ombrocisSASPCLsupportstatement

ombrocisSASPCLsupportstatement.doc

Semi-Annual Progress Report for the Sexual Assault Services Program – Grants to Culturally Specific Programs

OMB: 1122-0023

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submission


Semi-Annual Progress Report for the Sexual Assault Services Program – Grants to Culturally Specific Programs

A. Justification


1. Statutorily-Mandated Need for Information


The Sexual Assault Services Program Grants to Culturally Specific Programs (SASP Culturally Specific Grant Program), part of the Sexual Assault Services Program (SASP) was created by the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (VAWA 2005), 42 U.S.C. §14043g, and is the first Federal funding stream solely dedicated to the provision of direct intervention and related assistance for victims of sexual assault. The SASP encompasses four different funding streams for States and Territories, tribes, state sexual assault coalitions, tribal sexual assault coalitions, and culturally specific organizations. Overall, the purpose of SASP is to provide intervention, advocacy, accompaniment (e.g., accompanying victims to court, medical facilities, police departments, etc.), support services, and related assistance for adult, youth, and child victims of sexual assault, family and household members of victims, and those collaterally affected by the sexual assault.


Survivors of sexual assault from culturally specific communities frequently confront unique challenges when seeking assistance, such as linguistic and cultural barriers. Sexual assault advocates report that survivors are more inclined to seek services from organizations that are familiar with their culture, language, and background and that there is no “one size fits all” solution to adequately address these critical needs. Culturally specific community-based organizations are more likely to understand the complex, multi-layered challenges and obstacles that victims from their communities face when attempting to access services in response to the sexual assault. In addition, culturally specific community-based organizations have experience forming relationships and engaging their communities and serve a vital role in providing services that are relevant for their community.


In order to provide the most appropriate services to such victims, the SASP Culturally Specific Grant Program targets nonprofit organizations that focus primarily on culturally specific communities and have experience in the area of sexual assault or who partner with an organization having such expertise. The goal of the SASP Culturally Specific Grant Program is to create, maintain, and expand sustainable sexual assault services provided by culturally specific organizations, which are uniquely situated to respond to the needs of sexual assault victims within culturally specific populations.


Currently, there are different statutory and regulatory reporting requirements that affect SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees. First, VAWA 2000 requires all VAWA grantees, including SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees, to report on the effectiveness of their programs to the Attorney General who, in turn, must report to Congress every two years. Section 1003 of VAWA 2000 states that:


(a) REPORT BY GRANT RECIPIENTS.- The Attorney General or Secretary of Health and Human Services, as applicable, shall require grantees under any program authorized or reauthorized by this division or an amendment made by this division to report on the effectiveness of the activities carried out with amounts made available to carry out that program, including number of persons served, if applicable, numbers of persons seeking services who could not be served and such other information as the Attorney General or Secretary may prescribe.


(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.- The Attorney General or Secretary of Health and Human Services, as applicable, shall report biennially to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Senate on the grant programs described in subsection (a), including the information contained in any report under that subsection.


42 U.S.C. 3789.


Second, OVW must also comply with the statutory reporting requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), Pub. L. No. 103-62. GPRA was enacted to increase Congressional and Administrative focus on the results of government programs and activities. To meet its GPRA reporting obligations and elicit more meaningful information about grantee performance, OVW has recently developed performance measures, including output measures, regarding which the SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees must report on a semi-annual basis.


2. Use of Information


OVW will use the information collected from all SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees to monitor their grant-funded activities and assess those activities. In particular, OVW is seeking data that includes baseline information to review activities supported with grant funds, including, for example, an increase in the number of trainings or persons trained, number of victims served.


Therefore, OVW plans to use data from the proposed information collection in two different ways. First, OVW will review each semi-annual progress report to monitor individual SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees’ performance and ensure that each grantee is achieving the goals and objectives set forth in its application for funding and award documents. Second, OVW will aggregate data from all SASP Culturally Specific Program progress reports to assess the performance of the SASP Culturally Specific Program as a whole and to respond to Congressional, Department of Justice, and other inquiries about how SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees use OVW funds.


In addition to the proposed information collection, OVW will continue to use a number of other techniques to assess the performance of SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees. These include OVW staff attendance at site visits, grant- funded training and technical assistance events, staff review of products prior to dissemination, and ongoing consultation with OVW staff.


Under a cooperative agreement between OVW and the University of Southern Maine’s Muskie School of Public Service, data collected from OVW grantees on all of OVW’s progress report forms is transmitted to the Muskie School for analysis. For the analysis of the data, standard descriptive statistics (frequency, sum, percentage, mean, etc.) are used to describe the characteristics of the grantees and report basic findings. All analyses are conducted in SPSS 13.0.


  1. Use of Information Technology


The collection of information will involve the use of automated, electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.


  1. Duplication of Information Request


There is no other mechanism by which OVW collects information about grant funded activities number of victims served, victims seeking services who could not be served or persons trained.


  1. Impact on Small Businesses

There is no impact on small businesses.


  1. Consequences to Federal Programs or Policy


Through VAWA 2000, Congress has mandated that all OVW grantees, including SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees, report to the Attorney General on the effectiveness of their activities funded under VAWA, including the number of victims served and the number of victims who could not be served. If OVW was not able to collect the information necessary to complete these reports on behalf of the Attorney General, not only would it be failing to meet a statutorily required reporting mandate, but also the existence of this important and necessary grant program could be jeopardized. The SASP Culturally Specific Program supports important programs that provide culturally and linguistically specific services to victims of sexual assault and critical training to assist law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and relevant officers of Federal, State, tribal, and local courts. This grant program was part of first Federal funding stream solely dedicated to the provision of direct intervention and related assistance for victims of sexual assault.


  1. Special Circumstances


There are no special circumstances as identified in the specific instructions for a supporting statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.


  1. Federal Register Publication

OVW has consulted with persons outside the agency who have advised that the data proposed to be collected is available, the annual collection of such data is not burdensome, the form is clear, and that the information is routinely kept by most grantees receiving funds under the SASP Culturally Specific Program. OVW has solicited public comment on this form in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act. A 60 day notice was published in the Federal Register on July 17, 2009 (Federal Register, Volume 74, page 34787) and a 30-day was notice was published in the Federal Register on September 18, 2009 (Federal Register, Volume 74, page 47959).

On September 18, 2009, the Department of Justice received one public comment that stated that it was discriminatory to spend federal funds for culturally specific program and that the American tax dollars should not be spent on people who are lawbreaking immigrants.

  1. Payment or Gift to Respondents


There will no payment or gift to respondents.


  1. Confidentiality


Although this information is needed for a public report to Congress, it will not involve any personal information about victims that could identify them as specific individuals. However, anecdotal, non-identifying information about the effectiveness of individual programs may be included in the report. There is no assurance to confidentiality.


  1. Specific Questions

The semi-annual progress report will not contain any questions of a personal, sensitive nature such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private.


  1. Hour Burden of the Collection of Information


This semi-annual progress report is not overly burdensome. The data collection tool will be completed by approximately 11 SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees twice a year as there are 2 reporting periods- January 1 through June 30 and July 1 through December 31. There will be 22 annual responses and it is estimated that it will take grantees no more than 1 hour to complete the semi-annual progress report form. Thus, the annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden is 22 hours. SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees are informed about the reporting requirements during the grant solicitation process and during the grant award process. Because the semi-annual progress report covers a six month period, grantees are not in a position to complete the form until the end of each reporting period.


OVW is seeking basic information that is routinely kept by the SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees in the normal course of their operations. Thus, the requirement that grantees complete this semi-annual progress report within a period of less than 30 days after receipt of it is not overly burdensome. OVW estimates that it will take approximately 1 hour for a grantee to complete the form. OVW developed this estimate based on the fact that information of this nature is already kept by grantees receiving funds under the SASP Culturally Specific Program and that the grantees have been apprized of these reporting requirements during the solicitation process and reminded throughout the grant award process. The semi-annual progress report is divided into sections that pertain to the different types of activities that grantees may engage in, i.e. training, product development, victim services. Grantees will only have to complete the sections of the form that relate to their specific activities.


13. Cost Burden of the Collection of Information


OVW does not believe that there is any annual cost burden on respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of this information.



  1. Annualized Costs to the Federal Government


OVW does not believe that there are any annualized costs to the Federal Government resulting from the collection of this information beyond those costs associated with the routine management, monitoring, and oversight of the SASP Culturally Specific Program.


  1. Program Changes or Adjustments


There are no program changes or adjustments for the estimates identified in Section 13 and in Section 14. This is a information collection that is necessary for OVW and its SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees to comply with the statutory reporting requirements of 42 U.S.C. 3789 and the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Pub. L. 103-62).


  1. Published Results of Information Collections


There will be no complex analytical techniques used in connection with the publication of

information collected under the request. Information will be gathered twice a year at the end of the reporting periods, January 1 through June 30 and July 1 through December 31. OVW is statutorily required to submit a report on the effectiveness of grant-funded activities on a biennial basis.


  1. Display of the Expiration Date of OMB Approval


OVW will display the Expiration Date of OMB Approval in the upper right hand corner of the Semi-annual Progress Report.


18. Exception to the Certification Statement


OVW is not seeking any exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19, Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions, of OMB Form 83-I.








6



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorCathy Poston
Last Modified Bycatherine m. poston
File Modified2009-10-28
File Created2009-10-28

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy