NMFS Alaska Region Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Program

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
VMS check-in report, plus time and costs for installation and maintenance	Form and Instruction	Modified	Available
0445 ss ren 103009rev.pdf	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2009-11-13	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
4528	VMS check-in report, plus time and costs for installation and maintenance	Form and Instruction	Modified
44331	VMS Malfunction Notification		Removed

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0648-0445	ICR Reference No: 200910-0648-012
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200901-0648-005
Agency/Subagency: DOC/NOAA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: NMFS Alaska Region Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Program
Type of Information Collection: Extension without change of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 07/09/2010
	Date Received in OIRA: 11/13/2009
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	07/31/2013	36 Months From Approved	07/31/2010
Responses	44	0	10,638,853
Time Burden (Hours)	3,721	0	23,766
Cost Burden (Dollars)	733,574	0	1,276,700

---

Abstract: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA)’s National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Service (NMFS), Alaska Region requires use of the Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) when fishing under certain conditions in the following fisheries: Atka Mackerel, Pollock, Pacific Cod, BSAI Crab, essential fish habitat (EFH) and habitat areas of particular concern (HAPC) in the Aleutian Islands and Gulf of Alaska. The VMS transmitter automatically determines the vessel’s position several times per hour using a Global Positioning System satellite. A communications service provider receives the transmission and relays it to NMFS, Office for Enforcement. The VMS transmitters are designed to be tamper-resistant and automatic. In most cases, the vessel owner is unaware of exactly when the unit is transmitting and is unable to alter the signal or the time of transmission. The VMS unit is passive and automatic, requiring no reporting effort of the vessel operator.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 16 USC 773-773k Name of Law: Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982
   PL: Pub.L. 94 - 265 303 Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 23390	05/19/2009
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 58241	11/12/2009
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
VMS check-in report, plus time and costs for installation and maintenance	NA	VMS activation checklist
VMS Malfunction Notification

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	44	10,638,853	0	-100	-10,638,709	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	3,721	23,766	0	-3	-20,042	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	733,574	1,276,700	0	-50	-543,076	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Short Statement: Program adjustments are due to the difference between initiating a new program and maintaining an existing program. Also, responses and hours for VMS transmission are no longer counted; only the transmission costs, per clarification from OMB. VMS Check-in report. a decrease of 56 respondents, 44 instead of 100 a decrease of 11 responses, 33 instead of 44 an increase of 2 hr burden, 9 hr instead of 7 hr* an increase of $50 personnel costs, $225 instead of $175 an increase of $64 miscellaneous costs, $264 instead of $200 VMS Operation (includes installation, transmission, and maintenance) a decrease of 964 respondents, 878 instead of 1842 a decrease of responses, 0 instead of 10,638,720 a decrease of 20,044 hr burden, 3,712 hr instead of 23,756 hr a decrease of $131,700 personnel costs, $92,800 instead of $224,500 a decrease of $543,274 miscellaneous costs, $733,310 instead of $1,276,584 VMS Malfunction [REMOVED] a decrease of 100 respondents, 0 instead of 100 a decrease of 100 responses, 0 instead of 100 a decrease of 3 hr burden, 0 hr instead of 3 hr a decrease of $75 personnel costs, $0 instead of $75 a decrease of $50 miscellaneous costs, $0 instead of $50

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $72,900

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 11/13/2009

---