Attachment C
FERC-715 - Annual Transmission Planning and Evaluation Report Instructions
Revised November 2009
Approved OMB Control No. 1902-0171
Expires:
(MM/DD/YY)
This report is mandatory under Sections 213(b),
307(a) and 311 of the Federal Power Act and 18 CFR Section 141.300 of
the Commission's regulations.
§
141.300 FERC Form No. 715, Annual Transmission Planning and
Evaluation Report
Who must file: Any transmitting utility, as defined in § 3(23) of the Federal Power Act, that operates integrated (that is, non-radial) transmission facilities at or above 100 kilovolts must complete FERC Form No. 715;
When to file: FERC Form No. 715 must be filed on or before each April 1st;
What to file:
FERC Form No. 715 must be filed with the Office of the Secretary of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in accordance with the
instructions on that form.
The Commission considers the
information collected by this report to be Critical
Energy Infrastructure Information (CEII)
and will treat it as such. The public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to average 160 hours per
response, including the time for reviewing the instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
You shall not be penalized for failure to respond to this collection
of information unless the collection of information displays a valid
OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or
any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Office of the Deputy Chief Information Officer
ATTN: Information Clearance
Officer (ED-32)
888 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20426
and to:
Office of Management and Budget
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
ATTN: Desk Officer for the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20503
Table
of Contents
I.
General
Information
A. Purpose
of Report
B. Who Must Submit
C.
Waiver Request
D. Blank
or N/A (Not Applicable) Responses
E. Checklist
and Where to Submit
F. When to
Submit
G. Contact Information
H.
Sanctions and Confidentiality
Statements
II. General Instructions
A. Submit
B.
Designate Entity to Submit Power Flow
Cases
C. Fee Schedule
D.
The Importance of Power Flow Cases in
the Evaluation of System Performance
III. Terms and Definitions
A. Transmission
Planning Reliability Criteria
B. Transmitting
Utility
IV. Specific Instructions
A. Part
1: Identification
and Certification
B. Part
2: Power
Flow Base Cases
C. Part
3: Transmitting
Utility Maps and Diagrams
D. Part
4: Transmission
Planning Reliability Criteria
E. Part
5: Transmission
Planning Assessment Practices
F. Part
6: Evaluation
of Transmission System Performance
A. Purpose
of Report
The
FERC Form No. 715, Annual Transmission Planning and Evaluation
Report, is required pursuant to Sections 213(b), 307(a) and 311 of
the Federal Power Act to provide information adequate to inform
potential transmission customers, State regulatory authorities and
the public of potential transmission capacity and known constraints,
to support the Commission's expanded responsibilities under §§
211, 212 and 213(a) of the Federal Power Act (as amended by the
Energy Policy Act), and to assist in rate or other regulatory
proceedings.
B.
Who Must Submit
Each
transmitting utility, as defined in section 3(23) of the Federal
Power Act, that operates network (that is, non-radial) transmission
facilities at or above 100 kilovolts must report the information
requested under the listed items in the prescribed manner. In the
case of joint ownership, only the operator of the facilities must
report.
A designated agent, such as a regional
transmission group, regional reliability organization, formal power
pool, or other group, may submit part or all of the required
information on behalf of the transmitting utility. The transmitting
utility is responsible for submitting all data not submitted on its
behalf by a designated agent. Designated agents must specify the
transmitting utility (or transmitting utilities) for which they are
submitting information. The Commission prefers that all power flow
data submitted for Part 2 of FERC-715 be submitted by designated
agents outlined above.
C. Waiver
Request
The
final rule requires that an entity requesting waiver of FERC-715 must
either: (1) indicate the entity that performs transmission planning
for it, or (2) state that it does not use power flow analyses in
performing transmission planning. Once granted, a waiver request in
subsequent years is unnecessary, provided the party's status does not
change; that is, as long as the party does not begin to perform
transmission planning or to use power flow analyses in its planning.
Requests for waivers must be submitted prior to the required
submission date, April 1st of the filing year.
D. Blank
or N/A (Not Applicable) Responses
All parts of the FERC-715 must be completed. Blank or N/A (Not
Applicable) responses are not acceptable. For example; for Parts 4
and 5, respondent transmitting utilities should state the reasons why
they have not developed specific transmission reliability criteria or
assessment practices for their own system in addition to that of the
regional entities if that should be the case.
E. Checklist
and Where to Submit
Respondents may send their responses via FERC eFiling, if all the files comprising the submission are on the list of FERC acceptable file formats.
Respondents who are unable or
unwilling to use the FERC eFiling system must submit one original,
either in hardcopy or electronically on CDs or DVDs, including all
six Parts of FERC-715 to:
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Form No. 715
Secretary of the Commission
888
First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20426
F. When
to Submit
File
the report annually by April 1st of the filing year.
G. Contact
Information
Direct
technical questions concerning the FERC-715, Annual Transmission
Planning and Evaluation Report, to email [email protected].
H. Sanctions
and Confidentiality Statements
The FERC-715, Annual Transmission Planning and Evaluation
Report, is mandatory under the Federal Power Act. The information
reported in FERC-715 is classified as CEII.
Late filing or failure to file, keep records, or comply with these
instructions may result in criminal fines, civil penalties, and other
sanctions as provided by law.
II. GENERAL
INSTRUCTIONS
The
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) has determined that
to satisfy section 213(b) of the Federal Power Act (FPA) it is
necessary for potential customers to be able to reasonably anticipate
the outcome of technical studies that a transmitting utility would
perform in assessing the availability of transmission capacity to
satisfy a request for transmission service. Therefore, the Commission
requires each transmitting utility, or its designated agent, to:
A. Submit
The
Commission requires each transmitting utility, or its designated
agent, to submit an annual report that includes:
1. power flow base
cases for its transmission system, or if the transmitting utility
belongs to a regional or subregional transmission planning or
reliability organization, power flow base cases for that region or
subregion;
2. system maps and one-line diagrams;
3. a description of their reliability criteria and
transmission planning assessment practices; and
4. an
evaluation under the reliability criteria of the current and future
performance of their transmission system.
B. Designate
Entity to Submit Power Flow Cases
The Commission requires each transmitting utility, or its
agent, to designate any regional or subregional transmission planning
or reliability organizations to which it belongs or any other single
entity to submit to the Commission any regional or subregional power
flow base cases developed for the purposes of members' transmission
planning.
C. Fee
Schedule
If
Respondents make CEII directly available to the requesting public and
desire to impose copying charges for this service, they shall provide
a fee schedule..
D. The
Importance of Power Flow Cases in the Evaluation of System
Performance
The
Commission assumes that most transmitting utilities participate in
the development, by a regional or subregional organization to which
they belong, of regional or subregional power flow base cases. The
purpose of this process is to ensure consistency of assumptions and
accuracy of data.
Individual members of regional or
subregional organizations use these power flow cases as the starting
place for their own transmission planning studies. A detailed
description of a transmitting utility's reliability criteria and
planning practices and an evaluation of system performance are
essential to perform planning studies, to assess the availability of
transmission, to identify potential constraints, and to anticipate
the outcome of transmitting utility technical studies made in
response to an actual request for service.
A. Transmission
Planning Reliability Criteria
The measuring systems and performance standards that are
used for assessing the actual or projected ability of the bulk
electric transmission system to deliver power to load reliably.
Failure to attain a specified performance standard indicates the need
to consider adding or rearranging facilities, changing operating
modes, or other responses.
Examples of criteria that
might apply to simulated testing of the bulk electric transmission
system are:
1. No cascading
outage following any specified set of contingencies.
2. No
overloaded facilities following a specified contingency.
3. All
voltages within prescribed limits.
B. Transmitting
Utility
Any
electric utility, qualifying cogeneration facility (section 3(18)(B),
FPA), qualifying small power production facility (section 3(17)(C),
FPA), or Federal power marketing agency (section 3(19), FPA) that
owns or operates electric power transmission facilities that are used
for the sale of electric energy at wholesale. (section 3(23),
FPA)
A. Part
1: Identification and Certification
Provide the following information:
1. Transmitting
Utility Name
2. Transmitting Utility Mailing
Address
3. Contact Person Name
4.
Contact Person Title
5. Contact Person Telephone
Number
6. Contact Person Facsimile Number
7.
Certification by an authorized official of the Transmitting Utility
regarding the accuracy of the information submitted.
8.
Certifying Official Signature
9. Certifying Official
Name
10. Certifying Official Title
B. Part
2: Power Flow Base Cases
A Respondent participating in a regional or subregional
process (for consolidating and ensuring the consistency and accuracy
of the power flow information used by the Respondent for transmission
planning) must submit the most current regional or subregional input
data to solved power flow base cases that the transmitting utility
would ordinarily use as the starting point for its transmission
planning studies or, where these data are unavailable from a regional
organization, submit such data itself.
If the Respondent
participates in such a regional or subregional process, it must
submit the following items:
1. Regional or
subregional organization name;
2. Regional or
subregional organization mailing address;
3. Regional
or subregional organization contact person;
4. Regional
or subregional organization contact person title;
5. Regional
or subregional organization contact person telephone
number;
6. Regional or subregional organization
contact person facsimile number;
7. Description of
process for public access to regional or subregional power flow
information; and
8. Description of power flow cases
currently available from regional or subregional organization,
including time frame, conditions, format, media and the fees, if any,
for copying data for the public.
If a Respondent does not
participate in the development of regional or subregional
transmission planning power flow base cases, the Respondent must
submit its own equivalent power flow base cases directly to the
Commission.
Each Respondent must submit for each solved
power flow base case: the input data file (in formats described
below) and the corresponding output data file (in ASCII format)
showing the solved real and reactive power flows, voltages, real and
reactive generation and loads, solution parameters, and other
relevant output information; or, in the alternative, at a minimum, a
one-line diagram showing real and reactive power flows, bus voltages
and angles, generator outputs, transformer tap settings and loads.
Regional and subregional organizations authorized by
their members to provide access to solved power flow cases should
make them available electronically on CDs or DVDs, or via a computer
bulletin board, when practical, in the input data format associated
with the power flow program that the regional or subregional
organizations use in their transmission studies. The Commission
expects that, in nearly all cases, the format will be one of the
following:
1. The Raw Data
File format of the PTI (Power Technologies, Inc.) PSS/E Power flow
program;
2. The Card Deck Image format of the
Philadelphia Electric Power flow program;
3. The Card
Deck format of the WSCC Power flow program;
4. The
Raw Data File format of the General Electric PSLF power flow program;
5. The IEEE Common Format for Exchange of Solved Power Flows; or
6. The Binary or Project File format of the PowerWorld simulator.
Respondents submitting their own cases must supply the input data to the solved base cases and associated ASCII output data on CDs or DVDs in the format associated with the power flow program used by the Respondents in the course of their transmission studies, as described above.
The power flow cases may also
be submitted via eFiling, if they are available in an acceptable file
format. A list of acceptable file formats is available on the FERC
eFiling website.
The input data to the solved power flow
base cases must be forward-looking. For example, the power flow base
cases submitted and made available might include:
1. One, two, five
and ten-year forecasts under summer and winter peak conditions
and
2. A one-year forecast under light load/heavy
transfers condition.
This example is similar to a
schedule of base cases proposed by North American Electric
Reliability Corporation’s (NERC) Multiregional Modeling Working
Group for development at the time this form was created. A regional
or subregional organization may develop, depending on its needs, a
different number of power flow base cases than those described above.
The power flow base cases must be in sufficient detail
that network equivalents, if used, extend sufficiently beyond the
electrical borders of the transmitting utility that potential
transmission users could simulate power transfers within a reasonable
market area without significant loss of accuracy.
The
power flow base cases should include all branch circuit ratings (that
is, normal, long-term and short-term emergency, or other relevant
ratings) that a Respondent uses. Each Respondent must also submit or
make available a data-dictionary that cross-references the bus or
line terminal names. Energy Information Administration (EIA) codes
must be included for each generating plant referenced. | EIA
Plant Codes
C. Part
3: Transmitting Utility Maps and Diagrams
1. Each Respondent
must submit general transmission maps and single-line schematic
diagrams. The maps and diagrams should be those prepared in the
general course of business for planning and operating purposes. The
guidelines provided below indicate the type of information and the
level of detail desired; however, the Commission is not requiring the
Respondent to specifically prepare new maps and diagrams to satisfy
this requirement. If the Respondent has readily available more than
one set of maps and/or diagrams, the Commission requests that the set
submitted best provide the level of detail described below.
2. The
transmitting utility's general maps should show the geographic
locations and names of:
a. Generating
plants;
b. Switching
stations;
c. Substations;
d. Service
areas; and
e. Interconnections with other utilities.
3. The
transmitting utility's single-line schematic diagrams should show and
identify:
a. AC and DC
transmission lines and facilities, including their nominal operating
and design voltages;
b. Electrical
connections;
c. Generating plants;
d. Transformation
facilities;
e. Phase angle transformers; and
f. VAR
control equipment; (i.e., shunt and series capacitors and inductors,
etc.).
4. On the maps or
in separate documentation, each Respondent should provide a legend
that shows the symbols used on the map or diagram to represent
generators, transmission lines, transformers, capacitors, reactors,
buses, etc.
5. Respondents must submit new
maps or diagrams each year regardless of its revision.
6. The
FERC prefers all maps and diagrams be submitted electronically in a
format such that any text is searchable. For example, these maps
typically list many substations, and FERC prefers that the format
support a search for specific substation names. The Adobe PDF format
is an example of a common file type that provides this feature.
D. Part
4: Transmission Planning Reliability Criteria
Each Respondent is to provide the transmission planning
reliability criteria used to assess and test the strength and limits
of its transmission system to meet its load responsibility as well as
to move bulk power between and among other electric systems.
If
a transmitting utility subscribes, through its interconnection or
pooling agreements with others, to criteria that are more detailed
than the NERC and regional entity standards, then it must also submit
these additional criteria.
The Commission expects that
each transmitting utility will have additional detailed criteria. For
example, each utility generally sets its own voltage limit criteria
on its bulk system as well as its lower voltage system, since NERC
and the regional entities generally do not. Each transmitting utility
must submit all such additional criteria.
The above
criteria will be those which the transmitting utility uses to
determine available transmission capacity needed to meet potential
transmission requests as well as its own native load. A transmitting
utility must describe the criteria that it uses in sufficient detail
to allow others to use the criteria when performing their own
planning or screening studies and to better understand the process of
determining available transmission capacity.
In
subsequent years, Respondents need only identify and file changed
criteria. If the criteria are unchanged from a previous filing,
please provide the date of that filing. If this date is prior to the
2010 filing deadline, Respondents need only state that the previous
filing was “prior to the 2010 filing.”
E. Part
5: Transmission Planning Assessment Practices
The criteria submitted under Part 4 of this form set the
limits of transmission use. However, assessment practices that a
transmitting utility uses in applying these criteria are as important
as the criteria themselves. These practices, developed through
experience and study, include consideration of detailed factors that
a transmitting utility may not list in the criteria that it submits
under Part 4. For example, a utility might have certain operating
restrictions and limitations that must be met by appropriate modeling
within a simulation study.
Also, through experience and
study, each transmitting utility may have developed a list of various
contingencies it typically tests against in the application of its
transmission planning reliability criteria. For example, before
testing for the limits of transmission capability that could be used
for firm power transfers on its system, a transmitting utility will
assume, based on experience or realistic expectation, that certain
facilities will be unavailable for some period of time. Each
transmitting utility must identify these contingencies and submit
them under this Part.
A description of the Respondent's
practices when applying the transmission planning reliability
criteria submitted in Part 4 must be submitted under this part. The
description must include the substantive planning assessment
practices that a Respondent follows in the normal course of business.
The information filed should help requesters to perform planning or
screening studies and to better understand the process of determining
available transmission capacity and known constraints.
In
subsequent years, Respondents need only identify and file changed
assessment practices. If the practices are unchanged from a previous
filing, please provide the date of that filing. If this date is prior
to the 2010 filing deadline, Respondents need only state that the
previous filing was “prior to the 2010 filing.”
F. Part
6: Evaluation of Transmission System Performance
The transmitting utility must provide a narrative
evaluation or assessment of the performance of its transmission
system in future time periods based on the application of its
reliability criteria. It must provide a clear understanding of
existing and likely future transmission constraints, their sources,
how it identified these constraints, and a description of any plans
to mitigate the constraints. The evaluation must provide a clear
understanding of the existing and expected system performance of the
Respondent's transmission system. The evaluation should include a
description of all existing transmission stability limits that the
transmitting utility has uncovered through dynamic system simulation
studies. If, in their studies, Respondents identify stability as a
regional transmission limiting factor, Respondents must, on request,
provide the results of their studies.
The required
evaluation is to be drawn from existing utility transmission planning
studies and the experience and judgment of the Respondents'
transmission system planners. Respondents may base the required
evaluation, in part, on recently performed operating studies that
determine transfer capabilities for the upcoming peak load season.
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | Attachment |
Author | Ellen Brown |
Last Modified By | Ellen Brown |
File Modified | 2009-11-25 |
File Created | 2009-11-23 |