cause under the "Equipment
and Operations" cause category.
1. Specify:

 Valve Misalignment
 Incorrect Reference Data/Calculation
 Miscommunication
 Inadequate Monitoring
 Other ____________________________________

 Pipeline or Equipment
Overpressured



Equipment Not Installed Properly



Wrong Equipment Specified or
Installed



Other Incorrect Operation

2. Describe: __________________________________________________

Complete the following if any Incorrect Operation sub-cause is selected.

Items 3-5.a are new; however, on the

3. Was this Incident related to: (select all that apply)
current form, "inadequate procedure" &
 Inadequate procedure
"failure to follow procedure" appear as a
 No procedure established
 Failure to follow procedure
type of incorrect operation.
 Other: ______________________________________________________
4. What category type was the activity that caused the Incident:
 Construction
 Commissioning
 Decommissioning
 Right-of-Way activities
 Routine maintenance
 Other maintenance
 Normal operating conditions
 Non-routine operating conditions (abnormal operations or emergencies)
5. Was the task(s) that led to the Incident identified as a covered task in your Operator Qualification Program?  Yes

 No

5.a If Yes, were the individuals performing the task(s) qualified for the task(s)?

 Yes, they were qualified for the task(s)
 No, but they were performing the task(s) under the direction and observation of a qualified individual
 No, they were not qualified for the task(s) nor were they performing the task(s) under the direction and observation of a
qualified individual

G8 – Other Incident Cause - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Miscellaneous



Unknown

1. Describe:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
2. Specify:

 Investigation complete, cause of Incident unknown
 Still under investigation, cause of Incident to be determined*
(*Supplemental Report required)

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 19 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART H – NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE INCIDENT

(Attach additional sheets as necessary)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PART I – PREPARER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

Signature section appears on the
first page on the current form.

Preparer's Name (type or print)

Preparer’s Telephone Number

Preparer's Title (type or print)

Preparer's E-mail Address
Authorized Signature

Preparer’s Facsimile Number
Date

Authorized Signature Telephone Number

Authorized Signature’s Name (type or print)

Authorized Signature’s E-mail Address

Authorized Signature’s Title (type or print)

Form PHMSA F 7100.2 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 20 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleNOTICE: This report is required by 49 CFR Part 195
AuthorDebbie
File Modified2009-12-15
File Created2009-12-11

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy