Crosswalk

Crosswalk.doc

Medicare Contractor Provider Satisfaction Survey (MCPSS) and Supporting Regulations in 42 CFR 421.120, 421.122 and 421.201

Crosswalk

OMB: 0938-0915

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Medicare Contractor Provider Satisfaction Survey


2009 - 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk

2009 Introductory Section

2010 Introductory Section

Business Function (BF) Revisions /

DPRE Recommendations

Q0. Approximately how long have you been a Medicare Provider?

Q0. Approximately how long have you been a Medicare provider?

We suggest the question remains the same

Q1. {CONTRACTOR}, your Contractor, provides a number of services on behalf of Medicare to Medicare Providers in your area. Thinking about ALL your interactions with your Contractor, {CONTRACTOR}, {[In the last twelve months/ Since {DATE}], how satisfied have you been with your Contractor’s performance overall.

Q1. [CONTRACTOR], your Contractor, provides a number of services on behalf of Medicare to Medicare Providers in your area. Thinking about ALL your interactions with your Contractor, [CONTRACTOR], [in the last 12 months/ since {DATE}], how satisfied have you been with your Contractor’s performance overall?


We suggest the question remains the same


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

Q2. Thinking about the size of your provider’s practice/facility, please answer the following: (answer only those questions that apply to your practice/facility)


a. If you are a provider, do you have fewer than 25 full-time employees in your practice/facility?

b. If you are a supplier of medical equipment, does your organization have fewer than 10 full-time employees?

c. Do you consider yourself to be a small provider?


IF YES:


Please check the group below which best applies to you:

0 Physician

0 Non-physician practitioner

0 DMEPOS supplier

0 Other (i.e., rural health clinic, federally qualified health center, etc.) __________________

0 Don’t know



The rationale for adding these background items is that CMS is required to specifically monitor outreach activities to “small providers”. The addition of these items will allow CMS to better fulfill this requirement.

2010 SECTION-LEVEL BURDEN: 1 minute (3 questions; 5 items)





2009 - 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk

2009 Section A : Provider Inquiries

2010 Section A : Provider Inquiries

Business Function (BF) Revisions /

DPRE Recommendations

A1. How quickly you can reach a representative to make a Provider Inquiry by telephone?

A1a. How quickly you can reach a representative to make a provider inquiry by telephone?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE has no further recommendations

A2. Receiving the correct information

A1b. Receiving the correct information over the phone from a representative?


BF suggest revising question to include the following language “over the phone from a representative”, DPRE has no further recommendations


A3. The consistency of responses that you get from different Provider Inquiries representatives

A1c. The consistency of written responses?


BF suggest revising the question; DPRE has no further recommendations


A4. The effort your Contractor makes to make the Provider Inquiries process as easy as possible


THIS ITEM DELETED

BF suggest deleting question from 2010 survey; DPRE has no further recommendations


A5. The modes communication that are offered by your Contractor to exchange information with them about Inquiries

A1d. The modes communication that are offered by your Contractor to exchange information with them about inquiries?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE has no further recommendations

A6. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s representatives throughout Provider Inquiries activities


THIS ITEM DELETED

BF suggest deleting question from 2010 survey; DPRE has no further recommendations


A7. Your Contractor’s ability to fully resolve problems without you having to make multiple inquiries

A1e. Your Contractor’s ability to fully resolve problems without you having to make multiple inquiries?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE has no further recommendations

A8. [In the last twelve months/Since {DATE}] which method(s) have you used to communicate with your Contractor?


Telephone call with a Contractor representative

Automated telephone system

Web

E-mail

Mail

Fax

Other (specify)



A2. [In the last twelve months/Since {DATE}] which method(s) have you used to communicate with your Contractor? (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)


Telephone call with your Contractor’s representative

Automated telephone system (IVR)

Web

E-mail

Mail

Fax

Other (specify)


BF revised the answers to include “IVR” as a possible response

A9. [In the last twelve months/ Since {DATE}] which method have you used most often to communicate with your Contractor?


Telephone call with a Contractor representative

Automated telephone system

Web

E-mail

Mail

Fax

Other (specify)


A3. [In the last twelve months/ Since {DATE}] which method have you used most often to communicate with your Contractor?


Telephone call with your Contractor’s representative

Automated telephone system (IVR)

Web

E-mail

Mail

Fax

Other (specify)


BF revised the answers to include “IVR” as a possible response; DPRE has not further recommendations


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

A1f. The information made available through your Contractor’s automated telephone system (IVR) meeting your needs, if accessed?

Questions on IVR added by BF; DPRE recommends the addition of “ if accessed”

A1g. The ease of obtaining information through your Contractor’s automated telephone system (IVR), if accessed?

A10. [In the last twelve months/ Since {DATE}] how many inquires have you and any other persons in your facility made?



THIS ITEM DELETED

BF is willing to delete question; DPRE recommends that this question be pulled from the survey or swap with question #4 in the remarks section below

A11. Do you use the internet to get any of the following?


CMS Program updates

Contractor updates

Training

Billing and coverage regulations

Other (Please specify)



THIS ITEM DELETED

BF has decided to delete question from 2010 survey; DPRE has no further recommendations



THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

A4. [In the last 12 months/since {DATE}], what is your overall satisfaction with your Contractor’s provider inquiry activities?

Interest in understanding overall satisfaction at the BF level

A12. We are interested in any general comments you have about [CONTRACTOR NAME]'s handling of Provider Inquiry activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved?






A5. We are interested in any general comments you have about [CONTRACTOR NAME]'s handling of provider inquiry activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved?






BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE has no further recommendations

2010 SECTION-LEVEL BURDEN: 2.5 minutes (5 questions; 10 items, plus 1 open ended question)





2009 - 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk

2009 Section B: Provider Outreach & Education

2010 Section B: Provider Outreach & Education

Business Function Revisions /DPRE Recommendations

B1. [In the last twelve months/ Since {DATE}] what education and training resources of (CONTRACTOR) have you used?


Web-based Training

Contractor Web site

In-person training / Workshops

Teleconference

Hard copy materials

Other (specify) _____

None used


B1. [In the last twelve months/ Since {DATE}] what education and training resources of [CONTRACTOR NAME] have you used? [CHECK ALL THAT APPLY]


Web-based Training

Contractor website

In-person training / workshops

Teleconferences

Hard copy materials

Electronic mail (e-mail) materials - NEW

Listserv information - NEW

Other (specify) _____

None used


BF revised the answers to include two additional “E-mailed materials” and “Listserv information”

B2. The amount of training and educational resources available from your Contractor


THIS ITEM DELETED

BF has decided to delete question from 2010 survey; DPRE has no further recommendations


B3. The detail in which topics are covered

THIS ITEM DELETED

B4. The tailoring of training or education at a level you can understand


THIS ITEM DELETED

B5. The topics of the training and education materials are up-to-date

THIS ITEM DELETED

B6. The relevance of the training and education material topics to your organizations needs.

THIS ITEM DELETED

B7. The accessibility of education and training resources from your Contractor

THIS ITEM DELETED

B8. The expertise of your Contractor’s provider education and training staff

B2a. The expertise of your Contractor’s provider education and training staff?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE has no further recommendations

B9. Your Contractor’s communication with you about changes that have been or are being made to Medicare policies and regulations

B2b. Your Contractor’s communication with you about changes that have been or are being made to Medicare policies and regulations?

B10. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s training and education representatives

B2c. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s training and education representatives?

B11. If you are an eligible professional, CMS’ outreach and educational efforts on the “Physician Quality Reporting Initiative or PQRI”?

THIS ITEM DELETED

DPRE recommendations that these questions not be included in the survey tool since it has no direct relation to goals of the survey

B12. CMS products to educate you on how to bill for preventative services

THIS ITEM DELETED

B13. For which of the following topics would you like to see more training and education material (mark all that applies)?

Claims processing

Payment policy

Local coverage determination

NPI

Enrollment

Appeals

Audit and reimbursement

Other (specify)


B3. For which of the following topics would you like to see more training and education materials? [CHECK ALL THAT APPLY]

Claims processing

Payment policy

Local coverage determination

Enrollment

Appeals

Audit and reimbursement

Other (specify)


BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE recommends removing NPI since this initiative is complete

B14. Do you find CMS listserv messages {@ ADDRESS} an effective method of communication to notify you about new Medicare Fee-for-Service information?


THIS ITEM DELETED

BF has decided to delete question from 2010 survey; DPRE has no further recommendations


B15. We are interested in any general comments you have about [CONTRACTOR NAME]'s handling of Provider Outreach & Education activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved?


B9. We are interested in any general comments you have about [CONTRACTOR]’s handling of provider outreach and education activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved?

BF suggests the question remain the same. DPRE agrees with BF recommendations


THESE ITEMS DID NOT EXIST IN THIS STRUCTURE IN 2009

B4. If you have received in-person training…[RATE LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH]:


B4a. Availability of training

BF revised these questions to reflect the providers satisfaction based on the following:

a) Face to Face training,

b) Non-face to face (non interactive activities),

c) Educational material / resource availability.







B4b. Clarity of information presented

B4c. Detail of topics covered

B4d. The relevance of the training to meet your specific needs


THESE ITEMS DID NOT EXIST IN THIS STRUCTURE IN 2009

B5. If you have participated in non face-to-face training …[RATE LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH]:


B5a. Availability of training

DPRE recommends that the questions be ordered in a specific prompt format for easier answer completion reducing the respondent burden; also recommend some specific language to clarify and define the intent of the question format.



B5b. Clarity of information presented

B5c. Detail of topics covered

B5d. The relevance of the training to meet your specific needs

B6. If you have received educational materials/information resources from your Contractor… [RATE LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH]:


B6a. Amount of educational materials/information resources

B6b. Accessibility of educational materials/information resources

B6c. Clarity of information

B6d. The relevance of the educational materials and information resources to meet your specific needs

B6e. The usefulness of your Contractor’s listserv (e-mail) messages in notifying you about new Medicare program information

B6f. The usefulness of your Contractor’s frequently asked questions (FAQs)


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

B7. How often do you use the Medicare Learning Network (MLN) products and services?

This item added so that CMS has information on how often these products are used by providers.


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

B8. What is your overall satisfaction with your Contractor’s outreach and educational activities?

Noted in the Other remarks Section A #4

Other Remarks Provided by Business Function with 2010 Section B: None

2010 SECTION-LEVEL BURDEN: 4.7 minutes (9 questions; 21 items, plus 1 open ended question) + 0.6 minutes (3 potential questions on emerging topics (TBD)) = 5.3 Total minutes





2009 - 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk

2009 Section C: Claims Processing

2010 Section C: Claims Processing

Business Function Revisions /DPRE Recommendations

C1. The accuracy of your Contractor’s claims editing

C1b. The accuracy of your Contractor’s claims editing?

BF has reordered the questions based on ease and relevance; BF suggests that question C1e focus on all claims related issues (which includes addressing comment regarding C1e as mentioned in Section A Other Remarks (7&8) was revised); DPRE agrees with BF recommendations





C2. The timeliness of notification from your Contractor that a claim will not be paid, including denied, returned or unprocessed claims

C1c. The timeliness of notification from your Contractor that a claim will not be paid, including denied, returned or unprocessed claims?



C3. The accuracy of remittance advises received from your contractor

THIS ITEM DELETED

C4. The ease of submitting electronic claims

C1a. The ease of submitting electronic claims?


C5. The availability of your Contractor’s representatives to address claims

C1e. The promptness of your Contractor in resolving claims-related issues brought to their attention?

C6. The clarity of remittance advices you receive from your Contractor

C1d. The clarity of remittance advices you receive from your Contractor?

C7. The ease of correcting claims, such as correcting claims online or asking for a change over the phone

C1f. The ease of correcting claims, such as correcting claims online or requesting a change over the phone?

C8. In the last twelve months/Since (Date) how have you submitted claims?

THIS ITEM DELETED



THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

C1g.The correctness of the information provided to you by your Contractor in response to claims-related issues raised by you?

BF suggest adding new question; DPRE agrees with BF recommendation


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

C1h. The overall performance of your Contractor’s claims processing activities?

Noted in the Other remarks Section A #4

C9. We are interested in any general comments you have about [Contractor Name]’s handling of Claims Processing activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved

C2. We are interested in any general comments you have about [CONTRACTOR]’s handling of claims processing activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved?

BF suggests the question remain the same. DPRE agrees with BF recommendations

Other Remarks Provided by Business Function with 2010 Section C:

No Additional Remarks Provided by Business Function

2010 SECTION-LEVEL BURDEN: 2.1 minutes (2 questions; 8 items, plus 1 open ended question)



2009 - 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk

2009 Section D: Appeals

2010 Section D: Appeals

Business Function Revisions /DPRE Recommendations

D1. The consistency of your Contractor’s first level appeals decisions for claims that have been denied

D2a. The consistency of your Contractor’s first-level appeals decisions for claims that have been denied?

BF suggest that questions D1-D4 remain the same (but are renumbered and reordered); DPRE has no further recommendations



D2. The mechanisms that your Contractor offers for exchanging information with them about first level appeals

D2b. The mechanisms that your Contractor offers for exchanging information with them about first-level appeals?

D3. Your Contractor’s responsiveness, attentiveness and availability during the process of first level appeals

D2c. Your Contractor’s responsiveness, attentiveness and availability during the process of first-level appeals?

D4. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s representatives during the appeals process

D2f. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s representatives during the first-level appeals process?

D5. The clarity of explanations of appeal decisions made by your Contractor


D2g. The clarity of explanations of first-level appeal decisions made by your Contractor?


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

D2d. Your average telephone hold time before talking to a live person?

BF suggests adding these questions to gain insight on these items; DPRE has no further recommendations

D2e. If leaving a message, the average time before receiving a return call?


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

D2h. The overall performance of your Contractor’s first-level appeals activities?

Noted in the Other remarks Section A #4

D6. We are interested in any general comments you have about [Contractor Name]’s handling of Appeals activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved

D3. We are interested in any general comments you have about [CONTRACTOR]’s handling of first-level appeals activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE agrees with BF recommendation

Other Remarks Provided by Business Function with 2010 Section D:

No Additional Remarks Provided by Business Function

2010 SECTION-LEVEL BURDEN: 2.1 minutes (2 questions; 8 items, plus 1 open ended question)





2009 - 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk

2009 Section E: Provider Enrollment

2010 Section E: Provider Enrollment

Business Function Revisions /DPRE Recommendations

E1. The ability of your Contractor representatives to respond to your questions about Medicare enrollment application, CMS Form 855

E2a. The ability of your Contractor’s representative to respond to your questions about Medicare enrollment application, CMS Form 855?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE agrees with BF recommendation

E2. The consistency of your Contractor’s responses or decisions

E2b. The consistency of your Contractor’s responses or decisions?

E3. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s representatives during the Provider Enrollment process

E2c. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s representatives during the provider enrollment process?

E4. Your Contractor’s responsiveness, attentiveness and availability during the process of enrollment

E2d. Your Contractor’s responsiveness, attentiveness and availability during the process of enrollment?

E5. Your Contractor’s ability to answer questions specific to your situation or specialty

E2e. Your Contractor’s ability to answer questions specific to your situation or specialty?

E6. {In the last twelve (12) months/since {Date}, have you completed the enrollment process

THIS ITEM DELETED

E7. The information provided by your Contractor to enable you to start billing for services

E3. [In the last 12 months/since {DATE}], how satisfied have you been with the information provided by your Contractor to enable you to start billing for services?


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

E4. What is your overall satisfaction with your Contractor’s provider enrollment activities?

Noted in the Other remarks Section A #4

E8. We are interested in any general comments you have about [Contractor Name]’s handling of Provider Enrollment activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved

E5. We are interested in any general comments you have about [CONTRACTOR]’s handling of provider enrollment activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE agrees with BF recommendation

Other Remarks Provided by Business Function with 2010 Section E:

No Additional Remarks Provided by Business Function

2010 SECTION-LEVEL BURDEN: 1.9 minutes (4 questions; 7 items, plus 1 open ended question)






2009 - 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk

2009 Section F: Medical Review

2010 Section F: Medical Review

Business Function Revisions /DPRE Recommendations

F1. The clarity of the notification (letter, phone call, etc.) from your Contractor that your claims were selected for Medical Review

F2a. The clarity of the notification (letter, phone call, etc.) from your Contractor that your claims were selected for medical review?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE agrees with BF recommendation











Slight revision to item F2f to improve readability

F2. The clarity of the explanations of your Contractor’s Medical Review decision

F2b. The clarity of the explanations of your Contractor’s medical review decisions?

F3. Receiving timely local Medical Review policy changes and updates that affect your organization from your Contractor

F2c. Receiving timely local medical review policy changes and updates that affect your practice or facility from your Contractor?

F4. The follow through that your Contractor provided after Medical Review

F2d. The follow through that your Contractor provided after medical review decisions?

F5. The knowledge of your Contractor’s Medical Reviewers

F2e. The knowledge of your Contractor’s medical reviewers?

F6. How well your Contractor makes an effort to make things easy and as fair as possible for you

F2f. How well your Contractor makes an effort to make things as easy as possible for your medical review?

F7. The consistency of your Contractor’s Medical Review decisions and answers to your questions

F2g. The consistency of your Contractor’s medical review decisions and answers to your questions?

F8. Professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s representatives throughout the medical review process

F2h. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s representatives throughout the medical review process?


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

F3. What is your overall satisfaction with your Contractor’s medical review activities?

Noted in the Other remarks Section A #4

F9. We are interested in any general comments you have about [Contractor Name]’s handling of Medical Review activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved

F4. We are interested in any general comments you have about [CONTRACTOR]’s handling of medical review activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE agrees with BF recommendation

Other Remarks Provided by Business Function with 2010 Section F:

No Additional Remarks Provided by Business Function

2010 SECTION-LEVEL BURDEN: 2.3 minutes (3 questions; 9 items, plus 1 open ended question)










2009 - 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk

2009 Section G: Provider Audit & Reimbursement

2010 Section G: Provider Audit & Reimbursement

Business Function Revisions /DPRE Recommendations

G1. Availability of timely updates from your Contractor on Medicare policy (regulations, manuals and other instructions) that affect provider Audit and Reimbursement

G2a. The availability of timely updates from your Contractor on Medicare policy (regulations, manuals and other instructions) that affect provider audit and reimbursement?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE has no further recommendations






Slight revision to item G2c to improve readability

G2. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor representatives throughout the Provider Audit and Reimbursement activities

G2b. The professionalism and courtesy of your Contractor’s representatives throughout all provider audit and reimbursement activities?

G3. How well your Contractor makes an effort to make things easy and as fair as possible for you during Cost Report settlement activities

G2c. How well your Contractor makes an effort to make things as easy as possible for you during cost report settlement activities?

G4. Your Contractor’s interpretations of CMS’ rules for Cost Report and payment policies

G2d. Your Contractor’s interpretations of CMS’ rules for cost report and payment policies?

G5. The knowledge of your Contractor’s Cost Report Auditors

G2e. The knowledge of your Contractor’s cost report auditors?

G6. The timeliness of your Contractor’s audit of your Cost Report, if one is conducted, and the final settlement

G2f. The timeliness of your Contractor’s audit of your cost report?

Suggest the split of 2009 question into to separate questions since audits take a longer time where settlements themselves are mostly completed within 12 months of receipt of the cost report


G2g. The timeliness of your Contractor’s settlement of your cost report?

G7. The overall communication between you and your Contractor about adjustments and Cost Reports/ Cost Report Audit

G2h. The overall communication between you and your Contractor about adjustments and cost reports/cost report audits?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE has no further recommendations

G8. The clarity of your Contractor’s instructions for the process of requesting a review and adjustment to your Interim Payments

G2i. The clarity of your Contractor’s instructions for the process of requesting a review and adjustment to your interim payments?

G9. The reasonableness of your Contractor’s requests during their consideration of an adjustment to your Interim Payments, including the time you are given to submit documentation and the methods you are given for submitting those documents

G2j. The reasonableness of your Contractor’s requests during its consideration of an adjustment to your interim payments, including the time you are given to submit documentation and the methods you are given for submitting those documents?

G10.The clarity of your Contractor’s explanations for decisions about your interim payments

G2k.The clarity of your Contractor’s explanations for decisions about adjustments to your interim payments?

G11.The timeliness of your Contractor’s decisions about adjustments to your interim payments

G2l.The timeliness of your Contractor’s decisions about adjustments to your interim payments?


THIS ITEM DID NOT EXIST IN 2009

G2m. The overall performance of your Contractor’s provider audit and reimbursement activities?

Noted in the Other remarks Section A #4.

G12. We are interested in any general comments you have about [Contractor Name]’s handling of Provider Audit and Reimbursement activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved

G3. We are interested in any general comments you have about [CONTRACTOR]’s handling of provider audit and reimbursement activities. In what ways (if any) do you think this service could be improved?

BF suggest that questions remain the same; DPRE agrees with BF recommendation

Other Remarks Provided by Business Function with 2010 Section G:

No Additional Remarks Provided by Business Function

2010 SECTION-LEVEL BURDEN: 3.1 minutes (2 questions; 13 items, plus 1 open ended question)



2009 - 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk

Before Total # Items

After BF Revisions Total # Items

2009 Introductory section: 2 items

2010 Introductory section: 5 items

2009 Section A: 11 items + 1 optional open ended question

2010 Section A: 10 items + 1 open ended question

2009 Section B: 13 items + 1 optional open ended question

2010 Section B: 21 items + 1 open ended question

Also requesting up to 3 additional items in support of emerging issues (if needed)

2009 Section C: 8 items + 1 optional open ended question

2010 Section C: 8 items + 1 open ended question

2009 Section D: 6 items + 1 optional open ended question

2010 Section D: 8 items + 1 open ended question

2009 Section E: 8 items + 1 optional open ended question

2010 Section E: 7 items + 1 open ended question

2009 Section F: 9 items + 1 optional open ended question

2010 Section F: 9 items + 1 open ended question

2009 Section G: 12 items + 1 optional open ended question

2010 Section G: 13 items + 1 open ended question

2009 Total Questions: 69 items + 7 open ended questions


Total Approved Avg. Survey Time: 22 minutes


The actual average survey time was 16.4 minutes and the screener was 3.5 minutes, for a total of approximately 20 minutes for the telephone administration.


2010 Total Questions: 84 items + 7 open ended questions


Total Requested Avg. Survey Time: 20.3 minutes


Screener telephone interview is estimated at 4 minutes for a Total of 24.3 minutes.

(Refer to Section B, Table 1: Time Burden per Survey Section)




Confidential Page 11 2/3/2021


INFORMATION NOT RELEASABLE TO THE PUBLIC UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY LAW:

This information has not been publicly disclosed and may be privileged and confidential.  It is for internal government use only and must not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive the information.  Unauthorized disclosure may result in prosecution to the full extent of the law.


File Typeapplication/msword
File Title2009 2010 MCPSS Question Crosswalk
AuthorCarlene Randolph, BSN MSBA
Last Modified ByCMS
File Modified2009-06-23
File Created2009-06-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy