10 CFR Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities

ICR 200910-3150-001

OMB: 3150-0011

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
3150-0011 200910-3150-001
Historical Inactive 200906-3150-005
NRC
10 CFR Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Preapproved 12/24/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 10/02/2009
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for 3 years. Upon resubmission, the agency has committed to a rigorous reevaluation of their burden estimate, including reevaluating estimation through direct feedback from respondents. In particular, in relation to comments received, NRC has committed to evaluating the burden increase and any issues with duplication in information collection due to the requirement for embedded flaws violating the sizing criteria.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
12/31/2012 06/30/2012 06/30/2012
45,521 0 45,520
5,218,590 0 5,218,227
1,816,726 0 1,816,726

10 CFR 50,

PL: Pub.L. 83 - 703 68 Stat. 919 Name of Law: Atomic Energy Act of 1954
   PL: Pub.L. 109 - 58 119 Stat 594 Name of Law: Energy Policy Act of 2005
  
None

3150-AI01 Final or interim final rulemaking

No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
10 CFR Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities

  Total Request Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 45,521 45,520 0 1 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 5,218,590 5,218,227 0 363 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 1,816,726 1,816,726 0 0 0 0
Yes
Changing Regulations
No
The NRC is proposing to amend its regulations in 10 CFR Part 50.61, to provide updated fracture toughness requirements for protection against pressurized thermal shock (PTS) events for pressurized water reactor (PWR) pressure vessels. These amended regulations will be captured in the mew 10 CFR 50.61a. The final rule would require new PTS requirements based on updated analysis methods. this action is being taken because the existing requirements are based on unnecessarily conservative probabilistic fracture mechanics analyses. This action would reduce a regulatory burden for licensees, specifically those licensees that expect to exceed the existing requirements before the expiration of their licenses. These new requirements would be voluntarily utilized by any PWR licensees as an alternative to complying with the existing requirements. The requirements in 10 CFR 50.61a will only apply to those licensees that voluntarily choose compliance with this section as an alternative to compliance with the requirements specified in 10 CFR 50.61. Of the 69 currently operating PWR's, the staff projects that eight reactor vessels could exceed the screening criteria specified in 10 CFR 50.61 during their extended (60 year) lifetime. The NRC expects that each of these licensees will elect to apply the less stringent embrittlement correlations and screening criteria in 10 CFR 50. 61a rather than applying the compensatory measures of 10 CFR 50.61(b)(3) through (b)(7). Because it could take approximately up to 3 years to prepare the package for initial submittal to the NRC, the NRC estimates that only one licensee is expected to apply during the initial 3 year clearance period. The NRC assumes that, 3 years subsequent to the effective date of the final rule, one operating reactor licensee per year will choose to comply with 10 CFR 50.61a for the following eight years. Thus, in the three years following the effective date of this rule, one operating reactor would be affected by the RT max-x assessment and inservice testing and none would perform the flux reduction analyses nor the reactor vessel thermal annealing. Therefore, the estimated number of annual respondents is expected to be 0.333 per year and each respondent would provide two responses (i.e., one for the RT max-x assessment and one for the analysis of ASME Code inservice ultrasonic testing results).

$498,610
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Veronica Rodriguez 301 415-3703 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/02/2009


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy