Individual Fishing Quotas for Pacific Halibut and Sablefish in the Alaska Fisheries

ICR 200910-0648-005

OMB: 0648-0272

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Unchanged
Form and Instruction
Modified
Form and Instruction
Modified
Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change
2009-10-09
ICR Details
0648-0272 200910-0648-005
Historical Active 200804-0648-010
DOC/NOAA
Individual Fishing Quotas for Pacific Halibut and Sablefish in the Alaska Fisheries
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 11/19/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 10/20/2009
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011
49,537 0 49,537
20,239 0 20,364
38,397 0 38,727

The National Marine Fisheries Service seeks to renew a collection-of-information for the continued management of the Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program for fixed-gear Pacific halibut and sablefish fisheries off Alaska as well as the Western Alaska Community Development Quota Program (CDQ) halibut fishery. The IFQ program allocates annual total catch limits for the halibut and sablefish fisheries among individual fishermen and Gulf of Alaska Non-profit Organizations holding QS. The CDQ halibut program allocates annual total catch limits for the halibut fishery among individual CDQ fishermen. Fishermen are assigned Quota Shares (QS) for the fisheries, and then annually receive an IFQ and/or CDQ. Applications and reporting are required to manage and track the program. This request removes the notarization requirement from the hired master application, removing notary time and notary and postage costs and adding fax time and costs. It also removes the password information requirement, with no burden or cost changes estimated.

PL: Pub.L. 94 - 265 303 Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as amended in 2006
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  72 FR 63166 11/08/2007
73 FR 22920 04/28/2008
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 49,537 49,537 0 0 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 20,239 20,364 0 -125 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 38,397 38,727 0 -330 0 0
No
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
Dropping the notary requirement for the hired master application and allowing submittal by fax will make the permitting process faster and maybe a bit less expensive for constituents, potentially increasing their operational efficiency. This notary removal will result in a cost savings. The costs of faxing instead of notarizing the application are about the same ($3,750), however, the cost of postage would be saved (0.44 x 750 = $330); thus, the cost would be reduced overall by about $330. Overall, for an estimated 750 applications annually submitted for a hired master permit x 10 minutes saved by faxing instead of notarizing is estimated to result in a savings of 125 hr.

$204,750
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Patsy Bearden 907 586-7008

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/20/2009


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy