60_Day_FR_Notice

39978

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices

likelihood that any employee exposure
to radiation from DOE sources would be
25 millirems per year (mrem/yr) or
more.
In a letter dated April 9, 2009, DOE
requested that OSHA or, as appropriate,
TOSHA accept occupational safety and
health regulatory authority over
employees at the East Tennessee
Technology Park at two existing
buildings known as K–1652, a fire
station owned and operated by the City
of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and K–1515,
the water treatment plant owned and
operated by the city, as well as two
other parcels of land known as ED–5
East and ED–7, transferred to the
Community Reuse Organization of East
Tennessee (CROET), pursuant to the
MOU on Safety and Health Enforcement
at Privatized Facilities and Operations
dated July 25, 2000.
OSHA’s Regional Office in Atlanta,
Georgia, working with the OSHA
Nashville Area Office, and the TOSHA,
determined that TOSHA is willing to
accept authority over the occupational
safety and health of employees at the
two existing buildings and the two other
parcels of land at the East Tennessee
Technology Park in Oak Ridge,
Tennessee that were transferred by deed
to the City of Oak Ridge and CROET,
respectively. In a letter from OSHA to
DOE dated May 13, 2009, OSHA stated
that TOSHA is satisfied with DOE
assurances that (1) there is no likelihood
that any employee at these facilities will
be exposed to radiation levels that will
be 25 millirems per year (mrem/yr) or
more, and (2) transfer of authority to
TOSHA is free from regulatory gaps, and
does not diminish the safety and health
protection of the employees. According
to this letter, TOSHA therefore accepted
and maintains health and safety
regulatory authority over employees at
buildings K–165 (fire station) and K–
1515 (water treatment plant), as well as
parcels ED–5 East and ED–7.

rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Authority and Signature
Jordan Barab, Acting Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, directed the
preparation of this notice. This Federal
Register notice provides public notice
and serves as an addendum to the 1992
OSHA/DOE MOU. This action is taken
pursuant to section 8(g) of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (29 U.S.C. 657(g)) and Secretary of
Labor’s Order No. 5–2007 (72 FR
31159).

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:09 Aug 07, 2009

Jkt 217001

Signed at Washington, DC, on August 4,
2009.
Jordan Barab,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9–19070 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2009–0021]

Benzene Standard; Extension of the
Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) Approval of Information
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comment concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the
information collection requirements
specified in the Standard on Benzene
(29 CFR 1910.1028).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
October 9, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may
submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit
three copies of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office,
Docket No. OSHA–2009–0021, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail,
messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the Information
Collection Request (ICR) (OSHA–2009–
0021). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.

PO 00000

Frm 00064

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Todd Owen or
Jamaa Hill at the address below to
obtain a copy of the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Owen or Jamaa Hill, Directorate of
Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–3609,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH
Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The information collection
requirements specified in Benzene
Standard protect workers from the
adverse health effects that may result

E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM

10AUN1

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices
from occupational exposure to benzene.
The major information collection
requirements in the Standard include
conducting worker exposure
monitoring, notifying workers of the
benzene exposure, implementing a
written compliance program,
implementing medical surveillance for
workers, providing examining
physicians with specific information,
ensuring that workers receive a copy of
their medical surveillance records, and
providing access to these records by
OSHA, the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, the
worker who is the subject of the records,
the worker’s representative, and other
designated parties.

rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend
its approval of the collections of
information requirements contained in
the Standard on Benzene (29 CFR
1910.1028). As a result of re-estimating
the number of medical examinations
from 10,800 examinations to 11,233
examinations there was an increase in
burden hours from 125,209 hours to
126,180 hours and an increase in costs
from $8,132,978 to $8,133,499.
OSHA will summarize the comments
submitted in response to this notice,
and will include this summary in
request to OMB to extend the approval
of the information collection
requirements contained in the Benzene
standard (29 CFR 1910.1028).
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Title: Benzene Standard (29 CFR
1910.1028).
OMB Number: 1218–0129.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits.
Total Responses: 267,376.
Frequency: On occasion.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies
from 5 minutes (.08 hour) for employers

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:09 Aug 07, 2009

Jkt 217001

to maintain records to 4 hours for
workers to receive referral medical
exams.
Total Burden Hours: 126,180.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $8,133,499.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (FAX); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and OSHA docket number for the ICR
(Docket No. OSHA–2009–0021). You
may supplement electronic submissions
by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, messenger, or courier service,
please contact the OSHA Docket Office
at (202) 693–2350 (TTY (877) 889–
5627).
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and date of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publically available to
read or download through this Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://
www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is
available through the Web site’s ‘‘User
Tips’’ link. Contact the OSHA Docket
Office for information about materials
not available through the Web Site, and
for assistance in using the Internet to
locate docket submissions.

PO 00000

Frm 00065

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

39979

V. Authority and Signature
Jordan Barab, Acting Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 5–2007 (72 FR 31160).
Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of
August 2009.
Jordan Barab,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9–19072 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0348; Docket No. 50–443]

FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, et al.*;
Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1;
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an amendment for Facility
Operating License No. NPF–86, issued
to FLP Energy Seabrook, LLC (the
licensee), for operation of the Seabrook
Station, Unit No. 1, located in
Rockingham County, New Hampshire.
Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21,
the NRC is issuing this environmental
assessment and finding of no significant
impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would change
the legal name of the Licensee and Coowner from ‘‘FPL Energy Seabrook,
LLC’’ to ‘‘NextEra Energy Seabrook,
LLC.’’
The proposed action is in accordance
with the licensee’s application dated
April 16, 2009.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action is necessary to
reflect the legal change of name of the
Licensee and Co-Owner on April 16,
2009.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC has concluded in its safety
evaluation of the proposed action that
* FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPLE Seabrook) is
authorized to act as agent for the Hudson Light &
Power Department, Massachusetts Municipal
Wholesale Electric Company, and Taunton
Municipal Light and has exclusive responsibility
and control over the physical construction,
operation and maintenance of the facility.

E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM

10AUN1